ABSTRACT
Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA, is undergoing a transformation in the way that it prosecutes R&D programs. Through the adoption of a “model-driven” culture, enhanced R&D productivity is anticipated, both in the form of decreased attrition at each stage of the process and by providing a rational framework for understanding and learning from the data generated along the way. This new approach focuses on the concept of a “Design Cycle” that makes use of all the data possible, internally and externally, to drive decision-making. These data can take the form of bioactivity, 3D structures, genomics, pathway, PK/PD, safety data, etc. Synthesis of high-quality data into models utilizing both well-established and cutting-edge methods has been shown to yield high confidence predictions to prioritize decision-making and efficiently reposition resources within R&D. The goal is to design an adaptive research operating plan that uses both modeled data and experiments, rather than just testing, to drive project decision-making. To support this emerging culture, an ambitious information management (IT) program has been initiated to implement a harmonized platform to facilitate the construction of cross-domain workflows to enable data-driven decision-making and the construction and validation of predictive models. These goals are achieved through depositing model-ready data, agile persona-driven access to data, a unified cross-domain predictive model lifecycle management platform, and support for flexible scientist-developed workflows that simplify data manipulation and consume model services. The end-to-end nature of the platform, in turn, not only supports but also drives the culture change by enabling scientists to apply predictive sciences throughout their work and over the lifetime of a project. This shift in mindset for both scientists and IT was driven by an early impactful demonstration of the potential benefits of the platform, in which expert-level early discovery predictive models were made available from familiar desktop tools, such as ChemDraw. This was built using a workflow-driven service-oriented architecture (SOA) on top of the rigorous registration of all underlying model entities.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Munos B. 2015 new drug approvals hit 66-year high! http://www.forbes.com. 2016.
Hirschler B. New drug approvals fall to six-year low in 2016. http://www.reuters.com. 2017.
Taylor K, Stockbridge M, Shah S. Balancing the R&D equation: measuring the return from pharmaeutical innovation. https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/pages/life-sciences-and-healthcare/articles/measuring-return-from-pharmaceutical-innovation.html. 2016.
Kaitin KI, Milne C, DiMasi JA, Cohen JP, Getz K, Evens R, Shader RI. Outlook 2016. Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. http://csdd.tufts.edu/files/uploads/Outlook-2016.pdf. 2016.
Schumaker A, Gassman O, Hinder M. Changing R&D models in research-based pharmaceutical companies. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):105.
Cook D, et al. Lessons learned from the fate of AstraZeneca’s drug pipeline: a five-dimensional framework. Nat Rev Drug Disc. 2014;13(June):419–31.
Brown FK, et al. The evolution of drug design at Merck Research Laboratories. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2017;31(3):255–66.
Sheridan RP, et al. eCounterscreening: using QSAR predictions to prioritize testing for off-target activities and setting the balance between benefit and risk. J Chem Inf Model. 2015;55(2):231–8.
Lipinski CA. Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2004;1(4):337–41.
TurboTax. Intuit, Mountain View, CA. https://turbotax.intuit.com/. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.
ChemDraw. PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA. http://www.cambridgesoft.com/software/overview.aspx. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.
Spotfire. PerkinElmer, Waltham MA. https://spotfire.tibco.com/. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.
AIM Change Management Methodology description. IMA. 2016. http://www.imaworldwide.com/aim-change-management-methodology-description. Accessed 16 Jan 2017.
Sharma KJ, Bowonder B. The making of Boeing 777: a case study in concurrent engineering. Int J Manuf Technol Manag. 2004;6(3/4):254–64.
Guerra-Zubiaga D, et al. Product life-cycle management tools and collaborative tools applied to an automotive case study. Int J Engng Ed. 2008;24(2):266–73.
Montgomery DC, Woodall WH. An overview of six sigma. Intl Stat Rev. 2008;76(3):329–46.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are grateful for the hard work and dedication of our colleagues and collaborators in Structural Chemistry and Information Technology at Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Guest Editor: Xiang-Qun Xie
Frank K. Brown is deceased.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brown, F.K., Kopti, F., Chang, C.(. et al. Data to Decisions: Creating a Culture of Model-Driven Drug Discovery. AAPS J 19, 1255–1263 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0124-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-017-0124-2