Skip to main content
Log in

An Estimate of the Benefit-Cost Impact of the FDA Guidance on Data Monitoring Committees

  • Regulatory Science: Original Research
  • Published:
Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is little information available about the impact that FDA guidances have on the clinical trial enterprise.

Objective

To estimate the impact of the FDA’s Guidance for Industry, “The Establishment and Operation of Clinical Trial Data Monitoring Committees for Clinical Trial Sponsors.”

Methods

An economic model was developed to measure the costs and potential savings associated with the change in data monitoring committee (DMC) usage since issuance of the DMC guidance for industry-sponsored clinical trials. To establish the change in use following the issuance of the DMC guideline, a literature search was conducted among high-impact medical journals during publication year 2010 and compared to a similar analysis conducted during publication year 2000. Costs were obtained for DMCs and applicable clinical trials. The results were applied to an analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov completed trials during 2007 to 2013.

Results

Review of 4200 manuscripts from publication year 2010 was compared to a similar literature search of publication year 2000. The mention of DMCs in industry-sponsored randomized controlled trials from high-impact journals increased from 24% to 47% (risk ratio = 1.9, P <.0001). This increased rate of DMCs is associated with an increase of 1045 DMCs for industry-sponsored phase 2 and 3 interventional trials that were commenced and completed from 2007 to 2013 and were listed in ClinicalTrials.gov. The increased cost due to these additional DMCs was approximately US$231 million, and the savings associated with early termination of clinical trials due to these DMCs was approximately US$428 million.

Conclusion

The DMC guidance has had a net positive economic impact on the clinical trial enterprise. However, noneconomic factors need to be evaluated. ClinicalTrials.gov could be further leveraged to explore further noneconomic benefits and costs of DMCs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance and regulation. http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation. Accessed December 9, 2014.

  2. Hirshberg B, Katz A. Cardiovascular outcome studies with novel antidiabetes agents: scientific and operational considerations. Diabetes Care. 2013;36 (suppl 2):S253–S258.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. US Food and Drug Administration. Economic impact analyses of FDA regulations. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/ReportsManualsForms/Reports/EconomicAnalyses/. Accessed December 9, 2014.

  4. Bouvy J, Koopmanschap M, Shah R, Schellekens H. The cost-effectiveness of drug regulation: the example of thorough QT/QTc studies. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012;91 (2):281–288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pasquali S, Lam W, Chiswell K, Kemper A, Li J. Status of the pediatric clinical trials enterprise: an analysis of the US ClinicalTrials.gov Registry. Pediatrics. 2012;130 (5):e1269–e1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. US Food and Drug Administration. The establishment and operation of clinical trial data monitoring committees for clinical trial sponsors. http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm127069.htm. Published March 2006. Accessed December 9, 2014.

  7. Department of Health and Human Services. Institutional review boards: a time for reform. https://oig.hhs.gov/oei/reports/oei-01-97-00193.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2014.

  8. Wadman M. FDA says study overestimated non-compliance with data-reporting laws. Nature. May 1, 2012.

  9. US National Institutes of Health. ClinicalTrials.gov. Histories, policies, and laws. http://ClinicalTrials.gov/ct2/about-site/history. Accessed November 2015.

  10. DeAngelis C, Drazen J, Frizelle F, et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA. 2004;292 (11):1363–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sydes M, Altman D, Babikera A, Parmar M, Spiegelhalter D; DAMOCLES Group. Reported use of data monitoring committees in the main published reports of randomized controlled trials: a cross-sectional study. Clin Trials. 2004;1(1):48–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berndt E, Cockburn I. Price indexes for clinical trial research: a feasibility study. http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2014/article/pdf/price-indexes-for-clinical-trial-research-a-feasibility-study.pdf. Accessed December 9, 2014.

  13. Bussom D, Winter L. Data monitoring committees: implementation and sourcing model options. http://www.appliedclinicaltrialsonline.com/appliedclinicaltrials/Online+Extras/Data-Monitoring-Committees-Implementation-and-Sour/ArticleStandard/Article/detail/835338?contextCategoryId=47497. Published 2014. Accessed December 9, 2014.

  14. Califf RM, Zarin DA, Kramer JM, Sherman RE, Aberle LH, Tasneem A. Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007–2010. JAMA. 2012;307:1838–1847.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomson Reuters. Science citation reports 2010 (impact factor) by Journal Citation Reports. http://www.rcmishra.com/research-tools/impact-factor-2010-journal-citation-reports-by-thomson-reutors. Accessed November 2015.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Seltzer MD, MBA, MA, FACC.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seltzer, J. An Estimate of the Benefit-Cost Impact of the FDA Guidance on Data Monitoring Committees. Ther Innov Regul Sci 49, 698–705 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015573586

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015573586

Keywords

Navigation