Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. Within the caption of Table 2 the sentence ‘The combination of all hypotheses explains most of the variation in the data (20%)’ should have read ‘The combination of all hypotheses explains most of the variation in the data (15%)’. Table 2 has been corrected in the original article and is also included correctly below.

Table 2 MRQAP decomposition of pairwise correspondence between concept co-occurrence and cultural factors