Background

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a hereditary disease characterized by the progressive growth of multiple cysts in both kidneys. Currently, the number of ADPKD patients in Japan is estimated to be 31,000, accounting for roughly 3–5% of all dialysis patients [1]. As the most important clinical feature in ADPKD, increases over time in the number and size of renal cysts contribute to both kidney enlargement and the promotion of kidney dysfunction, eventually leading to the requirement for renal replacement therapy [2]. Importantly, Grantham et al. reported that kidney size predicts the prognosis of renal failure in ADPKD patients [3]. Therefore, precise measurement of total kidney volume (TKV) should be established for evaluation of the progression of ADPKD.

In 2003, Gattone et al. reported that administration of a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist inhibited the generation and enlargement of cysts in animal models of polycystic kidney disease [4]. Since 2014, tolvaptan, a member of the family of vasopressin V2 receptor antagonists, has been approved for the treatment of ADPKD in Japan. During a phase III international collaborative study (TEMPO 3:4 study) [5], the rate of increase in TKV was 2.8% per year in the group administered tolvaptan, whereas it was 5.5% per year in the group treated with placebo. However, evaluation of increases in TKV was performed by ultrasound sonography (US) or computed tomography (CT). Therefore, the actual effect of tolvaptan on increases in kidney volume remains inconclusive.

While US, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have each been used to quantify TKV in ADPKD patients, MRI is considered the most accurate method for measuring TKV [6, 7]. Although a recent study reported that, in addition to age, TKV predicts the risk of decline in glomerular filtration rate [8], there are few reports demonstrating the therapeutic effect of tolvaptan on TKV evaluated by MRI. In this study, we performed MRI to investigate the actual effect of tolvaptan in patients with ADPKD.

Herein, we administered tolvaptan to six ADPKD patients and followed them for 1 year. We performed MRI to investigate the effect of tolvaptan on TKV and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after tolvaptan treatment.

Case presentation

We analyzed six patients (four males and two females) who underwent tolvaptan treatment between October 2014 and May 2015. Patients underwent kidney function tests and MRI at three time points (before, at the time of, and 1 year after the start of tolvaptan treatment). We also investigated changes in these parameters before and after treatment. TKV was measured by volumetry using a PHILIPS Achieva 1.5 tesla MRI system. Briefly, kidneys were scanned using a balanced fast field echo sequence, and the corresponding images were assembled into three-dimensions. Next, we used an image analysis system (VINCENT, FUJI Film Co, Tokyo, Japan), and kidneys were traced in horizontal, coronal, and sagittal sectional views. Subsequently, traced kidney images were analyzed graphically, and the dimensions were integrated. Finally, we converted the dimensions into TKV (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Measurement of total kidney volume. a Traced kidney image by magnetic resonance imaging. b Kidney image assembled in three-dimensions. c Integral graph

All six patients were confirmed to have a family history of ADPKD. We also recorded the eGFR of patients at three time points (at baseline, just before treatment, and after 1 year of treatment). The eGFR was calculated according to the formula for estimating kidney function from the Japanese Society of Nephrology [males: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 194 × Cr − 1.094 × Age − 0.28, female: eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) = 194 × Cr − 1.094 × Age − 0.28 × 0.739] [9]. We calculated the annual rate of decline of eGFR using the following formula {(value of eGFR before treatment) − (value of eGFR at the start of treatment)}/(value of eGFR at the start of treatment) × 12/observation period (months) × 100, or {(value of eGFR after treatment) − (value of eGFR before treatment)}/(value of eGFR before treatment) × 12/ observation period (months) × 100.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. All analyses were performed using SPSS software package version 23.0, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Table 1 shows the baseline clinical characteristics of patients. At the time of tolvaptan treatment, patients were 37–55 years old (median, 51.5 years), TKV was 788–4060 mL (median, 1535 mL), serum creatinine level was 0.76–1.80 mg/dL (median, 1.43 mg/dL), and the eGFR was 24.1–92.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (median, 44.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). An unruptured cerebral aneurysm was observed in one patient (case 4).

Table 1 Baseline clinical characteristics of patients before treatment

As shown in Table 2, each dose of tolvaptan is presented on the CKD heat map [10]. Cases 1 and 4 were administered 120 mg/day, while cases 2, 3, 5, and 6 were administered 90 mg/day. Compared with previous reports [5], our patients were administered relatively large doses of tolvaptan, regardless of the degree of renal function impairment.

Table 2 Doses of tolvaptan administered

Figure 2 shows the changes in eGFR before and after treatment with tolvaptan. Regarding changes in eGFR after treatment, two patients showed no changes, three showed improvement, and one showed a decline. Overall, tolvaptan treatment did not result in significant changes in eGFR (before treatment, 9.2 mL/min/1.73 m2/year [range 7.4–10.2]; after treatment, 2.4 mL/min/1.73 m2/year [range 0.8–5.9], P = 0.58) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, the rate of increase in TKV was significantly lower after treatment compared with before treatment (before treatment, 14.5%/year [range 11.3–22.4]; after treatment, 1.3%/year [range 0.4–5.7], P = 0.031) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Rates of change of estimated glomerular filtration rate before and after treatment with tolvaptan. The analysis was performed with Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test

Fig. 3
figure 3

Rates of change of total kidney volume before and after treatment with tolvaptan. The analysis was performed with Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test

Patients were enforced to consume sufficient volumes of water. However, there were no changes in patient weight or blood pressure after treatment compared with values before treatment. Any of the patients were taking antihypertensive drugs prior to the study. However, it was not necessary to modify the use of antihypertensive drugs during treatment with tolvaptan.

Discussion

In this study, we showed that MRI accurately assesses the therapeutic effect of tolvaptan on TKV in Japanese ADPKD patients. Of note was that the beneficial effect was observed in cases with severe kidney enlargement and advanced kidney dysfunction. In the clinical setting, US cannot depict three-dimensional outlines of a whole kidney, and CT does not readily distinguish renal cysts from hepatic cysts. However, a previous study reported MRI as a reliable method for measuring TKV [6, 7], despite a lack of evidence for evaluation of TKV in ADPKD patients. Our results demonstrated the actual effect of tolvaptan on TKV in Japanese ADPKD patients.

The six patients had a family history of end-stage kidney disease, suggesting they had PKD1 gene mutations that resulted in rapid disease progression [11]. In ADPKD patients with PKD1 gene mutations, TKV is known to increase drastically with age, and kidney enlargement contributes directly to the progression of kidney dysfunction [11]. In the clinical setting, increased TKV is also used to predict the decline in eGFR in ADPKD patients [8]. In this study, tolvaptan inhibited the annual rate of increase in kidney volume, suggesting that tolvaptan is effective, even in Japanese ADPKD patients considered to have poor renal prognosis.

Although the rate of increase in TKV was suppressed in the six patients, the rate of decline of eGFR did not improve with treatment. In the TEMPO 3:4 study, the mean rate of change in eGFR was reported to be − 2.72 mL/min/1.73 m2/year in the tolvaptan group and − 3.70 mL/min/1.73 m2/year in the placebo group [5, 12, 13]. However, there was no statistical difference in eGFR at 12 months between the two groups. Notably, an increase in TKV is known to precede the progression to kidney dysfunction [14], and here we showed that tolvaptan inhibits the increase in TKV. The therapeutic effect of tolvaptan on renal function may have been observable after 1 year in patients with ADPKD.

ADPKD is a well-established systemic disease, and tolvaptan has been shown to suppress fibrosis in various rodent model of fibrosis, such as of the heart, liver, and kidney. In contrast, a previous study reported that tolvaptan treatment decreased the size of cysts in patients but did not decrease substantial degrees of cystic wall thickening and interstitial fibrosis [15]. In case 6, eGFR was 24.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the start of treatment despite a relatively small TKV. Because beneficial effects are not expected in patients with advanced kidney dysfunction, the indication of tolvaptan should be determined cautiously in cases with advanced kidney dysfunction and lower kidney size.

Another report indicated that administration of tolvaptan induces tubuloglomerular feedback independently of the reduction in cyst volume, leading to a transient and reversible decrease in eGFR [16]. Notably, the degree of the initial decrease in eGFR following tolvaptan treatment in patients with mild kidney dysfunction was more drastic than in those with advanced kidney dysfunction. In this study, tolvaptan-induced eGFR reduction was most evident in case 1. Given that inhibition of glomerular hyperfiltration is considered a long-term renoprotective effect, tolvaptan may be more effective in patients with mild kidney dysfunction than those with advanced kidney dysfunction.

Conclusions

In conclusion, MRI accurately demonstrates that tolvaptan treatment improves increases in TKV in patients with ADPKD.