Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of exact groundwater model within a confined aquifer: New proposed model beyond the Theis equation

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The European Physical Journal Plus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The aim of this work was to develop the exact groundwater flow model within a confined aquifer. We argued that, the Theis groundwater flow model is an approximation of the real formulation of the model as Theis removed some components of the equation to have a simple model. Initially, we derived an exact groundwater flow equation for a confined aquifer so as to include all high order terms that were removed by Theis and also to take into account the assumptions that were used during the derivation of the groundwater flow by Theis. Thereafter, we proved that the new groundwater flow equation has a unique solution. We then derived a new numerical scheme for a singular partial differential equation that combines the Mellin transform and the Lagrange approximation of a continuous function. The Mellin transform was used to remove the singularity in the newly developed exact groundwater flow equation for a confined aquifer. The equation became ordinary, wherein we used the Adam Bashforth method to the ordinary differential equation in the Mellin space. The inverse of Mellin was then used to get the exact numerical scheme in real space. We present the stability analysis of the new numerical scheme using the von Neumann method. Lastly, numerical simulations using experimental field data are presented. Our solution is compared to that of Theis. Our simulations show the importance of the scaling factor which was removed from the Theis groundwater flow equation. The simulations also show that the change in drawdown dependdepends on the scaling factor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Troldborg, J.C. Refsgaard, K.H. Jensen et al., Hydrogeol. J. 15, 843 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. E.D. Alexander, D. Poularikas, The Mellin Transform, The Handbook of Formulas and Tables for Signal Processing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, LLC, 1999) pp. 1--11

  3. M.P. Anderson, W.W. Woessner, Applied Groundwater Modelling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport (Academic Press, California, 2002)

  4. Atangana Abdon, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 505, 688 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Atangana Abdon, Necdet Bildik, Math. Probl. Eng. 2013, 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Atangana, C. Ünlü, Sci. Iran. 23, 1837 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Atangana, G. Van Tonder, Stochastic Risk and Uncertainty Analysis for Shale Gas Extraction in the Karoo Basin of South Africa (Hindawi Publishing Corporation, Bloemfontein, South Africa, 2014) pp. 1--11

  8. A. Atangana, P.D. Vermeulen, Abstr. Appl. Analy. 2014, 381753 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. P.M. Barlow, A.F. Moench, Analytical solutions and computer programs for hydraulic interaction of stream-aquifer systems. (1998) U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98--415A

  10. P.B. Bedient, H.S. Rifai, C.J. Newell, Ground Water Contamination: Transport and Remediation, 2nd edition (Prentice Hall PTR, New Jersey, 1997)

  11. D. Benson, R. Schumer, S. Wheatcraft, M. Meerschaert, Transp. Porous Media 42, 211 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. D. Benson, S. Wheatcraft, M. Meerschaert, Water Resour. Res. 36, 1403 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Betrand, P. Bertrand, J. Ovarlez, The Mellin Transform, The Transforms and Applications Handbook, second edition (CRC Press, Boca Raton, LLC, 2000)

  14. K. Beven, J. Hydrol. 320, 18 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. J.G. Charney, R. Fjortoft, J. von Neumann, Tellus 2, 237 (1950)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Cloot, J.F. Botha, Water SA 32, 55 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Crank, P. Nicolson, Proc. Cambridge Philol. Soc. 43, 50 (1947)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. C.W. Fetter, Applied Hydrogeology, 2nd edition (Macmillan, New York, Inc., 1988)

  19. R. Gnitchogna, A. Atangana, Numer. Methods Partial Differ. Eq. 34, 1739 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Metropolis, A.W. Rosenbluth, M.N. Rosenbluth et al., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Metzler, J. Klafter, Phys. Rep. 339, 1 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. S.P. Nasholm, S. Holms, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 130, 3038 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. E. Poeter, D. Anderson, Ground Water 43, 597 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J.C. Refsgaard, A.L. Højberg, I. Møller, M. Hansom, Ground Water 48, 633 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T.E. Reilly, W. Harbough, Guidelines for evaluating groundwater flow models, Scientific Investigations Report, 2004-5038. (U.S. Geological Survey, 2004)

  26. C.V. Theis, Am. Geophys. Union Trans. 16, 519 (1935)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Delahaies, Numerical Solutions for Partial Differential Equations (2012) https://doi.org/www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/st/S.B/MAT3015_notes_2_2012.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Atangana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mathobo, M., Atangana, A. Analysis of exact groundwater model within a confined aquifer: New proposed model beyond the Theis equation. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133, 415 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12205-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12205-9

Navigation