Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Candidates for Early Discharge After Gastrectomy

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to analyze clinical and laboratory variables associated with complications after gastrectomy for gastric cancer to predict candidates for successful early discharge.

Methods

Consecutive patients undergoing gastrectomy at Seoul National University Hospital from January through December 2013 were identified from a prospective complications database. Clinicopathologic and postoperative laboratory parameters were analyzed to determine variables associated with complications. An additional validation study was performed from March through May 2014.

Results

Overall, complications occurred in 180/855 patients (21.1 %). Age >68 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.64), use of an open approach (OR 1.9), and use of combined resection (OR 1.67) were significant independent risk factors for complications (p < 0.05). The postoperative day (POD) 5 to preoperative white blood cell count (WBC) ratio (risk ratio [RR] 2.01), C-reactive protein (CRP) level on POD 5 (RR 1.1), and maximum body temperature on POD 4 (RR 2.36) independently predicted complications in a multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). After establishing an early discharge profile (EDP) based on these six variables, 152/855 patients (17.8 %) were predicted to have an uncomplicated course. Of these, 8/152 (5.3 %) experienced complications. In a validation study of 217 patients, 43/217 (19.8 %) were candidates for early discharge on POD 5, and 3 (7.0 %) had a false-positive EDP.

Conclusions

Patients younger than 68 years of age who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy without combined resection might be candidates for early discharge on POD 5 if the POD 5 to preoperative WBC ratio is ≤1.2, POD 5 CRP level is ≤5.38 g/mL, and POD 4 body temperature is ≤37.4 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sierzega M, Kolodziejczyk P, Kulig J. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long‐term survival after total gastrectomy for carcinoma of the stomach. Br J Surg. 2010;97:1035-42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoo HM, Lee HH, Shim JH, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Negative impact of leakage on survival of patients undergoing curative resection for advanced gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:734-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sasako M, Sano T, Yamamoto S, et al. D2 lymphadenectomy alone or with para-aortic nodal dissection for gastric cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:453-62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee KG, Lee HJ, Yang JY, et al. Risk factors associated with complication following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data based on the Clavien–Dindo system. J Gastroint Surg. 2014;18:1269-77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417-20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A. Morbidity and mortality in the Italian gastric cancer study group randomized clinical trial of D1 versus D2 resection for gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2010;97:643-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park DJ, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK, Lee KW, Choe KJ. Predictors of operative morbidity and mortality in gastric cancer surgery. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1099-102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim MC, Kim W, Kim HH, et al. Risk factors associated with complication following laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale Korean multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2692-700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Persiani R, Antonacci V, Biondi A, et al. Determinants of surgical morbidity in gastric cancer treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207:13-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Platt JJ, Ramanathan ML, Crosbie RA, et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of postoperative infective complications after curative resection in patients with colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:4168-77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dutta S, Fullarton GM, Forshaw MJ, Horgan PG, McMillan DC. Persistent elevation of C-reactive protein following esophagogastric cancer resection as a predictor of postoperative surgical site infectious complications. World J Surg. 2011;35:1017-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Welsch T, Frommhold K, Hinz U, et al. Persisting elevation of C-reactive protein after pancreatic resections can indicate developing inflammatory complications. Surgery. 2008;143:20-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Garcia-Granero A, Frasson M, Flor-Lorente B, et al. Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein as early predictors of anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: a prospective observational study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56:475-83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiran RP, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Steel M, Garafalo T, Fazio VW. Outcomes and prediction of hospital readmission after intestinal surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198:877-83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Collins TC, Daley J, Henderson WH, Khuri SF. Risk factors for prolonged length of stay after major elective surgery. Ann Surg. 1999;230:251-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JW, Kim WS, Cheong JH, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH. Safety and efficacy of fast-track surgery in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a randomized clinical trial. World J Surg. 2012;36:2879-87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu Z, Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang CJ, Dong QT, Chen BC. Fast-track surgery in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399:85-92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:3077-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113-23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim HI, Hur H, Kim YN, et al. Standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and surgical quality control (KLASS-02-QC): a prospective, observational, multicenter study [NCT01283893]. BMC Cancer. 2014;14:209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Jeong SH, Yoo MW, Yoon HM, et al. Is the critical pathway effective for the treatment of gastric cancer? J Kor Surg Soc. 2011;81:96-103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bae HJ, Lee HJ, Han DS, et al. Prealbumin levels as a useful marker for predicting infectious complications after gastric surgery. J Gastroint Surg. 2011;15:2136-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jung DH, Lee HJ, Han DS, et al. Impact of perioperative hemoglobin levels on postoperative outcomes in gastric cancer surgery. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16:377-82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the National R & D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (1320270).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han-Kwang Yang MD, PhD.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure

Ji-Ho Park, Young-Gil Son, Tae-Han Kim, Yeon-Ju Huh, Jun-Young Yang, Yong-Joon Suh, Yun-Suhk Suh, Seong-Ho Kong, Hyuk-Joon Lee, and Han-Kwang Yang declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Ji-Ho Park and Young-Gil Son have contributed equally to this study.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 115 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, JH., Son, YG., Kim, TH. et al. Identification of Candidates for Early Discharge After Gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 24, 159–166 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5447-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5447-1

Keywords

Navigation