Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hospital and Geographic Variability in Two Colorectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes: Complications and Mortality After Complications

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to describe hospital and geographic variation in 30-day risk of surgical complications and death among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and the extent to which patient-, hospital-, and census-tract-level characteristics increased risk of these outcomes.

Methods

We included patients at least 66 years old with first primary stage I–III CRC from the 2000–2005 National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data linked with 1999–2005 Medicare claims. A multilevel, cross-classified logistic model was used to account for nesting of patients within hospitals and within residential census tracts. Outcomes were risk of complications and death after a complication within 30 days of surgery.

Results

Data were analyzed for 35,946 patients undergoing surgery at 1,222 hospitals and residing in 12,187 census tracts; 27.2 % of patients developed complications, and of these 13.4 % died. Risk-adjusted variability in complications across hospitals and census tracts was similar. Variability in mortality was larger than variability in complications, across hospitals and across census tracts. Specific characteristics increased risk of complications (e.g., census-tract-poverty rate, emergency surgery, and being African-American). No hospital characteristics increased complication risk. Specific characteristics increased risk of death (e.g. census-tract-poverty rate, being diagnosed with colon (versus rectal) cancer, and emergency surgery), while hospitals with at least 500 beds showed reduced death risk.

Conclusions

Large, unexplained variations exist in mortality after surgical complications in CRC across hospitals and geographic areas. The potential exists for quality improvement efforts targeted at the hospital and/or census-tract levels to prevent complications and augment hospitals’ ability to reduce mortality risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures. 2012. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dekker J, van den Broek C, Bastiaannet E, van de Geest L, Tollenaar R, Liefers G. Importance of the first postoperative year in the prognosis of elderly colorectal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1533–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Panis Y, Maggiori L, Caranhac G, Bretagnol F, Vicaut E. Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2011;254:738–43;(discussion 43–4).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fazio VW, Tekkis PP, Remzi F, Lavery IC. Assessment of operative risk in colorectal cancer surgery: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation colorectal cancer model. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2015–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Morris EJ, Taylor EF, Thomas JD, Quirke P, Finan PJ, Coleman MP, et al. Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England. Gut. 2011;60:806–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davila J, Rabeneck L, Berger D, El-Serag H. Postoperative 30-day mortality following surgical resection for colorectal cancer in veterans: changes in the right direction. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1722–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schootman M, Lian M, Pruitt SL, et al. Variability in 30-day mortality following colorectal cancer surgery. Health Serv Res. Under review.

  8. Almoudaris AM, Burns EM, Mamidanna R, Bottle A, Aylin P, Vincent C, et al. Value of failure to rescue as a marker of the standard of care following reoperation for complications after colorectal resection. Br J Surg. 2011;98:1775–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silber JH, Williams SV, Krakauer H, Schwartz JS. Hospital and patient characteristics associated with death after surgery: a study of adverse occurrence and failure to rescue. Med Care. 1992;30:615–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Variation in mortality after high-risk cancer surgery: failure to rescue. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21:389–95, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250:1029–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Friese CR, Earle CC, Silber JH, Aiken LH. Hospital characteristics, clinical severity, and outcomes for surgical oncology patients. Surgery. 2010;147:602–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, Bach PB, Riley GF. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002;40:IV-3-18.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Warren JL, Yabroff KR, Meekins A, Topor M, Lamont EB, Brown ML. Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:888–97.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hendren S, Birkmeyer JD, Yin H, Banerjee M, Sonnenday C, Morris AM. Surgical complications are associated with omission of chemotherapy for stage III colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:1587–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. New Engl J Med. 2009;361:1368–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hodgson DC, Fuchs CS, Ayanian JZ. Impact of patient and provider characteristics on the treatment and outcomes of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:501–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Polite BN, Dignam JJ, Olopade OI. Colorectal cancer model of health disparities: understanding mortality differences in minority populations. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2179–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Donabedian A. The quality of care: How can it be assessed? JAMA. 1988;260:1743–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. National Cancer Institute. SEER-Medicare: Calculation of comorbidity weights. Available from URL: http://healthservices.cancer.gov/seermedicare/program/comorbidity.html. Accessed 18 July 2011.

  21. Diggs JC, Xu F, Diaz M, Cooper GS, Koroukian SM. Failure to screen: predictors and burden of emergency colorectal cancer resection. Am J Manag Care. 2007;13:157–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Li C. Risk factors for obstruction, perforation, or emergency admission at presentation in patients with colorectal cancer: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1098–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Multilevel analysis. An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:290–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Rothman RL, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology (3rd ed). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluer, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Abramson JH. WINPEPI updated: computer programs for epidemiologists, and their teaching potential. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2011;8:1.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rogers SO, Jr., Wolf RE, Zaslavsky AM, Wright WE, Ayanian JZ. Relation of surgeon and hospital volume to processes and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg. 2006;244:1003–11.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hung WW, Egol KA, Zuckerman JD, Siu AL. Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient. JAMA. 2012;307:2185–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hinami K, Feinglass J, Ferranti DE, Williams MV. Potential role of comanagement in “rescue” of surgical patients. Am J Manag Care. 2011;17:e333–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Story DA. Postoperative mortality and complications. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011;25:319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Aiken LH, Clarke SP, Sloane DM, Sochalski J, Silber JH. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. JAMA. 2002;288:1987–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Spanjersberg W, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven Cornelis JHM. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [serial online] 2011(2). Available from URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2/abstract.

  33. Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CHC, Fearon KCH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010;29:434–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Richman JS, Hosokawa PW, Min S-J, Tomeh MG, Neumayer L, Campbell DA Jr. Toward prospective identification of high-risk surgical patients. Am Surg. 2012;78:755–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hamel MB, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Daley J. Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:424–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Havey R, Herriman E, O’Brien D. Guarding the gut: early mobility after abdominal surgery. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2013;36:63–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Holte K, Foss NB, Andersen J, Valentiner L, Lund C, Bie P, et al. Liberal or restrictive fluid administration in fast-track colonic surgery: a randomized, double-blind study. Br J Anaesth. 2007;99:500–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Story DA. Postoperative mortality and complications. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011;25:319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. To KB, Napolitano LM. Common complications in the critically ill patient. Surg Clin North Am. 2012;92:1519–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Romano PS, Schembri ME, Rainwater JA. Can administrative data be used to ascertain clinically significant postoperative complications? Am J Med Qual. 2002;17:145–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Longo W, Virgo K, Johnson F, Oprian CA, Vernava AM, Wade TP, et al. Risk factors for morbidity and mortality after colectomy for colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:83–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Hall BL. Development of an American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program: morbidity and mortality risk calculator for colorectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:1009–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL, Jr. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology. 1978;49:239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Habermann EB, Kwaan M, Spencer MP, Henderson WG, et al. Operative outcomes beyond 30-day mortality: colorectal cancer surgery in oldest old. Ann Surg. 2011;253:947–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants from the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (Grant No. CA112159); and the Health Behavior, Communication and Outreach Core; the Core is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support Grant (Grant No. P30 CA91842) to the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital in St. Louis, Missouri. Dr. Davidson was supported in part through grants HL-38180, DK-56260, and Digestive Disease Research Core Center DK-52574. We gratefully acknowledge James Struthers for his data management and programming services. We thank the Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri, for the use of the Health Behavior, Communication, and Outreach Core. This study used the linked SEER-Medicare database. The interpretation and reporting of these data are the sole responsibility of the authors. The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Applied Research Program, NCI; the Office of Research, Development and Information, CMS; Information Management Services (IMS), Inc.; and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER-Medicare database.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Schootman PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schootman, M., Lian, M., Pruitt, S.L. et al. Hospital and Geographic Variability in Two Colorectal Cancer Surgery Outcomes: Complications and Mortality After Complications. Ann Surg Oncol 21, 2659–2666 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3472-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3472-x

Keywords

Navigation