Abstract
Graphene quantum dots (GQDs) are a newly developed class of material, known as zero-dimensional nanomaterials, with characteristics derived from both carbon dots (CDs) and graphene. GQDs exhibit several ideal properties, including the potential to absorb incident energy, high water solubility, tunable photoluminescence, good stability, high drug-loading capacity, and notable biocompatibility, which make them powerful tools for various applications in the field of biomedicine. Additionally, GQDs can be incorporated with additional materials to develop nanocomposites with exceptional qualities and enriched functionalities. Inspired by the intriguing scientific discoveries and substantial contributions of GQDs to the field of biomedicine, we present a broad overview of recent advancements in GQDs-based nanocomposites for biomedical applications. The review first outlines the latest synthesis and classification of GQDs nanocomposite and enables their use in advanced composite materials for biomedicine. Furthermore, the systematic study of the biomedical applications for GQDs-based nanocomposites of drug delivery, biosensing, photothermal, photodynamic and combination therapies are emphasized. Finally, possibilities, challenges, and paths are highlighted to encourage additional research, which will lead to new therapeutics and global healthcare improvements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Worldwide, cancer and cardiovascular diseases are increasingly becoming the leading factors contributing to mortality. Reports indicate that in 2020, there were approximately 10 million global fatalities and 18.1 million reported cases of cancer. Simultaneously, cardiovascular diseases are accountable for an estimated 32% of total global deaths [1]. Recognizing the severity of these pathophysiologies and the significant increase in their prevalence, it is imperative to undertake extensive research endeavours to develop advanced biomedical tools for addressing these global health challenges.
GQDs have made significant strides in the field of nanomaterials, witnessing continuous expansion in research. Notably, GQDs-based nanocomposites have garnered increased attention from scientists in recent years [2]. GQDs have gained popularity due to their exceptional biological characteristics, including biocompatibility, chemical stability, high surface area-to-volume ratios, and transparency. Moreover, their dispersibility in various solvents and favorable solubility characteristics, both in aqueous and organic solvents, make them highly versatile for integration into diverse systems for targeted applications. Additionally, GQDs exhibit electrical conductivity and inertness, further enhancing their utility across a wide range of fields [3]. The application of GQDs-based nanocomposites has emerged as a ground-breaking technology in various scientific domains such as photonics, composite materials, energies, and optoelectronics, experiencing rapid growth. GQDs-based nanomaterials have demonstrated remarkable potential in the biomedical field, playing pivotal roles in nano-theranostics, diagnostics, drug delivery, near-infrared light (NIR)-induced photothermal and photodynamic treatments, bioimaging, gene therapy, biosensors, and more. The versatility and promising applications of GQDs-based nanocomposites make them a focal point for advancing scientific frontiers, especially in the realm of biomedical research [4,5,6]. Figure 1 depicts the various biomedical applications of nanocomposites based on multidimensional GQDs.
Biomedical applications of multifunctional GQDs-based nanocomposites
The central objective of this review is to provide the scientific community with a foundational understanding of GQDs-based nanocomposites, encompassing their classification, synthesis, applications, and utilization within the biomedical domain. The primary aim is to elucidate their potential in addressing a spectrum of severe diseases. By exploring the intricacies of GQDs-based nanocomposites, we seek to contribute to the knowledge base, offering insights that can pave the way for innovative strategies in combating some of the most formidable health challenges.
2 Historical perspective of GQDs in biomedical sector
Exploratory research, driven by curiosity, has yielded transformative discoveries, exemplified by innovations like buckyballs and graphene [7]. In the contemporary landscape, carbon-based materials are playing an increasingly pivotal role with profound implications. Renowned British scientist Harry Kroto and collaborators were awarded the 1996 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for their groundbreaking work on carbon "buckyballs," consisting of just 60 carbon atoms. This breakthrough paved the way for the development of remarkably small and swift computers [8, 9]. In a subsequent milestone, the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov for their pioneering discovery of graphene, the foundational structure for all graphitic forms. Graphene has emerged as an exceptionally promising nanomaterial due to its unparalleled combination of properties [10]. Furthermore, recent progress in quantum dot research has significantly elevated their importance. Notably, the recognition of achievements in the field, akin to Nobel Prizes, underscores the transformative impact and potential of quantum dots, adding a new dimension to the evolving landscape of nanomaterials.
The characteristics and applications of graphene have undergone extensive exploration since its discovery. However, researchers have identified several limitations associated with graphene, such as zero bandgaps, hydrophobicity, and challenges in large-scale production [11, 12]. To overcome these drawbacks, researchers have delved into the realm of structural modification of graphene. Ponomarenko et al. [13] expanded on previous investigations into CDs and introduced GQDs depicted in Fig. 2. Unlike CDs, GQDs feature dots within the graphene lattice that are thinner than 10 layers and smaller than 100 nm, setting them apart. GQDs, a sole member of the carbon family with a zero-dimensional structure, are composed of one to several layers of graphene sheets with lateral dimensions of less than 10 nm [14]. The distinctions between CDs and GQDs will be thoroughly examined in the preceding section. The evolution of GQDs in the biomedical domain is marked by their efficiency in various applications, owing to their exceptional chemical, physical, and biological characteristics. In 2013, Zheng X and colleagues devised a successful approach for fluorescence imaging and targeted drug delivery, showcasing the capability of GQDs to reveal the intracellular location of nanocarriers through fluorescence. This revealed that active endocytosis serves as the mechanism of uptake [15]. Building on this progress, in 2014, Huang C and co-workers introduced a GQDs-based nanocomposite designed for dual-modality bioimaging and tumor-targeted drug delivery. This composite exhibited limited cytotoxicity and exceptional biocompatibility within specified concentration ranges [16]. Another notable advancement occurred in 2016 when Liu H. and team developed a redox-modulated fluorescence method using GQDs for the detection of glucose and uric acid [17]. In 2017, Ghafary and collaborators contributed to the field by creating outstanding GQDs nanocarriers for simultaneous gene delivery and tracking. Their work demonstrated improved nuclear internalization and tracking of plasmid (pDNA) both in vitro and in vivo [18]. Additionally, GQDs-based nanocomposites have recently demonstrated promising results in photothermal (PTT) and photodynamic therapy (PDT) in both in vitro and in vivo settings. However, there is a need for further research to effectively address limitations related to renal clearance, size, quantum yield, and toxicity [19, 20]. Figure 3 illustrates the upward trend in scientific articles on GQDs composites in recent years. The research community is actively engaged in efforts to control size, incorporate dopants, and utilize different polymers to enhance GQDs for diverse applications, underscoring the dynamic nature of ongoing investigations in this field.
Journey of GQDs in biomedical applications
Number of scientific publications per year related to GQDs-based nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Data obtained from Web of Science accessed in September 2023 using the words “GQDs nanocomposites in biomedical applications”
3 Overview of CDs and GQDs
CDs and GQDs are two examples of advanced carbon-based nanomaterials that have useful biomedical applications. These materials are naturally versatile, low-cost, biocompatible, have a large specific surface area, excellent electrical properties, are chemically stable, have low toxicity, and have abundant functionalization sites along the material's edges. Their adaptability to different surface chemistries and nanomaterial modifiers increases their potential applications [21, 22].
3.1 Differences in structure and synthesis of GQDs and CDs
GQDs and CDs exhibit notable differences in their structural properties and synthesis methods. GQDs are crystalline and Sp2 hybridised, while CDs are Sp2 hybridized carbon domains with Sp3 hybridized amorphous carbons. CDs appear luminescent due to mutual effect or collision between surface imperfections and intrinsic core state emissions, while GQDs fluoresce due to quantum confinement. Additionally, GQDs contain graphene sheets within the dots, distinguishing them from CDs, which are typically quasi-spherical carbon nanoparticles [23, 24]. The methodologies employed in the creation of CDs and GQDs exhibit notable variations. Typically, CDs are subjected to top-down methodologies, which involve the chemical, electrochemical, or physical degradation of carbon black or graphene oxide. In contrast, the production of GQDs involves bottom-up approaches, such as the carbonization or pyrolysis of organic substances, or the step-by-step chemical fusion of aromatic molecules. Consequently, the yield of CDs and GQDs vary from one another. In general, quantity obtained through electrochemical exfoliation and chemical oxidation synthesis tend to be lower, but more control over characteristics than hydrothermal and microwave-assisted synthesis, which have faster reaction rates. Optimising reaction parameters and investigating new pathways can increase CDs yield, while carbonisation and purification can increase GQDs yield. Hydrothermal synthesis favours CDs, although electrochemical exfoliation helps regulate GQDs characteristics despite lower yields. Recent advances have enabled the synthesis of biomass-derived GQDs with a yield of over 84%, the highest yet reported. Barium and nitrogen-doped CDs nanocomposite had high quantum yields (QYs) of 99.6% and 99.3%, respectively, indicating their promise for photoluminescence-intensive applications. To complement the understanding provided in the preceding paragraphs, Table 1 summarize the differences between GQDs, and CDs based on the referenced literature, [25,26,27] presented below.
4 Optical properties of GQDs and detection strategies
The photoluminescence (PL) of GQDs distinguishes them from graphene and ignites interest in their potential applications. GQDs are more resistant to blinking and photobleaching than semiconductor quantum dots. GQDs' small size and bandgap contribute to their PL properties. This structure can be modified by adding dopants and functional groups to the edges. These improvements significantly improve the versatility and utility of GQDs in a variety of areas. The quantum confinement characteristics of zigzag and armchair edges in GQDs influence their PL behavior. GQDs with zigzag edges have a lower bandgap than those with armchair edges, resulting in a blue shift in the emission spectrum. Sp2 carbon domain-rich precursors, such as citric acid, are favorable for producing GQDs with desirable PL properties. Quantum confinement effects in GQDs provide a size-dependent band structure, allowing for chemically tunable bio-conjugation via π-π interactions and hydrogen bonding with biological molecules. Because of their strong light absorption, GQDs make excellent light-sensitive sensors in optical detectors. Unsynchronized large-bandgap GQDs offer highly selective UV detection [28,29,30,31,32].
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) is a typical biosensing approach. This allows photoexcitation energy transfer from donor to acceptor fluorophores. Increasing interest in GQDs as fluorescent markers in biosensing is due to their high brightness, long fluorescence persistence, and resilience to light fading. Using GQDs and gold nanocomposites as energy donors and acceptors, studies created a simple FRET biosensor to detect the S. aureus gene and found biosensor has low detection threshold and high sequence selectivity. similarly, researchers created nanocomposites using silica SNPs as donors and GQDs as acceptors. FRET efficiency is roughly 78% based on excitation-dependent photoluminescence spectra and decay curves [33, 34]. Unlike FRET nanosurface energy transfer (NSET) transfers energy from a molecule dipole to a metal nanosurface, providing a longer effective distance than FRET. Noble metal nanoparticles and GQDs interact via NSET to quench fluorescence signals, causing an "OFF" state. This phenomenon can help develop cell-based biomolecule sensing methods. A higher signal-to-noise ratio and lower nonspecific adsorption make “OFF–ON” sensors better for diverse applications than “ON–OFF” sensors. GQDs-based nanocomposites have been extensively explored [35]. In a particular investigation, ATP was introduced into GQDs, resulting in an "ON" state that allowed for the tracking of ATP molecules via fluorescent signals [36]. Another study looked at using biofunctionalized GQDs as an energy donor and AuNPs as an energy acceptor to detect cancer biomarkers [37].
5 Synthesis and surface modifications of GQDs-based nanocomposites
GQDs, as a component of the graphene family, share a structural foundation with sheets of atoms bonded together in a honeycomb-like configuration. These nanostructures manifest a tunable bandgap, a result of quantum confinement and the edge effect. Their synthesis involves diverse techniques to ensure properties indicates low cytotoxicity, cell membrane permeability, photostability, and resistance to photobleaching are optimized for subsequent biomedical exploration [38, 39]. Various synthetic methodologies contribute to GQDs formation, predominantly employing top-down and bottom-up approaches. Top-down strategies encompass hydrothermal, solvothermal, micromechanical cleavage, thermal reduction, and electrochemical oxidation, each influencing the GQDs properties. Conversely, bottom-up techniques, notably chemical vapor deposition and carbonization methods, involve the drying and carbonization of suitable small molecules or polymers, stepwise organic synthesis, and dynamic functional group acquisition. These intricate procedures enhance the suitability of GQDs for diverse biomedical applications [40,41,42,43]. For a comprehensive overview, Table 2 presents a summary of synthesis with surface modification methods applied to GQDs-based nanocomposites, detailing precursor materials, binding energy, and potential applications derived from each method. This synthesis versatility underscores the multifaceted nature of GQDs and their potential in tailored biomedical applications.
FA–Folic acid, EVO–Evodiamine, ConA –Concanavalin A, Fe3O4–Ferric ferrous oxide, N-GQDs–Nitrogen, TiO2–Titanium dioxide, PEG–Polyethylene glycol, PB- Prussian blue, PDA- Dopamine hydrochloride, ZrO2– Zirconia, UPNP- Upconversion nanoparticles, TRITC Tetramethylrhodamin, DOX- Doxorubicin, MMSN- Mesoporous silica nanoparticles, HMNS- Hollow mesoporous nanoparticles, SiO2- Silicon dioxide.
5.1 Surface modification of GQDs and nanocomposite synthesis
GQDs possess the capability to undergo functionalization through various methods, enabling the modification of their properties to suit specific applications. This versatility enhances their potential utilisation across multiple sectors, thereby expanding their range of practical applications. Certainly, there are various restrictions pertaining to the utilisation of pristine and uncontaminated GQDs. Novel functionalities for GQDs can be generated through various methods such as doping, size/shape alteration, and composites formation, thereby enabling the development of new applications. The electrical, optical, and chemical properties of GQDs can be modified by means of functionalization, thereby enabling a diverse range of applications for these materials. The ultimate structure of the GQDs will be predominantly influenced by the intended application of these materials [53,54,55]. Various types of modifications can be employed, including the two covalent or non-covalent. The decrease in conductivity can be attributed to the alteration of hybridization from Sp2 to Sp3 in the atom, which occurs because of covalent modification. This modification reduces the influence of the orbital responsible for electronic conjugation [56, 57]. In turn, the non-covalent alteration maintains the extended π conjugation, preserving the GQDs' structural and electrical characteristics. Noncovalent modifications include polymer wrapping, bonding of hydrogen, van der Waals forces, π–π interactions, ionic bonding, and electrostatic effects [56, 58].
The process of amino functionalization, employing primary amine molecules, significantly enhances the electronic properties of N-GQDs. This modification induces considerable electron donation, thereby augmenting the singlet–triplet splitting within amino-functionalized N-GQDs (amino-N-GQDs), consequently boosting the efficiency of intersystem crossing. As a result, the fluorescence emissions of amino-N-GQDs are expected to intensify. Recent investigations have highlighted the robust emission spectra of amino-N-GQDs, contrasting with the weak emission observed in nanocomposites of AgNPs and PEI N-doped GQDs. This enhancement is attributed to the surface conjugation's ability to impede the nonradiative recombination of localized hole-electron pairs into Sp2 clusters, consequently improving the surface integrity of the π-electron network and enhancing both electronic and optical characteristics. [59,60,61]
5.2 Nanocomposite formation from hydrothermal GQDs synthesis and surface modifications
The hydrothermal synthesis method significantly influences both the formation and particle size of GQDs, wherein carbon precursors such as graphite, graphene sheets, and carbon nanotubes undergo oxidation and subsequent treatment at elevated temperatures to yield GQDs. A study by S. Moghimian et al., showcased the production of a GQDs-MoS2 (Molybdenum disulfide) nanocomposite thin film through one-step hydrothermal process. The surface chemistry of the MoS2-GQDs nanocomposite revealed a surface composition consisting of basal planes adorned with interwoven nanosheets, displaying an average thickness of 15 nm. The nanocomposite holds promise for diverse applications, potentially undercovers new avenues for advanced materials and biomedical technologies [62]. Another group of researchers developed a fluorescent detector using MoS2 nanosheets and GQDs to identify epithelial cell adhesion molecules (EpCAM). MoS2 nanosheets switched down GQDs fluorescence in this detector utilizing fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). FRET acceptors were MoS2 nanosheets and donors were GQDs. This innovative sensor demonstrated promising capabilities for precise and efficient detection of EpCAM, highlighting its potential for biomedical applications [63]. Ramachandran et al., followed the hydrothermal route in which they used citric acid and ethylenediamine concurrently in a magnetically agitated solution for 30 min, followed by a 4-h hydrothermal treatment at 180 °C to produce N-GQDs-TiO2 composite. The resulting precipitate was cleaned, centrifuged, and overnight vacuum-dried at 60 °C [46]. In another study conducted by Kumawat M and co-workers, L-glutathione was used as a carbon precursor in a hydrothermal process to create graphene oxide- polyethyleneimine GQDs (GO-PEI-GQDs) that facilitates the electrostatic force at 150 degrees which attract negatively charged GO sheets to positively charged surfaces. The stabilising attachment of the GQDs anionic through the layer-by-layer assembly is made possible by the attachment of the PEI polymeric layer cationic into the GO sheets anionic surface, which results in net charge inversion of the resulting positively charged GO-PEI sheets [64]. Recent approaches to overcome these issues have already been made, with the goal of creating GQDs in a simple, eco-friendly, and controlled manner in one step by modifying the control parameters [65, 66]. Figure 4 depicts the synthesis methodology employed to produce GQDs composite via a hydrothermal process.
Schematic showing synthesis procedure of GQDs nanocomposite through a hydrothermal process. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. [67] permission conveyed through Copyright 2023, The Author Springer nature
5.3 Nanocomposite formation from green GQDs synthesis and surface modifications
Green synthesis represents an innovative approach aimed at minimizing or eliminating the use of hazardous materials in the development, production, and application of chemical products. An example of this approach involves the utilization of biowastes as a cost-effective and sustainable carbon source for GQDs synthesis [68]. Roy P and colleagues pyrolyzed rice husks at 700 °C for two hours to make wrinkled hybrid silicon nanosheets (Si NSs). In addition, GQDs were hydrothermally synthesised from fenugreek seed extracts at 300 °C for eight hours, showing outstanding catalytic activity in oxygen reduction processes. Si-GQDs nanocomposite were produced at three concentrations by stirring 100, 75, and 50 mg of Si NSs with 50, 75, and 100 mg of GQDs in ethanol for 2 h at ambient temperature. The Si-GQD nanocomposite powder was obtained by drying the combined solution overnight at 100 °C [69]. Tajiki et al. reported another instance of green synthesis nanocomposite fabricated by a one-pot photochemical process under an ultraviolet lamp. The procedure entailed the integration of rGO, NGQDs, and metal nanoparticles (AgPd). NGQDs functioned both as a directing and reducing agent, ultimately stabilizing on the surface of rGO through π-π stacking interactions. In this process, the nitrite oxidation reaction was electro-catalyzed using silver and palladium nanoparticles. Cyclic voltammetry data indicated that the nitrite oxidation mechanism using this technique was diffusion-regulated. Furthermore, the constructed sensor's sensitivity and detection limit were determined through chronoamperometry experiments, revealing superior performance compared to most recently developed sensors [70]. In a recent investigation, Teymourinia et al. created GQDs nanocomposite solvothermally using corn powder. The resulting trisulfide/GQDs were then dispersed into a 30 mL solution with a concentration of 0.045 M and sonicated for 15 min. A mixture of 5 mL of titanium tetraisopropoxide and ethanol at a 1:5 ratio was prepared and added dropwise to the solution under sonication. The mixture was stirred vigorously overnight. Additionally, the nanocomposite shows very high antibacterial activity [71]. These instances underscore the multifaceted applications of green synthesis in producing GQDs with diverse properties, showcasing its potential in environmentally friendly and economically viable approaches to advanced sensor technologies and other applications in the biomedical domain.
5.4 Nanocomposite formation from pyrolytic GQDs synthesis and surface modifications
Pyrolysis is the chemical breakdown of organic compounds such as citric acid, acetylacetone, dioxins, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons triggered by heat in the absence of oxygen [72, 73]. In a study performed by Kadian. S and colleagues fabricated a nanocomposite of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) coated with sulfur-doped GQDs (S-GQDs) using pyrolysis and HEK 293 cell lines were used to study the cytotoxicity of the nanocomposite. Surprisingly, compared to AgNPs and S-GQDs, the nanocomposite demonstrated improved cell survivability and offers potential as an industrial antibacterial agent [74]. Rahimi K and colleagues employed a straightforward pyrolysis technique for the isolation of zinc oxide nanorods (ZnO NRs) and GQDs. Subsequently, the structures were amalgamated, and it was demonstrated that they exhibited superior catalytic efficacy in comparison to the constituent materials. The encapsulation of ZnO nanorods by GQDs resulted in a decrease in the bandgap from 3.2 to 2.8 eV [75]. Similarly, Alvand and colleagues successfully synthesized a multifunctional nanocomposite consisting of iron oxide/silcon/GQDs (Fe3O4@SiO2@GQDs) with an average diameter of approximately 22 nm. Through surface modification, the amino-functionalized Fe3O4@SiO2 nanospheres were affixed to a mixture comprising the prepared GQDs and EDC, facilitating their dispersion. Fluorescent probes are employed for the purpose of detecting and eliminating Hg2+ from polluted water sources [76]. Nanocomposites of GQDs have also been fabricated using other techniques such as simple stirring, electrochemical oxidation, microwave method, calcination, and by utilizing natural products such as rice husk and corn powder [26]. Figure 5 shows the fabrication of a nanocomposite using GQDs and amine-functionalized silica nanoparticles. To increase surface area, SiNPs are functionalized with(3-Aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (APTES). GQDs are ultrasonically combined with amine functionalized SiNPs to make the composite.
Schematic illustration of the surface modified GQDs nanocomposite synthesis via pyrolysis procedure with ultrasonic assistance. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. [77] Copyright (2021) Published by Elsevier
6 Classification of GQDs-based nanocomposites
GQDs-based nanocomposites are systematically formulated by incorporating various nanomaterials to cater to diverse applications in the biomedical sector. Despite the exceptional qualities of GQDs, their standalone application may present drawbacks related to conductivity, toxicity, and quantum yield [22, 78]. To address these limitations and optimize properties for a range of scientific applications, GQDs are often combined with other materials, resulting in nanocomposites. The upcoming section will delve into GQDs-based nanocomposites that integrate polymer, liposomal, magnetic, and metallic materials. This strategic integration enhances the overall performance and functionality of GQDs, expanding their utility in biomedical applications. The synergistic effects achieved through these nanocomposites offer tailored solutions to overcome the inherent limitations of GQDs when used independently.
6.1 GQDs-based polymer-nanocomposites
An important advancement in the realm of nanomedicine is the creation of polymeric nanocomposite based on GQDs. The most prevalent organic materials for hosting GQDs are polymeric structures. In these materials, GQDs not only respond to outside stimuli with photoluminescence but also function as nano-catalysts to increase the durability of the nanocomposite through the development of either covalent or non-covalent interactions between the secondary chains and surface functional groups of the GQDs and polymer matrices [79]. Numerous polymers, such as polyethylene, cellulose, starch, polydopamine, polyaniline, polyethylenedioxythiophene, polyvinyl-alcohol etc., are combined for developing polymeric nanocomposite with GQDs [80,81,82]. Because of their highly unique surface characteristics, aggregation, and hydrophobic relations, GQDs functionalized with different polymers exhibit improved biocompatibility, physiological stability, and reduced toxicity and are crucial for biomedical applications such as drug delivery, cell culture, and tissue engineering, antibacterial and anti-diabetic potentials, biosensing, and bioimaging [83].
A variety of techniques have been employed for the preparation of polymer GQDs composites, such as non-covalent dispersion methods, solution intercalation, in situ polymerization, melt intercalation, in situ mini-emulsion polymerization, etc [84,85,86]. In a study conducted by Gebreegziabher et al. they used the chemical in situ polymerization approach and created polyaniline (PANI)-GQDs hybrid nanocomposite, and found that it had better thermal stability and conductivity using the Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and instrumental variable (I–V) analyses, respectively [87]. In another work done by Chen W and co-workers, they employed a facial synthesis approach with starch as a precursor and successfully used GQDs composite for cell imaging because of its strong PL emission, low cytotoxicity, and good hydrophilicity [88].
Yang C and his group synthesized biodegradable charged polyester vectors (BCPVs) with GQDs for pancreatic cancer therapy applications. The resultant nanocomposite has shown outstanding K-ras downregulation activity, high stability in physiologically realistic environments, and efficient bioactivity suppression of pancreatic cancer. More crucially, NIR laser light was used to destroy the cells by heating up the composites via the photothermal phenomenon. This heat then caused the nanocomposite to release its contents. The anticancer activity of the nano-complexes was greatly improved by the subsequent triggered release function [89]. Additionally, in recent work on colon cancer suppression analysis, Lee G. and his associates used PEI conjugated GQDs and a type of green fluorescent protein, to test the drug carrier's delivery capabilities. Intrinsic—π–π interaction was used to encapsulate DOX and create GQDs-polymer-DOX conjugates. The in vivo and in vitro data suggest that the nanocomposite has a great ability for tumour suppression and may be used in the treatment of cancer in the future. [90]
6.2 GQDs-based metallic nanocomposites
The most promising materials in nanotechnology are carbon allotropes and metallic nanoparticles. [91] In general, in-situ and ex-situ preparations can be used to produce GQDs nanocomposites containing inorganic compounds. The choice of an appropriate strategy can improve nanofabrication because each process has benefits and limitations of its own. Various metallic nanoparticles such as gold (Au), bismuth (Bi), silver (Ag), cobalt (Co), platinum (Pt), magnesium (Mg), and cadmium are utilised to create GQDs-based metallic nanocomposites [92, 93]. For instance, Ganganboina et al. first produced Au-PANI nanocomposites by oxidising aniline interfacially in the presence of Au3+ ions in water and toluene. The hydrothermal technique was used to create the N, S-GQDs. To confirm that N, S-GQDs were linked to Au-PANI via the Au-thiol interaction to generate N, S-GQDs@Au-PANI nanocomposites, N, S-GQDs and Au-PANI were then combined and stirred for 24 hours for detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. It is determined that the lattice fringe of the N, S-GQDs on the Au-PANI nanowires, which was visible in TEM pictures, is 0.21 nm, which is consistent with the (100) plane of GQDs as-prepared [94]. Similarly, Jin et al. reported the creation of nanocomposites for surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS) and catalytic treatment specifically targeted towards tumours by hydrothermally processing a mixture of GQDs and AgNO3 for 30 minutes at 120 °C. The authors continued by explaining that the core and shell of their core-shell nanostructured (10nm) nanocomposites were made of AgNP and GQDs, respectively [95]. In a distinct work, reported by Liu J his team prepared (AuNPs) /glycine(Gn)/GQDs nanocomposite. In summary, 100μl of AuNPs aqueous solution received 3ml Gn at various concentrations along with 100μl of GQDs using the hydrothermal process. According to transmission electron microscopy, AuNPs are monodispersed and spherical and the size of AuNPs ranges from 45 to 60 nm. The interaction between AuNPs and GQDs can be changed by altering the chain length of Gn. In addition, the AuNPs/Gn/GQDs combination showed excellent fluorescence in cells and low toxicity [96]. Fig. 6 illustrates the process of generating GQDs nanocomposite using metallic materials.
Schematic representation depicting the interaction of GQDs with AuNPs to form hybrid nanocomposite. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. [97] Copyright (2020) Elsevier
6.3 GQDs-based magnetic nanocomposites
Numerous uses for magnetic nanoparticles have been discovered in the fields of bioimaging, magnetic hyperthermia therapy, drug delivery, and nanomedicine. Fe3O4 nanoparticles seem an ideal choice for a GQDs-based nanocomposite because they are less toxic, superparamagnetic, environmentally friendly, and biocompatible than other magnetic nanoparticles [98]. According to our understanding, the GQDs nanocomposite with Fe3O4 have ample opportunity for exploration and advancement. Although there are few articles available with promising results in biomedical applications. For example, Chen et al. created a GQDs/magnetic chitosan formulation in which DOX was incorporated into chitosan via the aldehyde group, ferrous nanoparticles were formed by co-precipitation, and GQDs were altered on the surface of magnetic chitosan via an amide bonding. The drug delivery nanosystems treat tumours with synergistic effects, according to the investigation conducted in vivo and in vitro, nanocomposite featuring a promising platform for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma [99].
PEG was used in similar research by Bernad S and colleagues to improve the stability and biocompatibility of nanocomposite. TEM images show that a light GQDs background surrounds the spherical magnetic NPs. The drug release tests showed a pH-dependent profile, with higher rates of release observed at an acidic pH of 5.0 relative to a neutral pH of 7.4 [100]. In another research study published by Hasanzadeh the researchers created GQDs using pyrolysis and the formation of nanocomposites using the one-step co-precipitation method by vigorously stirred Fe3+/GQDs under nitrogen flow. To confirm their morphology characterisation techniques were used and concluded that nanocomposite has superior performance for electrochemical oxidation of amino acids and detection, respectively [101].
6.4 GQDs-based liposomal nanocomposites
Liposomes are spherical membranes made of a phospholipid bilayer that replicates the fluid mosaic structure and characteristics of the cell membrane. They are hydrophilic and hydrophobic environments [102]. In a recent study, Liu C. and colleagues achieved a high loading of GQDs with the size of (4 nm) into the aqueous core of liposomes (45.68 ± 1.44%) which was regulated by pressure. They also demonstrated good photothermal therapeutic effectiveness in vitro, killing about 75% of cancer cells and proving to be an effective tool for quick renal clearance [103]. In another study conducted by Ramedani et.al.,hybrid liposome nanocarrier that includes a piezoelectric polymer, GQDs and Silibinin were fabricated by the hydration thin-film method, with an average size of (230 ± 20 nm). The researchers demonstrated how the created hybrid nanoparticles allow for simultaneous fluorescence imaging of cancer cells in vivo and piezoelectric-stimulated drug administration [104]. Moreover, modified AuNPs and GQDs were added to a phospholipid thin film during the film hydration process to create a multifunctional liposome by Prasad R and his team [105]. DOX was also encapsulated on a nanocomposite to demonstrate photo-triggered chemotherapy and cell targeting. The composite uncovered new possibilities for targeted imaging and cancer therapy by demonstrating the bimodality for in vivo tumour diagnostics and tumour reduction. The visual representation in Fig. 7 depicts the composite of GQDs liposomes, which demonstrates a responsive characteristic to dual stimuli. This property makes them well-suited for applications in cancer therapy and bioimaging.
Graphical illustration of the efficient liposomes with dual-stimuli response nature for cancer treatment and bioimaging. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref [104]. Copyright 2022, International Journal of Pharmaceutics
7 GQDs-based nanocomposites in vitro and in vivo investigations
Despite being in the early stages of research, GQDs have already exhibited acknowledged biocompatibility and low cytotoxicity in both in vitro and in vivo studies. These findings have sparked increased interest in GQDs as nanomaterials, surpassing the appeal of other quantum dots [83, 106]. The toxicity studies conducted on GQDs based nanomaterial have yielded encouraging findings. Dutta Chowdhury et al. demonstrated that DOX-loaded nanocarriers GQD-ConA@Fe3O4 were cultured in HeLa and endothelial cells for 12 hours in the presence of a magnetic field. The data revealed that these nanocarriers had no discernible effect on cell viability, which remained above 90%. The findings also revealed a highly targeted intracellular release of DOX within cancer cells. [45] In another work by Ramachandran et al. nanocomposite dosages (0.1 and 0.5 mg mL−1) caused MDA-MB-231 cells to perish more than HS27 cells. Cancer cells had enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly singlet oxygen. Cancer cell death pathways were investigated using Caspase Glo-3/7.
The nanocomposite could induce mitochondrial-dependent death in targeted cells as a photosensitizer [46]. Chen and co-workers examined the biological toxicity and side effects of altering the size of the synthesised material GQDs/magnetic chitosan and PTT treatment intensity in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Their study found no in vivo or in vitro toxicity or harmful consequences. Due to its tumour cell targeting, the DOX-Fe3O4@CGA group outperformed DOX in tumour cell elimination [107]. Figure 8 depicts the vitality of HeLa and L929 cells. The amine-functionalized GQDs were modified by the addition of a nucleus targeting TAT peptides (TAT-NGs). TAT-NGs were then further changed by including cancer-cell-targeting folic acid (FA) modified PEG via a disulfide bond, yielding folic acid modified PEG via disulfide linkage (FAPEG-TNGs). Furthermore, most of the NH-GQDs-treated HeLa and L929 cells were green-stained and alive, demonstrating that the NH-GQDs are having cytocompatibility.
TAT-NGs and FAPEG-TNGs' 24-h effects on HeLa or L929 cell survival. a CCK-8 test, b Calcein-AM/PI live/dead staining. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref [108]. (2021) Springer Nature
Prasad, Rajendra et al. examined liposomal nanotheranostic systems with GQDs and AuNP in vivo. Liposomal nanohybrids scavenged ROS in this investigation. During treatment with near-infrared (NIR) light, the tumor's surroundings were unharmed. In tumour-bearing mice, the nanohybrids were biocompatible, reducing haemolysis, increasing cell viability, maintaining animal health, and controlling body weight. Nanohybrid chemo phototherapy reduced tumours more than single therapy [105]. Similarly, Dong and colleagues created PEG modified GQDs@hMSN-PEG (hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles), which was a good candidate for drug transport and delivery due to its fluorescence, structural stability, and huge porosity confirmed by vivo organ distribution and histopathology tests. In tumor-bearing animals, DOX distribution to MCF-7 tumours was enhanced. [109] Kersting, David et al. examined GQDs absorption in C57BL/6 mice liver tissue ex vivo. Precision-cut tissue slices (PCLS) show more gene expression similarity than liver cell lines and hepatocyte cultures. The liver's role in nanoparticle biotransformation, metabolism, and toxicity makes this finding significant. After cultivation, histological analysis of precision-cut mammary tumour slices (PCMTS) showed that 90% of cells were viable and 10% were necrotic [110]. GQDs' low toxicity and biocompatibility make them promising for numerous applications. However, the toxicity profile of GQDs varied with different investigations, and there is evidence that certain GQDs can kill cells by generating intracellular ROS [111]. Due to the diversity and complexity of GQDs surface changes, a thorough evaluation of their toxicity and function is still missing in experimental and theoretical simulation. Several crucial factors contribute to the mitigation of toxicity, including the regulation of GQDs concentration. Additionally, the toxicity of GQDs is subject to variation based on the specific synthesis process employed. Furthermore, it has been observed that GQDs with nano-meter dimensions pose a lower level of harm when compared to GQDs with micro-meter dimensions. Surface modification and functionalization also improve GQDs characteristics for biomedical applications [112,113,114].
8 Biomedical application of GQDs-based nanocomposites
Although GQDs possess remarkable properties, as discussed in the previous sections, their exclusive utilisation may not be sufficient for certain applications. Consequently, the enhancement of performance can be achieved through surface functionalization and the incorporation of supplementary materials. In this scenario, GQDs and other materials were mixed to create hybrid structures with features that were optimised for a variety of technological applications. In particular, the subsequent sections will primarily emphasise biomedical applications involving composites based on GQDs. Table 3 provides a comprehensive overview of various biomedical applications where GQDs have shown promising potential.
8.1 Drug delivery
Most of the drugs can be loaded quickly because GQD-based nanocomposites can bind to different biological materials via π–π stacking and electrostatic interaction. GQDs exhibit effective drug molecular loading cores because of their higher specific surface area, improved water solubility, and less cytotoxicity [83]. The rapid delivery rate of GQDs, which prolongs the time of blood circulation, is another aspect that enhances their efficacy [122]. Some researchers have theoretically studied the properties of GQDs using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and density functional theory (DFT) calculations to better use GQDs for drug delivery [123, 124]. The rapid delivery rate of GQDs, which prolongs the time of blood circulation, is another aspect that enhances their efficacy. The therapeutic efficacy of drugs cannot be improved merely by concentrating on drug delivery and disregarding drug release [125]. As a result, there is an increasing need for researchers to comprehend the intimate connection between the delivery of drugs and release, and work on creating various drug delivery-release mechanisms with different materials. Figure 9 depicts a visual representation of the nanocomposite consisting of GQDs utilised for drug delivery purposes.
Graphical illustration of the GQDs nanocomposite for cellular uptake and release in breast cancer cells. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. [126] Copyright (2023) Elsevier
GQDs may offer more bonding sites for chemotherapeutic conjugation and better cell absorption when paired with other organic and inorganic conventional nanoplatforms [127]. In some investigations, GQDs-based nanocomposite serves as a reliable drug delivery system and fluorescent imaging probe, enabling the tracking of a carrier's intracellular localization and the path that the drug travels after entering the carrier [128, 129]. Recent research also looked at PEG, chitosan, and dextran/poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (Dex/PNIPAM) as GQDs-based polymers for drug administration. Findings indicate that the synthetic GQDs composite is exceptionally efficient in delivering drugs to cancer cells while also being biocompatible. The same is true for the complicated arrangement of targeted ligand medications in nanomaterials [130, 131]. GQDs represent a promising avenue in drug delivery owing to their multifunctional properties, including high surface area and effective drug loading capabilities. However, while studies demonstrate their potential, there's a need for further investigation into the precise mechanisms of drug release and the optimization of delivery-release strategies. Additionally, exploring the synergistic effects of GQDs with other nanoplatforms could enhance their efficacy in targeted drug delivery systems. It's crucial for future research to address these challenges to unlock the full potential of GQDs in biomedical applications.
8.2 Biosensing
Biosensing platforms provided a wealth of potential for diagnosing a variety of illnesses, including cancer, cardiovascular, viral, and neurological diseases. Early disease detection is essential for eradicating metastases and avoiding fatalities [132]. In this context, the current part will cover recent developments in platforms for electrochemical biosensing, electrochemiluminescence, and fluorescent-based GQDs. In accordance with this, Miao X and his colleagues developed monodisperse N-doping GQDs-wrapped gold nanoparticles for Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based sensing and cell imaging. These nanoparticles exhibit excellent biocompatibility, stability, and excellent enhancement ability [133]. Figure 10 depicts a schematic representation of electrochemical sensing leveraging nanocomposite based GQDs.
Schematic for an electrochemical dopamine sensor using multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs)/GQDs. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. [134] Copyright (2020) American chemical Society
Another study reported by Lei Y and co-workers developed solvothermally W18O49/GQDs (tungsten oxide) composites with exceptional stability and homogeneous particle dispersion. As a result, changing GQDs will be a useful technique to enhance W18O49's SERS performance [135]. In a way similar, Sun Y and his team developed a molybdenum disulfide-based GQDs nanocomposite and combined it with enzyme-assisted recycling DNA for sensitive analysis of DNA sequences, offering a powerful approach for biomedical research [136]. Furthermore, Du J and team also generated luminous composite hydrogel poly(AM-co-AA)/GQDs using in situ free radical polymerization, which had remarkable mechanical strength, resistance to fatigue, and natural healing qualities. As a result, the nanocomposite worked well as a sensor to find aqueous Fe3+ contamination in water [137]. The current standards for sensing in GQDs involve addressing key challenges such as cost-inefficient synthesis routes, time-consuming processes, and low sensitivity in complex samples. Recent advancements have focused on enhancing sensitivity, specificity, and selectivity by combining GQDs with electrochemical biosensors. Optimizing bioconjugation and biofunctionalization strategies, as well as the interplay between the size and shape of biorecognition elements and GQDs, are crucial for achieving high reliability and sensitivity in GQDs-based electrochemical biosensors. Moreover, there is a need to validate the technology using human samples to ensure accuracy and applicability in clinical settings. Overall, ongoing research aims to develop efficient biosensing platforms capable of real-time and rapid monitoring to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes in conditions different medical conditions [138,139,140].
8.3 Photothermal therapy
PTT uses, electromagnetic wave energy with wavelengths in between (700–1350 nm) between the first and second and NIR infrared region and absorbent nanomaterials at these wavelengths, which have a conversion efficiency of light to heat. Thus, by turning light energy into heat and raising the temperature to between 42 and 46 °C, cancer cells are killed through the rupturing of cell membranes and proteins [141]. In addition to its localized tumor ablation capabilities and compatibility with other treatments, PTT boasts minimal invasiveness, reduced side effects, and the potential for targeted delivery, making it a promising avenue for cancer therapy. Furthermore, PTT exhibits tunable parameters, allowing for customization based on specific tumor characteristics and patient needs. GQDs exhibit promising attributes as photothermal materials due to their chemical stability, broad light absorption range, lightweight nature, and cost-effectiveness. Their capacity to convert light into heat relies on the excitation of loosely bound π electrons and subsequent relaxation to these states [142]. Additionally, GQDs are regarded as emerging nanomaterials for PTT in cancer treatment owing to their favourable biological compatibility and quick elimination from organs [143]. Currently, great efforts have been given for GQDs-based nanocomposite for PTT. For instance, Chen L. and his team created a synergetic photo-chemotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using aptamer-modified GQDs and magnetic chitosan. PTT temperature climbed swiftly to about 43 °C in the photothermal group, then progressively increased to 48 °C near the tumour site, inhibiting tumour growth and extending the survival time of tumour-bearing mice [107]. Likewise, Tian Z and colleagues reported the development of ZIF-8/GQDs nanocomposite for chemo- and photothermal treatment with drug encapsulation. Additionally, the pH-controlled DOX release and the photothermal effect of the GQDs nanoparticles resulted in a synergistic effect that killed cancer cells [144]. Figure 11 depicts a schematic of the targeted PTT using GQDs-based nanomaterial for the eradication of tumours in both in vitro and in vivo conditions. However, despite promising preclinical results, there are still challenges to address before clinical translation, including optimizing targeting strategies, enhancing tumor accumulation, and ensuring controlled drug release. Additionally, further investigation is needed to understand the long-term biocompatibility and potential toxicity of GQDs in vivo. While recent studies have shown encouraging outcomes with GQDs-based nanocomposites, more rigorous preclinical and clinical studies are necessary to validate their efficacy and safety for widespread clinical use. Overall, while GQDs hold great promise in PTT, continued research efforts and critical analysis are essential to overcome existing challenges and realize their full potential in cancer therapy.
Schematic illustration of targeted PTT with IR780 Iodide on Folic Acid-functionalized GQDs. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref [145]. Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society
8.4 Photodynamic therapy
PDT is a procedure that involves the use of photosensitizers, which, when activated by light of a certain wavelength, react with molecular oxygen to produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as singlet oxygen (1O2), to target and kill cancer cells in a specific area. These ROS are made by a photosensitizer (PS) when oxygen is present, and light is applied between UV–visible region. Researchers have shown that GQDs can be used for both imaging and treating cancer. As an extra benefit, GQDs make these photosensitizers more photoactive, which means they could be used as helpers in PDT [146, 147]. According to a recent study, Reagen S. and colleagues addressed the use of GQDs-hollow mesoporous silica nanocomposite (hMSNs) for fluorescence imaging for dual cancer treatment combining drug delivery and PDT. The GQDs' ability to maintain their fluorescence is due to the surface attachment to hMSNs. The nanocomposite was used to successfully treat PDT, and they demonstrated induced toxicity with increasing concentration as more oxygen was produced [148]. In another study GQDs-based nanocomposites were utilised in treating cancer via PDT, which caused mitochondria-associated apoptotic cell death in TNBC (MDA-MB-231) cells [149]. Similar to the previous group, this group used microwave-assisted synthesis to create titanium-based GQDs nanocomposite. After being photoactivated with NIR light, the nanocomposites produced ROS, primarily singlet oxygen (1O2), which significantly increased MDA-MB-231 cell death [149]. Recent research highlights the significance of selecting appropriate photosensitizers for PDT applications. Studies have demonstrated the promising potential of boron-dipyrromethene (BODIPY) with singlet-oxygen production quantum yields of up to 83% when doped with GQDs. However, BODIPY exhibits poor water solubility, limiting its practical utility. Recent investigations have addressed this issue by improving the water solubility of BODIPY through fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). In these studies, BODIPY was incorporated as an acceptor chromophore, with nanoparticles serving as donors, resulting in enhanced PDT efficiency [150,151,152]. Nevertheless, issues such as selecting the appropriate photosensitizer and ensuring long-term biocompatibility must be solved. Optimising GQD-based nanocomposites for targeted drug administration and monitored release is critical for achieving better therapeutic effects. More research is required to overcome these obstacles and enable the clinical translation of GQDs in PDT.
8.5 Combinational therapies
Cancer therapy's cornerstone is multiple combination therapy, a method that combines two or more therapeutic therapies. This strategy may decrease the occurrence of drug resistance while also having therapeutic anti-cancer effects, such as lowering tumour growth and cancerous potential, stopping mitotically active cells and causing apoptosis [153]. Yu C. and his team's workers added GE11, an EGFR antagonist peptide, to GQDs and employed it as a drug delivery system for clinical chemotherapy medicines. In vivo, investigations have demonstrated that the specific targeting effect of a nanocomposite enrichment at the tumour location leads to a significant reduction in the proliferation of tumour cells. This novel targeted therapy fluorescence probe offers novel approaches for the investigation of drug release mechanisms and the management of nasopharyngeal cancer [154]. Figure 12 depicts representation of synergistic therapeutic approaches aimed at combating cancer.
Schematic for chemo-PDT/PTT synergistic therapy of glioma cancer cells. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from ref. [155] Copyright (2021) Xiaoli Cai et al.
Yang et al. employed GQDs to increase PDT and PTT as multifunctional nanocarriers. Additionally, the nanocomposite has increased T1-weighted MRI and deep-red fluorescence that responds to tumours, allowing for imaging of the tumour during therapy. Thereby this potent hybrid nanosystem offered a new multimodal tool for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer [156]. Similarly, using the silica shells, Wo F and colleagues created magnetic nanospheres/GQDs. Mechanical stimulation, photothermal damage, photodynamic toxicity, and chemotherapy were four different treatment strategies used in conjunction with the multimodal system to kill cancer cells [51]. Combining GQDs with various cancer therapies like chemotherapy, PDT, and PTT enhances treatment efficacy by targeting tumours more effectively and reducing drug resistance. However, critical analysis is needed to optimize dosing, minimize side effects, and understand the mechanisms of interaction between GQDs and other therapies for improved cancer treatment outcomes.
9 Critical analysis and challenges in clinical translation of GQDs
In addition to the insights presented, it is critical to explore other details from existing research to gain a complete grasp of the issues connected with GQDs. Photoluminescence quenching in GQDs is a complex phenomenon impacted by parameters, including surface defects, functional groups, and chemical contaminants. Surface passivation and defect engineering have been proven in studies to have a considerable impact on photoluminescence characteristics, allowing for the mitigation of quenching effects. Furthermore, while GQDs are generally low in toxicity, there are differences between research due to variations in experimental conditions and GQDs properties. GQDs' biocompatibility is regulated by size, surface chemistry, and exposure concentration. Understanding the root mechanisms of GQD toxicity, such as oxidative stress and cellular absorption pathways, is critical for precisely predicting their behavior in biological systems. Furthermore, long-term in vivo investigations are required to fully assess potential chronic effects and biodistribution profiles. The stability in physiological conditions is critical for the clinical translation of GQDs. Surface modifications with biocompatible polymers improve stability by reducing nonspecific binding and negative interactions with biomolecules. Polymeric coatings such as PEG and polydopamine (pDA) protect GQDs from external effects, whereas natural matrices increase biocompatibility. Long-term stability studies under physiological settings are critical for monitoring GQDs behavior over time, assuring safe and effective therapeutic use [111, 113, 157, 158].
Several significant hurdles hinder the clinical translation of GQDs in a variety of biomedical applications. To begin, the high variety among GQDs synthesized using various methods leads in variable physicochemical properties, making standardization challenging. Second, the potential toxicity of GQDs, such as generating inflammatory responses and DNA damage, raises questions about their safety in clinical settings. Furthermore, GQDs have limited PDT efficiency in their pure form, requiring precision engineering to improve their efficacy. Furthermore, the absence of thorough studies on genotoxicity and its long-term effects on normal tissues emphasizes the importance of meticulous monitoring and toxicity mitigation techniques. Furthermore, there is a need for novel ways to increase GQD selectivity, clearance rate, and therapeutic efficacy for better clinical results. Overall, while GQDs show enormous promise for biomedical applications, overcoming these issues is critical to their successful clinical translations [159,160,161].
10 Summary and outlook
The integration of GQDs with diverse materials has proven to be a promising strategy for the development of highly effective biomedical applications addressing various health challenges. Despite the substantial progress and rapid expansion of GQDs-based nanocomposites, they are still largely in their early stages of development. In this review, we have underscored emerging and alternative methods for the efficient fabrication of GQDs-based nanocomposites, highlighting their interactions with different materials within the biomedical realm. Our exploration has delved into recent remarkable advancements in the biomedical field facilitated by GQDs-based nanocomposites. The diverse characteristics exhibited by these nanocomposites, stemming from varied preparation methods, grant them access to a wide spectrum of physicochemical properties. However, mitigating toxicity and enhancing the clearance rate of GQDs within organs, crucial for minimizing harm to healthy tissues, necessitate strategies such as size management and improved selectivity. These strategies may involve variations in preparation methods, choice of elements, and other influencing factors. Undoubtedly, a paramount focus should be placed on comprehending and revealing the interactions of GQDs-based nanocomposites with biological systems through extensive biological assessments and standardized protocols. The future applications of GQDs-based nanocomposites demand further research to unravel the intricate interactions occurring between the nanomaterials and GQDs, as these interactions profoundly impact the properties of the resulting nanocomposites. While extensive research on these interactions holds the potential for versatile applications, including targeted drug delivery, PTT, PDT, biosensing, and bioimaging, the precise design of their properties remains a challenging and significant undertaking. In conclusion, we foresee a promising future for the continued development of GQDs-based nanocomposites, offering solutions to a variety of unmet therapeutic challenges in the biomedical field.
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Sung H, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. https://doi.org/10.3322/CAAC.21660.
Chen F, et al. Graphene quantum dots in biomedical applications: Recent advances and future challenges. Front Lab Med. 2017;1(4):192–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FLM.2017.12.006.
Han D-W, et al. Recent advances on graphene quantum dots for bioimaging applications. Front Chem. 2020;1:424. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00424.
Tiwari SK, Sahoo S, Wang N, Huczko A. Graphene research and their outputs: status and prospect. J Sci: Adv Mater Dev. 2020;5(1):10–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSAMD.2020.01.006.
Fang J, Liu Y, Chen Y, Ouyang D, Yang G, Yu T. Graphene quantum dots-gated hollow mesoporous carbon nanoplatform for targeting drug delivery and synergistic chemo-photothermal therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:5991–6007. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S175934.
Tian P, Tang L, Teng KS, Lau SP. Graphene quantum dots from chemistry to applications. Mater Today Chem. 2018;10:221–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCHEM.2018.09.007.
dos Santos MC, Maynart MC, Aveiro LR, da Paz EC, dos Santos Pinheiro V. Carbon-based materials: recent advances, challenges, and perspectives. Refer Module Mater Sci Mater Eng. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.09262-6.
Nasir S, Hussein MZ, Zainal Z, Yusof NA. Carbon-Based nanomaterials/allotropes: a glimpse of their synthesis, properties and some applications. Materials. 2018;11(2):295. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA11020295.
Bayda S, Adeel M, Tuccinardi T, Cordani M, Rizzolio F. The history of nanoscience and nanotechnology: from chemical-physical applications to nanomedicine. Molecules. 2020;25(1):112. https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES25010112.
Gao W. Synthesis, structure, and characterizations. Graphene Oxide: Reduction Recipes, Spectroscopy, and Applications,. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15500-5_1/COVER.
Lawrence J, et al. Circumventing the stability problems of graphene nanoribbon zigzag edges. Nat Chem. 2022;2022:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-022-01042-8.
Castelletto S, Boretti A. Advantages, limitations, and future suggestions in studying graphene-based desalination membranes. RSC Adv. 2021;11(14):7981–8002. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RA00278C.
Ponomarenko LA, Schedin F, Katsnelson MI, Yang R, Hill EW, Novoselov KS, Geim AK. Chaotic dirac billiard in graphene quantum dots. Science. 2008;320(5874):356–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154663.
Younis MR, He G, Lin J, Huang P. Recent advances on graphene quantum dots for bioimaging applications. Front Chem. 2020;8:424. https://doi.org/10.3389/FCHEM.2020.00424/BIBTEX.
Zheng XT, He HL, Li CM. Multifunctional graphene quantum dots-conjugated titanate nanoflowers for fluorescence-trackable targeted drug delivery. RSC Adv. 2013;3(47):24853–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RA44125C.
Huang CL, et al. Application of paramagnetic graphene quantum dots as a platform for simultaneous dual-modality bioimaging and tumor-targeted drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2014;3(4):651–64. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB01650E.
Liu H, Li X, Wang M, Chen X, Su X. A redox-modulated fluorescent strategy for the highly sensitive detection of metabolites by using graphene quantum dots. Anal Chim Acta. 2017;990:150–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACA.2017.07.031.
Ghafary SM, Nikkhah M, Hatamie S, Hosseinkhani S. Simultaneous gene delivery and tracking through preparation of photo-luminescent nanoparticles based on graphene quantum dots and chimeric peptides. Sci Rep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-017-09890-Y.
Buzzá H, et al. Carbon-based materials in photodynamic and photothermal therapies applied to tumor destruction. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23:22. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS23010022.
Dash BS, Das S, Chen JP. Photosensitizer-functionalized nanocomposites for light-activated cancer theranostics. Int J Mol Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS22136658.
Teradal NL, Jelinek R. Carbon nanomaterials in biological studies and biomedicine. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADHM.201700574.
Campuzano S, Yáñez-Sedeño P, Pingarrón JM. Carbon dots and graphene quantum dots in electrochemical biosensing. Nanomaterials. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO9040634.
Ozyurt D, Al Kobaisi M, Hocking RK, Fox B. Properties, synthesis, and applications of carbon dots: a review. Carbon Trends. 2023;12:100276. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CARTRE.2023.100276.
Tepliakov NV, et al. Sp2-sp3-hybridized atomic domains determine optical features of carbon dots. ACS Nano. 2019;13(9):10737–44. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSNANO.9B05444/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/NN9B05444_0007.GIF.
Tajik S, et al. Carbon and graphene quantum dots: a review on syntheses, characterization, biological and sensing applications for neurotransmitter determination. RSC Adv. 2020;10(26):15406–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA00799D.
Kaur A, Pandey K, Kaur R, Vashishat N, Kaur M. Nanocomposites of carbon quantum dots and graphene quantum dots: environmental applications as sensors. Chemosensors. 2022;10(9):367. https://doi.org/10.3390/CHEMOSENSORS10090367.
Zheng XT, Ananthanarayanan A, Luo KQ, Chen P. Glowing graphene quantum dots and carbon dots: properties, syntheses, and biological applications. Small. 2015;11(14):1620–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMLL.201402648.
Tian P, Tang L, Teng K-S, Lau S-P. Topical Review Graphene quantum dots: preparations, properties, functionalizations and applications. Mater Funct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5724/ad08cb.
Wei D, Liu Y, Wang Y, Zhang H, Huang L, Yu G. Synthesis of n-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties. Nano Lett. 2009;9(5):1752–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/NL803279T/SUPPL_FILE/NL803279T_SI_001.PDF.
Gómez IJ, et al. Exploring the emission pathways in nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots for bioimaging. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125(38):21044–54. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JPCC.1C06029/SUPPL_FILE/JP1C06029_SI_001.PDF.
Kansara V, Shukla R, Flora SJS, Bahadur P, Tiwari S. Graphene quantum dots: synthesis, optical properties and navigational applications against cancer. Mater Today Commun. 2022;31: 103359. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.103359.
Hai X, Feng J, Chen X, Wang J. Tuning the optical properties of graphene quantum dots for biosensing and bioimaging. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(20):3219–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TB00428E.
Kim S, et al. Energy transfer from an individual silica nanoparticle to graphene quantum dots and resulting enhancement of photodetector responsivity. Scient Reports. 2016;6(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27145.
Shi J, et al. A fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) biosensor based on graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) for the detection of mecA gene sequence of Staphylococcus aureus. Biosens Bioelectron. 2015;67:595–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOS.2014.09.059.
Chen C, Midelet C, Bhuckory S, Hildebrandt N, Werts MHV. Nanosurface energy transfer from long-lifetime terbium donors to gold nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C. 2018;122(30):17566–74. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JPCC.8B06539/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/JP-2018-06539F_M010.GIF.
Zhang R, et al. A novel ‘OFF-ON’ biosensor based on nanosurface energy transfer between gold nanocrosses and graphene quantum dots for intracellular ATP sensing and tracking. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2019;282:910–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNB.2018.11.141.
Kalkal A, Pradhan R, Kadian S, Manik G, Packirisamy G. Biofunctionalized graphene quantum dots based fluorescent biosensor toward efficient detection of small cell lung cancer. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(8):4922–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSABM.0C00427/SUPPL_FILE/MT0C00427_SI_001.PDF.
Tabish TA, Zhang S. Graphene quantum dots: syntheses, properties, and biological applications. Compreh Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019;1–5:171–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.04133-3.
Ozhukil Valappil M, Pillai VK, Alwarappan S. Spotlighting graphene quantum dots and beyond: synthesis, properties and sensing applications. Appl Mater Today. 2017;9:350–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.09.002.
Lee BH, McKinney RL, Hasan Md T, Naumov AV (2022) Top Down and bottom up synthesized graphene quantum dots as nanothermometers for In vitro imaging,” ECS Meeting Abstracts, vol. MA2022-01, no. 8, p. 698, Jul. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1149/MA2022-018698MTGABS
Ahirwar S, Mallick S, Bahadur D. Electrochemical method to prepare graphene quantum dots and graphene oxide quantum dots. ACS Omega. 2017;2(11):8343–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.7B01539/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AO-2017-01539G_0005.JPEG.
Chen W, Lv G, Hu W, Li D, Chen S, Dai Z. Synthesis and applications of graphene quantum dots: a review. Nanotechnol Rev. 2018;7(2):157–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/NTREV-2017-0199/ASSET/GRAPHIC/J_NTREV-2017-0199_FIG_011.JPG.
Luo P, Guan X, Yu Y, Li X, Yan F. Hydrothermal synthesis of graphene quantum dots supported on three-dimensional graphene for supercapacitors. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2019. https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO9020201.
Ma Y, et al. The nanocomposite system comprising folic acid-modified graphene quantum dots loaded with evodiamine in the treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Mater Des. 2022;220: 110838. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2022.110838.
Dutta Chowdhury A, Ganganboina AB, Chung-Tsai Y, Cheng-Chiu H, An-Doong R. Multifunctional GQDs-concanavalin A@Fe3O4 nanocomposites for cancer cells detection and targeted drug delivery. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1027:109–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ACA.2018.04.029.
Ramachandran P, et al. N-doped graphene quantum dots/titanium dioxide nanocomposites: a study of ros-forming mechanisms, cytotoxicity and photodynamic therapy. Biomedicines. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOMEDICINES10020421/S1.
Qi L, et al. Biocompatible nucleus-targeted graphene quantum dots for selective killing of cancer cells via DNA damage. Commun Biol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/S42003-021-01713-1.
Wang M, Li B, Du Y, Bu H, Tang Y, Huang Q. Fluorescence imaging-guided cancer photothermal therapy using polydopamine and graphene quantum dot-capped Prussian blue nanocubes. RSC Adv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra10491d.
Gupta PK, Chauhan D, Khan ZH, Solanki PR. ZrO2 nanoflowers decorated with graphene quantum dots for electrochemical immunosensing. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2020;3(3):2506–16. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSANM.9B02598/SUPPL_FILE/AN9B02598_SI_001.PDF.
Zhang D, Wen L, Huang R, Wang H, Hu X, Xing D. Mitochondrial specific photodynamic therapy by rare-earth nanoparticles mediated near-infrared graphene quantum dots. Biomaterials. 2018;153:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2017.10.034.
Wo F, et al. A multimodal system with synergistic effects of magneto-mechanical, photothermal, photodynamic and chemo therapies of cancer in graphene-quantum dot-coated hollow magnetic nanospheres. Theranostics. 2016;6(4):485–500. https://doi.org/10.7150/THNO.13411.
Yao X, et al. Graphene quantum dots-capped magnetic mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a multifunctional platform for controlled drug delivery, magnetic hyperthermia, and photothermal therapy. Small. 2017;13(2):1602225. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMLL.201602225.
Kalluri A, Dharmadhikari B, Debnath D, Patra P, Kumar CV. Advances in structural modifications and properties of graphene quantum dots for biomedical applications. ACS Omega. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.2C08183.
Sheely A, Gifford B, Tretiak S, Bishop A. Tunable optical features of graphene quantum dots from edge functionalization. J Phys Chem C. 2021;125:9252. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c00537.
Kalluri A, Dharmadhikari B, Debnath D, Patra P, Kumar CV. Advances in structural modifications and properties of graphene quantum dots for biomedical applications. ACS Omega. 2023;8(24):21358. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.2C08183.
Georgakilas V, et al. Noncovalent functionalization of graphene and graphene oxide for energy materials, biosensing, catalytic, and biomedical applications. Chem Rev. 2016;116(9):5464–519. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.5B00620/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/CR-2015-00620Y_0046.GIF.
Speranza G. Carbon nanomaterials: synthesis functionalization and sensing applications. Nanomaterials. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO11040967.
Jeong S, et al. Graphene quantum dot oxidation governs noncovalent biopolymer adsorption. Scient Reports. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63769-z.
Karatay A, et al. Amino-functionalized nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots and silver-graphene based nanocomposites: Ultrafast charge transfer and a proof-of-concept study for bioimaging applications. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2022;426: 113741. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHOTOCHEM.2021.113741.
Kalkal A, Pradhan R, Packirisamy G. Gold nanoparticles modified reduced graphene oxide nanosheets based dual-quencher for highly sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;242: 125157. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2023.125157.
Kuo WS, et al. Amino-functionalized nitrogen-doped graphene-quantum-dot-based nanomaterials with nitrogen and amino-functionalized group content dependence for highly efficient two-photon bioimaging. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(8):2939. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS21082939.
Moghimian S, Sangpour P. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of GQDs-MoS2 nanocomposite with enhanced supercapacitive performance. J Appl Electrochem. 2020;50(1):71–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10800-019-01366-3/FIGURES/8.
Shi J, Lyu J, Tian F, Yang M. A fluorescence turn-on biosensor based on graphene quantum dots (GQDs) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets for epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) detection. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;93:182–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOS.2016.09.012.
Kumawat MK, et al. Preparation of graphene oxide-graphene quantum dots hybrid and its application in cancer theranostics. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2019;103: 109774. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.109774.
Gulati S, Baul A, Amar A, Wadhwa R, Kumar S, Varma RS. Eco-friendly and sustainable pathways to photoluminescent carbon quantum dots (CQDs). Nanomaterials. 2023;13:554. https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO13030554.
Valian M, Soofivand F, Khoobi A, Yousif QA, Salavati-Niasari M. A green approach: eco-friendly synthesis of Gd2Ti2O7/N-GQD nanocomposite and photo-degradation and electrochemical measurement of hydroxychloroquine as a perdurable drug. Arab J Chem. 2023;16(1): 104401. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARABJC.2022.104401.
Morsy M, Gomaa I, Abd Elhamid AEM, Shawkey H, Aly MAS, Elzwawy A. Ternary nanocomposite comprising MnO2, GQDs, and PANI as a potential structure for humidity sensing applications. Sci Rep. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41598-023-48928-2.
Bressi V, Ferlazzo A, Iannazzo D, Espro C. Graphene quantum dots by eco-friendly green synthesis for electrochemical sensing: recent advances and future perspectives. Nanomaterials. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/NANO11051120.
Roy P, Ravindranath R, Periasamy AP, Lien CW, te Liang C, Chang HT. Green synthesis of Si–GQD nanocomposites as cost-effective catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. RSC Adv. 2016;6(110):108941–7. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA23892K.
Tajiki A, Abdouss M, Sadjadi S, Mazinani S, Ramakrishna S. Photo-induced green synthesis of bimetallic Ag/Pd nanoparticles decorated reduced graphene oxide/nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots nanocomposite as an amperometric sensor for nitrite detection. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021;413(25):6289–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00216-021-03584-1/METRICS.
Teymourinia H, Salavati-Niasari M, Amiri O, Yazdian F. Application of green synthesized TiO2/Sb2S3/GQDs nanocomposite as high efficient antibacterial agent against E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2019;99:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2019.01.094.
Chen X, Yang L, Myneni SCB, Deng Y. Leaching of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from sewage sludge-derived biochar. Chem Eng J. 2019;373:840–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2019.05.059.
Devi M, Rawat S, Sharma S. A comprehensive review of the pyrolysis process: from carbon nanomaterial synthesis to waste treatment. Oxford Open Mater Sci. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfmat/itab014.
Kadian S, Manik G, Das N, Nehra P, Chauhan RP, Roy P. Synthesis, characterization and investigation of synergistic antibacterial activity and cell viability of silver–sulfur doped graphene quantum dot (Ag@S-GQDs) nanocomposites. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(15):3028–37. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TB02823D.
Rahimi K, Yazdani A, Ahmadirad M. Facile preparation of zinc oxide nanorods surrounded by graphene quantum dots both synthesized via separate pyrolysis procedures for photocatalyst application. Mater Res Bull. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.10.014.
Alvand M, Shemirani F. A Fe3O4@SiO2@graphene quantum dot core-shell structured nanomaterial as a fluorescent probe and for magnetic removal of mercury(II) ion. Microchim Acta. 2017;184(6):1621–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00604-017-2134-2.
Kaimal R, et al. Highly sensitive and selective detection of glutathione using ultrasonic aided synthesis of graphene quantum dots embedded over amine-functionalized silica nanoparticles. Ultrason Sonochem. 2022;82: 105868. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2021.105868.
Roy E, Nagar A, Sharma A, Roy S, Pal S. Graphene quantum dots and its modified application for energy storage and conversion. J Energy Storage. 2021;39: 102606. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EST.2021.102606.
Kurniawan D, Chen YY, Sharma N, Rahardja MR, Chiang WH. Graphene quantum dot-enabled nanocomposites as luminescence- and surface-enhanced raman scattering biosensors. Chemosensors. 2022;10(12):498. https://doi.org/10.3390/CHEMOSENSORS10120498.
Syed-Zainol-Abidin SNJ, Mamat S, Abdul-Rasyid S, Zainal Z, Sulaiman Y. Fabrication of poly(vinyl alcohol)-graphene quantum dots coated with poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for supercapacitor. J Polym Sci A Polym Chem. 2018;56(1):50–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/POLA.28859.
Li J, Li K, Shao D, Ding Y, Huang L, Zheng X. The synergistic antioxidant effect of polydopamine coating with amino-functionalized graphene quantum dots on osteoblast protection against oxidative stress. SSRN Electron J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4246356.
Dananjaya V, Marimuthu S, Yang R, Grace AN, Abeykoon C. Synthesis, properties, applications, 3D printing and machine learning of graphene quantum dots in polymer nanocomposites. Prog Mater Sci. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2024.101282.
Chung S, Revia RA, Zhang M. Graphene quantum dots and their applications in bioimaging, biosensing, and therapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(22): e1904362. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADMA.201904362.
Pathak R, Punetha VD, Bhatt S, Punetha M. Multifunctional role of carbon dot-based polymer nanocomposites in biomedical applications: a review. J Mater Sci. 2023;58(15):6419–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10853-023-08408-4.
Zeng M, et al. The synthesis of amphiphilic luminescent graphene quantum dot and its application in miniemulsion polymerization. J Nanomater. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6490383.
Mousavi SM, et al. Bioactive graphene quantum dots based polymer composite for biomedical applications. Polymers (Basel). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/POLYM14030617.
Gebreegziabher GG, et al. Polyaniline–graphene quantum dots (PANI–GQDs) hybrid for plastic solar cell. Carbon Lett. 2020;30(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S42823-019-00064-6/METRICS.
Chen W, et al. Synthesis of graphene quantum dots from natural polymer starch for cell imaging. Green Chem. 2018;20(19):4438–42. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8GC02106F.
Yang C, et al. Biodegradable polymer-coated multifunctional graphene quantum dots for light-triggered synergetic therapy of pancreatic cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(3):2768–81. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.8B16168/SUPPL_FILE/AM8B16168_SI_001.PDF.
Lee GY, et al. Integration of PEG and PEI with graphene quantum dots to fabricate pH-responsive nanostars for colon cancer suppression in vitro and in vivo. FlatChem. 2022;31: 100320. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FLATC.2021.100320.
Nasir S, Hussein MZ, Zainal Z, Yusof NA. Carbon-based nanomaterials/allotropes: a glimpse of their synthesis, properties and some applications. Materials. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA11020295.
Krishnan SK, Singh E, Singh P, Meyyappan M, Nalwa HS. A review on graphene-based nanocomposites for electrochemical and fluorescent biosensors. RSC Adv. 2019;9(16):8778–881. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA09577A.
Khan I, Saeed K, Khan I. Nanoparticles: properties, applications and toxicities. Arab J Chem. 2019;12(7):908–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARABJC.2017.05.011.
Ganganboina AB, Doong RA. Graphene quantum dots decorated gold-polyaniline nanowire for impedimetric detection of carcinoembryonic antigen. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43740-3.
Jin J, et al. A highly sensitive SERS platform based on small-sized Ag/GQDs nanozyme for intracellular analysis. Chem Eng J. 2022;430: 132687. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2021.132687.
Liu J, Qin L, Kang SZ, Li G, Li X. Gold nanoparticles/glycine derivatives/graphene quantum dots composite with tunable fluorescence and surface enhanced Raman scattering signals for cellular imaging. Mater Des. 2017;123:32–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES.2017.02.083.
Wadhwa S, et al. Engineering of luminescent graphene quantum dot-gold (GQD-Au) hybrid nanoparticles for functional applications. MethodsX. 2020;7: 100963. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MEX.2020.100963.
Staden S-V, Mihai M, Comanescu C. Magnetic nanoparticles: current advances in nanomedicine, drug delivery and MRI. Chemistry. 2022;4(3):872–930. https://doi.org/10.3390/CHEMISTRY4030063.
Chen L, Hong W, Duan S, Li Y, Wang J, Zhu J. Graphene quantum dots mediated magnetic chitosan drug delivery nanosystems for targeting synergistic photothermal-chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Canc Biol Therapy. 2022;23(1):281–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2022.2054249.
Bernad SI, et al. Magnetoresponsive functionalized nanocomposite aggregation kinetics and chain formation at the targeted site during magnetic targeting. Pharmaceutics. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS14091923.
Hasanzadeh M, et al. Graphene quantum dots decorated with magnetic nanoparticles: Synthesis, electrodeposition, characterization and application as an electrochemical sensor towards determination of some amino acids at physiological pH. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;68:814–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2016.07.026.
Nakhaei P, et al. Liposomes: structure, biomedical applications, and stability parameters with emphasis on cholesterol. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/FBIOE.2021.705886.
Liu C, et al. Pressure-controlled encapsulation of graphene quantum dots into liposomes by the reverse-phase evaporation method. Langmuir. 2021;37(48):14096–104. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.LANGMUIR.1C02338/SUPPL_FILE/LA1C02338_SI_001.PDF.
Ramedani A, Sabzevari O, Simchi A. Hybrid ultrasound-activated nanoparticles based on graphene quantum dots for cancer treatment. Int J Pharm. 2022;629: 122373. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2022.122373.
Prasad R, et al. Liposomal nanotheranostics for multimode targeted in vivo bioimaging and near-infrared light mediated cancer therapy. Communicat Biol. 2020;3(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-1016-z.
Kurniawan D, Weng RJ, Chen YY, Rahardja MR, Nanaricka ZC, Chiang WH. Recent advances in the graphene quantum dot-based biological and environmental sensors. Sens Actuat Reports. 2022;4: 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SNR.2022.100130.
Chen L, Hong W, Duan S, Li Y, Wang J, Zhu J. Graphene quantum dots mediated magnetic chitosan drug delivery nanosystems for targeting synergistic photothermal-chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biol Ther. 2022;23(1):281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2022.2054249.
Qi L, et al. Biocompatible nucleus-targeted graphene quantum dots for selective killing of cancer cells via DNA damage. Communicat Biol. 2021;4(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01713-1.
Dong J, Yao X, Sun S, Zhong Y, Qian C, Yang D. In vivo targeting of breast cancer with a vasculature-specific GQDs/hMSN nanoplatform. RSC Adv. 2019;9(20):11576. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA01833F.
Kersting D, et al. From in vitro to ex vivo: subcellular localization and uptake of graphene quantum dots into solid tumors. Nanotechnology. 2019;30(39): 395101. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6528/AB2CB4.
Sengupta S, Pal S, Pal A, Maity S, Sarkar K, Das M. A review on synthesis, toxicity profile and biomedical applications of graphene quantum dots (GQDs). Inorganica Chim Acta. 2023;557: 121677. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ICA.2023.121677.
Liang L, Peng X, Sun F, Kong Z, Shen JW. A review on the cytotoxicity of graphene quantum dots: from experiment to simulation. Nanoscale Adv. 2021;3(4):904–17. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00904K.
Wang S, Cole IS, Li Q. The toxicity of graphene quantum dots. RSC Adv. 2016;6(92):89867–78. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA16516H.
Liang L, Kong Z, Kang Z, Wang H, Zhang L, Shen JW. Theoretical evaluation on potential cytotoxicity of graphene quantum dots. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(11):1983–91. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSBIOMATERIALS.6B00390/SUPPL_FILE/AB6B00390_SI_001.PDF.
Sarabiyan Nejad S, Razzaghi D, Rezaei M, Bagheri M, Babaie A, Abbasi F. Preparation and characterization of electrospun shape memory polyurethane/graphene quantum dot nanocomposite scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2022;71(14):1069–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/00914037.2021.1941954.
Liu J, et al. Antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide-graphene quantum dot nanocomposites: enhanced adsorption on bacterial cells by cationic capping polymers. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2019;7(19):16264–73. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B03292/SUPPL_FILE/SC9B03292_SI_001.PDF.
Wang FH, Bae K, Huang ZW, Xue JM. Two-photon graphene quantum dot modified Gd2O3 nanocomposites as a dual-mode MRI contrast agent and cell labelling agent. Nanoscale. 2018;10(12):5642–9. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7NR08068A.
Mallakpour S, Khadem E. Construction of crosslinked chitosan/nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dot nanocomposite for hydroxyapatite biomimetic mineralization. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;120:1451–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2018.09.127.
Dong H, et al. Multifunctional poly(l -lactide)-polyethylene glycol-grafted graphene quantum dots for intracellular microrna imaging and combined specific-gene-targeting agents delivery for improved therapeutics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(20):11015–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.5B02803/SUPPL_FILE/AM5B02803_SI_001.PDF.
Hai X, et al. Synergistic in-situ growth of silver nanoparticles with nanozyme activity for dual-mode biosensing and cancer theranostics. Chin Chem Lett. 2021;32(3):1215–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CCLET.2020.09.013.
Liang J, et al. Versatile nanoplatform loaded with doxorubicin and graphene quantum dots/methylene blue for drug delivery and chemophotothermal/photodynamic synergetic cancer therapy. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(10):7122–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSABM.0C00942/SUPPL_FILE/MT0C00942_SI_001.PDF.
Sawy AM, et al. Insights of doxorubicin loaded graphene quantum dots: synthesis, DFT drug interactions, and cytotoxicity. Mater Sci Eng, C. 2021;122: 111921. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MSEC.2021.111921.
Mombrú D, Romero M, Faccio R, Mombrú ÁW. Electronic and optical properties of sulfur and nitrogen doped graphene quantum dots: a theoretical study. Physica E Low Dimens Syst Nanostruct. 2019;113:130–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PHYSE.2019.05.004.
Zhang P, et al. “Molecular dynamics simulation of transport mechanism of graphene quantum dots through different cell membranes. Membranes (Basel). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/MEMBRANES12080753/S1.
Patra JK, et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16(1):1–33. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12951-018-0392-8.
Mohammed-Ahmed HK, Nakipoglu M, Tezcaner A, Keskin D, Evis Z. Functionalization of graphene oxide quantum dots for anticancer drug delivery. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2023;80: 104199. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDDST.2023.104199.
Kortel M, Mansuriya BD, Santana NV, Altintas Z. graphene quantum dots as flourishing nanomaterials for bio-imaging, therapy development, and micro-supercapacitors. Micromachines (Basel). 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/MI11090866.
Hassani S, Gharehaghaji N, Divband B. Chitosan-coated iron oxide/graphene quantum dots as a potential multifunctional nanohybrid for bimodal magnetic resonance/fluorescence imaging and 5-fluorouracil delivery. Mater Today Commun. 2022;31: 103589. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2022.103589.
Flak D, et al. GQDs-MSNs nanocomposite nanoparticles for simultaneous intracellular drug delivery and fluorescent imaging. J Nanopart Res. 2018;20(11):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11051-018-4416-Y/TABLES/1.
Karmakar S, Das TK, Kundu S, Maiti S, Saha A. Recent advances in synthesis and biological applications of graphene quantum dots. J Indian Chem Soc. 2021;98(5): 100069. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JICS.2021.100069.
Duan C, et al. Chitosan-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) based nanogels for tumor extracellular targeting. Int J Pharm. 2011;409(1–2):252–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPHARM.2011.02.050.
George Kerry R, et al. A comprehensive review on the applications of nano-biosensor-based approaches for non-communicable and communicable disease detection. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(10):3576–602. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0BM02164D.
Miao X, et al. Graphene quantum dots wrapped gold nanoparticles with integrated enhancement mechanisms as sensitive and homogeneous substrates for surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy. Anal Chem. 2019;91(11):7295–303. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.ANALCHEM.9B01001.
Huang Q, Lin X, Tong L, Tong QX. Graphene quantum dots/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composite-based electrochemical sensor for detecting dopamine release from living cells. ACS Sustain Chem Eng. 2020;8(3):1644–50. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSSUSCHEMENG.9B06623/ASSET/IMAGES/MEDIUM/SC9B06623_0002.GIF.
Lei Y, et al. Graphene quantum dots modified W18O49 as SERS substrate for MB detection. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron. 2021;32(1):956–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10854-020-04872-9/METRICS.
Sun Y, et al. Electrochemiluminescence biosensor based on molybdenum disulfide-graphene quantum dots nanocomposites and DNA walker signal amplification for DNA detection. Mikrochim Acta. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00604-021-04962-3.
Du J, et al. A tough fluorescent nanocomposite hydrogel probe based on graphene quantum dots for the selective detection of Fe3+ ions. Mater Adv. 2022;3(20):7579–89. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2MA00605G.
Mansuriya BD, Altintas Z. Graphene quantum dot-based electrochemical immunosensors for biomedical applications. Materials. 2020;13(1):96. https://doi.org/10.3390/MA13010096.
Kalkal A, Kadian S, Pradhan R, Manik G, Packirisamy G. Recent advances in graphene quantum dot-based optical and electrochemical (bio)analytical sensors. Mater Adv. 2021;2(17):5513–41. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MA00251A.
Tabish TA, Hayat H, Abbas A, Narayan RJ. Graphene quantum dots-based electrochemical biosensing platform for early detection of acute myocardial infarction. Biosensors (Basel). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOS12020077.
Ge X, et al. Photoacoustic imaging and photothermal therapy in the second near-infrared window. New J Chem. 2019;43(23):8835–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NJ01402K.
Suhaan Dar M, Tabish TA, Thorat ND, Swati G, Kumar Sahu N. Photothermal therapy using graphene quantum dots. APL Bioeng. 2023;7(3):31502. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160324.
Liu H, et al. Magnetic-induced graphene quantum dots for imaging-guided photothermal therapy in the second near-infrared window. Biomaterials. 2020;232: 119700. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMATERIALS.2019.119700.
Tian Z, et al. Metal-organic framework/graphene quantum dot nanoparticles used for synergistic chemo- and photothermal Therapy. ACS Omega. 2017;2(3):1249–58. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSOMEGA.6B00385/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/AO-2016-003855_0004.JPEG.
Li S, et al. Exceptionally high payload of the IR780 iodide on folic acid-functionalized graphene quantum dots for targeted photothermal therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(27):22332–41. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.7B07267/SUPPL_FILE/AM7B07267_SI_001.PDF.
Correia JH, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta S, Dong T, Yang Z. Photodynamic therapy review: principles, photosensitizers, applications, and future directions. Pharmaceutics. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/PHARMACEUTICS13091332.
Yang Fan H, et al. Graphene quantum dots (GQDs)-based nanomaterials for improving photodynamic therapy in cancer treatment. Eur J Med Chem. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EJMECH.2019.111620.
Reagen S, et al. Development of biodegradable GQDs-hMSNs for fluorescence imaging and dual cancer treatment via photodynamic therapy and drug delivery. Int J Mol Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJMS232314931.
Ramachandran P, et al. N-doped graphene quantum dots/titanium dioxide nanocomposites: a study of ros-forming mechanisms, cytotoxicity and photodynamic therapy. Biomedicines. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/BIOMEDICINES100204214.
Wang X, Zheng M. Copper-boron dipyrromethene nanoagent for antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and wound healing. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2023;6(14):13689–97. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSANM.3C02574/SUPPL_FILE/AN3C02574_SI_001.PDF.
Su Y, Lu S, Gao P, Zheng M, Xie Z. BODIPY@carbon dot nanocomposites for enhanced photodynamic activity. Mater Chem Front. 2019;3(9):1747–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9QM00257J.
Jénnifer Gómez I, Russo M, Arcidiacono OA, Sánchez-Carnerero EM, Klán P, Zajíčková L. Coupling BODIPY with nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots to address the water solubility of photosensitizers. Mater Chem Front. 2022;6(12):1719–26. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2QM00200K.
Mokhtari RB, et al. Combination therapy in combating cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8(23):38022. https://doi.org/10.18632/ONCOTARGET.16723.
Yu C, et al. Graphene quantum dots-based targeted nanoprobes detecting drug delivery, imaging, and enhanced chemotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/BTM2.10270.
Cai X, et al. Sequence-defined nanotubes assembled from IR780-conjugated peptoids for chemophototherapy of malignant glioma. Research. 2021. https://doi.org/10.34133/2021/9861384.
Yang Y, et al. Increasing cancer therapy efficiency through targeting and localized light activation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(28):23400–8. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACSAMI.7B05463.
Kulahava T, et al. Photostability and phototoxicity of graphene quantum dots interacting with red blood cells. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2023;248: 112800. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPHOTOBIOL.2023.112800.
Nurunnabi M, Khatun Z, Nafiujjaman M, Lee DG, Lee YK. Surface coating of graphene quantum dots using mussel-inspired polydopamine for biomedical optical imaging. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(16):8246–53. https://doi.org/10.1021/AM4023863/SUPPL_FILE/AM4023863_SI_001.PDF.
Lingam K, Podila R, Qian H, Serkiz S, Rao AM. Evidence for edge-state photoluminescence in graphene quantum dots. Adv Funct Mater. 2013;23(40):5062–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/ADFM.201203441.
Kappen J, Ponkarpagam S, John SA. Study on the interactions between graphene quantum dots and Hg(II): Unraveling the origin of photoluminescence quenching of graphene quantum dots by Hg(II). Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2020;591: 124551. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COLSURFA.2020.124551.
Chen J, et al. Graphene quantum dots in photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale Adv. 2020;2(10):4961. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NA00631A.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Indian Council of Medical Research (EMDR/SG/13/2023-7802) for their financial support of this research.
Funding
The research reported in this paper was financially supported by the Indian Council of medical research (EMDR/SG/13/2023–7802).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MSD Conceptualization process, approach, original drafting writing, research, formal analysis, validation, and visualisation. NKS Conception, technique, verification, composing review & editing supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dar, M.S., Sahu, N.K. Graphene quantum dot-crafted nanocomposites: shaping the future landscape of biomedical advances. Discover Nano 19, 79 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-024-04028-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-024-04028-2