Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM Staging Classification for Carcinoma of the Stomach in China

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The 7th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging system was put into use recently. The study aimed to evaluate its predictive ability on survival and compare the difference between the 6th and 7th editions of AJCC TNM system in gastric carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1000 gastric carcinoma patients receiving treatment in our center were selected for the analysis. Patients were staged using both the 6th and 7th editions AJCC TNM staging system. Survival analysis was performed with a Cox regression model.

Results

Of previous stage IV patients, 39.9% (112 of 281) migrated to a lower tier in the 7th edition. By setting the cutoff of positive lymph nodes as 0, 2, 6, and 15, the 7th edition strengthens the role of positive lymph nodes. Multivariable regression analysis showed that both 6th and 7th TNM stage systems were independent factors for overall survival. For lymph nodes negative patients, the 5-year overall survival for patients with fewer than 15 resected lymph nodes was significantly lower than those with more than 15.

Conclusions

AJCC 7th is not superior to AJCC 6th in predicting the 5-year overall survival rates of gastric adenocarcinoma patients. The definition of stage IV and the selection of cutoffs for MLNC in the AJCC 7th system is much more reasonable compared with the AJCC 6th system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer incidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defining priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geographic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol. 2006;10:2137–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore MA, Eser S, Igisinov N, Igisinov S, Mohagheghi MA, Mousavi-Jarrahi A, et al. Cancer epidemiology and control in North-Western and Central Asia—past, present and future. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2010;11:17–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ichikura T, Tomimatsu S, Uefuji K, Kimura M, Uchida T, Morita D, et al. Evaluation of the New American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer classification of lymph node metastasis from gastric carcinoma in comparison with the Japanese classification. Cancer. 1999;86:553–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1471–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greene FL, Page DL, Fleming ID, Fritz A, Balch CM, Haller DG, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. 6th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, Fritz AG, Greene FL, Trotti A. American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) cancer staging manual. 7th ed. Chicago: Springer, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harrell FE Jr, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA. Evaluating the yield of medical tests. JAMA. 1982;247:2543–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deng J, Liang H, Sun D, Wang D, Pan Y. Suitability of 7th UICC N stage for predicting the overall survival of gastric cancer patients after curative resection in China. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:1259–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wu CW, Hsieh MC, Lo SS, Tsay SH, Lui WY, P’eng FK. Relation of number of positive lymph nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Gut. 1996;38:525–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang B, Zheng X, Wang Z, Wang M, Dong Y, Zhao B, et al. Prognostic significance of the number of metastatic lymph nodes: is UICC/TNM node classification perfectly suitable for early gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:61–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ielpo B, Pernaute AS, Elia S, Buonomo OC, Valladares LD, Aguirre EP, et al. Impact of number and site of lymph node invasion on survival of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:704–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hundahl SA, Phillips JL, Menck HR. The National Cancer Data Base Report on poor survival of U.S. gastric carcinoma patients treated with gastrectomy, 5th ed. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging, proximal disease, and the “different disease” hypothesis. Cancer. 2000;88:921–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mullaney PJ, Wadley MS, Hyde C, Wyatt J, Lawrence G, Hallissey MT, et al. Appraisal of compliance with the UICC/AJCC staging system in the staging of gastric cancer. Union Internationale Contre la Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89:1405–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China grant 30672408, Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Technology grant 2006Z3-E0041, and Sun Yat-sen University 985 Program Initiation Fund (China). We gratefully thank the staff members in the Department of Medical Oncology and GI Surgery Oncology at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center for their suggestion and assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui-hua Xu MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Qiu, Mz., Wang, Zq., Zhang, Ds. et al. Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM Staging Classification for Carcinoma of the Stomach in China. Ann Surg Oncol 18, 1869–1876 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1542-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1542-x

Keywords

Navigation