Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, systemic, and progressive inflammatory disorder primarily characterized by persistent chronic synovitis, progressive erosions, and cartilage destruction, which may cause deformed and painful joints, even resulting in loss of function [1]. The full etiology of RA remains unclear; in addition to the contributions of infectious, hormonal, and environmental factors, several lines of evidence have suggested that the disease has a genetic basis [2]. RA is characterized by infiltration of the synovial membrane in multiple joints with T cells, B cells, and monocytes. This process is preceded by activation of endothelial cells; neovascularization (growth of new blood vessels) is another hallmark of RA synovitis [1,2,3].

Expansion of synovial fibroblast-like and macrophage-like cells leads to a hyperplastic synovial lining layer. This expanded synovial membrane, often termed “pannus,” invades the periarticular bone at the cartilage-bone junction and leads to bony erosions and cartilage degradation [3, 4].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the most potent angiogenic factor produced by endothelial cells, fibroblasts, T cells, and macrophages [5, 6]. VEGF gene is located at chromosome 6p21.3, covering 14 kb in length with eight exons and seven introns. The VEGF gene has been found to be highly polymorphic and more than 30 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been reported [7, 8]. The VEGF gene is also an independent risk factor for RA severity and correlates with multiple disease parameters, such as disease activity, joint damage, and functional disability [3, 9].

Aim of work

This study aimed to investigate the impact of a common genetic polymorphism in the VEGF gene on disease activity and synovial lesions in patients with RA among a sample of Egyptian population.

Methods

Ethical statement

Prior to inclusion in the study, all participants were adequately informed about the aim and the procedures of the study. The protocol was accepted by Institutional Research Board (IRB) Mansoura Faculty of Medicine in May 2016 code Number (MS/16.05.22). An informed written consent was obtained from all participants.

Study population

In this case-control study, 80 consecutive RA patients were recruited from the Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinics, between July 2016 and July 2019. In addition, 80 age- and sex-matched healthy control volunteers were randomly enrolled in the study. Patients and control subjects had the same ethnicity (all were Caucasian) and were from the same geographical area. Patients were diagnosed according to the American college of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 criteria [10], and all of them were conventional DMARD therapy without corticosteroid therapy. Patients with other autoimmune rheumatic diseases, overlapping arthritis, family history of autoimmune diseases, and concomitant infection and patients with age less than or equal to 18 years were excluded from the study.

All RA patients were subjected to full history taking and thorough general and systemic examination as well as musculoskeletal examinations. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was used to detect the level of perception of pain intensity in RA patients. A total of 28 joints including bilateral glenohumeral, elbow, wrist, metacarpophalangeal joints (MCPjs), proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPjs), and knee and ankle joints were assessed for each patient to determine tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC). The RA activity was assessed by disease activity score 28 (DAS-28), ESR version (based on 28 joints) [11]. Venous blood samples were withdrew from all participants through antecubital venipuncture. These samples were used for VEGF genotyping and for measurement of ESR, CRP, RF, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody levels.

Power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) (Siemens ACUSON P300 color Doppler, Italy) with the probe frequency of 12-18MHZ was used to assess the intensity of the synovial blood flow. The most affected joints of each RA patient were examined using direct contact method. A semi-quantitative scoring system to assess the flow was graded in a four-step scale [12] as follows: grade 0, being with no signal visualized, grade 1, having one single or several vessels visualized, grade 2, less than 50% of the region of interest having signal, and grade 3, being more than 50% of the region of interest having signal.

Genotyping of the SNP rs3025039 polymorphisms VEGF gene

DNA was isolated from peripheral blood using Thermo Scientific whole blood genomic DNA purification Mini Kit K0781. The nucleotide sequence of VEGF gene polymorphism which was in the promoter region was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The primers for rs3025039 were 5′-AGGGTTTCGGGAACCAGATC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTCG GTGATTTAGCAGCAAG-3′ (reverse). Genotypes were determined by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP). The VEGF rs3025039 polymorphism was analyzed by digestion of the PCR product with restriction endonuclease NlaIII (Bio Basic Canada Inc.).

Statistical analysis

All statistical calculations were done through SPSS the version 20.0 statistic software. Continuous variables were tested for normality of distribution prior to statistical calculations. All continuous variables were normally distributed and were presented in mean ± SD. Categorical variables were presented in number and percentage. The comparisons were performed using independent sample Student’s t test for comparison between two continuous variables or one-way ANOVA test for comparison of three continuous variables. Chi-square test was used for comparison of categorical variables. Odds ratio were calculated to measure the association between an exposure (presence of alleles) and an outcome (occurrence of RA). The 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to estimate precision of OR [13]. The Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was evaluated by the goodness-of-fit X2 test to compare the observed genotype frequencies with the expected frequencies in controls in order to test the assumption that genotype frequencies in a population will remain constant from generation to generation [14]. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

Results

The RA patients and controls did not differ significantly as regards age (P = 0.482) and sex (P = 0.079). The two groups were matched regarding the age and sex distribution (Table 1). Table 2 shows range, mean ± SD of clinical findings, composite activity indices, laboratory findings, and PDUS findings.

Table 1 Comparison of age and sex distribution between RA patients and controls
Table 2 Clinical findings, composite indices, and laboratory findings of RA patients

As shown in Table 3, genotype frequencies of SNP rs3025039 of the controls fitted the HWE among controls (χ2 = 2.413; P = 0.112). The allele as well as genotype distribution of the SNP rs3025039 of VEGF gene is compared between RA patients and controls and illustrated in Table 3. T allele is present in the RA group more frequently than the control group (22.5% vs. 10% respectively). Meanwhile, C allele is less frequent in the RA group than controls (77.7% vs. 90% respectively). This difference was significant (OR = 1.559, 95% CI = 1.23–1.97, P = 0.002).

Table 3 Comparison of alleles and genotyping distribution of VEGF gene SNP rs3025039 between RA patients and controls

Homozygous genotype (CC) was found in 61.2% of patients and 82.5% of controls. Homozygous genotype (TT) was found in 6.3% of patients and 2.5% of controls. 32.5% of patients and 15% of controls carried the heterozygous (CT) genotype respectively (Fig. 1). These differences were statistically significant (P = 0.011) (Table 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Lanes 1, 2 and 3 show PCR products. Lane 4 shows a 50 bp DNA ladder; lanes 5, 6, and 8–16 show the heterozygote (CT) cut into fragments of lengths 208 and 122. Lanes 7 and 17–19 show the homozygous (CC) uncut, having a length of 208 bp. Lane 20 shows the homozygous (TT) uncut, having a length of 86 bp (lanes are numbered in the image from left to right)

Concerning clinical findings, TJC and SJC were significantly higher in T allele than in C allele and (P = 0.038 and P = 0.025, respectively). Moreover, TJC and SJC were significantly higher in TT genotype than in CT and CC genotypes being lowest in CC genotype (P = 0.020 and P = 0.005 respectively). As regards composite activity indices, DAS-28ESR was significantly higher in T allele than in C allele (P = 0.004), and it was significantly higher in TT genotype than in CT and CC genotypes being lowest in CC genotype (P = 0.003). In contrast, disease duration, morning stiffness duration, and VAS pain did not show any significant differences among RA patients’ genotyping.

As regards lab findings, ESR was significantly higher in T allele than in C allele (P < 0.001). Additionally, it was significantly higher in TT genotype than in CT and CC genotypes being lowest in CC genotype (P < 0.001). However, CRP did not show any significant difference among RA. Also, the RA patients’ genotyping did not differ significantly as regards RF (P = 0.189) and anti-CCP (P = 0.574) (Table 4).

Table 4 Comparison of the clinical features, activity indices, and laboratory findings among the VEGF gene SNP rs3025039 in RA patients

Regarding the PDUS grading, grade 1 was found in 26.6% and 8.3% of patients with C allele and T allele respectively. The grade 2 was found in 68.5% and 52% RA patients with C and T alleles respectively. On the other hand, while 38.9% of the patients with T allele had grade 3, only 4.8% of patients with C allele had grade 3. These differences were significant (P < 0.001). Moreover, 30.6% and 11.5% of patients with CC and CT genotypes had grade 1, respectively, while none of the patients with TT genotype had grade 1. The grade 2 was found in 69.4%, 65.4%, and only 20% of RA patients with CC, CT, and TT genotyping, respectively. In contrast, while 80% of the patients with TT genotype had grade 3, none of patients with CC genotype had grade 3, and only 23.1% of the patients with CT genotype had grade 3. These differences were significant (P < 0.001) (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5 Comparison of distribution of RF, anti-CCP, and PDUS grading among the VEGF gene SNP rs3025039 in RA patients
Table 6 Comparison of distribution of RF, anti-CCP, and PDUS grading between T allele and C allele of the VEGF gene SNP rs3025039 in RA patients

Discussion

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic multisystem inflammatory disease characterized mainly by inflammation of the synovial joints. The inflammation in the RA joint is associated with inflammatory cell infiltration and synovial lining hyper-proliferation as well as excessive pro-inflammatory mediator’s production [15].

Having a first-degree relative with high familial incidence in RA is one of the strongest risk factors for developing RA. This highlights the important role of genetic studies and GWAS in early RA detection [16].

Vascular endothelial growth factor is one of the most potent factors in RA development that seems to be responsible for the typical hypertrophied synovium (pannus), edema, swelling, and chondrolytic and osteolytic reactions and is expressed in synovial fibroblasts, fibroblasts close to microvessels, vascular smooth muscle, and macrophages, but not in endothelial cells [17].

Serum VEGF levels are upregulated in RA patients. In addition, synovial fluid or synovial cells from RA patients also contain high levels of VEGF, and VEGF levels are positively correlated with disease activity and joint destruction in RA [18].

Given the potential link between VEGF and autoimmune or inflammatory diseases, VEGF polymorphisms, which may influence VEGF expression, have been studied as potential causes of autoimmune or inflammatory diseases [19].

This attracts the attention to study the effect of its gene SNPs in RA incidence and pathogenesis. Our study was designed to investigate the impact of a common genetic polymorphism in the VEGF gene on disease activity and synovial lesions in patients with RA.

In the present study as regards SNP rs3025039, the T allele frequencies were higher in patients compared to the control group (22.5% vs. 10% respectively), making it a risky allele. On the other hand, the C allele frequencies were lower in patients compared to the control group (77.7% vs. 90% respectively), making it a protective allele (OR = 1.559, 95% CI = 1.23–1.97, P = 0.002). Regarding TT and CC genotypes in this study, there was a statistical difference in their frequencies in patients (6.3% and 61.2%) compared to the control group (2.5% and 82.5%. respectively), making the TT genotype a risky genotype while the CC genotype seemed to be protective (p = 0.011).

The presented results come in agreement with Han et al. [20] who examined rs3025039 SNP of VEGF gene using PCR-RFLP restriction fragment length polymorphism in Korean RA patients and detected significant association between T allele and increased susceptibility to RA.

The results were also in harmony with Lv et al. [21] research in China which was conducted on eight nucleotide polymorphisms including rs3025039 of VEGF gene analyzed using Sequenom MassArray platform and found decreased CC genotype in patients with RA compared to controls.

A previous meta-analysis [19] reported no association between the rs3025039 of VEGF gene polymorphisms and the development of RA. This finding may be explained by methodological differences, significant heterogeneity among these studies, and different clinical and environmental characteristics.

In our study, there is a significant association between TT genotype and high ESR in RA patients, while other laboratory investigations (CRP, RF, anti CCP ab) did not show any significant difference between genotypes.

In clinical disease activity evaluation by DAS-28 ESR, there is a significant association between vascular endothelial growth factor TT genotype and high DAS-28 grading as well as CC genotype and low DAS-28 grading.

The presented result comes in agreement with an earlier study [3] that demonstrated significantly high ESR levels in patients with RA. Also, they found significant association between the different genotypes of VEGF rs833070 in RA patients and DAS-28, although we did not study the same SNP.

In RA, MSUS can be now considered a complement to physical examination. This method evaluates synovitis through GS and power Doppler, and it is also able to identify bone erosions. Current data account for good correlation of MSUS with classical measures of clinical activity; in some instances, MSUS appears to perform even better. Diagnosis of subclinical synovitis by MSUS might help the physician in RA management [22].

Radiological evaluation of rheumatoid patients in the study by PDUS revealed that there is a significant association between VEGF gene polymorphisms and high PDUS grading.

Our results are in harmony with Chinese study of [3] that detected significant association between VEGF gene polymorphisms and PDUS, although we did not study the same SNP. Despite our interesting and novel findings in the present study, some limitations of our study should be stated. First, this was a hospital-based case–control study, so the subjects are not fully representative of the general population. Moreover, our study was performed in a small population, and further studies in a big population are needed to confirm our findings.

Limitations

Our study was performed on a relatively small population and from one geographical region, so our results should be confirmed on a larger sample size and on different populations for better understanding of the molecular genetics of angiogenesis as well as inflammation in RA.

Conclusions

This study reveals a trend of an association between VEGF gene SNP rs3025039 and increased risk for RA among a sample of Egyptian population. Notably, VEGF gene SNP rs3025039 in RA patients is significantly associated with high disease activity. Moreover, TT genotype may be a potential genetic susceptibility factor for RA and that CC genotype may be a potential genetic protective factor for RA. Thus, VEGF gene polymorphism appears to be a potential diagnostic activity indicator and a promising therapeutic target for RA patients.