Abstract
Adhesins are crucial factors in the virulence of bacterial pathogens such as Escherichia coli. However, to date no resources have been dedicated to the detailed analysis of E. coli adhesins. Here, we provide adhesiomeR software that enables characterization of the complete adhesin repertoire, termed the adhesiome. AdhesiomeR incorporates the most comprehensive database of E. coli adhesins and facilitates an extensive analysis of adhesiome. We demonstrate that adhesiomeR achieves 98% accuracy when compared with experimental analyses. Based on analysis of 15,000 E. coli genomes, we define novel adhesiome profiles and clusters, providing a nomenclature for a unified comparison of E. coli adhesiomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background
Escherichia coli is a bacterial species present as a common gut commensal or pathogen in humans and other animals and can survive in the environment during transmission between hosts [1, 2]. Distinct genotypes cause a wide range of intestinal and extraintestinal diseases, e.g., inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with millions of infections annually [3]. Moreover, antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) E. coli strains have emerged due to overuse of antibiotics and are now a leading cause of death, necessitating novel treatments of E. coli infections [4, 5]. E. coli strains are classified into distinct pathotypes based on the presence of certain virulence-associated factors (VAFs). For example, enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) produces specific enterotoxins and colonization factors (CFs) causing diarrhoea, whereas uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC), which may induce urinary tract infections, possesses various fimbriae and secreted VAFs [6, 7]. ETEC and enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) infections in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) cause disease outbreaks requiring interventions. ETECs are estimated to cause about 220 million cases of diarrhoea, 75 million affecting children under 5 years of age [8]. The high level of mortality, especially in children, makes the development of the ETEC vaccine the WHO’s primary strategic goal [8].
One of the promising targets for novel intervention strategies are adhesins, structures that mediate bacterial attachment to various surfaces, including host cells [9, 10]. They are a key factor enabling host colonization and pathogenesis of bacteria and therefore, ideal candidates for the development of new treatments. Adhesins have been used successfully as vaccines, for example against recurrent urinary tract infections, which confirmed their therapeutic potential [11]. Another promising strategy encompasses anti-adhesion treatments, which focus on the development of factors that specifically block adhesion. These approaches require a detailed knowledge of adhesin properties and their distribution in commensal and pathogenic strains [12].
Proteinaceous adhesins can be classified into fimbrial and nonfimbrial [13]. Fimbriae are supramolecular hair-like protein structures usually encoded by an operon consisting of multiple co-regulated genes. Many fimbriae depend upon usher and chaperone proteins for biogenesis of structural subunits and tip adhesins whose expression is controlled by common regulatory elements [14]. The nonfimbrial adhesins are mainly represented by outer membrane proteins such as those of the autotransporter family [14].
Since adhesins are regarded as important virulence factors of E. coli, they are often included in tools dedicated to the analysis of virulence factors, such as VFDB [15], Victors [16], and Virulence Finder [17]. However, the role of adhesins as VAFs has been studied for only fraction of them and as a result, many adhesin sequences are not present in available databases. In our previous studies of hemolytic E. coli we found that the repertoire of specific adhesin genes co-occurred in E. coli strains harbouring either alpha- or entero-hemolysin [18]. Furthermore, specific repertoires were associated with alpha-hemolytic E. coli isolated from different hosts (humans or farm animals) [19]. To enable further analysis of adhesiomes, we expanded our collection of adhesin sequences into the most comprehensive, manually curated set of E. coli adhesins.
Here, we present adhesiomeR, an open-source tool available as an R package and a web server. It includes a collection of 525 E. coli adhesin genes grouped into 102 systems and allows qualitative inspection of genome-encoded adhesin repertoires in (meta)genomic data. Results are available on both gene and adhesin system level, the latter encoded across multiple genes within a gene cluster. Based on the analysis of 15,000 E. coli genomes, we propose a novel adhesiome profiling nomenclature that enables reproducible comparison of E. coli adhesiome types between studies. AdhesiomeR classifies analysed E. coli strains into these novel adhesiome profiles and clusters, providing valuable insights into their adhesion and pathogenic potential. To our knowledge, it is the first approach to facilitate analysis of the complete repertoire of E. coli adhesins, the adhesiome.
Results
Overview of the adhesiomeR tool
The search for adhesin genes in adhesiomeR is implemented using BLAST + (blastn algorithm) [20] due to its availability and ease of usage. The genes are divided into three groups depending on their identity to each other: (i) highly similar—genes with > 95% nucleotide (nt) identity to representative adhesins in our database, (ii) moderately similar—genes with 75–95% nt identity, and (iii) unrelated—genes that exhibited remote similarity or no similarity to other adhesins in our database (identity < 75%) (Fig. S1). AdhesiomeR does not distinguish between genes at an identity level higher than 95% and reports highly similar genes as groups to minimize the effects of incomplete sequences or sequencing errors on the results. If a moderately similar gene matches multiple adhesin genes, adhesiomeR selects the one with the highest percent identity. By comparing localization within the genome (Fig. S2), adhesiomeR identifies multiple copies of the same gene.
Two search modes, strict and relaxed (Fig. 1c), provide functionality to either identify small numbers of adhesins with high confidence or a larger number of adhesins with less confidence. The strict search mode uses gene-specific bit score thresholds, calibrated on a reference set of adhesin sequences, similar in principle to the annotation strategy implemented in CARD-RGI [21] (see Methods and Additional Files 2–3 for details). The relaxed version uses by default 80% coverage and 80% identity threshold, which may be modified by the user.
AdhesiomeR web server and R package. a Web server home page presents short tool overview. In the ‘Adhesin database’ tab we provide all genes and systems with associated information collected throughout the study. In the ‘Analysis: Input & settings’ tab, users can upload their genome assemblies and run analysis. b When adhesiomeR analysis is finished, output tabs will appear, where users can investigate the results in the form of tables and plots. We also provide a comprehensive HTML report that can be downloaded. c Functions implemented in the adhesiomeR package
AdhesiomeR integrates search results into an overview of adhesin systems encoded across multiple genes within a gene cluster. Adhesion systems are reported as present if all genes were detected, and as partial if at least one gene was identified. Note that a system does not always correspond to a single operon. For example, some fimbriae such as curli are encoded by two differentially transcribed operons but still constitute one system [22].
The adhesiomeR web server, implemented using shiny R package [23] and ShinyProxy, allows running analyses of up to 20 genome assemblies (< 100 MB total size) in the strict search mode (Fig. 1a). It offers calculations of gene and system presence/absence as well as determination of adhesin profiles and clusters. A wide selection of charts allows for a visual inspection of results, and downloadable HTML reports can be saved for later reference and sharing of result (Fig. 1b). More customizable workflows for larger genome sets, pangenomes or gene catalogues, are possible with adhesiomeR standalone R package. This supports the analysis of a single pangenome or gene catalogue, tracing adhesion systems back to their metagenome/genome of origin. Step-by-step tutorials for the analysis of pangenomes and gene catalogues are provided in Additional Files 8–10. R package allows parallel processing using multisession option from the future package [24]. AdhesiomeR was developed following the FAIR Principles for research software (Table S1).
Profiling the E. coli adhesiome
We developed a unified and reproducible characterization of E. coli adhesiomes by defining adhesin profiles and profile clusters. This follows the idea of in silico serotyping that enables determination of genes encoding combinations of surface antigens such as LPS, flagella or capsule [25]. Adhesin profiles correspond to a specific pattern of the presence/absence of adhesin genes, while adhesiome clusters represent groups of profiles with shared patterns in their adhesin repertoire that have the potential to confer characteristic phenotypes, niche adaptation or pathotype. We investigate profiles and clusters using three gene subsets: (i) A-, all adhesin genes, (ii) F-, fimbrial adhesins only, (iii) N-, nonfimbrial genes only. We propose the following classification scheme to denote adhesin profiles and clusters: profiles are denoted with numbers, whereas clusters with letters (Table 1). Those based on different gene subsets are prefixed with letters corresponding to the given subset. Therefore, A-1, F-2, and N-4 indicate profile 1 of all adhesins, profile 2 of fimbrial adhesins and profile 4 of nonfimbrial adhesins, respectively. On the other hand, A-A, F-A and N-A indicate adhesiome cluster A based on all, fimbrial and nonfimbrial adhesins, respectively (Table 1).
For each of the gene subsets, we identified all profiles amongst 15,559 pathotyped genomes. Subsequently, we sorted and numbered profiles from the most frequently occurring to the rarest (Additional Files 4–6), as well as collected general information such as the number of unique profiles with specific patterns of gene presence/absence (Table S2). In total, we identified 7,038, 4,770 and 1,443 unique profiles when considering all adhesins (A-), fimbrial adhesins (F-) and nonfimbrial adhesin genes (N-), respectively. Especially among fimbrial adhesins, some profiles were notably overrepresented, for example the F-1 profile was identified in 1,971 genomes.
Clustering of adhesin profiles revealed patterns and associations of certain adhesin genes with known E. coli pathotypes. Since the distribution of pathotypes in our collection of genomes was unbalanced, with the majority of genomes belonging to nonpathogenic, unknown, and UPEC, genome counts were normalized to allow comparison of pathotype content in each cluster (see Methods for more details). Representation of pathotypes in clusters before normalization is presented in Figure S3.
Clusters A-A, A-B, A-C, and A-D form a closely related clade with a similar distribution of pathotypes (Fig. 2a). These four clusters contain majority of unknown, EHEC, aEPEC, STEC and ETEC (Fig. 2b). Interestingly, EHEC is found in both A-A and A-B but generally not in A-C and A-D. Cluster A-A is the largest and most variable cluster comprising multiple pathotypes. It includes 86% of all STEC strains (Fig. 2b, Table 2, Fig. S4-S5) and is associated with a high prevalence of ehaG and Stg fimbriae (Fig. S6). A-E and A-F clusters are closely related and comprised mainly of UPEC strains (Fig. 2a). UPEC strains are generally found in these two clusters or A-I (Fig. 2b). A-I also represents a cluster to which majority of DAEC and tEPEC are classified. A-G contains mostly one subtype of EHEC, and its most distinct feature is the presence of long polar fimbriae (Fig. 2, S6). Cluster A-H comprises mainly unknown, DAEC and EAEC, and its typical feature is the presence of aatB autotransporter (Fig. S6). A-J is a small cluster composed mostly of APEC (Fig. 2, Table 2).
Adhesiome clusters based on all adhesins. a Composition of the clusters. Bar plots on the left side show the pathotype composition of each cluster with a dendrogram depicting relationships between clusters. Bar plots on the right side indicate the number of genomes and adhesin profiles that each cluster represents. b Assignment of pathotypes to the clusters. Bar plot shows frequency of each pathotype in the clusters
Within the fimbrial adhesin subset, the F-A and F-B represents two closely related clusters containing mainly UPEC and APEC strains (Fig. S4b). F1C and UCL fimbriae are overrepresented in these clusters and likely indicative of UPEC pathotypes, as also reported previously [26,27,28]. F–C, F-D and F-E create another closely related clade. F–C contains the majority of STEC strains, and its characteristic feature is the presence of Stg fimbriae (Fig. S5-S6). A typical feature of F-D is a high prevalence of Yhc and Yad fimbriae (Fig. S6), whereas F-E is characterized by a high prevalence of ETEC (Fig. S4b, Table 2). F-F is the smallest cluster characterized mainly by EHEC strains and the presence of long polar fimbriae (Fig. S4b, S6). F-G comprise primarily DAEC, tEPEC and UPEC with Yfc and Ycb fimbriae, whereas F–H represents mainly DAEC, unknown and EAEC strains with genes encoding Yra fimbriae (Fig. S4-S6, Table 2).
Nonfimbrial adhesin clusters form two main clades. The first includes N-A and N-B, both characterized by the presence of the ehaA and ehaG genes; these clusters also contain almost all EHEC strains (Fig. S4c, S6). The most important genes in the N-A cluster are paa and intimin, whereas iha and flu are specific for N-B, which comprise mainly of STEC and EAEC (Fig. S4c, S6). N–C is represented mostly by nonpathogenic and unknown strains often carrying the yeeJ, aatA and ypjA genes (Fig. S4c, S6). N-D does not have one dominant pathotype but contains multiple pathotypes in similar ratios and is characterized by a high prevalence of ehaG, cah and yeeJ (Fig. S4c, S6). N-E forms the cluster specific for UPEC, APEC and uknown strains with tia, cah, ycgV and ypjA being the most characteristic genes (Fig. S4c, S6).
Validation with experimental data
Von Mentzer et al. investigated the presence of 19 colonization factors in 354 human-isolated ETEC strains using dot-blots and PCRs [29]. We used these E. coli genomes to evaluate accuracy of adhesiomeR compared to published experimental analyses of colonization factors. CFs are a group of adhesins commonly found in ETEC that create structures dependent on multiple subunits encoded across a gene cluster (adhesin system or operon). Our adhesiomeR results were highly consistent with experimental results obtained by von Mentzer et al. When considering partial hits to operons as absence, adhesiomeR achieved 98% accuracy and Mathews correlation coefficient 0.956. Interestingly, among 133 genomes reported as not possessing any of the investigated colonization factors (CF-negative), adhesiomeR identified at least one full or partial operon in 19 and 35 genomes, respectively (Fig. 3).
Discussion
To date, the majority of studies have focused on the analysis of a single or a few E. coli adhesins and their role in pathogenicity or gut colonization [28, 30]. They provide valuable insight into the overall role of adhesins in these processes but have been limited by the lack of suitable databases and analysis tools. Our approach facilitates a holistic and standardized view of E. coli adhesion systems. This approach can be used to systematically investigate the role of adhesiomes in niche competition for space in the gut, at infection sites or during biofilm formation, among others.
UPEC is known as a successful colonizers of the gut and urinary tract, whereas ETECs are gastrointestinal pathogens [6, 7]. Accordingly, the adhesiome profiles and clusters we introduced reveal that ETEC and UPEC adhesin repertoires differ markedly. Moreover, adhesiome clustering shows a divergence of these pathotypes into groups with certain adhesin repertoires as they fall into multiple clusters (Fig. 2). This may indicate that adhesiomes contribute to their adaptation to specific niches.
The increasing availability of sequencing data has drastically changed the field of clinical microbiology and pathogen diagnostics. The increasing amount of data requires easy to use and interpret computational tools to enable the identification of potential microbial pathogens and the use of in silico diagnostics [31]. Many tools have been developed to allow the search for antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors [17, 21, 32]. However, despite their crucial role in the process of pathogenesis, adhesins still constitute only a fraction of all VAFs in currently available databases, even for model species such as E. coli. Therefore, a detailed characterization of adhesiomes is not possible with available tools as they often do not include multiple fimbrial adhesins. AdhesiomeR, with our collection of E. coli adhesins, is the first step towards a more holistic understanding of adhesiome role in host colonization. Furthermore, adhesin sequences gathered in our database can be used as a starting point for new adhesin discovery by identifying protein domains characteristic to adhesins or predicted structural similarity [33, 34]. Such systematic approach could be extended to search for new adhesins in other priority pathogens with high clinical significance.
The high level of agreement between adhesiomeR results and experimental studies (98% overlap) demonstrates the applicability of our tool to genomic studies of E. coli strains and metagenomes, to investigate adhesiomes at high-confidence and without the need for experimental validation. Moreover, adhesiomeR identified full operons encoding colonization factors in genomes annotated as CF-negative based on experimental analyses, showing its high sensitivity. These differences between in silico and experimental analyses might be explained by known problems associated with PCR and dot-blot analyses. Negative results of the PCR may be caused by mutations in fragments targeted by the primers [35], whereas dot-blot analyses would not identify fimbriae that are currently not being expressed. On the other hand, the presence of the full operon indicated by adhesiomeR is very unlikely to be a result of false positives as it requires hits to all genes across the system, which usually comprises at least four genes. The gene-specific thresholds additionally restrict results to high-confidence hits. Therefore, a more probable explanation for observed divergent results is lower sensitivity of experimental procedures. Overall, this comparison showed that adhesiomeR offers a convenient way of detailed E. coli adhesiome characterization and might provide higher sensitivity in the identification of adhesins compared to experimental procedures.
Conclusions
The worldwide rise of antimicrobial-resistant E. coli as well as the increase in detection of non-communicable diseases, such as IBD in developed countries, require new strategies to characterize AMR and disease-causing E. coli in humans and animals. AdhesiomeR fills the gap in the field of virulence-associated factors by focusing specifically on adhesins and offers cost-effective determination of E. coli adhesiomes. We propose a systematic scheme for profiling of E. coli adhesiomes using adhesin profiles and adhesiome clusters obtained with our software. Classification into adhesin profiles and adhesiome clusters provides insights into the adhesion and pathogenicity of analysed strains. Results obtained with adhesiomeR can assist experimentalists in characterizing E. coli strains relevant to human and animal health and guide the development of novel treatment strategies against AMR and pathogenic E. coli. The use of adhesiomeR for analysis of epidemiological E. coli strains could also influence the vaccine target selection leading to a better outbreak prevention.
Methods
Data acquisition
To collect all available sequences of E. coli adhesins, a literature search of adhesin reviews and original studies describing specific adhesins was conducted. Where possible, we used the sequences referenced in papers (93% gene sequences), otherwise we searched for sequences in the GenBank database. As a supplement to sequences, we also collected information about the function or class of each gene, i.e., if it encodes a structural subunit, tip adhesin, usher or chaperone in case of fimbrial adhesins (available on the adhesiomeR web server). In total, we collected 525 genes encoding adhesins grouped into 102 systems.
We downloaded 25,436 genomes of E. coli and associated metadata available in RefSeq on 26.10.2021. We filtered out genomes with (i) coverage < 50 and contig N50 < 1,000,000, (ii) sequenced only using 3rd generation platforms, (iii) sequencing platform not specified and contig N50 < 1,000,000, (iv) containing > 400 contigs. We performed in silico pathotyping, i.e. differentiating into groups with a certain pathogenicity and virulence factors, of obtained genomes into aEPEC, DAEC, EAEC, EHEC, EIEC, ETEC, NMEC, STEC, tEPEC, UPEC, nonpathogenic and unknown (NA). This procedure was based on the presence and/or absence of characteristic virulence factors of these pathotypes (Table S3-4) [18, 19]. Additionally, we included 354 ETEC genomes from a paper by Von Mentzer et al. [29] and 573 APEC genomes from multiple studies (Table S5). The final collection consisted of 15,559 genomes (Additional File 7).
For construction of exemplary pangenome, we used 72 strains from the E. coli reference collection (ECOR) [36]. To ensure compatibility of output formats, we built pangenome using two popular algorithms, Roary [37] and panaroo [38]. As an example of a metagenomic dataset, we used data from a study by Hildebrand et al. [39].
Selection of gene-specific bit score thresholds
To obtain the reference set, we first analysed the genome collection with adhesiomeR in the relaxed setting using 80% identity and 80% coverage cut-offs. Next, we analysed fimbrial and nonfimbrial adhesins separately. For the former, we selected results with complete systems localized on a single contig and plotted the gene localization to visually investigate the quality of the results. Using this approach, we were able to further exclude results, where genes in the system were not located next to each other in correct order or containing transposon insertions. If for a certain system we found less than 15 occurrences of a complete system on a single contig, we also considered results where genes of that system were found on multiple contigs. The set of results with intact systems was considered a reference set for fimbrial adhesins. In the case of nonfimbrial adhesins, which are encoded by single genes, we investigated their genomic context by searching for two genes located upstream and downstream of the adhesin-encoding gene. If the hits were in the same genomic context, we considered them as reference hits. Based on these results, we set a gene-specific bit score threshold by selecting the minimum value of bit score for a given gene in the reference set (Additional File 2). For some adhesins, we were unable to find a set of reference sequences as they were found only in a few cases or not at all. For 22 genes (draA, drab, draC, draD, draE, fotC, fotD, fotE, fotF, fotG, cs27a_gene1, cs27a_gene2, cs27a_gene3, cs27a_gene5, cs27a_gene6, cs27a_gene7, cs27a_gene8, cs27a_gene9, cs27b_gene1, cs27b_gene3, cs27b_gene4, cs27b_gene5, cs27b_gene6, cs27b_gene7) we estimated bit score thresholds based on genes of the same/very similar length from homologous operons. For 11 adhesin genes (afrA, afrB, afrC, afrD, afrE, afrR, afrS, fotA, fotB, cs27a_gene4, cs27b_gene2) which do not show homology to subunits from other systems, we estimated bit score thresholds based on genes of similar length.
Clustering of adhesin profiles
We used unique adhesin profiles of adhesin gene presence/absence to create adhesiome clusters. For this procedure, only genes found in at least one genome assembly were used. For each gene subset an optimal number of clusters was determined using gap statistic. The clustering was performed using Manhattan distance and clara algorithm [40].
To determine the most important adhesins for each cluster, a random forest classifier was trained on each of the three gene subsets of the data, using the ranger R package with default parameters [41]. Feature importance was calculated to see which genes contribute the most to the prediction of a certain cluster and finally 20 genes with the highest Gini importance were selected within each cluster (Fig. S6).
Our collection of E. coli genomes was highly unbalanced. Strains classified as nonpathogenic, unknown, and UPEC were overrepresented, comprising 33.7%, 18.9% and 16.3% of the whole collection, respectively. The least represented pathotypes in our collection were NMEC (9 strains, 0.06% of all genomes) and EIEC (30 strains, 0.19% of all genomes), which have been removed for visualisations of cluster compositions. To allow meaningful analysis of pathotype composition of the clusters, the numbers of genomes were normalized to make them comparable. The cluster composition before normalization is available in Fig. S3.
Performance evaluation
Von Mentzer et al. [29] investigated the presence of 19 colonization factors in human-isolated ETEC strains using dot-blots and PCRs. The whole genome sequence of 354 strains from their study were used to evaluate if adhesiomeR correctly identified CF systems investigated previously. To do that, adhesiomeR was run using strict version of the search and obtained system presence was compared with experimental results. For calculation of accuracy and MCC, only presence of the full operon was considered as a positive identification of a system, whereas ‘partial’ hits were treated as negative result and combined with ‘absent’. Accuracy was calculated as percent of correct assignments \(\frac{TP+TN}{TP+FP+TN+FN}\times 100\%\), where TP – true positives, TN – true negatives, FP – false positives, FN – false negatives. MCC was calculated as \(\frac{TP\times TN-FP\times FN}{\sqrt{(TP+FP)\times (TP+FN)\times (TN+FP)\times (TN+FN)}}\).
Availability of data and materials
E. coli genomes used in the study, including APEC and human-isolated ETEC, are available from NCBI Assembly (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/assembly) database using accession numbers listed in Additional File 7. E. coli genomes used to create pangenomes are available from ECOR [32]. Metagenomic dataset was obtained from Hildebrand et al. [35]. All code used for data analysis is available at https://github.com/ksidorczuk/adhesiomeR-paper. AdhesiomeR is available as a web server at https://adhesiomer.quadram.ac.uk/ and as an R package from GitHub https://github.com/ksidorczuk/adhesiomeR.
References
Tenaillon O, Skurnik D, Picard B, Denamur E. The population genetics of commensal Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:207–17.
Vila J, Sáez-López E, Johnson JR, Römling U, Dobrindt U, Cantón R, et al. Escherichia coli : an old friend with new tidings. Gerdes K, editor. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2016;40:437–63.
Anderson JD, Bagamian KH, Muhib F, Amaya MP, Laytner LA, Wierzba T, et al. Burden of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and shigella non-fatal diarrhoeal infections in 79 low-income and lower middle-income countries: a modelling analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e321–30.
Laupland KB. Incidence of bloodstream infection: a review of population-based studies. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:492–500.
Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Aguilar GR, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2022;399:629–55.
Zhang Y, Tan P, Zhao Y, Ma X. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli: intestinal pathogenesis mechanisms and colonization resistance by gut microbiota. Gut Microbes. 2022;14:2055943.
Terlizzi ME, Gribaudo G, Maffei ME. UroPathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) infections: virulence factors, bladder responses, antibiotic, and non-antibiotic antimicrobial strategies. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1566.
Khalil I, Anderson JD, Bagamian KH, Baqar S, Giersing B, Hausdorff WP, et al. Vaccine value profile for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Vaccine. 2023;41:S95-113.
Gadar K, McCarthy RR. Using next generation antimicrobials to target the mechanisms of infection. npj Antimicrob Resist. 2023;1:1–14.
Klemm P, Schembri MA. Bacterial adhesins: function and structure. Int J Med Microbiol. 2000;290:27–35.
Starks CM, Miller MM, Broglie PM, Cubbison J, Martin SM, Eldridge GR. Optimization and qualification of an assay that demonstrates that a FimH vaccine induces functional antibody responses in women with histories of urinary tract infections. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17:283–92.
Ofek I, Hasty DL, Sharon N. Anti-adhesion therapy of bacterial diseases: prospects and problems. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:181–91.
Berne C, Ducret A, Hardy GG, Brun YV. Adhesins involved in attachment to abiotic surfaces by Gram-negative bacteria. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4566860/. Cited 2021 May 9.
Aleksandrowicz A, Khan MM, Sidorczuk K, Noszka M, Kolenda R. Whatever makes them stick – adhesins of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Vet Microbiol. 2021;257:109095.
Liu B, Zheng D, Zhou S, Chen L, Yang J. VFDB 2022: a general classification scheme for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D912–7.
Sayers S, Li L, Ong E, Deng S, Fu G, Lin Y, et al. Victors: a web-based knowledge base of virulence factors in human and animal pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D693-700.
MalbergTetzschner AM, Johnson JR, Johnston BD, Lund O, Scheutz F. In silico genotyping of Escherichia coli isolates for extraintestinal virulence genes by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J Clin Microbiol. 2020;58:10–128. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01269-20.
Sidorczuk K, Aleksandrowicz A, Burdukiewicz M, Kingsley RA, Kolenda R. Genomic characterization of enterohaemolysin-encoding haemolytic Escherichia coli of animal and human origin. Microbial Genomics. 2023;9. Available from: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000999. Cited 2023 Aug 31.
Kolenda R, Sidorczuk K, Noszka M, Aleksandrowicz A, Khan MM, Burdukiewicz M, et al. Genome placement of alpha-haemolysin cluster is associated with alpha-haemolysin sequence variation, adhesin and iron acquisition factor profile of Escherichia coli. Microbial Genomics. 2021;7. Available from: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/mgen/10.1099/mgen.0.000743. Cited 2023 Aug 31.
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389–402.
Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D690–9.
Hammar M, Arnqvist A, Bian Z, Olsén A, Normark S. Expression of two csg operons is required for production of fibronectin- and congo red-binding curli polymers in Escherichia coli K-12. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18:661–70.
Chang W, Cheng J, Allaire JJ, Sievert C, Schloerke B, Xie Y, et al. shiny: Web Application Framework for R. 2024. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/shiny/index.html. Cited 2024 May 21.
Bengtsson H. future: Unified Parallel and Distributed Processing in R for Everyone. 2024. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/future/index.html. Cited 2024 Jun 8.
Joensen KG, Tetzschner AMM, Iguchi A, Aarestrup FM, Scheutz F. Rapid and easy in silico serotyping of Escherichia coli isolates by use of whole-genome sequencing data. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2410–26.
Behzadi P. Classical chaperone-usher (CU) adhesive fimbriome: uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) and urinary tract infections (UTIs). Folia Microbiol. 2020;65:45–65.
Lasaro MA, Salinger N, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhong Z, Goulian M, et al. F1C fimbriae play an important role in biofilm formation and intestinal colonization by the Escherichia coli commensal strain nissle 1917. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:246–51.
Wurpel DJ, Totsika M, Allsopp LP, Webb RI, Moriel DG, Schembri MA. Comparative proteomics of uropathogenic Escherichia coli during growth in human urine identify UCA-like (UCL) fimbriae as an adherence factor involved in biofilm formation and binding to uroepithelial cells. J Proteomics. 2016;131:177–89.
Von Mentzer A, Connor TR, Wieler LH, Semmler T, Iguchi A, Thomson NR, et al. Identification of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) clades with long-term global distribution. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1321–6.
Ong CLY, Ulett GC, Mabbett AN, Beatson SA, Webb RI, Monaghan W, et al. Identification of type 3 fimbriae in uropathogenic Escherichia coli reveals a role in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2008;190:1054–63.
Nunez-Garcia J, AbuOun M, Storey N, Brouwer MS, Delgado-Blas JF, Mo SS, et al. Harmonisation of in-silico next-generation sequencing based methods for diagnostics and surveillance. Sci Rep. 2022;12:14372.
Florensa AF, Kaas RS, Clausen PTLC, Aytan-Aktug D, Aarestrup FM. ResFinder – an open online resource for identification of antimicrobial resistance genes in next-generation sequencing data and prediction of phenotypes from genotypes. Microb Genom. 2022;8:000748.
Monzon V, Bateman A. Large-Scale Discovery of Microbial Fibrillar Adhesins and Identification of Novel Members of Adhesive Domain Families. J Bacteriol. 2022;204:e00107-22.
Monzon V, Lafita A, Bateman A. Discovery of fibrillar adhesins across bacterial species. BMC Genomics. 2021;22:550.
Akinlabi OC, Dada RA, Nwoko ESQA, Okeke IN. PCR diagnostics are insufficient for the detection of Diarrhoeagenic Escherichia coli in Ibadan Nigeria. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023;3:e0001539.
Patel IR, Gangiredla J, Mammel MK, Lampel KA, Elkins CA, Lacher DW. Draft genome sequences of the Escherichia coli Reference (ECOR) Collection. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2018;7:e01133-e1218.
Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:3691–3.
Tonkin-Hill G, MacAlasdair N, Ruis C, Weimann A, Horesh G, Lees JA, et al. Producing polished prokaryotic pangenomes with the Panaroo pipeline. Genome Biol. 2020;21:180.
Hildebrand F, Gossmann TI, Frioux C, Özkurt E, Myers PN, Ferretti P, et al. Dispersal strategies shape persistence and evolution of human gut bacteria. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:1167-1176.e9.
Kaufman L, Rousseeuw PJ. Clustering Large Applications (Program CLARA). Finding Groups in Data. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 1990. p. 126–63. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9780470316801.ch3. Cited 2023 Oct 25.
Wright MN, Ziegler A. ranger: a fast implementation of random forests for high dimensional data in C++ and R. J Stat Softw. 2017;77:1–17.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the QIB Core Bioinformatics, especially Dr Nabil-Fareed Alikhan and Dr Thanh Le-Viet, for their valuable feedback and assistance with setting up the web server. The authors also thank for the work delivered via the Scientific Computing group, as well as support for the physical HPC infrastructure and data centre delivered via the NBI Computing infrastructure for Science (CiS) group. The authors acknowledge the work delivered via the Laboratory Managers and/or Research Computing Groups at EI who manage and deliver High Performance Computing at EI.
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), part of UK Research and Innovation, Core Capability Grant BB/CCG2220/1 at the Earlham Institute this research was funded by the BBSRC Institute Strategic Programme Food Microbiome and Health BB/X011054/1 and its constituent project BBS/E/F/000PR13631 and Microbes and Food Safety BB/X011011/1 and its constituent projects BBS/E/F/000PR13634 and BBS/E/F/000PR13636, and BBSRC Core Capability Grant BB/CCG2260/1 at the Quadram Institute. This research was also supported by Earlham Institute ISP Decoding Biodiversity BBX011089/1, projects BBS/E/ER/230002A and BBS/E/ER/230002B, and Cellular Genomics BBX011070/1, project BBS/E/ER/230001A. FH and KS were supported by European Research Council H2020 StG (erc-stg-948219, EPYC). JF was supported by the UKRI Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council Norwich Research Park Biosciences Doctoral Training Partnership, BB/T008717/1. RAK and RK were supported by BBSRC grant BB/W003155/1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KS and RK conceived the study. KS collected adhesin sequences and associated information. KS, MB and RK designed methodology and scope of the tool. KS performed analyses and wrote software code. KS and JF set up the web server. KC and MB validated the web server and R package. KS prepared figures. RK and FH supervised the project. PS, FH, RAK an RK obtained funding. KS wrote the initial draft. All authors contributed to editing and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
12864_2024_10525_MOESM3_ESM.csv
Additional file 3: Table A2. Adhesin gene-specific bit score thresholds. These thresholds are used to determine gene presence absence in the strict version of the search.
12864_2024_10525_MOESM4_ESM.csv
Additional file 4: Table A3. Adhesin profiles based on all adhesin genes. The first column indicates the profile number, whereas the remaining columns list genes determining the profiles and their presence (1) or absence (0) in each profile.
12864_2024_10525_MOESM5_ESM.csv
Additional file 5: Table A4. Adhesin profiles based on fimbrial adhesin genes. The first column indicates the profile number, whereas the remaining columns list genes determining the profiles and their presence (1) or absence (0) in each profile.
12864_2024_10525_MOESM6_ESM.csv
Additional file 6: Table A5. Adhesin profiles based on nonfimbrial adhesin genes. The first column indicates the profile number, whereas the remaining columns list genes determining the profiles and their presence (1) or absence (0) in each profile.
12864_2024_10525_MOESM8_ESM.pdf
Additional file 8: Tutorial_genome_assemblies. Tutorial describing how to run adhesiomeR analysis of genome assemblies using R package.
12864_2024_10525_MOESM9_ESM.pdf
Additional file 9: Tutorial_pangenomes. Tutorial describing how to run adhesiomeR analysis of a pangenome using R package.
12864_2024_10525_MOESM10_ESM.pdf
Additional file 10: Tutorial_metagenomics. Tutorial describing how to run adhesiomeR analysis of metagenomic gene catalogue using R package.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
About this article
Cite this article
Sidorczuk, K., Burdukiewicz, M., Cerk, K. et al. adhesiomeR: a tool for Escherichia coli adhesin classification and analysis. BMC Genomics 25, 609 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10525-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-024-10525-6