Skip to main content
Log in

Jaynes’ principle for quantum Markov processes: generalized Gibbs–von Neumann states rule

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We prove that any asymptotics of a finite-dimensional quantum Markov processes can be formulated in the form of a generalized Jaynes’ principle in the discrete as well as in the continuous case. Surprisingly, we find that the open-system dynamics does not require maximization of von Neumann entropy. In fact, the natural functional to be extremized is the quantum relative entropy and the resulting asymptotic states or trajectories are always of the exponential Gibbs-like form. Three versions of the principle are presented for different settings, each treating different prior knowledge: for asymptotic trajectories of fully known initial states, for asymptotic trajectories incompletely determined by known expectation values of some constants of motion and for stationary states incompletely determined by expectation values of some integrals of motion. All versions are based on the knowledge of the underlying dynamics. Hence, our principle is primarily rooted in the inherent physics and it is not solely an information construct. The found principle coincides with the MaxEnt principle in the special case of unital quantum Markov processes. We discuss how the generalized principle modifies fundamental relations of statistical physics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

No data associated in the manuscript

References

  1. C. Lanczos, The Variational Principles of Mechanics (Dover Publications, Mineola, 1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J.-L. Basdevant, Variational Principles in Physics, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 2023)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. G.D. Kirchhoff, Ann. Phys. 75, 189 (1848)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J.W. Gibbs, Elementary Principles in Statistical Mechanics, Developed with Especial Reference to the Rational Foundation of Thermodynamics (Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York, 1902)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Gerjuoy, A.R.P. Rau, L. Spruch, x. Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 725 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Rojo, A. Bloch, The Principle of Least Action (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2018)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. L.M. Martyueshev, V.D. Seleynev, Phys. Rep. 426, 1 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 106, 620 (1957)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. E.T. Jaynes, Phys. Rev. 108, 171 (1957)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. E.T. Jaynes, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 31, 579 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. J.N. Kapur, K. Kesavan, Entropy optimization principles and their applications, in Entropy and Energy Dissipation in Water Resources. Water Science and Technology Library. ed. by V.P. Singh, M. Fiorentino (Springer, Dordrecht, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.K. Kesavan, J.N. Kapur, IEEE Trans. Syst. 19, 1042 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.R. Banavar, A. Maritan, I. Volko, Applications of the principle of maximum entropy: from physics to ecology. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 22, 063101 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Karmeshu (ed.), Entropy Measures, Maximum Entropy Principle and Emerging Applications (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Balian, From Microphysics to Macrophysics (Springer, Heidelberg, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. P.A. Ortega, D.A. Braun, J. Artif. Intell. Res. 38, 475 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Tsallis, Introduction to Nonextensive Statistical Mechanics: Approaching a Complex World (Springer, New York, 2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Pressé, K. Ghosh, J. Lee, K.A. Dill, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1115 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ch. Gogolin, M.P. Muller, J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040401 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Burgarth et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 150401 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Burgarth et al., Phys. Rev. A 103, 032214 (2021)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Novotný, J. Maryška, I. Jex, EPJ Plus 133, 310 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Novotný, G. Alber, I. Jex, J. Phys. A: Mat. Theor. 45, 485301 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Amato, P. Facchi, A. Konderak, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 265304 (2023)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. V.V. Albert, L. Jiang, Phys. Rev. A 89, 022118 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Gudder, J. Math. Phys. 49, 072105 (2008)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. R. Alicki, K. Lendi, Quantum Dynamical Semigroups and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. M.A. Nielsen, I.L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (University Press, Cambridge, 2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. B. V. R. Bhat, B. Talwar, S. Kar, arXiv:2209.07731 [math.OA] (2022)

  30. L. Boltzmann, Wien. Ber. 76, 373 (1877)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Z. Lenarčič, F. Lange, A. Rosch, Phys. Rev. B 97, 024302 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics, 2nd edn. (Wiley, New York, 1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. S. Goldstein, J. J. Lebowitz, R. Tumulka, N. Zanghi Gibbs and Boltzmann entropy in classical and quantum mechanics, (arxiv1903.11870v2)

  34. B. Kollár, T. Kiss, J. Novotný, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 230505 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. D. Chruściński, G. Kimura, A. Kossakowski, Y. Shishido, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 050401 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. D. Chruściński, R. Fujii, G. Kimura, H. Ohno, Linear Algebra Appl. 630, 293 (2021)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Novotný, A. Mariano, S. Pascazio, A. Scardicchio, I. Jex, Phys. Rev. A 103, 042218 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

J. N., J.M. and I. J. were supported by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, Grant No. SGS22/181/OHK4/3T/14. This publication was funded by the project “Centre for Advanced Applied Sciences,” Registry No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16 019/0000778, supported by the Operational Programme Research, Development and Education, co-financed by the European Structural and Investment Funds and the state budget of the Czech Republic. The support for J. N. and I. J. by GAČR of the Czech Republic under Grant No. 23-07169 S is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Novotný.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Novotný, J., Maryška, J. & Jex, I. Jaynes’ principle for quantum Markov processes: generalized Gibbs–von Neumann states rule. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 657 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04272-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04272-y

Navigation