Introduction

Trauma remain as a persistent contributor to global morbidity and mortality [1]. It often manifests across multiple anatomical areas, prominently involving the chest [1]. Chest trauma, ranging from simple rib fractures to severe penetrating injuries affecting vital structures such as the heart or tracheobronchial system, is observed in nearly two-thirds of patients [2]. Globally, chest trauma ranks among the foremost causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly impacting the younger demographic. It holds the position as the third most prevalent injury worldwide, trailing only head and extremity injuries [3]. Thoracic injury-related mortality, the second highest following head injury, underscores the critical significance of initial management in these cases. Notably, 25% of all trauma-related deaths worldwide stem from chest trauma alone [4]. A retrospective cross-sectional study in Tanzania and Egypt revealed that chest (thoracic) trauma carries an overall mortality rate of 15–25%, surpassing that of patients with cardiac or tracheobronchial–esophageal injuries. This emphasizes the gravity of chest trauma within the spectrum of traumatic injuries [5].

According to a study conducted in Europe (Spain), various factors are associated with mortality due to chest trauma. These factors include age, severity of injury, associated brain injury, hemodynamic instability, the need for prehospital intubation (ICU), and injury and multi-organ failure [6]. Another study in Egypt showed that age, unconsciousness, shock, and the need for surgical intervention are predictors of chest trauma-related mortality [7]. The existence of concomitant injuries, such as haemothorax, pneumothorax, and hemopneumothorax, along with untreated vascular injuries, can contribute to the mortality of chest trauma if not timely managed [8]. According to a recent study in Ethiopia, the mortality rate of chest trauma was 27% in 2020 and 26% in 2023 [9]. A recent study conducted in Ethiopia revealed that late presentation beyond 6 h, patient age (> 50), penetrating injury, bilateral chest injury, associated extra-thoracic injury, and the need for ICU care were predictors of mortality following traumatic chest injuries [9, 10].

Most chest traumas are blunt. For instance, a study conducted in Pakistan revealed that 126 (63.3%) patients had blunt chest injuries, whereas 73 (36.6%) had penetrating chest injuries [11]. Previous studies in sub-Saharan Africa have indicated that road traffic accidents were the most common cause of blunt chest injuries, accounting for 83 (65.8%) patients. In contrast, gunshots were the leading cause of penetrating chest injuries, accounting for 41 (56.2%) cases [11]. Mortality was higher in blunt chest trauma (11.65%) than in penetrating chest trauma (5.63%) [12]. Similar to other sub-Saharan African countries, in Ethiopia, road traffic accidents (RTA) (44.5%) were the most common cause of chest trauma, followed by violence (34.9%). Although the authors sought studies on this subject, no study had been conducted on the pooled mortality of chest injuries in sub-Saharan Africa; rather, individual studies are available. Pooling data from multiple studies through systematic reviews and meta-analyses can provide a more comprehensive and reliable understanding of overall trends and outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis examine the pooled mortality of traumatic chest injuries and their determinants throughout sub-Saharan Africa.

Research questions

What is the pooled mortality rate of traumatic chest injury in sub-Saharan Africa?

What are the pooled factors contributing to the mortality rate of chest injury across sub-Saharan Africa?

Methods

Protocol and registration

The findings presented in this review adhere to the guidelines defined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) [13]. The protocol for this review has been prospectively registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42023485003.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

All types of studies (both published and unpublished) reporting the mortality of chest trauma and published in English across sub-Saharan Africa were included. The findings were not restricted to a specific study period. All age groups in all health facilities pre hospital (on scene death, health post, clinic, and health center), all types of hospitals (primary, general and comprehensive specialized) and all department (emergency, ward, and intensive care unit, pediatric and neonatal unit) were included. Citations without abstracts and/or full-text and anonymous reports, editorials, and qualitative studies were excluded from the analysis. Studies that solely focused on specific intrathoracic injuries, such as cardiac injury, were also excluded.

Search strategy and selection criteria

The authors employed various advanced searching techniques between November 21−30/2023 to conduct this review across relevant databases, including PubMed, Africa Index Medicus, Science Direct, Scopus, Embase, HINARI, and Google Scholar. In addition, the authors accessed the online library repositories of Addis Ababa University and Bahir Dar University. Moreover, the authors searched for references in each article within the reviewed studies that were relevant to the objective of this review and meta-analysis. The main search terms in PubMed comprised ‘Mortality’ OR ‘Death’ OR ‘Outcome’ AND ‘Epidemiologic Factors’ OR ‘Predictor’ OR ‘Factor’ OR ‘Associated Factor’ AND ‘Thoracic Injuries’ OR ‘Thoracic Trauma’ OR ‘Chest Trauma’ OR ‘Chest Injury’ AND ‘Africa South of the Sahara.

Quality assessment and data abstraction procedures

All identified studies from the database were imported into the citation manager, EndNote version X9, to eliminate duplicate studies and process further. Five authors (OA, DE, EK, TF, and MG) independently reviewed and screened the titles and abstracts of the identified studies. Any disagreements that arose were resolved through discussion with the fourth author (OA) on the basis of pre-established article selection criteria. To assess the quality of each study, the authors used the Newcastle– Ottawa Scale [14], which was adapted for the systematic review to evaluate the quality of studies [15]. The assessment considered three key aspects: (1) Selection (with a maximum of 4 stars), (2) Comparability (with a maximum of 3 stars), and (3) Outcome (with a maximum of 2 stars). Each original article was appraised by each author individually. In the case of discrepancies between the authors, an agreement was reached by averaging the scores provided by the five authors. The score of each study was calculated on a scale from 0 to 10 for cross-sectional studies and zero to nine for cohort and case-control studies. A score > 6 was considered ‘good’ and included in the study [15]. Additionally, publication bias was evaluated using Egger’s regression test, funnel plot, and sensitivity analysis. Noteworthy is the fact that the reliability of these instruments across the diverse range of studies under consideration demonstrated a commendable consistency, as reflected by Cronbach alphas spanning from 7.5 to 8.9. Furthermore, the rigorous validation process undertaken by the three experts encompassed a comprehensive assessment of each study within the review.

Outcome measurement

The main outcome is mortality from thoracic (chest) trauma, defined as the proportion of all traumatic chest injury patients who died among the studies included in this review. This proportion was calculated by dividing the total number of patients who died from traumatic chest injuries by the total number of traumatic chest injury patients included in this review study, multiplied by 100. The authors used the adjusted odds ratio as an outcome measure to identify predictors of mortality among patients with traumatic chest injuries.

Data extraction and analysis

The data were extracted using the standard format adapted from the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) data extraction format [16]. The four authors independently extracted relevant data using this format. In situations where disagreements arose between authors during the data extraction procedure, they were resolved through discussion and consensus. The data extraction format included the primary author’s name, publication year, country, study design, sample size, sampling technique, and mortality with a 95% confidence interval (CI), the logarithm of proportion, and associated factors of mortality with a 95% CI. The statistical software STATA version 17 was used for the meta-analysis. Pooled analysis was conducted using the random-effects Dersimonian– Laird model [17]. The level of heterogeneity between the studies was measured using the I-squared statistic. Trim-and-fill analyses were also performed to assess publication bias and heterogeneity. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was conducted. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used for data presentation [13] (Fig. 1).

Results

Search results and characteristic of the reviewed studies

The authors initially identified 845 original articles from various databases, including PubMed, Africa Index Medicus, Scopus, Embase, Science Direct, and HINARI, along with manual searches. After eliminating 175 duplicate articles, 670 remained. Following the screening of titles and abstracts, 635 studies were excluded due to their irrelevance to the current study. The remaining 35 studies underwent further evaluation, and only 28 met the inclusion criteria. Seven articles were subsequently excluded for various reasons: one lacked full-text access [18], two had unclearly written methods [19, 20], and the remaining four had outcomes unrelated to this study [21,22,23,24]. Finally, 21 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis [4, 25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A flowchart showing the sequence of study selection using PRISMA

Twenty-one eligible studies included in the meta-analysis were published between 1981 and 2023. Of these 21 published original studies that reported the proportion of mortality, four were conducted in Ethiopia [26, 29, 39, 40], and the majority of studies (nine) were conducted in Nigeria [4, 25, 27, 28, 33,34,35,36,37]. The other studies were conducted in Tanzania (three) [30, 31, 43], South Africa (two) [41, 42], Cameroon (one) [32], Senegal (one) [44], and Sudan (one) [38]. Most studies were conducted with a cross-sectional design (thirteen) [4, 25,26,27, 29, 31, 32, 36, 39,40,41,42, 44], and the fewest were conducted via prospective cohort studies (eight) [28, 30, 33,34,35, 37, 38, 43]. The sample size of each study ranged between 40 and 442. In this review study, 3939 patients (cumulative sample size) were included.

Causes, mechanisms, and associated extra thoracic injuries for each study among traumatic chest injury patients across sub-Saharan Africa

Most injuries resulted from road traffic accidents (RTA), with blunt thoracic injuries being the dominant mechanism. Most patients with chest trauma had associated head and neck injuries, followed by injuries to the extremities. The highest mortality was reported in Ethiopia (27.6%) [26]. whereas the lowest mortality was reported in Nigeria (1.1%) [27] (Table 1).

Table 1 Causes, mechanisms, and associated extra thoracic injuries among patients with traumatic chest injury across sub-Saharan Africa

Meta-analysis results

The pooled mortality of traumatic chest injury

In this reviewed study, the pooled mortality rate of patients who suffered from chest trauma, using the random-effects Dersimonian-Laird model, was found to be approximately 9% (95% CI: 6.35, 11.65) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

A forest plot for the pooled mortality rate of patients with traumatic chest injuries across sub-Saharan Africa using the random-effects dersimonian-laird model

Heterogeneity results

The heterogeneity between studies in this review was high (I2 = 93.33%, t2 = 33.42%, t = 6.65) (Fig. 2), and it was significant (P < 0.001) with a 95% CI. The source of the high I2 is not identified. However, an increase in heterogeneity is expected in the meta-analysis of the proportion of mortality in different countries and study designs, and the results could be interpreted sequentially and with caution. Moreover, the study tested a wide prediction interval, which was a direct and easily interpretable indicator compared to the CI, suggesting high heterogeneity.

Publication bias and sensitivity test results

Publication bias was assessed using Begg’s test (p = 0.005) and Egger’s regression test (p < 0.001), both of which showed significant publication bias. The study also observed asymmetry in the funnel plot (Fig. 3). Trim and fill analyses were also performed to address publication bias and heterogeneity. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was conducted, and all estimates were within the confidence interval limits (Fig. 4), showing that no individual study contributed to publication bias. As a result, none of the studies were excluded from the final meta-analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Publication bias with funnel plot of pseudo 95% CI on pooled mortality on traumatic chest injury across sub-Saharan Africa

Fig. 4
figure 4

Sensitivity analysis for pooled mortality of traumatic chest injury

Subgroup analysis for mortality

Subgroup analysis by country showed the following percentages: Ethiopia 15.76% (95% CI: 4.62, 26.90), Nigeria 4.47% (95% CI: 2.52, 6.41), Tanzania 15.84% (95% CI: 0.827, 30.86), South Africa 9.11% (95% CI: 3.233, 21.45), Sudan 2.1%, Senegal 16.2%, and Cameroon 7.6%. In this reviewed study, the highest pooled mortality rates were reported in Tanzania (15.84%) and Ethiopia (15.76%). Subgroup analysis by study design showed cross-sectional studies at 10.65% (95% CI: 6.38, 14.92) and cohort studies at 6.04% (95% CI: 3.36, 8.71). Subgroup analysis by publication year revealed rates of 7.27% (95% CI: 4.81, 9.73) for 1981−2015 and 11.50% (95% CI: 5.28, 17.72) for 2016−2023 (Table 2).

Table 2 Subgroup analysis of patients with traumatic chest injuries based on country, study design, and publication year across sub-Saharan Africa

Factors associated with the mortality among patients with traumatic chest injury across sub-saharan Africa

Out of the total studies retrieved, nine factors were found to positively affect the mortality of traumatic chest injuries. The pooled effect of four studies [26, 34, 39, 40] revealed that individuals aged over 50 had 3.5 times higher odds (AOR 3.5; 95% CI: 1.19, 10.35) of mortality compared to those under 20. Similarly, the combined findings of three studies [26, 39, 40] indicated that a time interval between injury and admission of 2–6 h was associated with 3.9 times higher odds of mortality (AOR 3.9; 95% CI: 2.04, 7.51) compared to admission within less than 2 h. Additionally, the amalgamated results of three studies [26, 31, 40] demonstrated that associated injuries with the head and neck carried six times higher odds of mortality (AOR 6.28; 95% CI: 3.00, 13.15) than their counterparts. Furthermore, the combined effect of two studies [26, 40] showed that associated spinal injuries were associated with 7.8 times higher odds of mortality (AOR 7.86; 95% CI 3.02, 19.51) compared to cases without spinal injuries. The pooled effect of two studies [29, 30] indicated that the presence of comorbidities had 5.2 times higher odds of mortality (AOR 5.24, 95% CI 2.93, 9.40) compared to cases without comorbidities. The pooled effect of three studies [30, 39, 40] showed that any associated injuries had 7.6 times higher odds of mortality (AOR 7.59; 95% CI: 3.12, 18.45) compared to patients without any associated injury. The pooled effect of two studies [26, 44] showed that associated cardiac injuries were associated with five times higher odds (AOR 5.02; 95% CI: 2.62, 9.68) as predictors of mortality compared to cases without cardiac injury. The combined results of two studies [30, 40] showed that the need for ICU care had 13.7 times higher odds (AOR 13.7; 95% CI 9.59, 19.66) as predictors of mortality compared to patients who did not require ICU care. Furthermore, the combined effect of three studies [30, 34, 40] demonstrated that the Injury Severity Score (ISS) was associated with 3.5 times higher odds (AOR 3.5; 95% CI: 10.6, 11.60) as predictors of mortality among patients with traumatic chest injuries across sub-Saharan Africa (Table 3).

Table 3 Factors associated with the mortality among patients with traumatic chest injury across sub-Saharan Africa, 2023

Discussion

This systematic review and meta-analysis examine the pooled mortality of traumatic chest injuries and their determinants throughout sub-Saharan Africa. In this meta-analysis, the collective mortality rate among patients who underwent sustained chest trauma was precisely determined using the random-effects Dersimonian-Laird model. The identified mortality rate stands at 9%, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 6.35 to 11.65%. To put it into perspective, it suggests that, on average, out of one hundred of patients with traumatic chest injuries, approximately nine individuals succumbed to the condition. Furthermore, this constitutes a significant concern, as it represents a prevalent cause of death in sub-Saharan Africa.

This prevalence is notably higher than the 0.16% reported in the reviewed study conducted in the United States [45]. The disparity in the standard of medical care and the overall level of socioeconomic development in high income countries may serve as a contributing factor to this observed difference [46]. This study, however, is consistent with the previous Iranian study conducted in 2018, which found that 10.07% of patients with chest injuries died [47].

The pooled mortality rate of this study is also higher than the systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in the United Kingdom in 2012 and 2015, which showed mortality rates of 5.3% and 6%, respectively [48, 49].The difference might be attributed to the low level of security in sub-Saharan African countries, as well as the prevalence of trauma and warfare [50, 51]. The significant struggles in sub-Saharan Africa have all contributed to a higher mortality rate in traumatic chest injuries [18, 29]. This implies that the mortality of patients following chest injury in sub-Saharan Africa is considerably greater than in high income countries, with no change in trends from 2012 to 2015 [51, 52]. This underscores the need for action-based interventions focused on health system improvement and a trauma reduction plan.

In addition, the prevalence of road traffic accidents (RTA) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is a major challenge, contributing significantly to chest trauma [52]. For example, recent studies in Ethiopia and Tanzania revealed that RTAs accounted for 44.5% and 50.7%, respectively, with mortality following chest trauma reaching 27.6% [50]. Moreover, in many SSA countries, a delay of 2–6 h in seeking medical care is common due to a lack of transportation (ambulances) and poor road infrastructure. This is often linked to a scarcity of emergency care services and adequately qualified/trained trauma care professionals [50, 52]. Many SSA countries face challenges such as inadequate emergency teams (paramedics, surgeons, and nurses), insufficient equipment (first aid kits), limited prehospital care, and a lack of equipped trauma centers [53]. For instance, Ethiopia lacks paramedics nationwide, has no trauma center at the regional level, and has a shortage of chest surgeons [50]. Additional issues include the absence of trauma courses in some major universities and difficulties in accessing remote areas, making it challenging for emergency medical services (EMS) to provide timely assistance. Disparities in services are also evident regionally, with similar challenges observed across many SSA countries [52, 53].

Concerning the predictors of mortality in individuals with traumatic chest injuries, the cumulative impact of factors in this examined study indicates an increased mortality rate associated with the following listed factors. These included patients aged over 50, those facing a 2–6 h admission delay, individuals with associated head and neck injuries, patients with spinal injuries, those with comorbidities, individuals with additional injuries, those necessitating ICU care, and an escalation in the injury severity score. All of these factors were found to be associated with an increased likelihood of mortality in patients with traumatic chest injuries. Advancing age, coupled with concurrent injuries like spinal, head, and neck trauma, as well as the presence of comorbidities, often heightens the susceptibility of patients to complications such as shock and multiple organ failure. Consequently, this elevated risk significantly amplifies the likelihood of mortality following traumatic chest injury [5, 48, 49]. By directing our attention towards these specific factors or predictors, we can elevate our overall state of preparedness and improve response mechanisms. This approach ensures prompt and effective assistance for individuals confronted with life-threatening conditions. Through a comprehensive understanding and consideration of these elements, we strengthen our ability to provide timely and efficient support in critical situations.

Limitation of the study

In this study, the authors utilized PubMed with the query “(Mortality/death/outcome) AND (epidemiological factors/predictor/factor/associated factor) AND (thoracic injuries/thoracic trauma/chest trauma/chest injury) AND (Africa South of Sahara).” Despite the first question not requiring the third string, its inclusion, indicated by “AND,” excluded studies lacking these terms but containing “mortality.” To address this limitation, the authors expanded their searches to include Africa Index Medicus, HINARI, Science Direct, Scopus, Embase, and manual repositories for comprehensive coverage.

Conclusion

The pooled mortality of traumatic chest injury tends to be higher in sub-Saharan Africa. Patients aged over 50, those with delayed admission of 2–6 h, patients with associated head and neck injuries, patients with spinal injuries, the presence of comorbidities, patients with any associated injuries, patients requiring ICU admission, and increments in the injury severity score had positive predictors of mortality related to traumatic chest injury.

Implication of the study

This finding highlights a higher mortality rate associated with traumatic chest injuries in sub-Saharan Africa. The esteemed authorities are urged to take proactive measures in critical sectors, specifically in health facilities, municipal infrastructure, and community engagement. This intervention is crucial to mitigate the mortality rates linked to traumatic chest injuries. The targeted intervention areas include the health sector, infrastructure, municipality, transportation zones, and the community at large.