Abstract
In this paper, we study the singularities of Feynman integrals by compactifying the integration domain as well as the ambient space of these integrals, by embedding them in higher-dimensional space. In this compactified space, the singularities occur due to the meeting of compactified propagators at non-general position. The present analysis, which had been previously used only for the singularities of second type, is used to study other kinds of singularities viz threshold, pseudo-threshold and anomalous threshold singularities. We study various one-loop and two-loop examples and obtain their singularities. We also present observations based on results obtained, that allow us to determine whether the singularities lie on the physical sheet or not for some simple cases. Thus, this work at the frontier of our knowledge of Feynman integral calculus sheds insight into the analytic structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Notes
We stick to the notation of [29].
We assume that in all the Feynman integrals we consider the parameters that appear are “dimensionless” quantities which are divided by some fundamental ‘mass’ relevant to a particular theory under consideration.
We introduce parameters \(\alpha _{i}\) sticking to the notation in [29], they are not same as the Feynman parameters.
References
V.A. Smirnov, V.A. Smirnov, Feynman integral calculus, vol. 10 (Springer, Berlin, 2006)
S. Weinzierl, Feynman integrals (2022), https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99558-4, [arXiv:2201.03593]
B. Ananthanarayan, S. Banik, S. Friot, S. Ghosh, Double box and hexagon conformal Feynman integrals. Phys. Rev. D 102, 091901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.091901. [arXiv:2007.08360]
B. Ananthanarayan, S. Banik, S. Friot, S. Ghosh, Multiple series representations of N-fold Mellin-Barnes integrals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 151601 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151601. [arXiv:2012.15108]
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, From multiple unitarity cuts to the coproduct of Feynman integrals. JHEP 10, 125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2014)125. [arXiv:1401.3546]
S. Abreu, R. Britto, H. Grönqvist, Cuts and coproducts of massive triangle diagrams. JHEP 07, 111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)111. [arXiv:1504.00206]
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, Cuts from residues: the one-loop case. JHEP 06, 114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2017)114. [arXiv:1702.03163]
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, Diagrammatic Hopf algebra of cut Feynman integrals: the one-loop case. JHEP 12, 090 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2017)090. [arXiv:1704.07931]
B. Ananthanarayan, A.B. Das, D. Wyler, Hopf algebra structure of the two loop three mass nonplanar Feynman diagram. Phys. Rev. D 104, 076002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.076002. [arXiv:2104.00967]
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, E. Gardi, Algebraic structure of cut Feynman integrals and the diagrammatic coaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 051601 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.051601. [arXiv:1703.05064]
S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr, The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes Chapter 3: mathematical structures in Feynman integrals. J. Phys. A 55, 443004 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ac87de. [arXiv:2203.13014]
P. Federbush, Calculation of some homology groups relevant to sixth-order Feynman diagrams. J. Math. Phys. 6, 941 (1965)
L. de la Cruz, Feynman integrals as A-hypergeometric functions. JHEP 12, 123 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2019)123. [arXiv:1907.00507]
R.P. Klausen, Hypergeometric series representations of Feynman integrals by GKZ hypergeometric systems. JHEP 04, 121 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2020)121. [arXiv:1910.08651]
B. Ananthanarayan, S. Banik, S. Bera, S. Datta, FeynGKZ: a mathematica package for solving Feynman integrals using GKZ hypergeometric systems. Comput. Phys. Commun. 287, 108699 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2023.108699. [arXiv:2211.01285]
G. Barton, Introduction to dispersion techniques in field theory, vol. 6 (WA Benjamin, 1965)
I.T. Todorov, Analytic properties of Feynman diagrams in quantum field theory: international series of monographs in natural philosophy, vol. 38 (Elsevier, 2014)
R.J. Eden, R.J. Eden, P. Landshoff, D. Olive, J. Polkinghorne, The analytic S-matrix (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002)
H.P. Stapp, Finiteness of the number of positive-\(\alpha\) Landau surfaces in bounded portions of the physical region. J. Math. Phys. 8, 1606–1610 (1967)
V. Gribov, I. Dyatlov, Analytic continuation of the three-particle unitarity condition simplest diagrams. Sov. Phys. JETP 15, 140 (1962)
V. Kolkunov, L. Okun, A. Rudik, V. Sudakov, Location of the nearest singularities of the pi-pi-scattering amplitude. Soviet Phys. JETP-Ussr 12, 242 (1961)
R. Karplus, C.M. Sommerfield, E.H. Wichmann, Spectral representations in perturbation theory. I. vertex function. Phys. Rev. 111, 1187 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.111.1187
D.Y. Petrina, The Mandelstam representation and the continuity theorem. Soviet Phys. JETP Ser. 19, 370 (1964)
L. Landau, On analytic properties of vertex parts in quantum field theory. Nuclear Phys. 13, 181 (1959)
R. Zwicky, A brief introduction to dispersion relations and analyticity. In: Quantum field theory at the limits: from strong fields to heavy quarks, pp. 93–120, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3204/DESY-PROC-2016-04/Zwicky. [arXiv:1610.06090]
B. Ananthanarayan, A. Pal, S. Ramanan, R. Sarkar, Unveiling regions in multi-scale Feynman integrals using singularities and power geometry. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6533-x. [arXiv:1810.06270]
W. Flieger, W.J. Torres Bobadilla, Landau and leading singularities in arbitrary space-time dimensions, arXiv:2210.09872
R.E. Cutkosky, Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes. J. Math. Phys. 1, 429 (1960)
R.C. Hwa, V.L. Teplitz, Homology and Feynman integrals, (No Title) (1966)
D. Fotiadi, M. Froissart, J. Lascoux, F. Pham, Applications of an isotopy theorem. Topology 4, 159 (1965)
P. Federbush, Note on non-landau singularities. J. Math. Phys. 6, 825 (1965)
S. Coleman, R.E. Norton, Singularities in the physical region. Nuovo Cim. 38, 438 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02750472
G.B. Arfken, H.J. Weber, F.E. Harris, Mathematical methods for physicists: a comprehensive guide (Academic Press, London, 2011)
J.H. Silverman, J.T. Tate, Rational points on elliptic curves, vol. 9 (Springer, Berlin, 1992)
S. Mizera, S. Telen, Landau discriminants. JHEP 08, 200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)200. [arXiv:2109.08036]
F.A. Berends, A.I. Davydychev, N.I. Ussyukina, Threshold and pseudothreshold values of the sunset diagram. Phys. Lett. B 426, 95 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00166-X. [arXiv:hep-ph/9712209]
J. Boyling, Construction of vanishing cycles for integrals over hyperspheres. J. Math. Phys. 7, 1749 (1966)
J. Boyling, A homological approach to parametric Feynman integrals, Tech. Rep. Cambridge University(England) Dept. of Applied Mathematica and Theoretical Physics (1967)
C. Bogner, A. Schweitzer, S. Weinzierl, Analytic continuation and numerical evaluation of the kite integral and the equal mass sunrise integral. Nucl. Phys. B 922, 528 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.07.008. [arXiv:1705.08952]
M. Mühlbauer, On the homology of unions of certain non-degenerate quadrics in general position, arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.06683 (2022)
M. Mühlbauer, Momentum space landau equations via isotopy techniques, arXiv preprintarXiv:2011.10368 (2020)
M. Mühlbauer, Cutkosky’s theorem for massive one-loop Feynman integrals: part 1. Lett. Math. Phys. 112, 118 (2022)
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank B. Ananthanarayan for proposing the current investigation and for providing useful comments. The authors would also like to thank Souvik Bera, and Sudeepan Datta for their contribution during the initial stages of the project and also the Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, where this work was done. This work is a part of TP’s doctoral work at CHEP, IISc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Appendix: A toy example
Appendix: A toy example
In this appendix, we consider a toy example to demonstrate the method. We consider the following one-dimensional version of the bubble integral
Here, the integration cycle is \({\mathbb {R}}\) and the ambient space is \({\mathbb {C}}\), so we use the compactification procedure outlined in Sect. 2.2. Compactifying the propagators, we get the following
and the new ambient space W is given by
Similarly, we have \(dk \rightarrow \frac{dx_{1}}{x_{2}+x_{3}}\). This gave rise to an effective denominator
The singularities of integral (A.1) correspond to the following two cases
-
1.
When \(S_{1}\) and \(S_{2}\) meet in non-general position in W. This case is similar to the case of the Bubble Integral in Sect. 3. We get the two singularities: \(p^{2}= (m_{1}+m_{2})^{2}\) and \(p^{2}=(m_{1}-m_{2})^2\).
-
2.
When \(S_{1},S_{2}\) and \(S_{3}\) meet in non-general position in W. This case is similar to the Bubble Integral case and we get \(p^{2}=0\).
The situation for the \(S_{1}\) and \(S_{2}\) meeting in non-general position (for real \(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}\)) is as shown in Fig. 7. We can also look at the situation in the real \((x_{1},x_{2})\)-plane (with \(x_{3}=1\)). The situation of general and non-general positions is shown in Fig. 8. We note a special feature of the intersection of these surfaces is the ‘vanishing cycle’. In the plots shown in Fig. 8, notice that the green circle is divided into four parts in Fig. 8a and into three parts in Fig. 8b. The region that vanishes due to the meeting of the surfaces at non-general position is called the ‘vanishing cycle’. So whenever the surfaces meet at non-general position it corresponds to the vanishing of a cycle.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pathak, T., Sreekantan, R. Singularities of Feynman integrals. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-01084-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-01084-0