Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of impact force for dual-hose dry blasting nozzle geometry for various pressure and distance: an experimental work

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dry ice blasting plays an essential role in today’s cleaning industry, where many industry players have used it after realizing its advantages. The disadvantage of dry ice blasting is relatively small kinetic energy and offer less aggressive clean effect, especially for dual-hose nozzle geometry. This project was mainly to study the impact force of nozzle geometry of dry ice blasting concerning pressure and distance variation. The nozzle geometries with optimum size and shape are fabricated based on a recent literature study. The experimental research on the effect of the impact forces on different pressures and distances has been conducted to validate the simulation study. The result shows that the optimum nozzle design gives better performance than a based model. Besides, the optimum distance for dry ice blasting operation is less than 400 mm for the pressure range of 2 bars to 4 bars. This distance gives the maximum value of the impacted force for dry ice blasting operation in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Máša, P. Kuba, J. Clean. Prod. 111, 76 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.K. Witte et al., LWT 75, 735 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. H.J. Cho et al., Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Q. Blochet et al., J. Therm. Spray Technol. 26, 671 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ansarizadeh et al., Oilfield Rev. 27, 36 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. X. Guo et al., Appl. Energy 183, 1279 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Sherman, Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2016), p. 695

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Kohli, Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Applications of Cleaning Techniques (Elsevier, New York, 2019), p. 117

    Google Scholar 

  9. O.P. Morris, Applications of emerging optoelectronic materials: lead sulphide quantum dots and steam cracker tar. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2019)

  10. C. Josserand, S.T. Thoroddsen, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 48, 365 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Hoffman, L. King, Applications of emerging optoelectronic materials: lead sulphide quantum dots and steam cracker tar. International Journal Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology (2019) p 101–114

  12. P.A. Harris, N. Faucher, N. George, P.M. Eidam, B.W. King, G.V. White, S.B. Berger, Discovery and lead-optimization of 4, 5-dihydropyrazoles as mono-kinase selective, orally bioavailable and efficacious inhibitors of receptor interacting protein 1 (RIP1) kinase. J. Med. Chem. 62, 5096–5110 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Curlett, H. Wanlin, Google Patents (2019)

  14. J.O. Morales, A.B. Watts, J.T. McConville, Formulating Poorly Water Soluble Drugs (Springer, Berlin, 2016), p. 165

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Nguyen et al., Wear 348, 126 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Vardelle et al., J. Therm. Spray Technol. 25, 1376 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Shojaeizadeh et al., Measurement 122, 325–338 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. H.L. Williams, UC Berkeley (2017)

  19. R. Kohli, Developments in Surface Contamination and Cleaning: Applications of Cleaning Techniques (Elsevier, New York, 2019), p. 391

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.N.H. Mat et al., CFD Lett. 11, 18 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. V. Ramji, R. Mukesh, I. Hasan, Applied Mechanics and Materials (Trans Tech Publ, Stafa, 2016), p. 617

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.N.H. Mat, N., Asmuin, Int. J. Integr. Eng. 10, 130–135 (2018).

  23. A. Rudek, Development and validation of a numerical model of the CO2 dry-ice blasting process for aircraft engine cleaning applications. Technological University Dublin p 5096–5110 (2018)

  24. N. Yuvaraj, M.P. Kumar, Mater. Manuf. Process 32, 162 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.P. de Sousa Ferreira, Integration of design rules and process modelling within SPIF technology-a review on the industrial dissemination of single point incremental forming. International Journal Advance Manufacturing Technol p 4387–4399 (2017)

  26. S. Dong et al., Surf. Coat. Technol. 268, 46 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. K. Penttilä, (2017)

  28. M. Askarishahi et al., Powder Technol. 274, 379 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. A.M. Ganán-Calvo et al., J. Aerosol Sci. 125, 32 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Spur, E. Uhlmann, F. Elbing, Wear 233, 402 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  31. S. Dong et al., Mater. Res. Innov. 16, 61 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  32. J.Y. Yong et al., J. Clean. Prod. 111, 1 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge financial support from the Ministry of Education Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) K080 and Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia under Geran Penyelidikan Pascasiswazah (GPPS) U966. The author from UTM would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Education (MOE) and Research Management Centre-UTM, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) for the financial support through the research grant (vote number 17J52).

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Education Malaysia under Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) K080 and Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia under Geran Penyelidikan Pascasiswazah (GPPS) U966. The APC was funded by Geran Penyelidikan Pascasiswazah (GPPS) U966.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Energy and Thermodynamic Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), 86400, Parit Raja, Johor, Malaysia

    Mohamad Nur Hidayat Mat & Nor Zelawati Asmuin

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

    Md. Faisal Md. Basir

  3. Sustainable Management of Natural Resources and Environment Research Group, Faculty of Environment and Labour Safety, Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    Marjan Goodarzi

  4. Department of Occupational Safety and Health Sarawak (Ministry of Human Resources), Aras 17, Ariva Kuching Gateway, No. 9, Jalan Bukit Mata, 93100, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

    Nor Halim Hasan

Authors
  1. Mohamad Nur Hidayat Mat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nor Zelawati Asmuin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. Faisal Md. Basir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marjan Goodarzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nor Halim Hasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors were jointly involved in the formulation of the problem, experimental setup and writing up the paper. N.A and M.N.H.M formulate the design experiment, M.G. and M.F.M.B analyze the experimental result, N.H.H. contributes to preparing methodology workflow, and lastly, M.N.H.M, M.G. and M.F.M.B wrote and improved the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjan Goodarzi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mat, M.N.H., Asmuin, N.Z., Md. Basir, M.F. et al. Effect of impact force for dual-hose dry blasting nozzle geometry for various pressure and distance: an experimental work. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 135, 260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00251-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00251-9

Search

Navigation