Abstract
The quartic gauge boson couplings that identify the strengths of the gauge boson self-interactions are exactly determined by the non-Abelian gauge nature of the Standard Model. The examination of these couplings at ep collisions with high center-of-mass energy and high integrated luminosity provides an important opportunity to test the validity of the Standard Model and the existence of new physics beyond the Standard Model. The quartic gauge boson couplings can contribute directly to multi-boson production at colliders. Therefore, we examine the potential of the process \(ep \rightarrow \nu _{e}W^{+}W^{-} j\) at the Large Hadron Electron Collider and the Future Circular Collider-hadron electron to study non-standard WWWW couplings in a model independent way by means of the effective Lagrangian approach. We present an investigation on measuring \(W^{+}W^{-}\) production in pure leptonic and semileptonic decay channels. In addition, we calculate the sensitivity limits at \(95\%\) Confidence Level on the anomalous \(\frac{f_{M0}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\), \(\frac{f_{M1}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\), \(\frac{f_{M7}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\), \(\frac{f_{S0}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\), \(\frac{f_{S1}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\), \(\frac{f_{T0}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\), \(\frac{f_{T1}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\) and \(\frac{f_{T2}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\) couplings obtained by dimension-8 operators through the process \(ep \rightarrow \nu _{e}W^{+}W^{-} j\) for the Large Hadron Electron Collider and the Future Circular Hadron Electron Collider’s different center-of-mass energies and integrated luminosities. Our results show that with the process \(ep \rightarrow \nu _{e}W^{+}W^{-} j\) at the Large Hadron Electron Collider and the Future Circular Collider-hadron electron the sensitivity estimated on the anomalous WWWW couplings can be importantly strengthened.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Chatrchyan et al., CMS collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012)
G. Aad et al., ATLAS collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012)
G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, Phys. Lett. B 288, 201 (1992)
G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, Y. Kurihara, D. Perret-Gallix, A. Semenov, Eur. Phys. J. C 13, 283 (2000)
M. Baak et al., The Snowmass EW WG report, arXiv:1310.6708 (2013)
M. Koksal, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29, 1450184 (2014)
M. Koksal, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 130, 75 (2015)
M. Koksal, A. Senol, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30, 1550107 (2015)
A. Senol, M. Koksal, JHEP 1503, 139 (2015)
A. Senol, M. Koksal, Phys. Lett. B 742, 143–148 (2015)
A. Senol, M. Koksal, S.C. Inan, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 6970587 (2017)
M. Koksal, A. Senol, V. Ari, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 8672391 (2016)
A. Gutierrez-Rodriguez, C.G. Honorato, J. Montano, M.A. Perez, Phys. Rev. D 89, 034003 (2014)
S. Fichet, G. von Gersdorff, O. Kepka, B. Lenzi, C. Royon, M. Saimper, Phys. Rev. D 89, 114004 (2014)
S. Fichet, G. von Gersdorff, O. Kepka, B. Lenzi, C. Royon, M. Saimper, JHEP 1502, 165 (2015)
C. Baldenegro, S. Fichet, G. von Gersdorff, C. Royon, JHEP 1706, 142 (2017)
K. Ye, D. Yang, Q. Li, Phys. Rev. D 88, 015023 (2013)
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, S.F. Novaes, Nucl. Phys. B 411, 381 (1994)
O.J.P. Eboli, M.B. Magro, P.G. Mercadante, S.F. Novaes, Phys. Rev. D 52, 15 (1995)
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Phys. Rev. D 93(9), 093013 (2016)
O.J.P. Eboli, J.K. Mizukoshi, Phys. Rev. D 64, 075011 (2001)
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, S.M. Lietti, Phys. Rev. D 69, 095005 (2004)
M. Beyer et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 48, 353 (2006)
T. Pierzchala, K. Piotrzkowski, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 179180, 257 (2008)
S. Atag, I. Sahin, Phys. Rev. D 70, 053014 (2004)
S. Atag, I. Sahin, Phys. Rev. D 75, 073003 (2007)
I. Sahin, B. Sahin, Phys. Rev. D 86, 115001 (2012)
G. Perez, M. Sekulla, D. Zeppenfeld, Eur. Phys. J. C 78(9), 759 (2018)
A.S. Kurova, EYu. Soldatov Phys. Atom. Nucl. 80(4), 725 (2017)
J. Kalinowski et al., Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 403 (2018)
G. Perez, M. Sekulla, D. Zeppenfeld, Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 759 (2018)
A.I. Ahmadov, arXiv:1806.03460
A. Senol, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29, 1450148 (2014)
A.M. Sirunyan et al., Phys. Rev. D 100, 012004 (2019)
A.M. Sirunyan et al., CMS collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 798, 134985 (2019)
A.M. Sirunyan et al., CMS collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 795, 281–307 (2019)
A.M. Sirunyan et al., CMS collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 774, 682–705 (2017)
M. Aaboud et al., Atlas collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. C 77(9), 646 (2017)
M. Aaboud et al., ATLAS Collaboration. JHEP 07, 107 (2017)
A.M. Sirunyan et al., CMS Collaboration. JHEP 10, 072 (2017)
M. Aaboud et al., Atlas collaboration. Phys. Rev. D 96(1), 012007 (2017)
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, J.K. Mizukoshi, Phys. Rev. D 74, 073005 (2006)
M. Fabbrichesi, M. Pinamonti, A. Tonero, A. Urbano, Phys. Rev. D 93, 015004 (2016)
M. Aaboud et al., Atlas collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 141 (2017)
C. Degrande et al., arXiv:1309.7452. (2013)
Y. Wen, H. Qu, D. Yang, Qs Yan, Q. Li, Y. Mao, JHEP 1503, 025 (2015)
H.Y. Bi, R.Y. Zhang, X.G. Wu, W.G. Ma, X.Z. Li, S. Owusu, Phys. Rev. D 95, 074020 (2017)
J.L.A. Fernandez et al., LHeC study group. J. Phys. G39, 075001 (2012)
J. L. A. Fernandez, et al., [LHeC Study Group], arXiv:1211.5102
O. Bruning, M. Klein, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 28, 1330011 (2013)
A Large Hadron electron Collider at CERN, web page with recent papers, talks and workshop documentation: http://cern.ch/lhec
P. Agostini, et al., [LHeC Collaboration and FCC-he Study Group],
Y.C. Acar, A.N. Akay, S. Beser, H. Karadeniz, U. Kaya, B.B. Oner, S. Sultansoy, Methods Phys. Res. A 871, 47–53 (2017)
A. Abada et al., FCC collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 474 (2019)
A. Abada et al., FCC collaboration. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 228, 755 (2019)
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 2250 (2014)
J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, T. Stelzer, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 128 (2011)
C. Degrande, C. Duhr, B. Fuks, D. Grellscheid, O. Mattelaer, T. Reiter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 1201 (2012)
J. Pumplin, D.R. Stump, J. Huston, H.L. Lai, P.M. Nadolsky, W.K. Tung, JHEP 0207, 012 (2002)
A. M Sirunyan et al., CMS Collaboration, CMS PAS SMP-19-008
A. M Sirunyan et al., CMS Collaboration, CMS PAS SMP-18-007
A.M. Sirunyan et al., CMS collaboration. Phys. Lett. B 809, 135710 (2020)
A.M. Sirunyan et al., CMS collaboration. Phys. Rev. D 100, 012004 (2019)
A. M Sirunyan et al., CMS Collaboration, CMS-SMP-20-001, CERN-EP-2020-127
R. D. Ballet al.[NNPDF Collaboration], Nucl. Phys. B877, 290 (2013) [arXiv:1308.0598 [hep-ph]]
S. Carrazza [NNPDF Collaboration], PoS DIS2013, 279 (2013) [arXiv:1307.1131 [hep-ph]]
S. Carrazza [NNPDF Collaboration],
R. D. Ballet al.[NNPDF Collaboration], http://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8849[hep-pharXiv:1410.8849[hep-ph]
T. Sjöstrand, P. Skands, JHEP 0403, 053 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/03/053
O.J.P. Eboli, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, http://feynrules.irmp.ucl.ac.be/wiki/AnomalousGaugeCoupling
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix A: Fit functions for the total cross sections of the process \(ep \rightarrow \nu _{e}W^{+}W^{-} j\)
Appendix A: Fit functions for the total cross sections of the process \(ep \rightarrow \nu _{e}W^{+}W^{-} j\)
Numerical calculations of the total cross sections for \(\frac{f_{M1}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\) , \(\frac{f_{S1}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\) and \(\frac{f_{T1}}{\Lambda ^{4}}\) at \(\sqrt{s}=1.30\), 1.98, 7.07 and 10 TeV are given in Tables 24 and 25. Here, \(\sigma _{0}\) is the SM cross section of the process \(ep \rightarrow \nu _{e}W^{+}W^{-} j\) where \(W^{+}\) and \(W^{-}\) decays pure leptonic and semi-leptonic. On the other hand \(\sigma _{1}\) and \(\sigma _{2}\) are interference and new physics term, respectively.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gurkanli, E., Ari, V., Billur, A.A. et al. Analysis of the anomalous quartic WWWW couplings at the LHeC and the FCC-he. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 784 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01775-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-01775-4