Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Expression of Endometrial Receptivity Genes Increase After Myomectomy of Intramural Leiomyomas not Distorting the Endometrial Cavity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Reproductive Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate whether endometrial receptivity genes are altered in infertile patients with intramural leiomyomas (IM) not distorting the endometrial cavity undergoing myomectomy. We measured endometrial HOXA-10, HOXA-11, LIF, ITGB3, and ITGAV messenger RNA (mRNA) expressions levels before and after myomectomy/metroplasty during mid-luteal phase in participants with IM, submucosal leiomyomas (SM), and septate uterus and fertile participants without fibroids. Initial endometrial sampling was obtained at the time of surgery, and second sampling was obtained 3 months after myomectomy/metroplasty. Expressions of each gene were evaluated using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A trend toward decreased endometrial HOXA-10, HOXA-11, and ITGAV mRNA expression was detected in both SM and IM groups before myomectomy when compared to both fertile group and septate uterus. However, the differences failed to show statistical significance. After myomectomy of IM, we have detected 12.8-fold increase in endometrial HOXA-10 mRNA expression and 9.0-fold increase in endometrial HOXA-11 mRNA expression. This increase in endometrial HOXA-10 and 11 mRNA expression was significant. Accordingly, 2 patients having intramural fibroids greater than 5 cm were able to remain pregnant after myomectomy. Conversely, submucosal myomectomy did not cause any significant effect on endometrial receptivity markers. Likewise, all markers of endometrial receptivity remained unchanged after metroplasty. Myomectomy of IM have favorable effect on endometrial HOXA-10 and 11 mRNA expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buttram VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology and management. Fertil Steril. 1981;36(4):433–445.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Verkauf BS. Myomectomy for fertility enhancement and preservation. Fertil Steril. 1992;58(1):1–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manyonda I, Sinthamoney E, Belli AM. Controversies and challenges in the modern management of uterine fibroids. BJOG. 2004;111(2):95–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benecke C, Kruger TF, Siebert TI, Van der Merwe JP, Steyn DW. Effect of fibroids on fertility in patients undergoing assisted reproduction. A structured literature review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;59(4):225–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bulletti C, De Ziegler D, Serti PL, Cicinelli E, Polli V, Stefanetti M. Myomas, pregnancy outcome, and in vitro fertilization. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004;1034:84–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Casini ML, Rossi F, Agostini R, Unfer V. Effect of the position of fibroids on fertility. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006;22(2):106–109.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eldar GT, Meagher S, Healey DL, MacLachlan V, Breheny S, Wood C. Effect of intramural, subserosal and submucosal uterine fibroids on the outcome of assisted reproductive technology treatment. Fertil Steril. 1998;70(4):687–691.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brosens J, Campo R, Gordts S, Brosens I. Submucous and outer myometriumleiomyomas are two distinct clinical entities. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(6):1452–1454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vollen-Hoven BJ, Lawrence AS, Healy DL. Uterine fibroids: a clinicalreview. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97(4):285–288.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Deligdish L, Lowenthal M. Endometrial changes associated with myomata of the uterus. J Clin Pathol. 1970;23(8):676–680.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Richards PA, Tiltman AJ. Anatomical variation of the oestrogen receptor in the non-neoplastic myometrium of fibromyomatous uteri. Virchows Arch. 1996;428(6):347–351.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Donnez J, Jadoul P. What are the implications of myomas on fertility? A need for a debate? Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1424–1430.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan Y, Jayaprakasan K, Zamora J, Thornton J, Raine-Fenning N, Coomarasamy A. The prevalence of congenital uterine anomalies in unselected and high-risk populations: a systematic review. Hum Repod Update. 2011;17(6):761–771.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Valle RF, Ekpo GE. Hysteroscopic metroplasty for the septate uterus: review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013;20(1):22–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56(8):483–491.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fernandez H, Sefrioui O, Virelizier C, Gervaise A, Gomel V, Frydman R. Hysteroscopic resection of submucosal myomas in patients with infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1489–1492.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kowalik CR, Goddijn M, Emanuel MH, et al. Metroplasty versus expectant management for women with recurrent miscarriage and a septate uterus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6): CD008576.

  18. Nouri K, Ott J, Huber JC, et al. Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic septoplasty in patients with septate uterus—a retrospective cohort study and systematic review of the literature. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2010;8:52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor HS. The role of HOX genes in human implantation. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6(1):75–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor HS, Arici A, Olive D, Igarashi P. HOXA10 is expressed in response to sex steroids at the time of implantation in the human endometrium. J Clin Invest. 1998;101(7):1379–1384.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bagot CN, Troy PJ, Taylor HS. Alteration of maternal Hoxa10 expression by in vivo gene transfection affects implantation. Gene Ther. 2000;7(16):1378–1384.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Daftary GS, Troy PJ, Bagot CN, Young SL, Taylor HS. Direct regulation of beta3-integrin subunit gene expression by HOXA10 in endometrial cells. Mol Endocrinol. 2002;16(3):571–579.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Taylor HS, Igarashi P, Olive DL, Arici A. Sex steroids mediate HOXA11 expression in the human peri-implantation endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(3):1129–1135.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Uterine leiomyomas affect endometrial HOXA10 expression. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2006;13:280–284.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sutherland AE, Calarco PG, Damsky CH. Developmental regulation of integrin expression at the time of implantation in the mouse embryo. Development. 1993;119(4):1175–1186.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Damsky C, Sutherland A, Fisher S. Extracellular matrix 5: adhesive interactions in early mammalian embryogenesis, implantation, and placentation. FASEB J. 1993;7(14):1320–1329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lessey BA, Damjanovich L, Coutifaris C, Castelbaum A, Albelda SM, Buck CA. Integrin adhesion molecules in the humanendometrium. Correlation with the normal and abnormalmenstrual cycle. J Clin Invest. 1992;90(1):188–195.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Sawin SJ, et al. Aberrant integrin expression in the endometriumof women with endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(2):643–649.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S, et al. Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers ofendometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(7):1393–1398.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kimber SJ. Leukaemia inhibitory factor in implantation and uterine biology. Reproduction. 2005;130(2):131–145.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arici A, Engin O, Attar E, Olive DL. Modulation of leukemia inhibitory factor gene expression and protein biosynthesis in human endometrium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(6):1908–1915.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Buttram VC Jr, Gomel V, Siegler A, DeCherney A, Gibbons W, March C. The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Müllerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1988;49(6):944–955.

    Google Scholar 

  33. McLucas B. Diagnosis, imaging and anatomical classification of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;22(4):627–642.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Fertil Steril. 1950;1(1):3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Creus M, Ordi J, Fábregues F, Casamitjana R, Ferrer B, Coll E. Alphavbeta3 integrin expression and pinopod formation in normal and out-of-phase endometria of fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(9):2279–2286.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Surrey ES. Impact of intramural leiomyomata on in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15(3):239–242.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jun SH, Ginsburg ES, Racowsky C, Wise LA, Hornstein MD. Uterine leiomyomas and their effect on in vitro fertilization outcome: a retrospective study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18(3):139–143.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Surrey ES, Liez AK, Schoolcraft WB. Impact of intramural leiomyomata in patients with a normal endometrial cavity on in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer cycle outcome. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(2):405–410.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Healy DL. Impact of uterine fibroids on ART outcome. Environ Health Perspect. 2000;108(suppl 5):845–847.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Horcajadas JA, Goyri E, Higón MA, et al. Endometrial receptivity and implantation are not affected by the presence of uterine intramural leiomyomas: a clinical and functional genomics analysis. J ClinEndocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3490–3498.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Celik O, Celik E, Turkcuoglu I, Yilmaz E, Ulas M, Simsek Y. Surgical removal of endometrioma decreases the NF-kB1 (p50/ 105) and NF-kB p65 (Rel A) expression in the eutopic endometrium during the implantation window. Reprod Sci. 2013;20(7):762–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bulletti C, De Ziegler D, Polli V, Diotallevi L, Del Ferro E, Flamigni C. The role of leiomyomas in infertility. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1999;6(4):441–445.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):2027–2034.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Darcha C, Pouly JL, Mage G. HOXA-10 expression in the mid-secretory endometrium of infertile patients with either endometriosis, uterine fibromas or unexplained infertility. Hum Reprod. 2009;24(12):3180–3187.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vercellini P, Maddalena S, De Giorgi O, Aimi G, Crosignani PG. Abdominal myomectomy for infertility: a comprehensive review. Hum Reprod. 1998;13(4):873–879.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Soriano D, Dessolle L, Poncelet C, Benifla JL, Madelenat P, Darai E. Pregnancy outcome after laparoscopic and laparoconverted myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;108(2):194–198.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bosteels J, Weyers S, Puttemans P, et al. The effectiveness of hysteroscopy in improving pregnancy rates in subfertile women without other gynaecological symptoms: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16(1):1–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharma SP, Misra SD, Mittal VP. Endometrial changes–a criterion for the diagnosis of submucous uterine leiomyoma. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 1979;22(1):33–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Daftary GS, Taylor HS. Endocrine regulation of HOX genes. Endocr Rev. 2006;27(4):331–355.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Doherty L, Mutlu L, Sinclair D, Taylor H. Uterine fibroids: clinical manifestations and contemporary management. Reprod Sci. 2014;21(9):1067–1092.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li Q, Kannan A, Wang W, Web site. Bone morphogenetic protein 2 functions via a conserved signaling pathway involving Wnt4 to regulate uterine decidualization in the mouse and the human. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(43):31725–31732.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sinclair DC, Mastroyannis A, Taylor HS. Leiomyoma simultaneously impair endometrial BMP-2-mediated decidualization and anticoagulant expression through secretion of TGF-β3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(2):412–421.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Doherty LF, Taylor HS. Leiomyoma-derived transforming growth factor-β impairs bone morphogenetic protein-2-mediated endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):845–852.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Sozen I, Arici A. Interactions of cytokines, growth factors, and the extracellular matrix in the cellular biology of uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(1):1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Khalaf Y, Ross C, El-Toukhy T, Hart R, Seed P, Braude P. The effect of small intramural uterine fibroids on the cumulative outcome of assisted conception. Hum Reprod. 2006;10(10):2640–2644.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Cermik D, Arici A, Taylor HS. Coordinated regulation of HOX gene expression in myometrium and uterine leiomyoma. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(5):979–984.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID. The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(1):1–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Zlopaša G, Škrablin S, Kalafatić D, Banović V, Lešin J. Uterine anomalies and pregnancy outcome following resectoscope metroplasty. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;98(2):129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tomaževič T, Ban-Frangež H, Virant-Klun I, Verdenik I, Požlep B, Vrtačnik-Bokal E. Septate, subseptate and arcuate uterus decrease pregnancy and live birth rates in IVF/ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21(5):700–705.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Daftary GS, Kayisli U, Seli E, Bukulmez O, Arici A, Taylor HS. Salpingectomy increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA10 expression in women with hydrosalpinx. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2):367–372.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bildirici I, Bukulmez O, Ensari A, Yarali H, Gurgan T. A prospective evaluation of the effect of salpingectomy on endometrial receptivity in cases of women with communicating hydrosalpinges. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(11):2422–2426.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Seli E, Kayisli UA, Cakmak H, Bukulmez O, Bildirici I, Guzeloglu-Kayisli O. Removal of hydrosalpinges increases endometrial leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF) expression at the time of the implantation window. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(11):3012–3017.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Celik O, Unlu C, Otlu B, Celik N, Caliskan E. Laparoscopic endometriomaresection increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA-10 and HOXA-11 mRNA expression. Fertil Steril. 2015;104(2):356–365.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onder Celik MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Unlu, C., Celik, O., Celik, N. et al. Expression of Endometrial Receptivity Genes Increase After Myomectomy of Intramural Leiomyomas not Distorting the Endometrial Cavity. Reprod. Sci. 23, 31–41 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115612929

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115612929

Keywords

Navigation