Abstract
We review the current status and implications of the anomalies (i.e. deviations from the Standard Model predictions) in semi-leptonic B meson decays, both in the charged and in the neutral current. In \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\) transitions significant tensions between measurements and the Standard Model predictions exist. They are most pronounced in the branching ratios \({{\mathcal {B}}}_{B \rightarrow K\mu ^+\mu ^-}\) and \({{\mathcal {B}}}_{B_s\rightarrow \phi \mu ^+\mu ^-}\) (albeit quite dependent on the form factors used) as well as in angular observables in \(B\rightarrow K^*\mu ^+\mu ^-\) (the \(P_5^\prime\) anomaly). Because the measurements of \({{\mathcal {B}}}_{B_s\rightarrow \mu ^+\mu ^-}\) and of the ratios R(K) and \(R(K^*)\) agree reasonably well with the SM predictions, this points towards (dominantly) lepton flavour universal NP coupling vectorially to leptons, i.e. contributions to \(C_9^{\textrm{U}}\). In fact, global fits prefer this scenario over the SM hypothesis by \(5.8\sigma\). Concerning \(b\rightarrow c\tau \nu\) transitions, R(D) and \(R(D^*)\) suggest constructive new physics at the level of \(10\%\) (w.r.t. the Standard Model amplitude) with a significance above \(3\sigma\). We discuss new physics explanations of both anomalies separately as well as possible combined explanations. In particular, a left-handed vector current solution to \(R(D^{(*)})\), either via the \(U_1\) leptoquark or the combination of the scalar leptoquarks \(S_1\) and \(S_3\), leads to an effect in \(C_9^{\textrm{U}}\) via an off-shell penguin with the right sign and magnitude and a combined significance (including a tree-level effect resulting in \(C_9^\mu =-C_{10}^\mu\) and \(R(D^{(*)})\)) of \(6.3\sigma\). Such a scenario can be tested with \(b \rightarrow s \tau ^+\tau ^-\) decays. Finally, we point out an interesting possible correlation of \(R(D^{(*)})\) with non-leptonic B anomalies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No data associated in the manuscript.
Notes
In Ref. [33] the NLO corrections to the leading-power contributions together with the subleading-power effects at twist-6 accuracy were computed.
Interestingly it was recently found in Ref. [61] that semi-inclusive \(b \rightarrow s \ell ^+\ell ^-\) transitions at high-q\(^2\) also points towards the same solution.
The SM prediction, where the absence of a subleading Isgur-Wise function at \(\mathcal {O}({{\bar{\Lambda }}}/m_{c,b})\) in the \(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c\) transition suppresses the theoretical uncertainty [85], is equal to [86,87,88,89,90,91,92] \({{\mathcal {R}}}_{\textrm{SM}}(\Lambda _c) = 0.324 \pm 0.004\)
A PhD thesis on \(R(D^{(*)})\) analyzing BaBar data exists which finds significantly lower values [96]. However, these results are neither published nor approved by the BaBar collaboration.
This does not include the case of light right-handed neutrinos.
Recently, BELLE II presented results with an excess in \(B\rightarrow K^*\nu \nu\) [159], which could be related to the B anomalies discussed here. However, the differential distribution seems to prefer light NP.
A precise computation of the tension requires the use of the SM distribution of these observables that can be found in Ref. [169].
References
M. Kobayashi, T. Maskawa, CP violation in the renormalizable theory of weak interaction. Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652–657 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.49.652
A. Abashian et al., The Belle detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 117–232 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)02013-7
B. Aubert et al., The BaBar detector. Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 479, 1–116 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)02012-5. arXiv:hep-ex/0105044
P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields. Phys. Lett. 12, 132–133 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9163(64)91136-9
F. Englert, R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321–323 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.13.321
G. Aad et al., Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 1–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.020. arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]
S. Chatrchyan et al., Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC. Phys. Lett. B 716, 30–61 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2012.08.021. arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]
O. Fischer et al., Unveiling hidden physics at the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(8), 665 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10541-4. arXiv:2109.06065 [hep-ph]
S. Bhattacharya, G. Coloretti, , A. Crivellin, S.-E. Dahbi, Y. Fang, M. Kumar, B. Mellado, Growing excesses of new scalars at the electroweak scale (2023). arXiv:2306.17209 [hep-ph]
S. Descotes-Genon, T. Hurth, J. Matias, J. Virto, Optimizing the basis of \(B\rightarrow K^*\ell ^+\ell ^-\) observables in the full kinematic range. JHEP 05, 137 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2013)137. arXiv:1303.5794 [hep-ph]
F. Sala, D.M. Straub, A new light particle in \(B\) decays? Phys. Lett. B 774, 205–209 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.09.072. arXiv:1704.06188 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, C.A. Manzari, W. Altmannshofer, G. Inguglia, P. Feichtinger, J. Martin Camalich, Toward excluding a light \(Z^{\prime }\) explanation of \(b\rightarrow s \ell ^+ \ell ^-\). Phys. Rev. D 106(3), 031703 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.L031703. arXiv:2202.12900 [hep-ph]
E. Witten, Short distance analysis of weak interactions. Nucl. Phys. B 122, 109–143 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(77)90428-X
G. Buchalla, A.J. Buras, M.E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1125–1144 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.68.1125. arXiv:hep-ph/9512380
C. Bobeth, T. Ewerth, F. Kruger, J. Urban, Analysis of neutral Higgs boson contributions to the decays \(\bar{B}\)( \(s^{)} \rightarrow \ell ^{+} \ell ^{-}\) and \(\bar{B} \rightarrow K \ell ^{+} \ell ^{-}\). Phys. Rev. D 64, 074014 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.074014. arXiv:hep-ph/0104284
C. Bobeth, G. Hiller, G. Piranishvili, Angular distributions of \(\bar{B} \rightarrow \bar{K} \ell ^+\ell ^-\) decays. JHEP 12, 040 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/040. arXiv:0709.4174 [hep-ph]
R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions \(mathcal B (\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+}\tau ^{-}\bar{\nu }_{\tau })/mathcal B (\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+}\mu ^{-}\bar{\nu }_{\mu })\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 115(11), 111803 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.111803. arXiv:1506.08614 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 115, 159901 (2015)]
F. Kruger, J. Matias, Probing new physics via the transverse amplitudes of \(B^0\rightarrow K^{*0} (\rightarrow K^- \pi ^+) l^+l^-\) at large recoil. Phys. Rev. D 71, 094009 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.71.094009. arXiv:hep-ph/0502060
J. Matias, F. Mescia, M. Ramon, J. Virto, Complete anatomy of \(\bar{B}_d \rightarrow \bar{K}^{* 0} (\rightarrow K \pi )\ell ^+\ell ^-\) and its angular distribution. JHEP 04, 104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2012)104. arXiv:1202.4266 [hep-ph]
U. Egede, T. Hurth, J. Matias, M. Ramon, W. Reece, New physics reach of the decay mode \(\bar{B} \rightarrow \bar{K}^{*0}\ell ^+\ell ^-\). JHEP 10, 056 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2010)056. arXiv:1005.0571 [hep-ph]
M. Beneke, T. Feldmann, Symmetry breaking corrections to heavy to light \(B\) meson form-factors at large recoil. Nucl. Phys. B 592, 3–34 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00585-X. arXiv:hep-ph/0008255
M. Beneke, T. Feldmann, D. Seidel, Systematic approach to exclusive \(B \rightarrow V \ell ^+ \ell ^-\), \(V \gamma \) decays. Nucl. Phys. B 612, 25–58 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00366-2. arXiv:hep-ph/0106067
G. Hiller, F. Kruger, More model-independent analysis of \(b \rightarrow s\) processes. Phys. Rev. D 69, 074020 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.074020. arXiv:hep-ph/0310219
S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Ramon, J. Virto, Implications from clean observables for the binned analysis of \(B \rightarrow K*\mu ^+\mu ^-\) at large recoil. JHEP 01, 048 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)048. arXiv:1207.2753 [hep-ph]
R. Aaij et al., Measurement of form-factor-independent observables in the decay \(B^{0} \rightarrow K^{*0} \mu ^+ \mu ^-\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 191801 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.191801. arXiv:1308.1707 [hep-ex]
A. Abdesselam et al.: Angular analysis of \(B^0 \rightarrow K^*(892)^0 \ell ^+ \ell ^-\) (2016). arXiv:1604.04042 [hep-ex]
S. Wehle et al., Lepton-flavor-dependent angular analysis of \(B\rightarrow K^\ast \ell ^+\ell ^-\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(11), 111801 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.111801. arXiv:1612.05014 [hep-ex]
M. Aaboud et al., Angular analysis of \(B^0_d \rightarrow K^{*}\mu ^+\mu ^-\) decays in \(pp\) collisions at \(\sqrt{s}= 8\) TeV with the ATLAS detector. JHEP 10, 047 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2018)047. arXiv:1805.04000 [hep-ex]
A.M. Sirunyan et al., Measurement of angular parameters from the decay \(\rm B ^0 \rightarrow \rm K ^{*0} \mu ^+ \mu ^-\) in proton-proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s} = \) 8 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 781, 517–541 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.04.030. arXiv:1710.02846 [hep-ex]
B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, Hadronic uncertainties in \(B \rightarrow K^* \mu ^+ \mu ^-\): a state-of-the-art analysis. JHEP 04, 016 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)016. arXiv:1701.08672 [hep-ph]
M. Algueró, A. Biswas, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Novoa-Brunet, To (b)e or not to (b)e: no electrons at LHCb. Eur. Phys. J. C 83(7), 648 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11824-0. arXiv:2304.07330 [hep-ph]
N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu, D. Dyk, \(B\rightarrow P\) and \(B\rightarrow V\) form factors from \(B\)-meson light-cone sum rules beyond leading twist. JHEP 01, 150 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2019)150. arXiv:1811.00983 [hep-ph]
J. Gao, C.-D. Lü, Y.-L. Shen, Y.-M. Wang, Y.-B. Wei, Precision calculations of \(B \rightarrow V\) form factors from soft-collinear effective theory sum rules on the light-cone. Phys. Rev. D 101(7), 074035 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.074035. arXiv:1907.11092 [hep-ph]
A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel, A.A. Pivovarov, Y.-M. Wang, Charm-loop effect in \(B \rightarrow K^{(*)} \ell ^{+} \ell ^{-}\) and \(B\rightarrow K^*\gamma \). JHEP 09, 089 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2010)089. arXiv:1006.4945 [hep-ph]
S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, J. Virto, On the impact of power corrections in the prediction of \(B \rightarrow K^*\mu ^+\mu ^-\) observables. JHEP 12, 125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2014)125. arXiv:1407.8526 [hep-ph]
N. Gubernari, D. Dyk, J. Virto, Non-local matrix elements in \(B_{(s)}\rightarrow \{K^{(*)},\phi \}\ell ^+\ell ^-\). JHEP 02, 088 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2021)088. arXiv:2011.09813 [hep-ph]
C. Bobeth, M. Chrzaszcz, D. Dyk, J. Virto, Long-distance effects in \(B\rightarrow K^*\ell \ell \) from analyticity. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(6), 451 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5918-6. arXiv:1707.07305 [hep-ph]
N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. Dyk, J. Virto, Dispersive analysis of \(B\rightarrow K^{(*)}\) and \(B_s\rightarrow \phi \) form factors (2023). arXiv:2305.06301 [hep-ph]
T. Blake, U. Egede, P. Owen, K.A. Petridis, G. Pomery, An empirical model to determine the hadronic resonance contributions to \(\overline{B}{} ^0 \!\rightarrow \overline{K}{} ^{*0} \mu ^+ \mu ^- \) transitions. Eur. Phys. J. C 78(6), 453 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5937-3. arXiv:1709.03921 [hep-ph]
R. Aaij et al., Angular analysis of the \(B^{+}\rightarrow K^{\ast +}\mu ^{+}\mu ^{-}\) decay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126(16), 161802 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.161802. arXiv:2012.13241 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of \(B \rightarrow K^{(*)} \mu ^+ \mu ^-\) decays. JHEP 06, 133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)133. arXiv:1403.8044 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Measurements of the S-wave fraction in \(B^{0}\rightarrow K^{+}\pi ^{-}\mu ^{+}\mu ^{-}\) decays and the \(B^{0}\rightarrow K^{\ast }(892)^{0}\mu ^{+}\mu ^{-}\) differential branching fraction. JHEP 11, 047 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP11(2016)047. arXiv:1606.04731 [hep-ex]. [Erratum: JHEP 04, 142 (2017)]
R. Aaij et al., Branching fraction measurements of the rare \(B^0_s\rightarrow \phi \mu ^+\mu ^-\) and \(B^0_s\rightarrow f_2^\prime (1525)\mu ^+\mu ^-\)-decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127(15), 151801 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.151801. arXiv:2105.14007 [hep-ex]
A. Bharucha, D.M. Straub, R. Zwicky, \(B\rightarrow V\ell ^+\ell ^-\) in the standard model from light-cone sum rules. JHEP 08, 098 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2016)098. arXiv:1503.05534 [hep-ph]
N. Gubernari, M. Reboud, D. Dyk, J. Virto, Improved theory predictions and global analysis of exclusive \(b \rightarrow s\mu ^+\mu ^-\) processes. JHEP 09, 133 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)133. arXiv:2206.03797 [hep-ph]
W.G. Parrott, C. Bouchard, C.T.H. Davies, \(B\rightarrow K and D\rightarrow K\) form factors from fully relativistic lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 107(1), 014510 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.014510. arXiv:2207.12468 [hep-lat]
M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Novoa-Brunet, \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\) global fits after \(R_{K_S}\) and \(R_{K^{*+}}\). Eur. Phys. J. C 82(4), 326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10231-1. arXiv:2104.08921 [hep-ph]
A. Tumasyan et al., Measurement of the \(B^{0}_{{\rm S}} \rightarrow \mu ^{+}\mu ^{-}\) decay properties and search for the \(B^0\rightarrow \mu ^{+}\mu ^{-}\) decay in proton–proton collisions at \(\sqrt{s}\) = 13 TeV. Phys. Lett. B 842, 137955 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2023.137955. arXiv:2212.10311 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Measurement of lepton universality parameters in \(B^+\rightarrow K^+\ell ^+\ell ^-\) and \(B^0\rightarrow K^{*0}\ell ^+\ell ^-\) decays. Phys. Rev. D 108(3), 032002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.032002. arXiv:2212.09153 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton universality in \(b \rightarrow s \ell ^+ \ell ^-\) decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131(5), 051803 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.051803. arXiv:2212.09152 [hep-ex]
B. Grinstein, R.P. Springer, M.B. Wise, Effective Hamiltonian for weak radiative \(B\) meson decay. Phys. Lett. B 202, 138–144 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90868-4
P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch, Anomalous dimension matrix for radiative and rare semileptonic \(B\) decays up to three loops. Nucl. Phys. B 673, 238–262 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.09.024. arXiv:hep-ph/0306079
C. Bobeth, P. Gambino, M. Gorbahn, U. Haisch, Complete NNLO QCD analysis of \(\bar{B} \rightarrow X_s \ell ^+ \ell ^-\) and higher order electroweak effects. JHEP 04, 071 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/04/071. arXiv:hep-ph/0312090
M. Misiak, M. Steinhauser, NNLO QCD corrections to the \(\bar{B} \rightarrow X_s \gamma \) matrix elements using interpolation in \(m_c\). Nucl. Phys. B 764, 62–82 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.11.027. arXiv:hep-ph/0609241
T. Huber, E. Lunghi, M. Misiak, D. Wyler, Electromagnetic logarithms in \(\bar{B} \rightarrow X_s \ell ^+ \ell ^-\). Nucl. Phys. B 740, 105–137 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2006.01.037. arXiv:hep-ph/0512066
T. Huber, T. Hurth, E. Lunghi, Logarithmically enhanced corrections to the decay rate and forward backward asymmetry in \(\bar{B} \rightarrow X_s \ell ^+ \ell ^-\). Nucl. Phys. B 802, 40–62 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2008.04.028. arXiv:0712.3009 [hep-ph]
A. Greljo, J. Salko, A. Smolkovič, P. Stangl, Rare \(b\) decays meet high-mass Drell–Yan. JHEP 05, 087 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2023)087. arXiv:2212.10497 [hep-ph]
M. Ciuchini, M. Fedele, E. Franco, A. Paul, L. Silvestrini, M. Valli, Constraints on lepton universality violation from rare B decays. Phys. Rev. D 107(5), 055036 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.055036. arXiv:2212.10516 [hep-ph]
T. Hurth, F. Mahmoudi, D.M. Santos, S. Neshatpour, More indications for lepton nonuniversality in \(b \rightarrow s \ell ^+ \ell ^-\). Phys. Lett. B 824, 136838 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136838. arXiv:2104.10058 [hep-ph]
M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, S. Descotes-Genon, P. Masjuan, J. Matias, Are we overlooking lepton flavour universal new physics in \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\)? Phys. Rev. D 99(7), 075017 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.075017. arXiv:1809.08447 [hep-ph]
G. Isidori, Z. Polonsky, A. Tinari, Semi-inclusive \(b\rightarrow s\bar{\ell }\ell \) transitions at high \(q^2\) (2023). arXiv:2305.03076 [hep-ph]
M. Algueró, B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, P. Masjuan, J. Matias, M. Novoa Brunet, J. Virto, Emerging patterns of new physics with and without lepton flavour universal contributions. Eur. Phys. J. C 79(8), 714 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7216-3. arXiv:1903.09578 [hep-ph]. [Addendum: Eur.Phys.J.C 80, 511 (2020)]
D. London, J. Matias, \(B\) flavour anomalies: 2021 theoretical status report. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 72, 37–68 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102020-090209. arXiv:2110.13270 [hep-ph]
J. Albrecht, D. Dyk, C. Langenbruch, Flavour anomalies in heavy quark decays. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 120, 103885 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103885. arXiv:2107.04822 [hep-ex]
M.T. Prim et al., Measurement of differential distributions of B\(\rightarrow \)D*\(\ell \)\(\nu \)\(^{-}\)\(\ell \) and implications on \(|V_{cb}|\). Phys. Rev. D 108(1), 012002 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.012002. arXiv:2301.07529 [hep-ex]
Talk by Chaoyi Lyu on “Recent semileptonic results from Belle II” at ALPS 2023 conference in Obergurgl (Austria)
J.P. Lees et al., Evidence for an excess of \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(*)} \tau ^-\bar{\nu }_\tau \) decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 101802 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.101802. arXiv:1205.5442 [hep-ex]
J.P. Lees et al., Measurement of an excess of \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau ^- \bar{\nu }_\tau \) decays and implications for charged higgs bosons. Phys. Rev. D 88(7), 072012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.072012. arXiv:1303.0571 [hep-ex]
M. Huschle et al., Measurement of the branching ratio of \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(\ast )} \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_\tau \) relative to \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(\ast )} \ell ^- \bar{\nu }_\ell \) decays with hadronic tagging at Belle. Phys. Rev. D 92(7), 072014 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.072014. arXiv:1507.03233 [hep-ex]
Y. Sato et al., Measurement of the branching ratio of \(\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_{\tau }\) relative to \(\bar{B}^0 \rightarrow D^{*+} \ell ^- \bar{\nu }_{\ell }\) decays with a semileptonic tagging method. Phys. Rev. D 94(7), 072007 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.072007. arXiv:1607.07923 [hep-ex]
S. Hirose et al., Measurement of the \(\tau \) lepton polarization and \(R(D^*)\) in the decay \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^* \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_\tau \). Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(21), 211801 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.211801. arXiv:1612.00529 [hep-ex]
S. Hirose et al., Measurement of the \(\tau \) lepton polarization and \(R(D^*)\) in the decay \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^* \tau ^- \bar{\nu }_\tau \) with one-prong hadronic \(\tau \) decays at Belle. Phys. Rev. D 97(1), 012004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.012004. arXiv:1709.00129 [hep-ex]
G. Caria et al., Measurement of \(\cal{R} (D)\) and \(\cal{R} (D^*)\) with a semileptonic tagging method. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124(16), 161803 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.161803. arXiv:1910.05864 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the ratio of the \(B^0 \rightarrow D^{*-} \tau ^+ \nu _{\tau }\) and \(B^0 \rightarrow D^{*-} \mu ^+ \nu _{\mu }\) branching fractions using three-prong \(\tau \)-lepton decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(17), 171802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.171802. arXiv:1708.08856 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton flavor universality by the measurement of the \(B^0 \rightarrow D^{*-} \tau ^+ \nu _\tau \) branching fraction using three-prong \(\tau \) decays. Phys. Rev. D 97(7), 072013 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.072013. arXiv:1711.02505 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Test of lepton flavor universality using \(B^0\rightarrow D^*-\tau ^+\nu _\tau \) decays with hadronic \(\tau \) channels. Phys. Rev. D 108(1), 012018 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.012018. arXiv:2305.01463 [hep-ex]
Y.S. Amhis et al., Averages of \(b\)-hadron, \(c\)-hadron, and \(\tau \)-lepton properties as of 2021. Phys. Rev. D 107(5), 052008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.052008. arXiv:2206.07501 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the ratio of branching fractions \(\cal{B} (B_c^+\,\rightarrow \, J/\psi \tau ^+\nu _\tau )\)/\(\cal{B} (B_c^+\,\rightarrow \, J/\psi \mu ^+\nu _\mu )\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(12), 121801 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.121801. arXiv:1711.05623 [hep-ex]
T.D. Cohen, H. Lamm, R.F. Lebed, Model-independent bounds on \(R(J/\psi )\). JHEP 09, 168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2018)168. arXiv:1807.02730 [hep-ph]
D. Leljak, B. Melic, M. Patra, On lepton flavour universality in semileptonic B\(_{c}\rightarrow \)\(\eta \)\(_{c}\), J/\(\psi \) decays. JHEP 05, 094 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2019)094. arXiv:1901.08368 [hep-ph]
J. Harrison, C.T.H. Davies, A. Lytle, \(R(J/\psi )\) and \(B_c^- \rightarrow J/\psi \ell ^-\bar{\nu }_\ell \) lepton flavor universality violating observables from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125(22), 222003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.222003. arXiv:2007.06956 [hep-lat]
J. Harrison, C.T.H. Davies, A. Lytle, \(B_c \rightarrow J/\psi \) form factors for the full \(q^2\) range from lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 102(9), 094518 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.094518. arXiv:2007.06957 [hep-lat]
R. Aaij et al., Observation of the decay \( \Lambda _b^0\rightarrow \Lambda _c^+\tau ^-\overline{\nu }_{\tau }\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 128(19), 191803 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.191803. arXiv:2201.03497 [hep-ex]
F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, D.J. Robinson, Interpreting LHCb’s \(\Lambda _b\rightarrow \Lambda _c\tau \bar{\nu }\) measurement and puzzles in semileptonic \(\Lambda _b\) decays. Phys. Rev. D 107(1), 011502 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.L011502. arXiv:2206.11282 [hep-ph]
M. Neubert, Heavy quark symmetry. Phys. Rept. 245, 259–396 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(94)90091-4. arXiv:hep-ph/9306320
T. Gutsche, M.A. Ivanov, J.G. Körner, V.E. Lyubovitskij, P. Santorelli, N. Habyl, Semileptonic decay \(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c + \tau ^- + \bar{\nu _\tau }\) in the covariant confined quark model. Phys. Rev. D 91(7), 074001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.074001. arXiv:1502.04864 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 91, 119907 (2015)]
S. Shivashankara, W. Wu, A. Datta, \(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c \tau \bar{\nu }_{\tau }\) decay in the standard model and with new physics. Phys. Rev. D 91(11), 115003 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.115003. arXiv:1502.07230 [hep-ph]
W. Detmold, C. Lehner, S. Meinel, \(\Lambda _b \rightarrow p \ell ^- \bar{\nu }_\ell \) and \(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c \ell ^- \bar{\nu }_\ell \) form factors from lattice QCD with relativistic heavy quarks. Phys. Rev. D 92(3), 034503 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.034503. arXiv:1503.01421 [hep-lat]
X.-Q. Li, Y.-D. Yang, X. Zhang, \( {\Lambda }_b\rightarrow {\Lambda }_c\tau {\overline{\nu }}_{\tau } \) decay in scalar and vector leptoquark scenarios. JHEP 02, 068 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2017)068. arXiv:1611.01635 [hep-ph]
A. Datta, S. Kamali, S. Meinel, A. Rashed, Phenomenology of \( {\Lambda }_b\rightarrow {\Lambda }_c\tau {\overline{\nu }}_{\tau } \) using lattice QCD calculations. JHEP 08, 131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2017)131. arXiv:1702.02243 [hep-ph]
F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, D.J. Robinson, W.L. Sutcliffe, New predictions for \(\Lambda _b\rightarrow \Lambda _c\) semileptonic decays and tests of heavy quark symmetry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(20), 202001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.202001. arXiv:1808.09464 [hep-ph]
F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, D.J. Robinson, W.L. Sutcliffe, Precise predictions for \(\Lambda _b \rightarrow \Lambda _c\) semileptonic decays. Phys. Rev. D 99(5), 055008 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.055008. arXiv:1812.07593 [hep-ph]
M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. Boer, T. Kitahara, M. Moscati, U. Nierste, I. Nišandžić, Impact of polarization observables and \( B_c\rightarrow \tau \nu \) on new physics explanations of the \(b\rightarrow c \tau \nu \) anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 99(7), 075006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.075006. arXiv:1811.09603 [hep-ph]
M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, T. Kitahara, M. Moscati, U. Nierste, I. Nišandžić, Addendum to “Impact of polarization observables and \(B_c\rightarrow \tau \nu \) on new physics explanations of the \(b\rightarrow c \tau \nu \) anomaly” (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.035035arXiv:1905.08253 [hep-ph]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 100, 035035 (2019)]
M. Fedele, M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, U. Nierste, R. Watanabe, Impact of \(\Lambda \)b\(\rightarrow \)\(\Lambda \)c\(\tau \)\(\nu \) measurement on new physics in b\(\rightarrow \)cl\(\nu \) transitions. Phys. Rev. D 107(5), 055005 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.055005. arXiv:2211.14172 [hep-ph]
Y. Li, Search for Beyond Standard Model Physics at \(BaBar\). PhD thesis, Caltech (2022). https://doi.org/10.7907/tz7n-d662
D. Bigi, P. Gambino, Revisiting \(B\rightarrow D \ell \nu \). Phys. Rev. D 94(9), 094008 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094008. arXiv:1606.08030 [hep-ph]
F.U. Bernlochner, Z. Ligeti, M. Papucci, D.J. Robinson, Combined analysis of semileptonic \(B\) decays to \(D\) and \(D^*\): \(R(D^{(*)})\), \(|V_{cb}|\), and new physics. Phys. Rev. D 95(11), 115008 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.115008. arXiv:1703.05330 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 97, 059902 (2018)]
S. Jaiswal, S. Nandi, S.K. Patra, Extraction of \(|V_{cb}|\) from \(B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\ell \nu _\ell \) and the standard model predictions of \(R(D^{(*)})\). JHEP 12, 060 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2017)060. arXiv:1707.09977 [hep-ph]
P. Gambino, M. Jung, S. Schacht, The \(V_{cb}\) puzzle: an update. Phys. Lett. B 795, 386–390 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.039. arXiv:1905.08209 [hep-ph]
M. Bordone, M. Jung, D. Dyk, Theory determination of \(\bar{B}\rightarrow D^{(*)}\ell ^-\bar{\nu }\) form factors at \(\cal{O} (1/m_c^2)\). Eur. Phys. J. C 80(2), 74 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7616-4. arXiv:1908.09398 [hep-ph]
G. Martinelli, S. Simula, L. Vittorio, \(\vert V_{cb} \vert \) and \(R(D)^{(*)}\)) using lattice QCD and unitarity. Phys. Rev. D 105(3), 034503 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034503. arXiv:2105.08674 [hep-ph]
A. Bazavov et al., Semileptonic form factors for \(B\rightarrow D^*\ell \nu \) at nonzero recoil from \(2+1\)-flavor lattice QCD: Fermilab lattice and MILC Collaborations. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(12), 1141 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10984-9. arXiv:2105.14019 [hep-lat]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 83, 21 (2023)]
J. Harrison, C.T.H. Davies, \(B \rightarrow D^*\) vector, axial-vector and tensor form factors for the full \(q^2\) range from lattice QCD (2023). arXiv:2304.03137 [hep-lat]
M. Di Carlo, G. Martinelli, M. Naviglio, F. Sanfilippo, S. Simula, L. Vittorio, Unitarity bounds for semileptonic decays in lattice QCD. Phys. Rev. D 104(5), 054502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054502. arXiv:2105.02497 [hep-lat]
G. Martinelli, S. Simula, L. Vittorio, Constraints for the semileptonic B\(\rightarrow \)D(*) form factors from lattice QCD simulations of two-point correlation functions. Phys. Rev. D 104(9), 094512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.094512. arXiv:2105.07851 [hep-lat]
G. Martinelli, S. Simula, L. Vittorio, Exclusive determinations of \(\vert V_{cb} \vert \) and \(R(D^{*})\) through unitarity. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(12), 1083 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11050-0. arXiv:2109.15248 [hep-ph]
M. Fedele, M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, S. Iguro, U. Nierste, S. Simula, L. Vittorio, Discriminating \(B\rightarrow D^{*}\ell \nu \) form factors via polarization observables and asymmetries (2023). arXiv:2305.15457 [hep-ph]
A. Carvunis, A. Crivellin, D. Guadagnoli, S. Gangal, The forward–backward asymmetry in \(B\rightarrow D^{*}\ell \nu \): one more hint for scalar leptoquarks? Phys. Rev. D 105(3), 031701 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.L031701. arXiv:2106.09610 [hep-ph]
S. Iguro, T. Kitahara, R. Watanabe, Global fit to \(b \rightarrow c\tau \nu \) anomalies 2022 mid-autumn (2022). arXiv:2210.10751 [hep-ph]
A.J. Buras, J. Girrbach, Left-handed \(Z^{\prime }\) and \(Z\) FCNC quark couplings facing new \(b \rightarrow s \mu ^+ \mu ^-\) data. JHEP 12, 009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2013)009. arXiv:1309.2466 [hep-ph]
R. Gauld, F. Goertz, U. Haisch, On minimal \(Z^{\prime }\) explanations of the \(B\rightarrow K^*\mu ^+\mu ^-\) anomaly. Phys. Rev. D 89, 015005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.015005. arXiv:1308.1959 [hep-ph]
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov, I. Yavin, Quark flavor transitions in \(L_\mu -L_\tau \) models. Phys. Rev. D 89, 095033 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.89.095033. arXiv:1403.1269 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio, J. Heeck, Explaining \(h\rightarrow \mu ^\pm \tau ^\mp \), \(B\rightarrow K^* \mu ^+\mu ^-\) and \(B\rightarrow K \mu ^+\mu ^-/B\rightarrow K e^+e^-\) in a two-Higgs-doublet model with gauged \(L_\mu -L_\tau \). Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 151801 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.151801. arXiv:1501.00993 [hep-ph]
L. Di Luzio, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, Updated \(B_s\)-mixing constraints on new physics models for \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\) anomalies. Phys. Rev. D 97(9), 095035 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.095035. arXiv:1712.06572 [hep-ph]
B. Allanach, F.S. Queiroz, A. Strumia, S. Sun, \(Z^\prime \) models for the LHCb and \(g-2\) muon anomalies. Phys. Rev. D 93(5), 055045 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.055045. arXiv:1511.07447 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 119902 (2017)]
J. Alcaraz et al.: A combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model (2006). arXiv:hep-ex/0612034
A.J. Buras, F. De Fazio, J. Girrbach, The anatomy of Z’ and Z with flavour changing neutral currents in the flavour precision era. JHEP 02, 116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2013)116. arXiv:1211.1896 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, L. Hofer, J. Matias, U. Nierste, S. Pokorski, J. Rosiek, Lepton-flavour violating \(B\) decays in generic \(Z^{\prime }\) models. Phys. Rev. D 92(5), 054013 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.054013. arXiv:1504.07928 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, G. D’Ambrosio, J. Heeck, Addressing the LHC flavor anomalies with horizontal gauge symmetries. Phys. Rev. D 91(7), 075006 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.075006. arXiv:1503.03477 [hep-ph]
L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C.A. Manzari, L. Vernazza, \(Z^\prime \) models with less-minimal flavour violation. Phys. Rev. D 101(9), 095003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.095003. arXiv:1910.00014 [hep-ph]
S. Jäger, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, K. Leslie, Charming new physics in rare B-decays and mixing? Phys. Rev. D 97(1), 015021 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.015021. arXiv:1701.09183 [hep-ph]
C. Bobeth, U. Haisch, A. Lenz, B. Pecjak, G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, On new physics in \(\Delta \Gamma _{d}\). JHEP 06, 040 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2014)040. arXiv:1404.2531 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, C. Greub, D. Müller, F. Saturnino, Importance of loop effects in explaining the accumulated evidence for new physics in B Decays with a vector leptoquark. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(1), 011805 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.011805. arXiv:1807.02068 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, D. Müller, F. Saturnino, Flavor phenomenology of the leptoquark singlet–triplet model. JHEP 06, 020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2020)020. arXiv:1912.04224 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, B. Fuks, L. Schnell, Explaining the hints for lepton flavour universality violation with three S\(_{2}\) leptoquark generations. JHEP 06, 169 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)169. arXiv:2203.10111 [hep-ph]
S. Iguro, K. Tobe, \(R(D^{(*)})\) in a general two Higgs doublet model. Nucl. Phys. B 925, 560–606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.10.014. arXiv:1708.06176 [hep-ph]
S. Iguro, Y. Omura, Status of the semileptonic \(B\) decays and muon \(g-2\) in general 2HDMs with right-handed neutrinos. JHEP 05, 173 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05(2018)173. arXiv:1802.01732 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, D. Müller, C. Wiegand, \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\) transitions in two-Higgs-doublet models. JHEP 06, 119 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)119. arXiv:1903.10440 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, M. Kirk, Diquark explanation of \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\) (2023). arXiv:2309.07205 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, D. Müller, A. Signer, Y. Ulrich, Correlating lepton flavor universality violation in \(B\) decays with \(\mu \rightarrow e\gamma \) using leptoquarks. Phys. Rev. D 97(1), 015019 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.015019. arXiv:1706.08511 [hep-ph]
B. Gripaios, M. Nardecchia, S.A. Renner, Linear flavour violation and anomalies in \(B\) physics. JHEP 06, 083 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2016)083. arXiv:1509.05020 [hep-ph]
P. Arnan, L. Hofer, F. Mescia, A. Crivellin, Loop effects of heavy new scalars and fermions in \(b\rightarrow s\mu ^+\mu ^-\). JHEP 04, 043 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2017)043. arXiv:1608.07832 [hep-ph]
B. Grinstein, S. Pokorski, G.G. Ross, Lepton non-universality in \(B\) decays and fermion mass structure. JHEP 12, 079 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)079. arXiv:1809.01766 [hep-ph]
P. Arnan, A. Crivellin, M. Fedele, F. Mescia, Generic loop effects of new scalars and fermions in \(b\rightarrow s\ell ^+\ell ^-\), \((g-2)_\mu \) and a vector-like \(4^{\rm th}\) generation. JHEP 06, 118 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2019)118. arXiv:1904.05890 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, C. Greub, A. Kokulu, Explaining \(B\rightarrow D\tau \nu \), \(B\rightarrow D^*\tau \nu \) and \(B\rightarrow \tau \nu \) in a 2HDM of type III. Phys. Rev. D 86, 054014 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.054014. arXiv:1206.2634 [hep-ph]
S. Fajfer, J.F. Kamenik, I. Nisandzic, J. Zupan, Implications of lepton flavor universality violations in \(B\) decays. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 161801 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.161801. arXiv:1206.1872 [hep-ph]
A. Celis, M. Jung, X.-Q. Li, A. Pich, Sensitivity to charged scalars in \(\varvec {B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \nu _\tau }\) and \(\varvec {B\rightarrow \tau \nu _\tau }\) decays. JHEP 01, 054 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2013)054. arXiv:1210.8443 [hep-ph]
B. Bhattacharya, A. Datta, D. London, S. Shivashankara, Simultaneous explanation of the \(R_K\) and \(R(D^{(*)})\) puzzles. Phys. Lett. B 742, 370–374 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.02.011. arXiv:1412.7164 [hep-ph]
A. Greljo, G. Isidori, D. Marzocca, On the breaking of lepton flavor universality in \(B\) decays. JHEP 07, 142 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2015)142. arXiv:1506.01705 [hep-ph]
S.M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente, J. Virto, Phenomenology of an \(SU(2) \times SU(2) \times U(1)\) model with lepton-flavour non-universality. JHEP 12, 059 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2016)059. arXiv:1608.01349 [hep-ph]
M. Carena, E. Megías, M. Quíros, C. Wagner, \( {R}_{D^{\left(*\right)}} \) in custodial warped space. JHEP 12, 043 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2018)043. arXiv:1809.01107 [hep-ph]
Y. Sakaki, M. Tanaka, A. Tayduganov, R. Watanabe, Testing leptoquark models in \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(*)} \tau \bar{\nu }\). Phys. Rev. D 88(9), 094012 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.094012. arXiv:1309.0301 [hep-ph]
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, Minimal leptoquark explanation for the \(R_{D^{(*)}}\), \(R_K\), and \((g-2)_\mu \) anomalies. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(14), 141802 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.141802. arXiv:1511.01900 [hep-ph]
M. Freytsis, Z. Ligeti, J.T. Ruderman, Flavor models for \(\bar{B} \rightarrow D^{(*)} \tau \bar{\nu }\). Phys. Rev. D 92(5), 054018 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.054018. arXiv:1506.08896 [hep-ph]
S. Fajfer, N. Košnik, Vector leptoquark resolution of \(R_K\) and \(R_{D^{(*)}}\) puzzles. Phys. Lett. B 755, 270–274 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.02.018. arXiv:1511.06024 [hep-ph]
A. Celis, M. Jung, X.-Q. Li, A. Pich, Scalar contributions to \(b\rightarrow c (u) \tau \nu \) transitions. Phys. Lett. B 771, 168–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.05.037. arXiv:1612.07757 [hep-ph]
R. Alonso, B. Grinstein, J. Martin Camalich, Lifetime of \(B_c^-\) constrains explanations for anomalies in \(B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \nu \). Phys. Rev. Lett. 118(8), 081802 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.081802. arXiv:1611.06676 [hep-ph]
J. Aebischer, B. Grinstein, Standard model prediction of the B\(_{c}\) lifetime. JHEP 07, 130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2021)130. arXiv:2105.02988 [hep-ph]
M. Blanke, S. Iguro, H. Zhang, Towards ruling out the charged Higgs interpretation of the \( {R}_{D^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomaly. JHEP 06, 043 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2022)043. arXiv:2202.10468 [hep-ph]
L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, T. Ota, Effective field theory approach to \(b\rightarrow s\ell \ell ^{(^{\prime })}\), \(B\rightarrow K^{(*)}\nu \overline{\nu }\) and \(B\rightarrow D^{(*)}\tau \nu \) with third generation couplings. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 181801 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.181801. arXiv:1506.02661 [hep-ph]
R. Barbieri, C.W. Murphy, F. Senia, B-decay anomalies in a composite leptoquark model. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(1), 8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4578-7. arXiv:1611.04930 [hep-ph]
L. Di Luzio, A. Greljo, M. Nardecchia, Gauge leptoquark as the origin of \(B\)-physics anomalies. Phys. Rev. D 96(11), 115011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.115011. arXiv:1708.08450 [hep-ph]
L. Calibbi, A. Crivellin, T. Li, Model of vector leptoquarks in view of the \(B\)-physics anomalies. Phys. Rev. D 98(11), 115002 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.115002. arXiv:1709.00692 [hep-ph]
M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierarchies and flavor anomalies. Phys. Lett. B 779, 317–323 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.02.011. arXiv:1712.01368 [hep-ph]
M. Blanke, A. Crivellin, \(B\) meson anomalies in a Pati–Salam model within the Randall–Sundrum background. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121(1), 011801 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.011801. arXiv:1801.07256 [hep-ph]
A. Crivellin, D. Müller, T. Ota, Simultaneous explanations of \(R(D^{(*)})\) and \(b\rightarrow e\ell ^+\ell ^-\): The last scalar leptoquarks standing. JHEP 09, 040 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2017)040. arXiv:1703.09226 [hep-ph]
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca, E. Venturini, Low-energy phenomenology of scalar leptoquarks at one-loop accuracy. JHEP 01, 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2021)138. arXiv:2008.09548 [hep-ph]
E. Ganiev (On behalf of the Belle II Collaboration). Talk given at EPS-HEP 2023 “On Radiative and Electroweak Penguin Decays”, Hamburg, DESY (2023)
B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, L. Hofer, J. Matias, Searching for new physics with \(b\rightarrow s\tau ^+\tau ^-\) processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(18), 181802 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.181802. arXiv:1712.01919 [hep-ph]
M. Algueró, J. Matias, B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, Disentangling lepton flavor universal and lepton flavor universality violating effects in \(b\rightarrow s \ell ^+\ell ^-\) transitions. Phys. Rev. D 105(11), 113007 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.113007. arXiv:2205.15212 [hep-ph]
S. Iguro, Conclusive probe of the charged Higgs solution of \(P_5^\prime \) and \(R(D^{(*)})\) discrepancies. Phys. Rev. D 107(9), 095004 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.095004. arXiv:2302.08935 [hep-ph]
J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, M. König, N. Selimović, Vector leptoquarks beyond tree level. Phys. Rev. D 101(3), 035024 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.035024. arXiv:1910.13474 [hep-ph]
J. Fuentes-Martín, G. Isidori, M. König, N. Selimović, Vector leptoquarks beyond tree level III: vector-like fermions and flavor-changing transitions. Phys. Rev. D 102, 115015 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.115015. arXiv:2009.11296 [hep-ph]
M. Fernández Navarro, S.F. King, B-anomalies in a twin Pati–Salam theory of flavour including the 2022 LHCb \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) analysis. JHEP 02, 188 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP02(2023)188. arXiv:2209.00276 [hep-ph]
V. Gherardi, D. Marzocca, E. Venturini, Matching scalar leptoquarks to the SMEFT at one loop. JHEP 07, 225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2020)225. arXiv:2003.12525 [hep-ph]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 006 (2021)]
C. Cornella, G. Isidori, M. König, S. Liechti, P. Owen, N. Serra, Hunting for \(B^+\rightarrow K^+ \tau ^+\tau ^-\) imprints on the \(B^+ \rightarrow K^+ \mu ^+\mu ^-\) dimuon spectrum. Eur. Phys. J. C 80(12), 1095 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-08674-5. arXiv:2001.04470 [hep-ph]
M. Algueró, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, M. Novoa-Brunet, A new \(B\)-flavour anomaly in \(B_{d, s}\rightarrow K^{*0}\bar{K}^{*0}\): anatomy and interpretation. JHEP 04, 066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2021)066. arXiv:2011.07867 [hep-ph]
A. Biswas, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias, G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, A new puzzle in non-leptonic \(B\) decays. JHEP 06, 108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2023)108. arXiv:2301.10542 [hep-ph]
R.L. Workman et al., Review of particle physics. PTEP 2022, 083-01 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac097
Y.-T. Duh et al., Measurements of branching fractions and direct CP asymmetries for B\(\rightarrow \)K\(\pi \), B\(\rightarrow \)\(\pi \) and B\(\rightarrow \)KK decays. Phys. Rev. D 87(3), 031103 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.031103. arXiv:1210.1348 [hep-ex]
B. Aubert et al., Observation of \(B^{+} \rightarrow \bar{K}^0 K^{+}\) and \(B^0 \rightarrow K^0 \bar{K}^0\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 171805 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.171805. arXiv:hep-ex/0608036
R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the branching fraction of the decay \(B_s^0\rightarrow K_S^0 K_S^0\). Phys. Rev. D 102(1), 012011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.012011. arXiv:2002.08229 [hep-ex]
B. Pal et al., Observation of the decay \(B_s^0\rightarrow K^0\overline{K}^0\). Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(16), 161801 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.161801. arXiv:1512.02145 [hep-ex]
R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of the \(B^0_{(s)} \rightarrow K^{*0} \overline{K}^{*0}\) decays and measurement of the branching fraction of the \(B^0 \rightarrow K^{*0} \overline{K}^{*0}\) decay. JHEP 07, 032 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2019)032. arXiv:1905.06662 [hep-ex]
B. Aubert et al., Observation of \(B^0 \rightarrow \) K*0 \(\bar{K}\)* 0 and search for \(B^0 \rightarrow \) K*0 K*0. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 081801 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.081801. arXiv:0708.2248 [hep-ex]
M. Beneke, J. Rohrer, D. Yang, Branching fractions, polarisation and asymmetries of \(B\rightarrow VV\) decays. Nucl. Phys. B 774, 64–101 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.03.020. arXiv:hep-ph/0612290
J.M. Lizana, J. Matias, B.A. Stefanek, Explaining the \(B_{d,s}\rightarrow {K^{(*)}\bar{K}^{(*)}}\) non-leptonic puzzle and charged-current \(B\)-anomalies via scalar leptoquarks (2023). arXiv:2306.09178 [hep-ph]
R. Barbieri, G. Isidori, A. Pattori, F. Senia, Anomalies in \(B\)-decays and \(U(2)\) flavour symmetry. Eur. Phys. J. C 76(2), 67 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-3905-3. arXiv:1512.01560 [hep-ph]
A. Mauri, Talk at CKM2023 on behalf of the LHCb collaboration (2023)
Acknowledgements
A.C. thanks Syuhei Iguro for useful discussions. A.C. gratefully acknowledges the support by the Swiss National Science Foundation under Project No. PP00P21_76884. JM acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PID2020-112965GB-I00/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033) and by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme. The work of B.C. is supported by the Margarita Salas postdoctoral program funded by the European Union-NextGenerationEU.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Capdevila, B., Crivellin, A. & Matias, J. Review of semileptonic B anomalies. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 233, 409–428 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-01012-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-023-01012-2