Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multi-organ involved autoimmune disease characterized as overactivation of T cells followed by B cells proliferation and excessive production of autoantibodies leading to the loss of self-tolerance. Although the pathogenesis of SLE still remains obscure, genetic factors play an essential role. T cell activation-related genetic loci, especially the HLA region, had been confirmed associated with SLE susceptibility by genome wide association studies (GWAS) [1]. Except for the important role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in T cell activation, the molecules balancing both T cell activation and inhibition were also crucial participants to generate the tolerance and negative feedback regulation of the immune response. After T cell activation, inducible T cell co-stimulator (ICOS), is constitutively expressed on naïve T lymphocytes contributing to effective T cell-dependent immune responses. Meanwhile, cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA4) is also induced and functions as an inhibitory molecule with the activation of T cells. However, the genetic contribution of CTLA4 and ICOS to SLE susceptibility remains controversial.

CTLA4 and ICOS are located at 2q33 and genetically adjoining. The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)s, rs3087243, rs231725, rs11571302, and rs11571297, located in the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region were identified in predisposition to autoimmune diseases including rheumatoid arthritis [2], vitiligo [3], hypothyroidism [4, 5], type 1 diabetes [6,7,8,9,10], and Graves’ disease [11] by GWASs. The SNPs in CTLA4-ICOS locus were also implicated in relation with SLE susceptibility. Previous genetic association studies mostly focused on the promoter and exon regions of CTLA4 and ICOS. CTLA4 +49G/A, CT60A/G, −1722T/C, and −318C/T might affect the expression of CTLA4 [12,13,14] and was reported associated with the susceptibility to SLE, especially in Asians [15,16,17,18]. Several SNPs in CTLA4 pathway including rs733618 at the 5′ flanking region of CTLA4 were identified associated with SLE [19]. In contrast, the genetic association studies were limited in ICOS gene and the causal variants were believed to be located at the 5’ flanking region of ICOS [20]. Despite the considerable contribution of variants in the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region to autoimmune diseases, its role has remained unappreciated in SLE.

Recent GWAS identified rs3087243 located in the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region was associated with SLE susceptibility after a meta-analysis of Asian and European populations [21]. In light of this inspiring achievement, we aimed to find a functional variant in this region. In the present study, we undertook an evaluation of the CTLA4-ICOS polymorphisms to SLE susceptibility in the Chinese population. In addition, we also investigated the possible functional mechanisms underlying genetic associations by integrated analysis of bioinformatics using an online database following with experimental validations and transcriptome profiles.

Methods

Population

There were two cohorts enrolled in our replication study. The Henan cohort included 2053 patients with SLE and 1845 healthy controls from Middle of China. The Beijing cohort consisted of 2303 SLE patients and 19,262 healthy controls from North of China. The diagnosis of SLE met the American College of Rheumatology revised criteria [22]. Participants in this cohort were geographically and ethnically matched [23], and demographical information of the cohorts was provided in supplementary table S1. Written informed consent was obtained from all the study subjects, and the study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Medical Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University First Hospital (2019-KY-134) and the Medical Ethics Committee of Peking University First Hospital (Institutional Review Board approval no. 2020Y158).

SNP selection

CTLA-4 was located in Chromosome 2: 204,732,509–204,738,683, and ICOS was located in Chromosome 2: 204,801,471–204,826,300 (Ensembl, GRCh37). The upstream and downstream 10kb of the CTLA-4-ICOS region spanning 113,791 bp were focused on the present study. A total of 136 SNPs was covered by ImmunoChip [23]. Among 24 SNPs were associated with SLE susceptibility (p < 0.05) (detailed genetic association results were extracted from previous publications and were provided in supplementary table S2). The top signals were rs17268364 and rs13029135 with p value 1.41×10−2 and were in high linkage disequilibrium with r2 0.99, D’ 1 according to ASN (East Asian). Since both rs17268364 and rs13029135 are located in intergenic, functional annotations were performed with RegulomeDB which is a database that annotates SNPs with known and predicted regulatory elements in the intergenic regions of the H. sapiens genome [24]. Higher RegulomeDB probability score for rs17268364 (rs17268364 = 0.55411; rs13029135 = 0.005) indicated rs17268364 is more likely to be a regulatory variant. Therefore, rs17268364 (risk allele G frequency cases/controls 79.6/74.9, OR 1.41×10−2, OR 1.30, 95%CI 1.06–1.61) was selected as the tag SNP. Further bioinformatics were conducted with HaploReg v4.1 for detailed regulatory annotation and GTEx database for expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) effect associated with CTLA-4 expression [25].

Genotyping

TaqMan real-time PCR was performed and allele-specific probes labeled with fluorochrome VIC or FAM were used to differentiate wild-type and variant alleles. Genotyping was performed using a 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Additionally, 10% of the DNA specimens were randomly chosen for sequencing. The concordance rate of 100% was seen across the assays.

Luciferase reporter assay

Luciferase reporter assay was performed as described previously [26]. Sequences of 101 bp flanking rs17268364 were synthesized and subcloned into pGL3-promoter vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) according to the instruction of the manufacturer (sequences are shown in Supplementary Table S3). Luciferase reporter assays were determined using the Promega Luciferase Assay System (Promega, Mannheim, Germany).

Protein mass spectrometry

Nuclear proteins were extracted from HEK 293T nucleus under the instruction of NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then double-strand DNA probes were synthesized and incubated with the extracted nuclear proteins (Supplementary Table S4). The DNA-protein complexes were added with 10 mM DTT and then 55 mM IAM for reductive alkylation. Followed by incubation with1ug Trypsin for protein digestion overnight at 37 °C. After desalted with C18 column and then dissolved with 15 μL Loading Buffer (0.1% formic acid, 3% acetonitrile), the peptide mixture was collected injected into liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (AB SCIEX tripleTOF 5600-plus, Redwood City, CA) platform.

Electrophoretic mobility shift assay

The sequences of the synthetic double-stranded biotinylated oligonucleotides were provided in Supplementary Table S4. The probes were incubated with the nuclear proteins from HEK 293T cells at room temperature for 30 min. For supershift assays, 10 μl of anti-EWS (catalog no. 11910S; Cell Signaling Technology) antibody was incubated with nuclear proteins from HEK 293T cells for 1 h before adding the relevant labeled probe. The entire reaction mixture was run on a non-denaturing 0.5×TBE 6% polyacrylamide gel for 1h at 60 V at 4°C, transferred onto Biodyne® B nylon membranes (Pall Corporation), and crosslinked at 120 × 100 μJ/cm2. Signals were visualized with reagents included in the kit and ChemiDoc XRS (Bio-Rad Laboratories, USA).

The mRNA expression of CTLA4 and IFN-α signatures

Total RNA was extracted from whole blood and isolated by the TRIzol Reagent (Life Technologies). Whole genome RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed with PE150 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). A total of 99 individuals were enrolled in the RNA-seq project including 57 lupus nephritis (LN) patients, 18 SLE patients (without renal impairment), and 24 healthy controls. Considering the expression of CTLA4 might be influenced by severe infection, we excluded two individuals with PCT > 0.5 ng/ml (one was 2.23 ng/ml and the other was 3.46 ng/ml).

Statistical analysis

A goodness-of-fit χ2 test was used to evaluate the deviation of rs17268364 for the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Allelic and genotypic associations were assessed by a chi-square test to give the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval. The meta-analysis of the three cohorts (one discovery cohort and two replication cohorts) was conducted by Mantel-Haenszel approach. Heterogeneity was performed with Review Manager 5.4. In rs17268364 genotypes and expression analysis, Spearman’s coefficient was calculated in allele-dependent gene expression regulations. Statistical analyses were carried out with the SPSS 13.0 software. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Result

The CTLA4-ICOS intergenic polymorphism rs17268364 associated with SLE susceptibility

To investigate the association between rs17268364 in the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region and SLE susceptibility, we validated the genetic association results in the Henan cohort (2053 cases and 1845 controls from Central of China) and Beijing cohort (2303 SLE patients and 19,262 healthy controls from North of China). Deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium was not observed in SLE patients or controls. The frequency of minor allele A was significantly lower in SLE patients than controls (risk allele cases vs. controls, 78.8% vs. 75.5% in the Henan cohort and 77.8% vs. 75.2% in th eBejing cohort), with p value 4.40×10−4 (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.09–1.35) in the Henan cohort and 1.62 × 10−4 in the Beijing cohort (OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.07–1.24) (Table 1).

Table 1 Association of the rs17268364 with SLE susceptibility

In the Chinese population from the previous GWAS cohort [23], the frequency of risk allele G was 79.6 in cases and 74.9 in controls with p value 1.41×10−2, OR of 1.30, and 95%CI 1.06 to 1.61. After combined analysis, the association result was pronounced with p value 7.02×10− 11, OR of 1.19, and 95%CI 1.13 to 1.26 (Table 1).

Regulatory effects of rs17268364 annotated by bioinformatic analysis

To investigate the functional basis of rs17268364 association with SLE etiology, we first checked the potential functional effect of rs17268364 with Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) data available. High-resolution genome wide ChIP-seq profiles for histone modifications showed that rs17268364 was mapped in the promoter region in PMA-I stimulated primary T helper 17 cells and enhancer regions in 6 tissues including primary T cells effector/memory enriched from peripheral blood (HaploReg v4.1 [27], supplementary table S5). Considering the fact that rs17268364 mapped to the H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, and H3K9ac in multiple cell lines, we speculated that rs17268364 might affect the transcription of target gene(s).

rs17268364 risk G allele reduced reporter gene activity

To test our hypothesis, the two sequences surrounding rs17268364 containing the protective A allele and risk G allele respectively were synthesized and subcloned into pGL3-promoter vector to test the potential regulatory effect of rs17268364. The results of luciferase activity were presented in Fig. 1A. Comparing with the protective A allele, the rs17268364 risk G allele significantly down-regulated luciferase activity (p = 0.002). So, it would be expected that the rs17268364 risk G allele would correlate with a decreased expression of the target gene(s).

Fig. 1
figure 1

rs17268364 risk G allele binds with EWSR1 and reduced gene expression. A In vitro luciferase assays in HEK293T cells showing reduced activity in risk allele constructs containing rs17268364 G allele (p = 0.002). B Protein mass spectrometry assay and Venn diagram with revealing the proteins pulled down by differentially binding with rs17268364 A or G allele from the lysates of HEK293 T cells. C An allele-specific band was observed in probes containing rs17268364 risk G allele. A supershift bind was detected with the rs17268364 risk G allele in addition of an anti-EWSR1 antibody. “+” and “−” mean added and unadded, respectively. Two independent experiments were performed with similar results

Transcription suppressor EWSR1 binds with rs17268364 risk G allele

In order to identify a potential transcription suppressor that binds rs17268364 risk G allele containing sequence, we performed DNA pulldown coupled with protein mass spectrometry (Fig. 1B). Twenty-four unique proteins were identified binding with rs17268364 risk G allele (Fig. 1B), including Ewing sarcoma breakpoint region 1 (EWSR1) which functions as a transcriptional repressor.

Further allelic differences binding of EWSR1 was validated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) using nuclear protein from 293T cell line. As shown in Fig. 1C, the binding affinities of the DNA protein complex were significantly different depending on the rs17268364 allele. The DNA protein complex binding intensity of the rs17268364 risk G allele was significantly higher than the rs17268364 protective A allele. Furthermore, a supershift bind was detected with the rs17268364 risk G allele in addition to an anti-EWSR1 antibody which confirmed the constitution of the DNA protein complex.

rs17268364 risk G allele associated with lower CTLA-4 expression by eQTL analysis

To test this conjecture, we searched the GTEx portal suggesting that rs17268364 was an eQTL locus. A significant correlation between rs17268364 and CTLA-4 expression was observed in multiple tissues including testis, esophagus-gastroesophageal junction, artery-aorta, uterus, nerve-tibial, heart-left ventricle, lung, prostate, artery-tibial, and spleen (details in supplementary table S6). The most significant relationship was in testis with elevated expression of CTLA-4 and the protective A allele (p = 8.6×10-12). Data from GENEVAR database also showed the protective rs17268364 G allele correlated with decreased CTLA4 expression in Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines from 6 HapMap3 populations (p = 1.71×10−3) (Fig. 2A).

Fig. 2
figure 2

rs17268364 risk G allele associated with lower expression of CTLA-4. A Integrated analysis of genotype-expression data from HapMap3 individuals including 76 Han Chinese in Beijing, China (CHB), 82 Japanese in Tokyo, Japan (JPT), 90 Yoruba in Ibadan, Nigeria (YRI), 75 Gujarati Indians in Houston, Texas (GIH), 69 Luhya in Webuye, Kenya (LWK), 42 Mexican ancestry in Los Angeles, California (MXL). ILMN_1763487 denotes the probe for CTLA-4 in the gene expression chip (Illumina). B The correlation between mRNA expression of CTLA-4 and rs17268364 genotypes in lupus nephritis patients

In light of the fact that rs17268364 risk G allele associated with lower CTLA-4 expression, we suspected that the SLE patients carrying rs17268364 G allele confer a higher risk of SLE by a low expression of CTLA-4 than those carrying rs17268364 A allele.

rs17268364 risk G allele correlated with lower CTLA-4 expression in SLE patients

The expression of CTLA-4 was strongly influenced by the state of the immune system with a significant upregulation upon immune activation. Thus, to examine our above assumption, we detected the correlation between rs17268364 genotypes and CTLA-4 expression in SLE patients and healthy controls respectively (Fig. 2). There was no significant association between rs17268364 genotypes and CTLA-4 expression in SLE patients (without renal impairment) or healthy controls (Supplementary Fig. S1). We observed a trend of negative correlation between individuals carrying rs17268364 risk G allele and CTLA-4 expression in LN patients (Fig. 2B). No similar results were observed between individuals carrying rs17268364 risk G allele and ICOS expression in LN patients (Supplementary Fig. S2).

rs17268364 risk G allele correlated with higher levels of IFN-α signatures in healthy individuals

The critical role of IFN-α signature in the pathogenesis of SLE has been well documented. We further analyzed the levels of IFN-α signature in healthy individuals with rs17268364 A/G genetic background. Healthy individuals carrying rs17268364 risk G allele was significantly correlated with increased lymphocyte antigen 6E (LY6E) (p=0.031), interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) (p=0.038), interferon regulatory factor 9 (IRF9) (p=0.028), and interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) (p=0.040) mRNA expression (Fig. 3). This result indicated that healthy individuals with a genetic background of carrying rs17268364 risk G allele might have a higher level of IFN-α signature and were more likely to confer a higher risk of SLE.

Fig. 3
figure 3

rs17268364 risk G allele associated with higher IFN-α signature. Healthy individuals carrying rs17268364 risk G allele was significantly correlated with increased LY6E (p=0.031), ISG15 (p=0.038), IRF9 (p=0.028), and IRF5 (p=0.040) mRNA expression. The Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) and p value for correlation were presented

Discussion

In the present study, we first explored the genetic contribution of variants within the CTLA4-ICOS locus to SLE susceptibility in the Chinese population. According to a previous East Asian ImmunoChip study, the results of genetic association for rs17268364 CTLA4-ICOS was 1.41×10−2 in the Chinese population (490 cases vs. 493 controls from Beijing, North of China) and 7.42×10−3 in the Korean population (1710 cases vs. 3167 controls) [23]. The genetic association results from a replication study comprising the Henan cohort (2053 cases and 1845 controls) and Beijing cohort (2303 cases and 19,262 controls) were pronounced with p value 4.40×10−4 and 1.62×10−4 with enlarged sample size. After combined analysis, the result reached the GWAS significance level (1.63×10−11) providing robust genetic association between rs17268364 and SLE susceptibility. Although the genetic association between variants at CTLA4-ICOS locus and SLE susceptibility were hotspots, previous candidate gene studies were mostly focused on the promoter and exon regions of CTLA4 and ICOS leaving the intergenic region yet to be studied. For GWAS and meta GWAS which included rs17268364, sample size and ethnicity might the most two important reasons for missing this finding. However, as an intergenic variant at the CTLA4-ICOS locus, rs17268364 cannot explain all the association signals of the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region (supplementary Fig. S3). More study in this particular region deserves further study. SLE is a complex autoimmune disease with multiple organ damage. We supposed that the association signal from rs17268364 might be diluted by the heterogeneous clinical manifestations of SLE patients. In the future, more clinical manifestations related to genetic signals would be discovered using phenotypic approaches in SLE.

The bioinformatics suggested that rs17268364 CTLA4-ICOS might affect the expression of CTLA4, not ICOS. Transcription suppressor EWSR1 binds with rs17268364 risk G allele and luciferase reporter assay demonstrated the risk allele of rs17268364 decreased the expression of reporter gene compared with protective allele. Following genotype-mRNA expression analysis also showed the risk allele of rs17268364 was associated with low CTLA4 expression in LN patients. Our results implied that risk allele rs17268364 CTLA4-ICOS might contribute to SLE by reducing the expression of CTLA4 especially in patients with renal impairment. Defects caused by negative regulators of immune responses were believed to contribute to the overproduction of auto-antibodies and inflammatory factors in patients with SLE. The expression of CTLA4 was mainly induced after T cell activation by acting as the negative regulator of immune responses. Consistent with previous findings that the deficiency of CTLA4 was involved in the development of SLE [28], our result showed that the expression of CTLA4 was not significantly increased in LN patients compared with healthy controls. Moreover, LN patients carrying risk alleles of rs17268364 correlated lower levels of CTLA4 expression comparing those with protective alleles. The risk allele of rs17268364 might contribute to the deficiency of CTLA4 expression. These findings might expand our knowledge of CTLA4 deficiency in the pathogenesis of SLE, particularly in LN.

There were some limitations in two aspects of our study. One is genetic association studies that the population included in our study was predominantly from China. Future investigations with multi-ethnic populations are crucial to generalize the association between rs17268364 and SLE to other populations. Moreover, LN patients constituted the vast majority of cases both in the discovery cohorts and replication cohorts. More cohorts which included both LN and SLE patients without LN were essential to specify whether the genetic association between rs17268364 and SLE was due to LN patients. The other aspect was our expression analysis. We identified that healthy individuals carrying rs17268364 risk G allele correlated with higher levels of IFN-α signatures. However, there were only two individuals who were AA genotype which might lead to a false positive result potentially due to the relatively small sample size. And studies with a larger sample size are necessary to confirm our findings in the future. Interestingly, the marginal correlation between rs17268364 genotypes and CTLA-4 mRNA expression was observed but not in healthy controls or SLE patients without LN. Enlarged sample size, especially in SLE patients without LN, was crucial to clarify whether the correlation between rs17268364 genotypes and CTLA-4 mRNA expression was LN specific. What is more, the mRNA expression can be greatly influenced by medication especially steroid and immunosuppressive agents which are commonly used in SLE treatment. SLE patients included in our study were mostly under treatment with steroid or/and immunosuppressive agents leading to a negative correlation in eQTL analysis. The ideal and essential approach is to perform the eQTL analysis in untreated SLE patients which is an important direction for future efforts.

Lupus nephritis remains the main cause of morbidity and mortality in SLE, particularly in Asians [29]. Genetic association analysis and genotypic mRNA expression of CTLA4 analysis showed a special relation between LN patients and CTLA4 in our present study. These results corroborate the previous work that CTLA-4-Ig or Abatacept or had shown promising results in alleviating murine lupus nephritis and human lupus nephritis patients after modification of the primary outcome in phase II/III randomized controlled trial of abatacept [30]. In immune checkpoint blockade therapy, target against CTLA-4 induces immune-related adverse events including lupus-like glomerulonephritis [31, 32].

Conclusions

Here we conducted a combined analysis of genetic association study, bioinformatics with validation, and mRNA expression. A new signal, rs17268364 located in the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region, was identified as associated with SLE in the Chinese population. Following investigations further revealed that the risk allele of rs17268364 CTLA4-ICOS might contribute to SLE by reducing the expression of CTLA4 especially in patients with renal impairment. The present study provided new insight into variants in the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region. Further trans-ethnic dense mapping of the CTLA4-ICOS intergenic region will be needed.