Abstract
Background
Elevated evidence suggests that the SENPs family plays an important role in tumor progression. However, the role of SENPs in AML remains unclear.
Methods
We evaluated the expression pattern of SENP1 based on RNA sequencing data obtained from OHSU, TCGA, TARGET, and MILE datasets. Clinical samples were used to verify the expression of SENP1 in the AML cells. Lentiviral vectors shRNA and sgRNA were used to intervene in SENP1 expression in AML cells, and the effects of SENP1 on AML proliferation and anti-apoptosis were detected using in vitro and in vivo models. Chip-qPCR, MERIP-qPCR, CO-IP, RNA pulldown, and dual-luciferase reporter gene assays were used to explore the regulatory mechanisms of SNEP1 in AML.
Results
SENP1 was significantly upregulated in high-risk AML patients and closely related to poor prognosis. The AKT/mTOR signaling pathway is a key downstream pathway that mediates SENP1's regulation of AML proliferation and anti-apoptosis. Mechanistically, the CO-IP assay revealed binding between SENP1 and HDAC2. SUMO and Chip-qPCR assays suggested that SENP1 can desumoylate HDAC2, which enhances EGFR transcription and activates the AKT pathway. In addition, we found that IGF2BP3 expression was upregulated in high-risk AML patients and was positively correlated with SENP1 expression. MERIP-qPCR and RIP-qPCR showed that IGF2BP3 binds SENP1 3-UTR in an m6A manner, enhances SENP1 expression, and promotes AKT pathway conduction.
Conclusions
Our findings reveal a distinct mechanism of SENP1-mediated HDAC2-AKT activation and establish the critical role of the IGF2BP3/SENP1signaling axis in AML development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is one of the most common cancers [1]. AML is caused by gene mutations, chromatin abnormalities, and protein conformational changes that shift the growth and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells [2]. In recent decades, a number of post-translational modifications of proteins (such as ubiquitination or small ubiquitin-like modifiers) have been reported to play a significant role in AML [3]. Previously, we reported some genetic mechanisms of AML, such as m6A modification and alternative splicing [4]. Further exploration of protein post-translational modifications is required to identify the pathological process of AML.
The small ubiquitin-like modifier (SUMO) is a common form of post-translational modification in many proteins. It has been found that sumo modification is involved in almost all malignant behaviors of tumors, such as tumor proliferation, metastasis, immune microenvironment [5]. The SENPs (SUMO/Sentrin Specific Peptidase) protein family is a class of key enzymes that are mainly responsible for the desumo modification of proteins in cells. Increasing evidence has revealed a correlation between SENPs and tumor development [6]. SENP1 desumoylated HK2 enhanced glycolysis in thyroid cancer, which promoted thyroid cancer proliferation and metastasis [7]. SENP3 transmits ROS information and activates STING to regulate the antitumor immunity of DC cells [8]. SENP7 enhances EMT in breast cancer and promotes its metastasis [9]. Despite this, there is still a lack of systematic analysis and research on the relationship between the SENPs family and AML development. Additionally, m6A plays a significant role in the activity of the body and in the development of AML. Research has shown that m6A modifications regulate the expression and function of many genes in cells. However, there is still a lack of reports on the correlation between SENP1 and m6A [4].
In this study, we found that SENP1 was significantly overexpressed in high-risk AML patients. SENP1 mediated HDAC2-AKT activity was verified both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we found that the above signaling pathway in AML is driven by IGF2BP3 in an m6A dependent manner.
Methods
Online data download and processing
Oregon Health and Science University (OHSU) AML dataset: RNA sequencing data (RPKM) and clinical data of patients were acquired from the cBioPortal data portal (https://www.cbioportal.org/) [10]. TARGET dataset for AML: We acquired RNA sequencing data (FPKM), clinical data, and patient survival information from TATGET (https://ocg.cancer.gov/). The leukemia MILE dataset was obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database (GEO ID: GSE13159). All the above RNA-seq data are converted into TPM value using R “LIMMA” package for subsequent analysis [11].
Patients
This study collected bone marrow and peripheral blood samples were collected from 10 patients diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University. The AML patient risk classification was based on the 2022 European Leukemia Net (ELN) guidelines [12]. The human bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cell isolation kits were purchased from Solarbio (Beijing, China). For the isolation of mononuclear cells, we refer to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein and RNA were extracted from the bone marrow and peripheral blood mononuclear cells and detected by western blotting and RT-PCR, respectively. Patient details can be found in Supplemental Material, Table S1. All the antibody information is provided in Supplementary Table S2. Table S3 lists all the primers.
Differential gene analysis and prognosis analysis
Differential SENPs genes were identified between the high- and low-risk groups using the R "LIMMA" package. The cutoff value was P less than 0.05, when comparing the adverse with the intermediate and favorable prognosis groups. Survival prognosis analysis was performed by dividing the patients into two groups based on the expression of the SENPs family proteins. The R "surveyor" software package was used to find the most appropriate separation plot the survival curve, calculate the HR value, and the cutoff value P < 0.05 [13].
GO annotation, GSEA and GSVA analysis
First, based on SENP1 expression, we divided AML into two groups. Differential expression genes were identified by the "LIMMA" package. Co-expressed genes were identified using SPERMAN correlation analysis. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were used for functional analyses of GO, GSEA, and GSVA. “Enrichplot” and “GOPLOT” packages are available for GO and GSEA analysis. “GSVA” packages are used for GSVA analysis [14].
Cell transduction, plasmid construction and lentivirus production
The human cell lines HEK-293T (cat. CL-0005), HL-60 (cat. CL-0110) and THP-1 (cat. CL-0233) and NB4 (cat. CL-0676) was purchased from Pricella Life Science&Technology Co.,Ltd. KG-1 (cat. CCL-246) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, USA). Complete medium containing serum was purchased from Pricella Life Science&Technology Co.,Ltd. Lentiviral vectors that knocked down and overexpressed SENP1, HDAC2, or IGF2BP3 were purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China). The negative control vector was used. The plasmid with the lentiviral vector knocking down IGF2BP1/2 was purchased from GeneChem (Shanghai, China). pCMV-VSV-G and pCAG-dR8.9 were used to package lentiviruses. Purinomycin was used to screen for cells with stable transduction.
shSENP1#1 CAAGAAGTGCAGCTTATAATT; shSENP1#2 GCAGTGAAACGTTGGACAATT; shSENP1#3 AACTACATCTTCGTGTACCTC; shIGF2BP3#1 GCACATTTAATTCCTGGATTA; shIGF2BP3#2 GCAGGAATTGACGCTGTAT; shIGF2BP1#1 ATGTAAAGCTTGTTCATGGTG; shIGF2BP1#2 CCGGCTCCAAAGTTCGTATGGTTATCTCGAGATAACCATACGAACTTTGGAGTTTTTTG; shIGF2BP2#1 TGATTTTCCCATGCAATTCCA; shIGF2BP2#2 ACCGGTGGCAGATGAGACCAAACTATTCAAGAGATAGTTTGGTCTCATCTGCCTTTTTTGAATTC. cDNA3.1. Full-length HDAC2 and HDAC2 fragments were obtained by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using specific primers and verified by sequencing. Flag, HIS, and EGFP vectors were used to construct expression plasmids. The construction of SENP1 enzyme-inactivated mutants (R630L and K631M) was based on previous studies [15].
Cas9/CRISPR gene knockout in AML cells
The design of the small cas9 guide RNA (sgRNA) sequence was based on the website tool of Zhang's laboratory (http://crispr.mit.edu/). HL-60 or KG-1 cells were cultured in a 100 mm petri dish, and a single lentivirus with sgRNA-Cas9 plasmid was transfected. Two days after transfection, the cells were transferred into a 100 mm petri dish at a ratio of 1:4 and treated with 2 μg/ml purinomycin after 3 days. Flow cytometry was used to sort single cells for culturing. Positive clones were selected by RT-PCR and Western blotting. Cells transfected with sgRNA were selected using purinamycin, and a pool of resistant cells was used as a knockout control. sgSENP1#1 GTTATCAGGCAGTGAAACGT; sgSENP1#2, ATTAAAAACGGCTGGTTATC.
Quantitative RT–PCR
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, the PrimeScript TM RT Master Mix Kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) was used to reverse-transcribe RNA into cDNA. SYBR (ABclonal Technology Co.Ltd. China ) was used for the real-time PCR analysis. Standardized expression under control ACTIN.
Cell proliferation and apoptosis assay
Cell counting kit - 8 (APExBio, USA) was used. The protocol recommended by the manufacturer was used to determine the proliferation rate at 0, 24, 36, 48, and 72 h post-infection. The Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis detection kit (China Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) was used to confirm the level of apoptosis using flow cytometry (FCM) analysis.
Immunoblot assay
A total protein extraction kit (Beyotime, China) was used to extract total protein from cultured cells. Proteins were separated using SDS-PAGE, which was then transferred to a PVDF membrane (0.45 um hole, Millipore). The bands were blocked with 5% skimmed milk powder for 1 h. The membranes were then incubated with primary antibodies overnight. TBST buffer washed the bands 3 times for 5 min each. Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-coupled anti-mouse or rabbit secondary antibodies were used for ECL detection.
EDU Cell Proliferation assay
The cells from each group were cultured in six-well plates. The cells were allowed to grow to 70% confluence, EDU was added at a 10M concentration, and incubated for 4 h. The cells were then fixed in paraformaldehyde. 0.3% Triton X-100–permeable cells. Finally, the EDU-positive cells were detected using flow cytometry. FlowJo_V10 was used for flow analysis.
Tumor xenograft model and tail vein injection mouse model
All animal experimentation methods employed in this study were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Chongqing Medical University. 4 weeks old male BALB/c Nude Mice (18–22 g) were purchased from Vital River (Beijing, China) and fed in an specific-pathogen-free (SPF) grade animal house. Nude mice were subcutaneously injected with a 1:1 mixture of Matrigel (BD356234; Corning, USA) and HL-60 cell suspension (1 × 107 cells). The mice were sacrificed, and the subcutaneous tumor was completely removed when the tumor grew to a certain size. Tumor volume was calculated as follows: (longest diameter) × (shortest diameter) 2 × (π/6).
Cell cycle
The cells were fixed overnight in 75% ethanol at 37 °C. On day two, the fixed solution was washed with PBS and 500μL of cell cycle detection working solution (RNase:PI= 1:9) was added. Flow cytometry was used to detect cell cycle distribution.
Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence staining in AML
An immunohistochemistry kit was purchased from Boster Biological Technology Co.,Ltd. Hematoxylin staining solution was purchased from Solarbio. Immunohistochemistry was performed as previously described [4]. Briefly, mouse subcutaneous tumor tissue was embedded in paraffin and made into paraffin sectioned. The IRS immunohistochemical score was used as the immunohistochemistry score, and the staining depth of the entire tumor tissue was evaluated under low magnification. IRS=SI (Positive Intensity) × PP (positive cell ratio), SI can be divided into four levels, with no positive staining at level 0, weak positive in light yellow at level 1, medium positive in brown at level 2, and strong positive in brown at level 3. PP can be divided into five levels, with 0% to 5% for Level 0, 6% to 25% for Level 1, 26% to 50% for Level 2, 51% to 75% for Level 3, and>75% for Level 4. Immunofluorescence co-staining was performed as previously described [16]. Briefly, co-staining was performed using multiple immunofluorescence kits (Servicebio, China). The corresponding secondary antibodies were CY3-TSA and FITC-TSA (G1222, Servicebio). DAPI was used to visualize the nuclei.
mRNA life-time experiment
AML cells were treated with actinomycin, total RNA was extracted at 0, 3, and 6 h, and the abundance of SENP1 mRNA was detected.
RNA pull down
An RNA probe with biotin-labeled m6A and guanine bases was synthesized. The RNA probe was co-incubated with streptomycin affinity magnetic beads, and the complex was co-incubated with the protein supernatant. The incubated magnetic beads were washed five times with IP washing buffer for 5 times, an elution time of 2 min. Protein samples were denatured with SDS buffer and analyzed by western blotting.
HDAC2 activity assay
First, the nuclear extract was prepared using EpiQuickTM Nuclear Extraction Kit I (Epigentek, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Nuclear extracts can be immediately used to detect HDAC activity. HDAC2 activity of each sample was analyzed using the EpiQuickTM HDAC2 Activity Assay Kit (Epigentek, USA). This detection kit contains seven different components, from HB1 to HB7. HB1 was diluted to the working concentration in distilled water. The protein concentration to 2μg/μL using HB2. For the control, 5 μL HB2. Add 150 μL HB3 incubate at 37 °C for 40 min. Each well was extracted, washed with diluted HB1 and HB4, and incubated at room temperature for 60 min. Each well was cleaned, diluted HB5 was added, and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Each well was cleaned, and 100 μL HB6 was added and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Then, 50 μL HB7 was added to each well, and the absorbance was read at 450 nm on a microplate reader.
Tunel staining
Under the action of deoxyribonucleotide terminal transferase (TdT), the derivatives formed by deoxyribonucleotide and biotin (FITC) are labeled at the 3 'end of the DNA to detect apoptotic cells.
Co-immunoprecipitation (CO-IP), RIP and Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (Chip)
Cells (1 × 107) were used for CO-IP, and cell lysates (RIPA) were used to lyse total cells. Incubate the antibody with A/G magnetic beads at room temperature for 1.5 hours, washed with PBS three times, and co-incubated the cell lysate and antibody complex at 4 ℃ overnight. On the second day, after three times of PBS cleaning, SDS denatured and extracted the proteins. The SUMO probe references Shangguan X 7. Briefly, plasmids (flag-HDAC2, UBE2, His-SUMO1, and EGFP-SENP1) were transfected into HEK-293T cells, and the formation of the SUMO1-HDAC2 complex was detected using CO-IP. Chip-qPCR was performed as previous literature [17, 18]. The RIP assay was performed according to the instructions of the RIP Kit (Guangzhou, China). Briefly, magnetic beads were mixed with anti-M6A /IGF2BP3/IgG antibodies before adding cell lysate. The bound complexes were thoroughly cleaned, eluded, purified, and analyzed by RT-PCR. The enrichment of the precipitated RNA was normalized relative to the input control. RT-PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis to visualize the results.
RNA Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)
The RNA fish assay procedure has been described in our previous studies [19]. Briefly, the cells were placed on a polylysine-coated cover slide, fixed with formaldehyde, and permeabilized. Cells were incubated overnight with a specific SENP1 RNA probe working solution. They were washed with the washing solution three times, IGF2BP3 protein was labeled by immunofluorescence, and colocalization was detected using laser confocal detection.
Dual luciferase assay
The HEK-293T cells were inoculated into 24-well plates and incubated until they reached 70% confluence. Then 0.75μg pGL3-basic-SENP1 3-UTR wt or pGL3-basic-SENP1 3-UTR mut luciferase reporter and 0.25 μg IGF2BP3 expression plasmid or empty vector were used. The luciferase activity was measured after 48h of incubation. The activity of the pGL3-basic-SENP1 3-UTR luciferase reporter gene was normalized to that of the pRL-TK luciferase reporter gene, and compared between IGF2BP3 overexpressed cells and cells transfected with empty vectors.
Statistical analysis
To compare non-normalized quantitative data between the two groups that followed a normal distribution, we used the Student’s t-test. The statistical test of two groups of non-normalized quantitative data that do not conform to a normal distribution is adopted by a non-parametric test. Single sample t and Wilcoxon tests were used to compare the normalized quantitative data between the two groups. Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for the survival analysis. One-way analysis of variance was used for pairwise comparisons between multiple groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05, and all statistical tests were bilateral unless otherwise specified. * P<0.05; ** P<0.01; *** P<0.001; ns, not significant. All statistical data were analyzed using R software version 4.4.10, and PRISM 8.0.
Results
High-throughput library screening identifies the expression patterns, prognostic significance, and clinical correlation of SENP1
To comprehensively investigate the role of SENPs (SENP1-3 and SENP5-8) family proteins in AML, we analyzed the expression pattern and survival significance by investigating publicly available OHSU-AML datasets (Table S4). We found that SENP1 and SENP2 were highly expressed in the high-risk AML group and closely related to poor prognosis (Fig. 1A, B, and S1A ). We explored the TARGET dataset for prognostic analysis to avoid errors in single-center sample datasets. We found that both SENP1 and SENP2 were strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes (Fig. 1C and S1B). SENP1, however, is more clinically relevant. Therefore, we focus on SENP1's role in AML in this study. In the TCGA-AML dataset, SENP1 was associated with poor prognosis (Fig. 1D). Pan cancer analysis showed that tumor patients with SENP1 high expression had a shorter survival period (HR=1.2, P<0.001) than those with low SENP1 (Fig. 1E). These results suggest that SENP1 is a key molecule in AML pathology.
Subsequently, we analyzed the correlation between SENP1 expression and clinical features of patients with AML. We found that SENP1 expression was the highest in AML patients with P53 mutation (Figure.S2A). SENP1 expression did not significantly correlate with patient age (Figure.S2B). TP53 mutations have been identified by the 2022 ELN guidelines as markers of poor AML prognosis. Exploring the MILE dataset, a large dataset of AML showed no significant difference in the expression of SENP1 in bone marrow mononuclear cells of normal and AML patients (Figure.S2C); however, we found that SENP1 mRNA expression was significantly upregulated in AML patients with adverse prognosis (Figure.S2D). In addition, exploring the BLOODSPOT database, we found that the expression level of SENP1 in AML with adverse prognosis karyotypes, such as complex karyotypes, was significantly higher than that in AML with favorable prognosis karyotypes, such as t(15,17) (Fig. 1F) [20]. Furthermore, we found that the expression of SENP1 mRNA and protein was significantly higher in AML patients with poor prognosis than in AML patients with favorable prognosis (Fig. 1G-J). Clinical correlation analysis found that patients with high SENP1 expression had lower BM BLASTS (65.96 vs 53.26, P=0.0002), more M1 type (1 vs. 7, P=0.0015), and fewer M4 type (22 vs. 3, P=0.0026) (Table 1). Univariate and multivariate COX regression analyses suggested that SENP1 was an independent risk factor for AML (hazard ratio [HR] =1.03, P=0.03) (Table 2). These data support an important role for SENP1 in AML development.
Subsequent pan-cancer analysis showed that SENP1 was most highly expressed in AML among all TCGA tumors (Figure.S2E). Differential gene analysis revealed that SENP1 is differentially expressed in multiple malignancies, such as BRCA and BLCA (Figure.S2F), and is closely associated with poor prognosis in malignant tumors, such as LIHC and KIRP (Figure.S2G). These data support SENP1's potential role in promoting malignancy progression.
Knockdown of SENP1 significantly inhibits AML progression in vitro and in vivo
Next, we verified SENP1's potential role in AML using in vitro and in vivo experiments. We measured SENP1 expression in four classical AML cell lines. We found that SENP1 was highly expressed in HL-60 and KG-1, and low in THP-1 and NB4 (Figure.S3A). This may be because KG-1 cells have complex karyotypes and HL-60 cells have P53 mutations. We used three independent lentivirus sequences to interfere with SENP1 expression in AML cells (HL-60 and KG-1) and found that the first and third sequences were effective in interfering with SENP1 expression (Figure.S3B). Using the CCK8 cell proliferation assay, we found that AML cell proliferation was significantly reduced after SENP1 silencing (Fig. 2A). The cell cycle assay showed that AML cells were blocked in the S1 phase after silencing of SENP1 (Fig. 2B). The EDU probe showed that the AML cell proliferation rate decreased after SENP1 silencing (Fig. 2C). The apoptosis rate were markedly increased after SENP1 silencing (Fig. 2D). Western blotting also showed that after silencing SENP1, the expression of anti-apoptosis protein (Bcl-2), proliferation protein (PCNA, C-MYC), and S phase checkpoint (CyclinA1 and CDK2) in AML cells was downregulated, and pro-apoptosis markers (Cleaved Caspase-3) were elevated (Fig. 2E). Next, we used two independent sgRNA sequences to knock out SENP1 in HL-60 and KG-1(Figure.S4A and S4B). CCK8 assay showed that the proliferation rate of AML cells decreased significantly after SENP1 knockout (Figure.S4C). The EDU probe showed that the AML cell proliferation rate decreased after SENP1 knockout (Figure.S4D). The apoptosis rate were markedly increased after SENP1 knockout (Figure.S4E). Cell cycle analysis showed that after SENP1 knockout, AML cells were blocked in S1 phase (Figure.S4F).
Subcutaneous tumorigenesis experiments in nude mice showed that SENP1 promoted AML cell proliferation in vivo (Fig. 2F, 2G, and S5A). Immunohistochemical results showed that the subcutaneous tumor proliferation marker KI67 decreased after SENP1 was silenced (Fig. 2H). Immunofluorescence showed that after SENP1 silencing, the abundance of proliferating PCNA protein in the subcutaneous tumors decreased (Figure.S5B). Immunofluorescence also showed that after SENP1 silencing, the expression of anti-apoptotic markers (Bcl-2) in subcutaneous tumors decreased (Figure.S5B). TUNEL staining revealed an increase in apoptosis in the silent SENP1 group (Fig. 2I). Western blotting also showed that after silencing of SENP1, PCNA expression was downregulated (Figure.S5C).
Overexpression of SENP1 promoted the proliferation and anti-apoptosis of AML
Next, we overexpressed SENP1 in THP-1 and NB4 cells (Fig. 3A). CCK8 assay showed that overexpression of SENP1 promoted AML cell proliferation (Fig. 3B and C). EDU showed an increased the proliferation rate of AML cells after increasing SENP1 expression (Fig. 3D). The apoptosis rate of AML cells was markedly reduced by increasing SENP1 expression (Fig. 3E). Western blotting showed that the expression of anti-apoptotic proteins (BCL-2) and proliferative proteins (PCNA) was upregulated, and the expression of pro-apoptotic protein (cleaved caspase-3) was downregulated after overexpression of SENP1 (Fig. 3F).
We aimed to determine whether SENP1 regulates AML progression in a sumo enzyme-dependent manner. We overexpressed two SENP1 enzyme-inactivated mutants (R630L and K631M) in AML cells (Figure.S3A). CCK8, EDU, and cell cycle assays showed that the SENP1 mutant did not affect AML cell growth (Figure.S6B-E).
SENP1 promotes AML progression through AKT signaling pathway
Next, we investigated the mechanism by which SENP1 regulates AML progression. To predict the downstream signaling pathways of SENP1, we conducted differential gene analysis based on SENP1 expression and identified 4746 DEGs between high-SENP1 and low-SENP1 expression groups. GO annotation was performed on 4746 DEGs (Figure.S7A and Table.S5). GO annotation showed that these genes were related to biological processes, such as mitotic division, nuclear division, and regulation of cell proliferation (Figure.S7B). GSEA and GSVA were performed on 4746 DEGs (Figure.S7C and S7D, Tables S6 and S7). The intersection of the GSEA and GSVA results was used to avoid errors caused by a single analysis method. These identified common signaling pathways, such as the adherent junction, cell cycle, and AKT/mTOR signaling pathways (Figure.S7E). Abnormal activation of the AKT/mTOR signaling pathway has been identified as a key feature of AML progression [21].
We then examined the changes in the expression of key molecules (p-AKT, p-mTOR, YAP1, p-P65, and β-catenin), which AML common signaling pathways in AML, after SENP1 knockdown. We found that AKT/mTOR signaling was significantly downregulated after SENP1 silencing (Fig. 4A). Next, we used the previous subcutaneous tumor tissue sections for double-fluorescence labeling. We found that silencing SENP1 significantly weakened AKT and mTOR phosphorylation (Fig. 4B). Addition of the AKT activator SC-79 restored the effect of SENP1 silencing on the expression of AML cell proliferation and apoptosis markers (Fig. 4C). CCK8 and apoptosis flow probes showed that SC-79 reversed the effect of SENP1 interference on AML cell proliferation and apoptosis (Fig. 4D and E).
SENP1 regulates HDAC2 activity in a sumo-dependent manner
To further investigate the mechanism by which SENP1 activates AKT signaling, we excavated the BioGRID database and conducted protein-protein interaction network analysis (PPI analysis) [22]. Interestingly, we observed potential interactions between HDAC2 and SENP1 (Fig. 5A). HDAC2 was also located in the central region of the network, suggesting that it may play a crucial role in SENP1 function. Studies have reported that sumo1 modification of HDAC2 may inhibit HDAC2 function [23]. HDAC2 plays a key role in AKT activation by transcriptionally activating EGFR expression [17]. Importantly, HDAC2 has also been proven to be a critical regulatory molecule in AML development [18]. The CO-IP assay revealed that SENP1 was combined with HDAC2 (Fig. 5B). Fluorescence colocalization showed that SENP1 and HDAC2 were partially colocalized in the AML nucleus (Fig. 5C). We identified a large number of sumo modification sites in HDAC2 using the GPS SUMO database (Fig. 5D). The SUMO probe showed that after overexpression of SENP1, HDAC2 sumo modification was suppressed (Fig. 5E). HDAC2 has both deacetylase and non-deacetylase protein domains, and SENP1 mainly binds to the HDAC2 deacetylase protein domain (Fig. 5F). These data support the regulation of HDAC2 deacetylase activity by SENP1 in a sumo enzyme–dependent manner. We found that silencing SENP1 did not affect HDAC2 expression but significantly reduced HDAC2 activity (Figure.S8A and 5G).
HDAC2 mediates SENP1 to regulate AKT-mTOR signaling in AML
By exploring the Cistrome DB database, we found that HDAC2 has peak enrichment in the EGFR promoter based on a previous ChIP-seq dataset (Fig. 6A) [24]. After silencing of SENP1, the ability of HDAC2 to bind to the EGFR promoter decreased (Fig. 6B). Overexpression of HDAC2 partially restored the effect of silencing SENP1 on EGFR, AKT phosphorylation signaling, and anti-apoptosis-related markers in AML cells (Fig. 6C and S9A). CCK8 experiments showed that overexpression of HDAC2 partially restored the silencing effect of SENP1 on AML cell proliferation (Fig. 6D). In the subcutaneous tumor experiment in nude mice, overexpression of HDAC2 promoted AML growth in vivo (Fig. 6E). Immunohistochemistry suggested overexpression of HADC2, enhancing KI67, EGFR, and p-AKT, and reducing apoptosis proteins (cleaved caspase-3) (Fig. 6F). TUNEL staining showed that HDAC2 overexpression reduced apoptosis (Fig. 6G). These results suggest that SENP1 activates the AKT pathway and promotes AML progression, at least in part dependent on HDAC2.
SENP1, which is regulated by IGF2BP3 mediated m6A, is highly expressed in high-risk groups of AML
Next, we explored the upstream regulatory mechanism of SENP1 in high-risk AML patients. In our previous study, we found that m6A is abnormally modified in the high-risk group of AML and systematically analyzed that the m6A reading protein IGF2BP3 is highly expressed in high-risk groups of AML and promotes AML development [4]. Therefore, we speculated that m6A may participate in SENP1 regulation in AML. By exploring the RM2Target database, we found that 14 RNA m6A regulators could potentially regulate SENP1 [25]. In order to screen the core factors, we conducted differential gene analysis between high-risk and low-risk AML groups and found that only YTHDF1, IGF2BP3, and FTO were significantly different (Figure.S10A). Survival analysis based on the TARGET and TCGA databases revealed that only IGF2BP3 was positively associated with poor prognosis in AML and pan-cancer patients (Figure.S10B-D). Correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between IGF2BP3 and SENP1 expression (Figure.S10E and S10F). These findings suggest that IGF2BP3 is a key regulator of SENP1 expression. To determine the binding mechanism between IGF2BP3 and SENP1, we searched the RMVar database. The results showed that IGF2BP3 has the potential to bind to the SENP1 mRNA 3-UTR region (Fig. 7A) [26]. We found that SENP1 protein and mRNA levels decreased significantly after silencing IGF2BP3 (Fig. 7B-D). It is known that the IGF2BP1/2/3 protein family can bind m6A and contribute to the regulation of mRNA stability, so what role does IGF2BP1/2 play when it comes to SENP1. The results showed that silencing IGF2BP1/2 did not affect the regulation of SENP1 expression (Figure.S10G and S10H). These results suggested that SENP1 is specifically regulated by IGF2BP3.
Immunofluorescence combined with FISH revealed a large amount of colocalization of SENP1 mRNA and IGF2BP3 protein in AML cells (Fig. 7E). RIP experiments confirmed that IGF2BP3 and m6A could bind to the 3-UTR region of SENP1 mRNA (Fig. 7F and G). RNA PULL DOWN experiments also showed that IGF2BP3 binds to SENP1 mRNA in an m6A-dependent manner (Fig. 7H). mRNA half-life experiments showed that after silencing IGF2BP3, SENP1 mRNA decay accelerated (Fig. 7I). Mutation at the m6A site predicted by the aforementioned database and a double luciferase assay revealed that IGF2BP3 does not regulate mut-SENP1 (Fig. 7J).
SENP1 mediates IGF2BP3's ability to regulate AKT/mTOR pathway activity and AML proliferation and anti-apoptosis
Next, we explored the role of SENP1 in IGF2BP3 regulated AML progression and signaling pathways. By re-analyzing our previous RNA-seq data of IGF2BP3 silencing in HL-60 [4], we found that IGF2BP3 function was significantly enriched in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway (Figure.S11A). Finally, we found that after silencing IGF2BP3, the expression of SENP1 and the activity of the AKT/mTOR pathway were significantly reduced (Fig. 8A and B). Functional recovery experiments showed that overexpression of SENP1 could reverse the effect of silencing IGF2BP3 on the proliferation, anti-apoptosis, and AKT pathway activities of AML cells (Fig. 8C-F).
Discussion
Although great progress has been made in chemotherapy and radiotherapy, because of the lack of sensitive and specific diagnostic biomarkers and common drug resistance, the overall prognosis of AML patients has not improved significantly [27]. Therefore, it is necessary to define an effective evaluation marker to accurately predict tumor progression and survival as well as the treatment response of patients with AML. In this study, we found that AML was a suitable candidate for anti-SENP1. In vitro and in vivo experiments were performed to verify SENP1's specific role in AML.
At present, AML with an adverse prognosis is the main challenge for clinical AML treatment [27]. Although exploring the largest online AML dataset, including normal samples, we found that the differential expression of SENP1 was not significant in AML and healthy bone marrow. A large number of studies have found that many non-differential genes play an important role in the development of AML. For example, Katharina et al. found that RPS6KA1 is not differentially expressed in AML and normal human bone marrow, but it is one of the essential genes in AML [28]. Our analysis found that SENP1 was highly expressed in the AML with adverse effects group and was positively correlated with shortened patient survival time. SENP1 high expression group was also accompanied by more P53 mutations. According to the latest ELN guidelines, the P53 mutation is a marker of poor prognosis in AML. We further mined the BLOODSPOT database and found that karyotypes with poor prognosis had higher SENP1 expression. Moreover, in clinical correlation analysis, we found that SENP1 was more highly expressed in M1 type AML and less expressed in M4 type AML, and studies showed that M1 type AML had a poor prognosis [29]. Together, these data support the pivotal role of SENP1 in the malignant progression of AML.
Abnormal transmission of signaling pathways is one of the basic pathological mechanisms of AML. Recent studies have mapped the genome in large AML cohorts and found mutations in more than 60% of AML patients that confer abnormal "carcinogenic" activation, such as the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, particularly in high-risk groups of AML patients [30]. Using the joint analysis of GSVA, GSEA, and PPI, we found that SENP1 is closely related to the AKT signaling pathway. The AKT signaling pathway can activate mTOR, which plays an important role in survival, death fate, drug resistance and stemness [30]. Energy metabolic reprogramming is a central feature of tumors. Recent studies have found that the AKT signaling pathway is closely related to tumor metabolism, and AKT can promote tumor cell glycolysis by activating MYC. Studies have also found that AML proliferation in vivo depends on glycolysis for energy supply [31]. Interestingly, previous studies have also reported that SENP1 enhances tumor cell glycolysis [7]. Next, we detected AML-related signaling pathway changes after interference with SENP1 expression. These results indicated that AKT/mTOR signaling is one of the most altered signaling pathways after silencing SENP1 expression.
SENP1 plays a role by influences the modification status of proteins and regulates downstream protein functional status or protein abundance. However, the downstream targets of SENP1 in AML remains unclear [32]. By exploring the bioGRID database and combining it with STRING analysis, we found that HDAC2 might be an important downstream target of SENP1. HDAC2 has been reported to have tumor-promoting properties in various malignancies, such as AML. HDAC2 has also been shown to transcriptionally activate EGFR and enhance AKT signaling. Previous studies have confirmed that sumo modifies HDAC2, which disturbs its transcriptional activity [17, 23]. Studies have confirmed the presence of more than 10 proven sumo sites for HDAC2 [33]. In this study, through sumo assays, we found that SENP1 affected HDAC2 sumo modifications. We found that SENP1 binds to the HDAC2 deacetylase protein domain. The HDAC2 active probe and Chip-qPCR probe showed that SENP1 increased HDAC2 transcriptional activity on EGFR. Therefore, we suggest that HDAC2 is a key mediator of SENP1 in the regulation of AKT signalling. A large number of studies have supported that m6A is abnormally modified in various malignant tumors, such as leukemia, and is involved in various signaling pathways, including AKT [34].
m6A is a novel RNA modification that has attracted considerable attention in recent years [35]. m6A has been reported to play a key role in tumor proliferation, death programming, microenvironment shaping, stemness maintenance, etc.. m6A may be a potential tumor treatment strategy due to its high plasticity [36]. For example, ALKBH5 has been reported to be involved in liver cancer development and immune microenvironment shaping, and IGF2BP3 promotes AML progression and stemness maintenance [19, 37]. In addition, m6A, as a post-transcriptional modification, has also been reported to interact with other modifications, such as histone methylation modification and ubiquitination, to promote tumor progression, and understanding its internal regulatory mechanism can further help us understand the regulatory network of tumors, such as AML [38]. The relationship between m6A and sumo modification and its potential role in AML require in-depth understanding. Consistent with previous reports that m6A mainly exists in 3-UTR and 5-UTR regions, we also found that SENP1 has m6A modification in 3-UTR. m6A modification in the 3-UTR mainly affects mRNA stability. IGF2BP3 promotes the stability of target mRNA by binding to m6A sites. We found that IGF2BP3 can promote the expression SENP1 via m6A modification. Furthermore, we analyzed our previous RNA-seq data from intervening IGF2BP3 in AML and found that the function of IGF2BP3 is enriched in the AKT/mTOR pathway [4]. Overexpression of SENP1 reversed the effect of silencing IGF2BP3 on the AKT pathway. Together, these results support our proposal of a novel mechanism by which IGF2BP3 drives SENP1 to activate AKT in an m6A dependent manner to promote AML. We also provided a new perspective on the relationship between m6A and sumo modifications.
This study also had some limitations. As there are more than 20 predicted and verified sumo sites on HDAC2, we did not look for a specific HDAC2 sumo site regulated by SENP1. However, we verified through various experiments that SENP1 binds to the HDAC2 deacetylase protein domain, supporting SENP1's influence on HDAC2 enzyme activity rather than protein expression. In addition, the effects of SENP1 on AML energy metabolism and the tumor microenvironment need to be further studied.
In conclusion, we have provided a broad perspective on the role of SENP1 in AML progression. Next, we explored the direct regulatory mechanisms of SENP1 upstream and downstream using in vivo and in vitro AML models, and proposed that SENP1 is driven by IGF2BP3 in m6A mode and activates AKT signaling via HDAC2 to promote AML progression (Fig. 8G).
Availability of data and materials
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Abbreviations
- AML:
-
Acute myeloid leukemia
- SUMO:
-
Small ubiquitin-like modifier
- GSEA:
-
Gene set enrichment analysis
- GSVA:
-
Gene set variation analysis
- ELN:
-
European Leukemia Net guidelines
- FISH:
-
Fluorescence in situ hybridization
- DEGs:
-
Differentially expressed genes
- OHSU:
-
Oregon Health and Science University
References
Deng D, Liu F, Liu Z, et al. Robust pyroptosis risk score guides the treatment options and predicts the prognosis of bladder carcinoma. Front Immunol. 2022;13:965469.
Daver N, Schlenk RF, Russell NH, Levis MJ. Targeting FLT3 mutations in AML: review of current knowledge and evidence. Leukemia. 2019;33(2):299–312.
Park SS, Baek KH. Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Related Proteins Modified by Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-like Proteins. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(1):514.
Zhang N, Shen Y, Li H, et al. The m6A reader IGF2BP3 promotes acute myeloid leukemia progression by enhancing RCC2 stability. Exp Mol Med. 2022;54(2):194–205.
Gâtel P, Brockly F, Reynes C, Pastore M, Hicheri Y, Cartron G, et al. Ubiquitin and SUMO conjugation as biomarkers of acute myeloid leukemias response to chemotherapies. Life Sci Alliance. 2020;3(6):e201900577.
Kunadis E, Lakiotaki E, Korkolopoulou P, Piperi C. Targeting post-translational histone modifying enzymes in glioblastoma. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;220:107721.
Shangguan X, He J, Ma Z, et al. SUMOylation controls the binding of hexokinase 2 to mitochondria and protects against prostate cancer tumorigenesis. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1812.
Hu Z, Teng XL, Zhang T, et al. SENP3 senses oxidative stress to facilitate STING-dependent dendritic cell antitumor function. Mol Cell. 2021;81(5):940-952.e5.
Zaidan NZ, Walker KJ, Brown JE, et al. Compartmentalization of HP1 Proteins in Pluripotency Acquisition and Maintenance. Stem Cell Rep. 2018;10(2):627–41.
Zhang X, Zhang X, Li X, Lv Y, Zhu Y, Wang J, et al. The specific distribution pattern of IKZF1 mutation in acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2020;13:140.
Liu S, Wang Z, Zhu R, Wang F, Cheng Y, Liu Y. Three Differential Expression Analysis Methods for RNA Sequencing: limma, EdgeR, DESeq2. J Vis Exp. 2021;18(175). https://doi.org/10.3791/62528.
Shimony S, Stahl M, Stone RM. Acute myeloid leukemia: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023;98:502–26.
Olson ND, Shah N, Kancherla J, Wagner J, Paulson JN, Corrada Bravo H. metagenomeFeatures: an R package for working with 16S rRNA reference databases and marker-gene survey feature data. Bioinformatics. 2019;35:3870–2.
Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D605–12.
Deng R, et al. Shp2 SUMOylation promotes ERK activation and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Oncotarget. 2015;6:9355–69.
Wang J, Sun J, Liu LN, et al. Siglec-15 as an immune suppressor and potential target for normalization cancer immunotherapy. Nat Med. 2019;25(4):656–66.
Noh JH, Bae HJ, Eun JW, Shen Q, Park SJ, Kim HS, Nam B, Shin WC, Lee EK, Lee K, et al. HDAC2 provides a critical support to malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma through feedback control of mTORC1 and AKT. Cancer Res. 2014;74:1728–38.
Gu S, Hou Y, Dovat K, Dovat S, Song C, Ge Z. Synergistic effect of HDAC inhibitor Chidamide with Cladribine on cell cycle arrest and apoptosis by targeting HDAC2/c-Myc/RCC1 axis in acute myeloid leukemia. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2023;12:23.
You Y, et al. ALKBH5/MAP3K8 axis regulates PD-L1+ macrophage infiltration and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Int J Biol Sci. 2022;18:5001–18.
Bagger, F. O., Kinalis, S. & Rapin, N. BloodSpot: a database of healthy and malignant haematopoiesis updated with purified and single cell mRNA sequencing profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47, D881-881D885.
Rodrigues A, Costa R, Silva S, Dias I, Dias RB, Bezerra DP. Cell signaling pathways as molecular targets to eliminate AML stem cells. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;160:103277.
Oughtred R, Rust J, Chang C, Breitkreutz BJ, Stark C, Willems A, Boucher L, Leung G, Kolas N, Zhang F, et al. The BioGRID database: A comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci. 2021;30:187–200.
Song Y, Chi DY, Yu P, Lu JJ, Xu JR, Tan PP, Wang B, Cui YY, Chen HZ. Carbocisteine Improves Histone Deacetylase 2 Deacetylation Activity via Regulating Sumoylation of Histone Deacetylase 2 in Human Tracheobronchial Epithelial Cells. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:166.
Zheng, R. et al. Cistrome Data Browser: expanded datasets and new tools for gene regulatory analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019; 47, D729-729D735.
Bao, X. et al. RM2Target: a comprehensive database for targets of writers, erasers and readers of RNA modifications. Nucleic Acids Res.2023; 51, D269-269D279.
Luo, X. et al. RMVar: an updated database of functional variants involved in RNA modifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021l 49: D1405-1405D1412.
Patnaik MM, Tefferi A. Myelodysplastic syndromes with ring sideroblasts (MDS-RS) and MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm with RS and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) - “2021 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.” Am J Hematol. 2021;96(3):379–94.
Weidenauer K, et al. The ribosomal protein S6 kinase alpha-1 (RPS6KA1) induces resistance to venetoclax/azacitidine in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2023;37:1611–25.
Douet-Guilbert N, et al. Acute myeloid leukaemia (FAB AML-M4Eo) with cryptic insertion of cbfb resulting in cbfb-Myh11 fusion. Hematol Oncol. 2017;35:385–9.
Estruch, M., Vittori, C., Montesinos, T. M., Reckzeh, K. & Theilgaard-Mönch, K. Targeting of PI3K/AKT signaling and DNA damage response in acute myeloid leukemia: a novel therapeutic strategy to boost chemotherapy response and overcome resistance. Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.). 2021; 4: 984-995.
Uhl FM, Chen S, O'Sullivan D, Edwards-Hicks J, Richter G, Haring E, et al. Metabolic reprogramming of donor T cells enhances graft-versus-leukemia effects in mice and humans. Sci Transl Med. 2020;12(567):eabb8969.
Wei M, Huang X, Liao L, Tian Y, Zheng X. SENP1 Decreases RNF168 Phase Separation to Promote DNA Damage Repair and Drug Resistance in Colon Cancer. Cancer Res. 2023;83:2908–23.
Zhao Q, et al. GPS-SUMO: a tool for the prediction of sumoylation sites and SUMO-interaction motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W325-330.
Lin K, et al. m6A eraser FTO impairs gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer through influencing NEDD4 mRNA stability by regulating the PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2023;42:217.
Li J, Zou C, Zhang Z, Xue F. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) reader YTHDF2 accelerates endothelial cells ferroptosis in cerebrovascular atherosclerosis. Mol Cell Biochem. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-023-04858-1.
Wang JJ, et al. Elevated expression of the RNA-binding protein IGF2BP1 enhances the mRNA stability of INHBA to promote the invasion and migration of esophageal squamous cancer cells. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2023;12:75.
Shao YL, et al. HIF1α-mediated transactivation of WTAP promotes AML cell proliferation via m6A-dependent stabilization of KDM4B mRNA. Leukemia. 2023;37:1254–67.
Qi YN, Liu Z, Hong LL, Li P, Ling ZQ. Methyltransferase-like proteins in cancer biology and potential therapeutic targeting. J Hematol Oncol. 2023;16:89.
Acknowledgements
No.
Funding
This study was sponsored by the Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, China Grant No. 2021jcyj-msxmX0064; the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing, No. CSTB2023NSCQ-LZX0052.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Diguang Wen designed and supervised the study. Diguang Wen performed most of the analyses and experiments, and wrote the manuscript. Hanqing Zeng, Hang Xiao, and Yueyi Gao participated in article revision. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Jianchuan Deng and Hanqing Zeng are guarantors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The acquisition of human tissue and its subsequent use were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, and informed consent of the patient/family was obtained. The animal study protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Chongqing Medical University. The study was conducted in accordance with local legislation and institutional requirements.
Consent for publication
All authors agree to publish.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Wen, D., Xiao, H., Gao, Y. et al. N6-methyladenosine-modified SENP1, identified by IGF2BP3, is a novel molecular marker in acute myeloid leukemia and aggravates progression by activating AKT signal via de-SUMOylating HDAC2. Mol Cancer 23, 116 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-02013-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-024-02013-y