Background

Drug addictions are chronic complex diseases that featured by repetitive and irresistible consumption of certain drugs that lead to temporary euphoria. Subsequently, the addict will encounter tolerance, craving, and relapse as a result of neurological changes [1]. Up to 5% of the adults worldwide have been reported as drug abusers in (2010), drug addiction burden both society and individual’s life in many aspects including physical, mental, and social aspects. Moreover, over 200 thousand deaths annually are recording due to drug addiction [2]. Addiction has been linked to environmental factors together with the genetic one [3]. Inspecting the role of genetic variations in the etiology of the addiction may improve response to the treatments and help in disease prevention [4, 5]. Both genome-wide methods and candidate gene studies, looking for the underlying role of the genetic factor in drug addiction by identification of genes that are crucial to neuroadaptation [6].

Opioid receptors (OPR) are part of the opioid system and responsible for mediating drug reward and addiction. These receptors in the nervous system attached to substances and induce a series of chemical reactions that lead to pain relief [7]. The OPRM1 gene located on chromosome number 6 and encode for endogenous G protein-coupled mu-opioid receptors [8, 9]. The OPRM1 is one of the most studied genes regarding drug addiction and several genetic variants within the gene were significantly implicated with drug addiction. (rs1799971) SNP of the OPRM1 gene has been extensively investigated in association with drug addiction in different ethnic groups including Caucasian [10] European American, African American [11], German [12], and Japanese [13].

In addition, the OPRD1 and OPRK1 genes encode for the δ-opioid receptor (DOR) and κ-opioid receptor (KOR) respectively are also belong to the opioid system. The OPRD1gene located on chromosome 1, while the OPRK1 gene located on chromosome 8 [14]. Activation of the μ-opioid receptor and δ-opioid receptor mediate drug rewarding DOR has been assigned as mood regulator for anxiety and depression [15]. Within the OPRD1 gene, both rs1042114 (G80T) and rs2234918 (T921C) have been in the spotlight for association with drug addiction. The latter SNP found to be correlated with heroin addiction in a German population [16]. Furthermore, the two intronic SNPs (rs2236857 and rs581111) within the OPRD1 gene found to be linked with heroin addiction risk [17].

Areas κ-opioid receptor activation is associated with increases in both physical and psychological stress responses. Genetic polymorphisms of the OPRK1 gene have been previously studied in association with substances [18]. In this study, we investigated the genetic susceptibility of three OPR genes (OPRM1, OPRD1 and OPRK1) to drug addiction among Jordanian males by screening and analyzing 29 candidate SNPs.

Methods

Participants

The study cohort consisted of 498 drug addicts selected depending on drug addiction criteria according to the Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) criteria [19]. All participants were males from Jordanian and were hospitalized in 2018 for 8 months in the National Centre for Rehabilitation of Addicts (NCRA) of the ministry of health in Jordanian and the Drug Rehabilitation Centre of the Jordanian Public Security Directorate (DRC-PSD). In addition, 496 healthy Jordanian male subjects with no history of drug addiction or psychiatric disorders were chosen as controls. Clinical data and structured questionnaires were collected according to the Human Ethics Committee of the Jordanian Ministry of Health (MOH/REC/180057), and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Jordan University of Science and Technology (43/114/2018). Patients who meet the inclusion criteria and had none of the exclusion criteria were interviewed, had the study objectives explained to them, and were asked to sign a consent form to participate in the study. Required written informed consent has been also obtained from all participants. All methods of the current study were performed in accordance with the IRB guidelines and regulations. Finally, all data was coded and no specific individual was identified.

SNPs selection

In this study, the 29 SNPs of three OPR genes (OPRM1, OPRD1, and OPRK1) were selected based on their clinical significance and according to early publications that reveled the plausible implication of these variants with drug addiction among other populations which make them polymorphisms of interest to be investigated as most of them have robust functions in neuroadaptation [20, 21]. Moreover, these polymorphisms selected to declare their influence on the Jordanian population of Arab descent.

DNA extraction and SNP genotyping

Venous blood samples were used to purify genomic DNA according to Wizard® Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega Corporation, USA). Agarose gel electrophoresis and the Nano-Drop ND-1000 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (BioDrop, UK) were used to select the quality and quantity of the extracted genetic material. Candidate SNPs within (OPRM1, OPRD1, and OPRK1) were screened using the Sequencing technique. Selected samples for genotyping were diluted using nuclease-free water with a final concentration of 20 ng/μl (50-500 μl) and shipped on wet ice to the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF) (Australia). At the AGRF, the samples were genotyped using the Agena Bioscience MassARRAY® on a Compact Spectrometer, iPLEX GOLD chemistry.

Statistical analysis

The P-Value of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), was used to detect if the selected variants fulfill the (HWE) equation. Genotypic and allelic frequencies, genetic association, multiple genetic models, and haplotyping analyses were performed using SNPStats software (InstitutCatalàd’Oncologia, 2006). In addition, multinomial logistic regression was done using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 25.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL). P-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Multiple testing corrections

The effective number of SNPs were tested according to [22] method, in addition, the Bonferroni correction was used to sets the significance cut-off at α/n where α = 0.05 and n number of tests [23].

Results

Clinical characteristic of participants

All participants in this study were Jordanian males of Arab descent. Four hundred ninety-eighr cases were identified as drug addicts with respect to different substances including; synthetic cannabinoids (47.5%), cannabinoids (19.6%), amphetamine (5.7%), alcohol (5.5%), benzodiazepines (4.6%), opiates (4.4%), cocaine (1.1%), and cannabis (0.4%). Among the cases 89% used only one substance. However, 11% of the addicts in this study were multi substance user. The routes for substances consumption were varying between substances. For instance, smoking was commonly used for cannabinoids use, while opiate was administrated by the cases using injection route. In addition, benzodiazepines, alcohol, and amphetamine were consumed orally. Cases were using inhalation for cocaine substance use.

The range of study cohort’s ages was from 18 to 40 years with mean age 29 ± 6.9 for controls and 28.7 ± 9.3 for patients. Age, smoking, work, and marital status for cases were considered also in this study; 88.2% of the patients were smokers, (70.4%) were single and (26.8%) were unemployed.

SNPs characterization

Table 1 summarizes the list of selected genetic variants of three OPR genes (OPRM1, OPRD1, and OPRK1). The table also shows the chromosomal positions of SNPs, minor alleles and their frequencies, and the P-value of HWE for cases and controls. Among the investigated SNPs, rs495491 SNP of the OPRM1 gene did not fulfill the HWE eq. (P-value < 0.05) and were excluded from this study.

Table 1 SNPs information and minor allele frequencies among cases and controls

Genetic association analyses

The correlation between the studied SNPs and drug addiction was conducted by performing different statistical tests. Table 2 illustrates the differences in the allelic and genotypic distribution between patients and controls. Our findings exposed that only rs1799971 of the OPRM1 gene was in association with drug addiction in this study (P-values were; 0.002, 0.01) for alleles and genotypes difference respectively. A significant variation in the variant allele (G) frequency distribution was observed between cases and controls; 14% of patients carried the (G) allele compared to only1% of healthy participants with the same variant (Table 2). In addition, the genotype (GG) among patients was twice it among control, this finding may propose the (G) allele of rs1799971 (OPRM1) as a risk genetic locus for drug addiction. Moreover, different genetic models analysis was done for further confirmation. Table S1 displays the included models in this study (dominant and recessive). According to Bonferroni correction, the P-value was set to 0.02. The result show a significant association between the dominant model (A/A vs G/A-G/G) of rs1799971 (OPRM1) and drug addiction (P-value = 0.003, OR = 1.59 (1.17–2.15)). Haplotyping was also investigated as a part of the genetic association’s analyses in this study. As Table S2 demonstrates, one block of the OPRM1 gene (AGGGCGACCCC) exhibits significant association with drug addiction (P-value = 0.01, OR = 1.56 (1.15–2.12)).

Table 2 Association of the investigated candidate gene polymorphisms with drug addiction

Regression analysis

In this study, regression analysis was done to detect the relationship between four major features that were significant for drug addiction among cases and the selected SNPs. Tables 3, 4, and 5 depict the outcome of regression analysis. However, age of the addicts, smoking and marital status revealed a relationship with different genotypes of some candidate SNPs of the investigated genes was only significant for the risk of drug addiction among males Jordanians.

Table 3 Regression analysis of the association between drug addiction features and candidate SNPs of OPRM1 gene
Table 4 Regression analysis of the association between drug addiction features and candidate SNPs of OPRK1 gene
Table 5 Regression analysis of the association between drug addiction features and candidate SNPs of OPRD1 gene

Discussion

Drug addiction is a chronic disease that involves both the environmental and genetic factors [24]. Despite the vague knowledge about the robust role of the genetic parameters in drug addiction risk, several approaches were extensively investigated to put the baseline of genetic predisposition to drug addiction such as family, twin, and adoption studies [25,26,27]. This study focus on investigating the impact of many Single nucleotide variants within critical genes on drug addiction among Jordanians. Several previous studies conducted on Jordanian Arabs have investigated the involvement of candidate genes in drug addiction including DRD4, 5-HTTLPR [28] SLC6A4 [29] and OPRM1 [3, 30, 31].

Our findings revealed that the OPRM1 gene may be implicated in drug addiction among Jordanians, in particular the functioning SNP (rs1799971) found to be significantly associated with drug addiction which is in consistence with a Chinese study on336 Han heroin addicts [32]. In this study, the distribution of the variant genotype GG of rs1799971 within cases was twice it within controls which propose that the G allele of (rs1799971) within OPRM1 gene may influence drug addiction increased risk. The aforementioned SNP is a missense variant located on exon 1 and encodes for a change from asparagine to aspartate amino acids. It has been suggested that this change results in removing an N-glycosylation site in the extracellular domain which alters the activity of endogenous opioid binding receptors [33]. These actions end in pain harbor and reduction in the response to analgesic drugs [9, 32] furthermore, it tend to increase administration of opioids [31]. In contrast to this study finding [11, 13] reported no evidence of an association between rs1799971 polymorphism and opioid addiction among African-Americans/ European-Americans (EA) and Japanese population.

rs648893 (C/T) polymorphism an Intronic SNP of the OPRM1 gene that implicated in DNA splicing has been recently nominated as candidate for substance dependence including drugs [34]. In accordance to our study, [34, 35] found that the rs648893 of OPRM1 was not associated with drug addiction among Iranian population and European Americans respectively. After all, ethnic variations reflect the differences in the drug addiction etiology among populations. Another significant outcome of this recent study, we found that one block of the OPRM1 gene (AGGGCGACCCC) exhibits significant association with drug addiction among Jordanian males.

In this study, none of the investigated SNPs of both OPRD1 and OPRK1 genes were in correlation with drug addiction among Jordanians. However, in a review of several studies about genetic variants of addiction susceptibility summarizes that both rs1051660 and rs1051660 of OPRK1 are involved in drug addiction [7], while rs1042114 polymorphism of OPRD1 was significantly correlated with substance dependence disorder among EA [19].

On the other hand, our regression analysis declared that the relationship between the age of addicts, smoking and marital status with genetic variants within OPRM1, OPRD1 and OPRK1 genes may be implicated in drug addiction risk. Remarkably, it has been reported that suicide attempts can be induced by drug addiction disorder. In regard, no correlation between significant OPRM1 SNPs (rs1799971, rs609148 and rs648893) and suicide attempts behavior among 426 European-Americans addicts was found [36]. However, the real relation between genetic factors and clinical features of drug addiction is not fully elucidated, more studies and analyses are needed to understand the biological etiology of the disorder.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we propose that rs1799971 of the OPRM1 gene is a genetic risk factor for drug addiction among Jordanian males. To avoid genotyping bias in this study, we excluded the genetic association outcome caused by population stratification. This study was the first to investigate a genetic association of opioid gene variations with drug addiction in males of Arab descent. These findings may provide crucial knowledge to understand the drug addiction mechanisms in Middle Eastern population of Arab descent. Overall, the current study has examined three genes of opioid receptors that appear to be involved in the vulnerability to and the treatment of drug addiction in a Middle Eastern population of Arab descent. Finally, the results of this study provided additional clinical, epidemiological and genetic knowledge that may be useful in the context of further genetic and pharmacogenetic analyses to reduce the severity of drug consumption and improve drug abstinence.