Abstract
The links between the deformation parameter \(\beta \) of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) to the two free parameters \(\hat{\omega }\) and \(\gamma \) of the running Newtonian coupling constant of the Asymptotic Safe gravity (ASG) program, has been conducted recently in [Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 12, 124054. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.124054] In this paper, we test these findings by calculating and examining the shadow and quasinormal modes of black holes, and demonstrate that the approach provides a theoretical framework for exploring the interplay between quantum gravity and GUP. Our results confirm the consistency of ASG and GUP, and offer new insights into the nature of black holes and their signatures. The implications of these findings for future studies in quantum gravity are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Quantum gravity is a field of theoretical physics that attempts to describe the behavior of gravity at the quantum level. Although Einstein’s general relativity has made remarkable contributions to our understanding of gravity, the existence of singularities and instabilities within classical black holes suggests that a more fundamental explanation is required to replace the classical framework. Quantum gravity aims to reconcile two fundamental theories of physics: quantum mechanics and general relativity [1, 2]. Several approaches to quantum gravity have been proposed, such as loop quantum gravity, string theory, and asymptotic safe gravity (ASG), among others [3,4,5,6,7,8].
One of the most crucial consistency requirements among various constraints is the ability to recover a gravitational effective field theory in the infrared (IR) by starting from the deep ultraviolet (UV). However, only a few theories have met this criterion so far. Asymptotically safe gravity [6,7,8] is one such theory that has emerged as a minimal yet promising proposal. It suggests that quantum gravity can be described by a quantum field theory (QFT) whose UV behavior is governed by an interacting fixed point of the gravitational renormalization group (RG) flow. This fixed point acts as an attractor for a subset of RG trajectories, providing a UV completion for the theory and making it renormalizable according to Wilson’s approach. The RG improvement has proven to be a valuable tool for investigating the possible implications of asymptotically safe gravity in cosmology and astrophysics, particularly during the emergence of asymptotically safe phenomenology. This technique has even led to the development of a new program, which is now separate from asymptotically safe gravity and known as “scale-dependent gravity”. However, more thorough and rigorous derivations and arguments based on either functional integrals or effective action are necessary to understand the modifications to classical black holes and early-universe cosmology induced by asymptotic safe gravity. These fundamental approaches have been the primary focus of the asymptotic safe gravity studies in recent years [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
On the other hand, a significant area of research aimed at describing the relationship between quantum effects and gravity is referred to as the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP) which has focused on how the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) should be modified when accounting for gravity. Because gravity plays a central role in these investigations, the most relevant modifications to the HUP have been proposed in string theory, loop quantum gravity, deformed special relativity, and studies of black hole physics [20, 21]. The dimensionless deforming parameter of the GUP, denoted by \(\beta \), is not fixed by the theory, although it is typically assumed to be on the order of one (as in some models of string theory, for example, Refs. [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]).
The key attribute that defines a black hole is its event horizon, which marks the point beyond which particles cannot escape. This immense gravitational pull traps all physical particles, including light, inside the event horizon. In contrast, outside this boundary, light can escape [34]. The matter that surrounds a black hole and is pulled inward is known as accretion. Over time, the accretion becomes heated due to viscous dissipation and emits bright radiation at various frequencies, including radio waves that can be detected by radio telescopes. The accreting material creates a bright background with a dark area over it, known as the black hole shadow [35]. Although the concept of the black hole shadow has been around since the 1970s, it wasn’t until Falcke et al. [36] that the idea of imaging the black hole shadow at the center of our Milky Way was first proposed. The Event Horizon Telescope has recently captured the image of the black hole shadow in the Messier 87 galaxy and Sagittarius A* [37, 38]. As a result, the black hole shadow has become a popular subject in today’s literature since the shadow can be used to extract information about the deviations in the spacetime geometry [39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. These deviations might be the cause of some parameters from various alternative theories of gravity [73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84], or the astrophysical environment where the black hole is immersed in [85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93]. In this paper, we also aim to find constraints of the GUP parameters \(\hat{\omega }\) and \(\gamma \), by extending the formalism in Refs. [94, 95] with the shadow radius instead of the angular radius. We also analyze the behavior of the black hole shadow using these constraints.
Black holes are intriguing objects in the Universe that are closely linked to the production of gravitational waves. Quasinormal modes are a fascinating feature of black hole physics that describe the damped oscillations of a black hole, characterized by complex frequencies [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105]. These modes are important because they provide valuable information about the properties of black holes, such as their mass, angular momentum, and the nature of surrounding spacetime. The study of quasinormal modes is crucial for understanding the structure and evolution of black holes, and their role in astrophysical phenomena such as gravitational wave signals. Recent research has extensively explored the properties of gravitational waves and quasinormal modes of black holes in various modified gravity theories [18, 106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135].
The main aim of this paper is to investigate the ASG parameter through the analysis of the quasinormal modes and shadow of a black hole. Additionally, we aim to establish a correlation between the unconstrained variables of ASG, specifically the renormalization scale, and the deforming parameter \(\beta \) of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP).
We program the paper as follows: In Sect. 2, we briefly review the black hole in asymptotically safe gravity. In Sect. 3, we study the black hole shadow by initially finding the constraints, and examining how the shadow behaves relative to some observer. Then, in Sect. 4, we study the scalar and electromagnetic perturbation and associated quasinormal modes, then we investigate the time evolution profiles of the perturbations and the quasinormal modes generated by such a black hole. We then form conclusive remarks in Sect. 5. Finally, we give research directions. In this paper, we use the metric signature \((-,+,+,+)\).
2 Black hole in asymptotically safe gravity
The static and spherically symmetric metric by ASG improved Schwarzschild black hole can be expressed [6] by
where the lapse function f(r) is
with \(G(r)=\frac{G_0 r^3}{r^3+\tilde{\omega } G_0 \hbar \left( r+\gamma G_0 M\right) }\) where \(G_0\) is Newton constant. \(\tilde{\omega }\) and \(\gamma \) are dimensionless numerical parameters and M the mass of the black hole. For \(\tilde{\omega }= 0\) we recover the standard Schwarzschild metric.
In Ref. [136], it has been shown that there is a link between the deformation parameter \(\beta \) of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) to the two free parameters \(\omega \) and \(\gamma \) of the running Newtonian coupling constant of the Asymptotic Safe gravity (ASG) program. In order to proceed, we express Eq. (2) as a small perturbation around the Schwarzschild metric [136]:
with
Note that \(|\varepsilon (r)|\ll 2G_0 M/r\) for any \(r>2G_0M\). The horizon of the black hole is
where \(a=2G_0M\).
To establish a connection between the Asymptotic Safe Gravity (ASG) and the Generalized Uncertainty Principle (GUP), one may compare the first orders of the expansions of the GUP-deformed Hawking temperature and the ASG-Schwarzschild temperature [136]. This allows us to obtain the relationship between the deformation parameter \(\beta \) and the two free parameters \(\tilde{\omega }\) and \(\gamma \)
Then, using the ASG-improved Newtonian potential, the parameter \(\tilde{\omega }\) is fixed to
It is worth noting that the ASG parameter \(\gamma \) is not a fixed value, although classical general relativistic arguments do set \(\gamma = 9/2\). With this value of \(\gamma \), the \(\beta \) parameter of the GUP can be determined to be approximately
which is of the order of \(10^2\) as predicted by certain string theory models.
3 Constraints using the black hole shadow
Here, we will first find constraints to \(\gamma \) by using the empirical data provided by the EHT collaboration for Sgr. A* and M87*, which is summarized in Table 1. Also for convenience, we will only consider a constant polar angle \(\theta = \pi /2\) in the analysis of null orbits. Using the black hole metric in Eq. (1) with the lapse function f(r) in Eqs. (3)–(4), the null geodesics along the equatorial plane can be derived through the Lagrangian
Applying the variational principle, the two constants of motion can be obtained
whereas the impact parameter, which is important in orbital motion analysis, is defined as
We can obtain how the radial coordinate changes with the azimuthal angle by setting \(ds^2 = 0\). That is,
where, by definition [137],
The simple definition above allows one to obtain the location of the photonsphere radius by taking \(h'(r) = 0\), where the prime denotes differentiation with respect to r. In doing so, we obtained:
We can only do a numerical analysis in obtaining the photonsphere radius \(r_{\textrm{ps}}\), which, by the above equation, is affected by the parameters \(\tilde{\omega }\) and \(\gamma \). This is important since the shadow cast, and how the shadow radius behaves, depend on the photonsphere radius as the critical impact parameter is evaluated in \(r_{\textrm{ps}}\).
If a certain observer is located at the coordinates (\((t_{\textrm{obs}},r_{\textrm{obs}},\theta _{\textrm{obs}} = \pi /2, \phi _{\textrm{obs}} = 0)\)), then one can construct [138] the relation
which can be alternatively expressed as
with the help of Eq. (12). In general, since some spacetime metrics do not have identical expressions for h(r), the expression for the critical impact parameter is given by [73, 86]
Using the lapse function f(r) in Eqs. (3)–(4), and Eq. (14),
Finally, the shadow radius can be sought-off as
By considering the distance D of the SMBH from the galactic center, the classical shadow diameter can be found through the standard arclength equation
The calculated values for the diameter of M87* and Sgr. A*’s shadows are as follows: These are \(d^{\textrm{M}87*}_{\textrm{sh}} = (11 \pm 1.5)M\), and \(d^{\textrm{Sgr}.\ {\textrm{A}}*}_{\textrm{sh}} = (9.5 \pm 1.4)M\), respectively [37, 38]. Note that sometimes, it is also useful to use the Schwarzschild deviation parameter \(\lambda \) to find constraints to parameters of a certain BH model. Here, we have used the uncertainties reported in Refs. [71, 72] to find constraints to \(\tilde{\omega }\) and \(\gamma \). Note that these uncertainties are tighter than if we used Eq. (20). The interested reader is directed to such reference to see how the \(1\sigma \) and \(2\sigma \) confidence levels were found.
Our first constraint plot considers a fixed \(\tilde{\omega }\), given by Eq. (7). Our results are shown in Fig. 1 (black solid lines), and we tabulate the bounds for \(\gamma \) in Table 2. In essence, not only that it gave us the relevant bounds for \(\gamma \), which in turn gives us the relevant values for \(\beta \) in Eq. (6), but it also visualizes how the shadow radius behaves as \(\gamma \) (or \(\beta \)) varies considering a fixed observer given in Table 1. Some models in string theory [6] suggests a fixed value for \(\gamma \) equal to 9/2, which immediately implies a certain value for \(\beta \) [136]:
It then leads us to constrain \(\tilde{\omega }\) to consider string theory for GUP and asymptotically safe gravity, where the results are shown in Fig. 1 (blue solid lines). Furthermore, the numerical values of the bounds for \(\tilde{\omega }\) and its corresponding value for \(\beta \) is in Table 3. Interestingly, we see that the constraint found in M87* for \(\beta \) is in good agreement with Eq. (21) as it falls within the range of the uncertainty levels. It can also be concluded that Sgr. A* gives a poor result for such a constraint.
Our next aim is to examine the behavior of the shadow radius due to an observer with varying \(r_{\textrm{obs}}\) for chosen values of the parameters presented in Tables 2 and 3. The result in Fig. 2 is simply the plot of the general equation in Eq. (19). We observe that the effect of the free parameters in asymptotic safe gravity is to increase or decrease the shadow radius at large distances and merely follow the Schwarzschild trend. We observe no peculiar deviation from such a trend. Our results for such constraints indicate, however, that these parameters are best explored through the shadow of M87*.
4 Quasinormal modes of ASG black holes
In this section, we study the behaviors of quasinormal modes of the ASG black holes for two different types of perturbations viz. scalar perturbations and electromagnetic perturbations. At first, we derive the associated potentials for scalar and electromagnetic perturbations and then we study the potential behavior with respect to the model parameters of the black hole. The behavior of the potential with the model parameters will provide a rough idea of how the quasinormal modes might vary in the framework.
In this context, we will presume that the scalar field or electromagnetic field under consideration has a negligible effect on black hole spacetime. To determine the quasinormal modes, we establish Schrödinger-like wave equations for each scenario by considering the corresponding conservation relations in the relevant spacetime. The wave equations will take the form of the Klein–Gordon type for scalar fields and the Maxwell equations for electromagnetic fields. We have used the Padé averaged 6th-order WKB approximation method to obtain the quasinormal modes.
By focusing solely on axial perturbation, the perturbed metric can be expressed as follows [107, 112]:
where the parameters \(p_1\), \(p_2\), and \(p_3\) describe the perturbation affecting the black hole spacetime. The metric functions \(g_{tt}\) and \(g_{rr}\) represent the zeroth order terms, and they are dependent on r exclusively.
4.1 Scalar perturbation
We begin by considering a scalar field with no mass in the vicinity of a previously established black hole. Since we assume that the scalar field has a negligible effect on the spacetime, we can simplify the perturbed metric equation to the following form:
The properties of the perturbation are characterized by the Klein–Gordon equation associated with the scalar field. In this case, we consider that the scalar field is massless. Next, we can express the Klein–Gordon equation in curved spacetime for this scenario as follows:
This equation explains the quasinormal modes connected with the scalar perturbations which are massless. In the above equation, \(\Phi \) represents the associated wave function of the scalar perturbation. It is a function of the coordinates \(t, r, \theta \) and \(\phi \). We can break down \(\Phi \) into spherical harmonics and the radial part which can be represented as:
where l and m are the associated indices of the spherical harmonics. The function \(\psi _l(t,r)\) is the time-dependent radial wave function. Using Eq. (24), we can derive the following equation for the scalar perturbation:
where \(r_*\) is defined as the tortoise coordinate, expressed as:
The effective potential \(V_s(r)\) in this case, takes on the following explicit form:
In this equation, the term l represents the multipole moment of the black hole’s quasinormal modes.
4.2 Electromagnetic perturbation
The next topic is an electromagnetic perturbation, which requires the use of the standard tetrad formalism [107, 108, 112]. This formalism defines a basis \(e^\mu _{a}\) that is related to the black hole metric \(g_{\mu \nu }\). The basis satisfies the following conditions:
One can express tensor fields in terms of this basis as shown below:
Now, for the electromagnetic perturbation, it is possible to rewrite the Bianchi identity of the field strength \(F_{[(a)(b)(c)]} = 0\), in the tetrad formalism as
From the conservation equation, in tetrad formalism, one can further obtain,
From the time derivative of Eq. (32) and Eqs. (30) and (31) one can have the following expression,
where \({\mathcal {F}} = F_{(t)(\phi )} \sin \theta .\) Defining \(\psi _e \equiv r \sqrt{|g_{tt}|}\, {\mathcal {F}}\) one can write Eq. (33) in the Schrödinger-like form:
where the potential is given by
This is the potential associated with electromagnetic perturbation. In the next subsection, we shall study the behaviors of these potentials in brief.
4.3 Behaviour of the potential
The potential for both types of perturbations depends on the parameters l, \(\tilde{\omega }\), and \(\gamma \). From the behavior of the perturbation potential, it is possible to have a preliminary idea of the behavior of quasinormal modes associated with the black hole spacetime.
In Fig. 3, we have shown the scalar potential for different values of multipole moment l and model parameter \(\gamma \). The multipole moment l impacts the potential in a usual way similar to the Schwarzschild black hole. However, the model parameter \(\gamma \) has a significantly different impact on the behavior of the potential. One can see that with an increase in the values of the parameter \(\gamma \), the peak of the potential shifts towards higher values of r. Similar behavior is seen for the electromagnetic potential also (see Fig. 4). But in this case, the maximum value of the potential is smaller than the corresponding maximum of the scalar potential.
4.4 Evolution of perturbations
Here, we shall discuss the evolution of the perturbation potentials for different values of the model parameters. To see the time evolution of the perturbations, we apply the time domain integration formalism as described by Gundlach [113]. To achieve this, we define the variables \(\psi (r_*, t) = \psi (i \Delta r_*, j \Delta t) = \psi _{i,j}\) and \(V(r(r_*)) = V(r_*, t) = V_{i,j}\). The scalar Klein–Gordon equation can then be expressed as:
To initiate the simulation, we set the initial conditions for \(\psi (r_*,t)\) as \(\psi (r_*,t) = \exp \left[ -\dfrac{(r_*-k_1)^2}{2\sigma ^2} \right] \) with \(\psi (r_*,t)\vert _{t<0} = 0\) (where \(k_1\) and \(\sigma \) are the median and width of the initial wave-packet). We then obtain the time evolution of the scalar field by iterative calculations:
By selecting a fixed value of \(\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta r_*}\) and utilizing the above iteration scheme, we can obtain the profile of \(\psi \) with respect to time t. However, it is crucial to ensure that \(\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta r_*} < 1\) satisfies the Von Neumann stability condition during the numerical process [108].
The time domain profiles for the black hole solution are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. In Fig. 5, we have shown the time domain profiles with \(l=1\) and \(l=2\) for both scalar and electromagnetic perturbations. One can see that the time domain profiles for both perturbations are not identical. In the case of scalar perturbation, the oscillation frequency seems to be higher and the decay rate is also comparatively higher. In both cases, with an increase in the multipole moment l, the oscillation frequency increases significantly. However, the variation in decay rate is very small. In Fig. 6, we have plotted the time domain profiles for both scalar and electromagnetic perturbations with different values of model parameter \(\gamma \). It is interesting to note that the evolution profiles do not show noticeable variations in the initial phase i.e. for a small value of time t. However, late-time profiles show a noticeable difference in the oscillation frequencies, and the damping rate is also slightly affected by the variation of the model parameter \(\gamma \). To get a more clear idea about the oscillation frequency and damping rate, in the next subsection we shall use the Padé averaged WKB approximation method to calculate the associated quasinormal modes.
4.5 Quasinormal modes using Padé averaged WKB approximation method
In this study, we employed the sixth-order Pad’e averaged Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin (WKB) approximation technique. This method enabled us to calculate the oscillation frequency \(\omega \) of gravitational waves (GWs) using the expression below by utilizing the sixth-order WKB method:
In this particular context, the variable n refers to overtone numbers and takes on integer values, including 0, 1, 2, and so on. The value of \(V_0\) is obtained by evaluating the potential function V at the position \(r_{max}\), where the potential reaches its maximum value. At this point, the derivative of V with respect to r, i.e. dV/dr, becomes zero.
The second derivative of the potential function V with respect to r, evaluated at the same position \(r_{max}\), is represented as \(V_0''\). Additionally, we incorporated supplementary correction terms, which are identified as \(\bar{\Lambda }_k\). These correction terms are explicitly defined in Refs. [114,115,116, 139]. It is important to note that in addition to utilizing the Padé averaging procedure, these correction terms improve the overall accuracy of the calculations.
In Table 4 and Table 5, we have listed the fundamental quasinormal modes for the massless scalar perturbation and electromagnetic perturbation for different values of the multipole moment l. To obtain these quasinormal modes, we have implemented the above-mentioned Padé averaged 6th-order WKB approximation method. The third column in the table represents rms error associated with the quasinormal modes while the fourth column represents an error term associated with the WKB method defined by [116]
The variables \(\omega _7\) and \(\omega _5\) denote the quasinormal modes that were calculated using the 7th and 5th order Padé averaged WKB method, respectively. One can see that with an increase in the multipole number l, the oscillation frequency increases and the damping rate decreases. From \(\vartriangle _{rms}\) and \(\Delta _6\), it is clear that the error associated with quasinormal modes with higher l values is significantly small. It is basically due to the property of the WKB approximation method [111, 112, 116] which states that for \(l\gg n\) the accuracy of the WKB method increases significantly.
To understand the behavior of the scalar quasinormal modes with respect to the model parameter \(\gamma \), we have plotted the real and imaginary quasinormal modes in Fig. 7. One can see that the real quasinormal modes decrease drastically with an increase in the value of \(\gamma \). On the other hand, with an increase in the parameter \(\gamma \), the damping rate of gravitational waves increases non-linearly. However, in comparison to the real modes, the impact of \(\gamma \) on the damping rate is less significant. We have plotted the real and imaginary quasinormal modes for electromagnetic perturbation in Fig. 8. It is clear from the figure that the variation of the quasinormal modes for both cases is similar. However, in the case of electromagnetic perturbation, the quasinormal modes are smaller than those found in the case of scalar perturbation.
The behavior of quasinormal modes is consistent with another study [140] where the impacts of the GUP parameters on the quasinormal modes have been investigated. However, it should be mentioned that in this Ref. [140], the authors considered two deformation parameters having opposite impacts on the quasinormal mode spectrum. The first deformation parameter used in this study resembles the behavior of \(\gamma \). In another study [108], GUP effects on quasinormal modes have been investigated in the bumblebee gravity framework. However, in this case, the first deformation parameter, which is linked with \(\gamma \) of this study, has an opposite impact on the real quasinormal modes. This variation is basically due to the nature of the black hole solution and the presence of other relics used in Ref. [108].
This investigation implies that the parameter \(\gamma \) which is connected to the GUP deformation parameter can have significant impacts on the gravitational wave frequencies coming from a perturbed Schwarzschild black hole spacetime or ring-down phase. A comparatively large value of the parameter \(\gamma \) can also increase the decay rate of gravitational waves. These results can be used in the near future to constrain ASG using observational results from quasinormal modes. One may note that the current gravitational wave detectors may not be able to detect quasinormal modes from black holes with suitable accuracy and hence we might need to wait for LISA to have a more clear and convincing result [98, 108].
5 Conclusion
In a recent study [136], intriguing connections were established between the deformation parameter \(\beta \) of the generalized uncertainty principle (GUP) and the two free parameters \(\omega \) and \(\gamma \) of the running Newtonian coupling constant in the Asymptotic Safe gravity (ASG) program. This study prompted us to examine the shadow and quasinormal modes of black holes. Our investigation demonstrates that the approach in [136] offers a valuable framework for exploring the interplay between GUP and quantum gravity. Additionally, our findings affirm the consistency of ASG and GUP, while providing fresh insights into the nature of black holes and their detectable signatures. Ultimately, our work has significant implications for future research in quantum gravity, which we explore in this paper. To do so, first, we have determined the values of \(\gamma \) and \(\tilde{\omega }\) parameters using the EHT observations of the shadow diameter of Sgr. A* and M87*. Our study presents a constraint plot using the shadow of a black hole with a fixed \(\tilde{\omega }\) value. Our results, presented in Fig. 1 (black solid lines), offer bounds for \(\gamma \), which in turn allows us to determine relevant values for \(\beta \). Furthermore, our plot provides a visual representation of how the shadow radius behaves as \(\gamma \) (or \(\beta \)) varies. By considering the string theory for GUP and asymptotically safe gravity, we can further constrain \(\tilde{\omega }\), as shown in Fig. 1 (blue solid lines), with the corresponding bounds for \(\tilde{\omega }\) and its value of \(\beta \) presented in Table 3.
Next, our investigation indicates that the GUP deformation parameter’s connection to the \(\gamma \) parameter can have significant implications for gravitational wave frequencies originating from perturbed Schwarzschild black hole spacetime or ring-down phases. Specifically, a higher \(\gamma \) value can result in increased gravitational wave decay rates. These findings have the potential to aid in constraining ASG through the utilization of observational data obtained from quasinormal modes in the future. However, it is essential to note that the current precision of gravitational wave detectors may not allow for accurate detection of quasinormal modes from black holes, necessitating the need for the LISA to provide more precise and convincing results [98, 108].
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This article describes entirely theoretical research and data sharing is not applicable to it since no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.]
References
C.P. Burgess, Quantum gravity in everyday life: general relativity as an effective field theory. Living Rev. Relativ. 7, 5–56 (2004). https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-2004-5. arXiv:0311082 [gr-qc]
S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis, Extended theories of gravity. Phys. Rep. 509, 167–321 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003. arXiv:1108.6266 [gr-qc]
A. Ashtekar, Gravity and the quantum. New J. Phys. 7, 198 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/198. arXiv:0410054 [gr-qc]
C. Rovelli, Loop quantum gravity. Living Rev. Relativ. 1, 1 (1998). https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-1998-1. arXiv:gr-qc/9710008
O. Aharony, S.S. Gubser, J.M. Maldacena, H. Ooguri, Y. Oz, Large N field theories, string theory and gravity. Phys. Rep. 323, 183–386 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00083-6. arXiv:hep-th/9905111
A. Bonanno, M. Reuter, Renormalization group improved black hole space-times. Phys. Rev. D 62, 043008 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.62.043008. arXiv:hep-th/0002196
A. Bonanno, M. Reuter, Cosmology of the Planck era from a renormalization group for quantum gravity. Phys. Rev. D 65, 043508 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.043508. arXiv:hep-th/0106133
M. Reuter, H. Weyer, Renormalization group improved gravitational actions: a Brans–Dicke approach. Phys. Rev. D 69, 104022 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.104022. arXiv:hep-th/0311196
B. Koch, I.A. Reyes, Á. Rincón, A scale dependent black hole in three-dimensional space-time. Class. Quantum Gravity 33, 225010 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/22/225010. arXiv:1606.04123 [hep-th]
A. Bonanno, M. Reuter, Cosmological perturbations in renormalization group derived cosmologies. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 107–122 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271804003809. arXiv:astro-ph/0210472
M. Fathi, Á. Rincón, J.R. Villanueva, Photon trajectories on a first order scale-dependent static BTZ black hole. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 075004 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab6f7c. arXiv:1903.09037 [gr-qc]
E. Contreras, Á. Rincón, B. Koch, P. Bargueño, A regular scale-dependent black hole solution. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1850032 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271818500323. arXiv:1711.08400 [gr-qc]
E. Contreras, Á. Rincón, B. Koch, P. Bargueño, Scale-dependent polytropic black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-5709-0. arXiv:1803.03255 [gr-qc]
Á. Rincón, B. Koch, Scale-dependent BTZ black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 1022 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6488-3. arXiv:1806.03024 [hep-th]
Á. Rincón, E. Contreras, P. Bargueño, B. Koch, G. Panotopoulos, Scale-dependent (\(2+1\))-dimensional electrically charged black holes in Einstein-power-Maxwell theory. Eur. Phys. J. C 78, 641 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6106-4. arXiv:1807.08047 [hep-th]
Á. Rincón, E. Contreras, P. Bargueño, B. Koch, Scale-dependent planar anti-de Sitter black hole. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 557 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-13081-5. arXiv:1901.03650 [gr-qc]
E. Contreras, P. Bargueño, Scale-dependent Hayward black hole and the generalized uncertainty principle. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 33, 1850184 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732318501845. arXiv:1809.00785 [gr-qc]
Á. Rincón, G. Panotopoulos, Quasinormal modes of scale dependent black holes in (1+2)-dimensional Einstein-power-Maxwell theory. Phys. Rev. D 97, 024027 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.024027. arXiv:1801.03248 [hep-th]
Á. Rincón, E. Contreras, P. Bargueño, B. Koch, G. Panotopoulos, A. Hernández-Arboleda, Scale dependent three-dimensional charged black holes in linear and non-linear electrodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 494 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5045-9. arXiv:1704.04845 [hep-th]
M. Maggiore, A generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity. Phys. Lett. B 304, 65–69 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(93)91401-8. arXiv:hep-th/9301067
A. Kempf, G. Mangano, R.B. Mann, Hilbert space representation of the minimal length uncertainty relation. Phys. Rev. D 52, 1108–1118 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1108. arXiv:hep-th/9412167
F. Scardigli, Generalized uncertainty principle in quantum gravity from micro-black hole Gedanken experiment. Phys. Lett. B 452, 39–44 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(99)00167-7. arXiv:hep-th/9904025
R.J. Adler, D.I. Santiago, On gravity and the uncertainty principle. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 1371 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732399001462. arXiv:gr-qc/9904026
S. Capozziello, G. Lambiase, G. Scarpetta, Generalized uncertainty principle from quantum geometry. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 39, 15–22 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003634814685. arXiv:gr-qc/9910017
F. Scardigli, R. Casadio, Generalized uncertainty principle, extra dimensions and holography. Class. Quantum Gravity 20, 3915–3926 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/20/18/305. arXiv:hep-th/0307174
A. Ovgün, K. Jusufi, The effect of the GUP on massive vector and scalar particles tunneling from a warped DGP gravity black hole. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 298 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2017-11574-9. arXiv:1703.08073 [physics.gen-ph]
A. Övgün, The Bekenstein–Hawking corpuscular cascading from the back-reacted black hole. Adv. High Energy Phys. 2017, 1573904 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1573904. arXiv:1609.07804 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, K. Jusufi, Massive vector particles tunneling from noncommutative charged black holes and their GUP-corrected thermodynamics. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 177 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2016-16177-4. arXiv:1512.05268 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, Entangled particles tunneling from a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an electromagnetic universe with GUP. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55, 2919–2927 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-016-2923-0. arXiv:1508.04100 [gr-qc]
A.F. Ali, S. Das, E.C. Vagenas, Discreteness of space from the generalized uncertainty principle. Phys. Lett. B 678, 497–499 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2009.06.061. arXiv:0906.5396 [hep-th]
P. Chen, Y.C. Ong, D. Yeom, Black hole remnants and the information loss paradox. Phys. Rep. 603, 1–45 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.10.007. arXiv:1412.8366 [gr-qc]
A.N. Tawfik, A.M. Diab, Review on generalized uncertainty principle. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 126001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/78/12/126001. arXiv:1509.02436 [physics.gen-ph]
R. Casadio, F. Scardigli, Horizon wave-function for single localized particles: GUP and quantum black hole decay. Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2685 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2685-2. arXiv:1306.5298 [gr-qc]
J.L. Synge, The escape of photons from gravitationally intense stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 131, 463–466 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/131.3.463
J.P. Luminet, Image of a spherical black hole with thin accretion disk. Astron. Astrophys. 75, 228–235 (1979)
H. Falcke, F. Melia, E. Agol, Viewing the shadow of the black hole at the galactic center. Astrophys. J. Lett. 528, L13 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1086/312423. arXiv:astro-ph/9912263
K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), First M87 Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole. Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab0ec7. arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]
K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope results. I. The shadow of the supermassive black hole in the center of the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac6674
A. Övgün, İ. Sakallı, J. Saavedra, Shadow cast and Deflection angle of Kerr–Newman–Kasuya spacetime. JCAP 10, 041 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/10/041. arXiv:1807.00388 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, İ. Sakallı, Testing generalized Einstein–Cartan–Kibble–Sciama gravity using weak deflection angle and shadow cast. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 225003 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abb579. arXiv:2005.00982 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, İ. Sakallı, J. Saavedra, C. Leiva, Shadow cast of noncommutative black holes in Rastall gravity. Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35, 2050163 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732320501631. arXiv:1906.05954 [hep-th]
X.-M. Kuang, A. Övgün, Strong gravitational lensing and shadow constraint from M87* of slowly rotating Kerr-like black hole. Ann. Phys. 447, 169147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.169147. arXiv:2205.11003 [gr-qc]
Y. Kumaran, A. Övgün, Deflection angle and shadow of the Reissner–Nordström black hole with higher-order magnetic correction in Einstein-nonlinear-Maxwell fields. Symmetry 14, 2054 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102054. arXiv:2210.00468 [gr-qc]
G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov, I. Hussain, S. Shaymatov, A. Övgün, Shadows and gravitational weak lensing by the Schwarzschild black hole in the string cloud background with quintessential field*. Chin. Phys. C 46, 125107 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac917f. arXiv:2207.07608 [gr-qc]
İ. Cimdiker, D. Demir, A. Övgün, Black hole shadow in symmergent gravity. Phys. Dark Universe 34, 100900 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100900. arXiv:2110.11904 [gr-qc]
M. Okyay, A. Övgün, Nonlinear electrodynamics effects on the black hole shadow, deflection angle, quasinormal modes and greybody factors. JCAP 01, 009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/009. arXiv:2108.07766 [gr-qc]
F. Atamurotov, I. Hussain, G. Mustafa, A. Övgün, Weak deflection angle and shadow cast by the charged-Kiselev black hole with cloud of strings in plasma*. Chin. Phys. C 47, 025102 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/ac9fbb
R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, D. Demir, Testing symmergent gravity through the shadow image and weak field photon deflection by a rotating black hole using the \(M87^{*}\) and Sgr. \(\text{A}^{*}\) results. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11400-6
A.B. Abdikamalov, A.A. Abdujabbarov, D. Ayzenberg, D. Malafarina, C. Bambi, B. Ahmedov, Black hole mimicker hiding in the shadow: optical properties of the \(\gamma \) metric. Phys. Rev. D 100, 024014 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024014. arXiv:1904.06207 [gr-qc]
A. Abdujabbarov, B. Juraev, B. Ahmedov, Z. Stuchlik, Shadow of rotating wormhole in plasma environment. Astrophys. Space Sci. 361, 226 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-016-2818-9
F. Atamurotov, B. Ahmedov, Optical properties of black hole in the presence of plasma: shadow. Phys. Rev. D 92, 084005 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.084005. arXiv:1507.08131 [gr-qc]
U. Papnoi, F. Atamurotov, S.G. Ghosh, B. Ahmedov, Shadow of five-dimensional rotating Myers–Perry black hole. Phys. Rev. D 90, 024073 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024073. arXiv:1407.0834 [gr-qc]
A. Abdujabbarov, F. Atamurotov, Y. Kucukakca, B. Ahmedov, U. Camci, Shadow of Kerr–Taub-NUT black hole. Astrophys. Space Sci. 344, 429–435 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-012-1337-6. arXiv:1212.4949 [physics.gen-ph]
F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, Shadow of rotating non-Kerr black hole. Phys. Rev. D 88, 064004 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064004
P.V.P. Cunha, C.A.R. Herdeiro, Shadows and strong gravitational lensing: a brief review. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 50, 42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-018-2361-9. arXiv:1801.00860 [gr-qc]
S.E. Gralla, D.E. Holz, R.M. Wald, Black hole shadows, photon rings, and lensing rings. Phys. Rev. D 100, 024018 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.024018. arXiv:1906.00873 [astro-ph.HE]
A. Belhaj, H. Belmahi, M. Benali, W. El Hadri, H. El Moumni, E. Torrente-Lujan, Shadows of 5D black holes from string theory. Phys. Lett. B 812, 136025 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.136025. arXiv:2008.13478 [hep-th]
A. Belhaj, M. Benali, A. El Balali, H. El Moumni, S.E. Ennadifi, Deflection angle and shadow behaviors of quintessential black holes in arbitrary dimensions. Class. Quantum Gravity 37, 215004 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/abbaa9. arXiv:2006.01078 [gr-qc]
R.A. Konoplya, Shadow of a black hole surrounded by dark matter. Phys. Lett. B 795, 1–6 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.05.043. arXiv:1905.00064 [gr-qc]
S.-W. Wei, Y.-C. Zou, Y.-X. Liu, R.B. Mann, Curvature radius and Kerr black hole shadow. JCAP 08, 030 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/08/030. arXiv:1904.07710 [gr-qc]
R. Ling, H. Guo, H. Liu, X.-M. Kuang, B. Wang, Shadow and near-horizon characteristics of the acoustic charged black hole in curved spacetime. Phys. Rev. D 104, 104003 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104003. arXiv:2107.05171 [gr-qc]
R. Kumar, S.G. Ghosh, A. Wang, Gravitational deflection of light and shadow cast by rotating Kalb–Ramond black holes. Phys. Rev. D 101, 104001 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.104001. arXiv:2001.00460 [gr-qc]
R. Kumar, S.G. Ghosh, Accretion onto a noncommutative geometry inspired black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 577 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5141-x. arXiv:1703.10479 [gr-qc]
P.V.P. Cunha, C.A.R. Herdeiro, B. Kleihaus, J. Kunz, E. Radu, Shadows of Einstein-dilaton-Gauss–Bonnet black holes. Phys. Lett. B 768, 373–379 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2017.03.020. arXiv:1701.00079 [gr-qc]
P.V.P. Cunha, C.A.R. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H.F. Runarsson, Shadows of Kerr black holes with and without scalar hair. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 25, 1641021 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271816410212. arXiv:1605.08293 [gr-qc]
P.V.P. Cunha, J. Grover, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, H. Runarsson, A. Wittig, Chaotic lensing around boson stars and Kerr black holes with scalar hair. Phys. Rev. D 94, 104023 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.104023. arXiv:1609.01340 [gr-qc]
A.F. Zakharov, Constraints on a charge in the Reissner–Nordström metric for the black hole at the Galactic Center. Phys. Rev. D 90, 062007 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.90.062007. arXiv:1407.7457 [gr-qc]
N. Tsukamoto, Black hole shadow in an asymptotically-flat, stationary, and axisymmetric spacetime: the Kerr–Newman and rotating regular black holes. Phys. Rev. D 97, 064021 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.064021. arXiv:1708.07427 [gr-qc]
L. Chakhchi, H. El Moumni, K. Masmar, Shadows and optical appearance of a power-Yang–Mills black hole surrounded by different accretion disk profiles. Phys. Rev. D 105, 064031 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.064031
P.-C. Li, M. Guo, B. Chen, Shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding Universe. Phys. Rev. D 101, 084041 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.084041. arXiv:2001.04231 [gr-qc]
P. Kocherlakota et al. (Event Horizon Telescope), Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT observations of M87*. Phys. Rev. D 103, 104047 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104047. arXiv:2105.09343 [gr-qc]
S. Vagnozzi, R. Roy, Y.-D. Tsai, L. Visinelli, M. Afrin, A. Allahyari, P. Bambhaniya, D. Dey, S.G. Ghosh, P.S. Joshi, K. Jusufi, M. Khodadi, R.K. Walia, A. Övgün, C. Bambi, Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the event horizon telescope image of Sagittarius A. Class. Quantum Gravity (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/acd97b
R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, Testing dynamical torsion effects on the charged black hole’s shadow, deflection angle and greybody with M87* and Sgr. A* from EHT. Ann. Phys. 448, 169197 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.169197. arXiv:2206.02161 [gr-qc]
R.C. Pantig, L. Mastrototaro, G. Lambiase, A. Övgün, Shadow, lensing, quasinormal modes, greybody bounds and neutrino propagation by dyonic ModMax black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 1155 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-11125-y. arXiv:2208.06664 [gr-qc]
N.J.L.S. Lobos, R.C. Pantig, Generalized extended uncertainty principle black holes: shadow and lensing in the macro- and microscopic realms. Physics 4, 1318–1330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/physics4040084
A. Uniyal, R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, Probing a non-linear electrodynamics black hole with thin accretion disk, shadow, and deflection angle with M87* and Sgr A* from EHT. Phys. Dark Universe 40, 101178 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101178. arXiv:2205.11072 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, R.C. Pantig, Á. Rincón, 4D scale-dependent Schwarzschild-AdS/dS black holes: study of shadow and weak deflection angle and greybody bounding. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, 192 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03793-w. arXiv:2303.01696 [gr-qc]
J. Rayimbaev, R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, A. Abdujabbarov, D. Demir, Quasiperiodic oscillations, weak field lensing and shadow cast around black holes in Symmergent gravity. Ann. Phys. 454, 169335 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2023.169335
A. Uniyal, S. Chakrabarti, R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, Nonlinearly charged black holes: shadow and thin-accretion disk (2023). arXiv:2303.07174 [gr-qc]
G. Panotopoulos, Á. Rincón, I. Lopes, Orbits of light rays in scale-dependent gravity: exact analytical solutions to the null geodesic equations. Phys. Rev. D 103, 104040 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.103.104040. arXiv:2104.13611 [gr-qc]
G. Panotopoulos, A. Rincon, Orbits of light rays in (12)-dimensional Einstein-power-Maxwell gravity: exact analytical solution to the null geodesic equations. Ann. Phys. 443, 168947 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2022.168947. arXiv:2206.03437 [gr-qc]
M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase, Probing Lorentz symmetry violation using the first image of Sagittarius A*: constraints on standard-model extension coefficients. Phys. Rev. D 106, 104050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.104050. arXiv:2206.08601 [gr-qc]
M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase, D.F. Mota, No-hair theorem in the wake of Event Horizon Telescope. JCAP 09, 028 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2021/09/028. arXiv:2107.00834 [gr-qc]
Y. Zhao, Y. Cai, S. Das, G. Lambiase, E.N. Saridakis, E.C. Vagenas, Quasinormal modes in noncommutative Schwarzschild black holes (2023). arXiv:2301.09147 [gr-qc]
R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, Dehnen halo effect on a black hole in an ultra-faint dwarf galaxy. JCAP 08, 056 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/08/056. arXiv:2202.07404 [astro-ph.GA]
R.C. Pantig, A. Övgün, Black hole in quantum wave dark matter. Fortschr. Phys. 2022, 2200164 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202200164. arXiv:2210.00523 [gr-qc]
R.C. Pantig, Constraining a one-dimensional wave-type gravitational wave parameter through the shadow of M87* via Event Horizon Telescope (2023). arXiv:2303.01698 [gr-qc]
M. Wang, S. Chen, J. Jing, Effect of gravitational wave on shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole. Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 509 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09287-2. arXiv:1908.04527 [gr-qc]
R. Roy, S. Chakrabarti, Study on black hole shadows in asymptotically de Sitter spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D 102, 024059 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024059. arXiv:2003.14107 [gr-qc]
Z. Xu, X. Hou, X. Gong, J. Wang, Black hole space-time in dark matter halo. JCAP 09, 038 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/038. arXiv:1803.00767 [gr-qc]
R.A. Konoplya, Black holes in galactic centers: quasinormal ringing, grey-body factors and Unruh temperature. Phys. Lett. B 823, 136734 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136734. arXiv:2109.01640 [gr-qc]
R.A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Solutions of the Einstein equations for a black hole surrounded by a galactic halo. Astrophys. J. 933, 166 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac76bc. arXiv:2202.02205 [gr-qc]
A. Anjum, M. Afrin, S.G. Ghosh, Astrophysical consequences of dark matter for photon orbits and shadows of supermassive black holes. Phys. Dark Univ. 40, 101195 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2023.101195. arXiv:2301.06373 [gr-qc]
V. Perlick, O.Y. Tsupko, G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole. Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.104031. arXiv:1507.04217 [gr-qc]
V. Perlick, O.Y. Tsupko, Calculating black hole shadows: review of analytical studies. Phys. Rep. 947, 1–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2021.10.004. arXiv:2105.07101 [gr-qc]
N. Andersson, Evolving test fields in a black hole geometry. Phys. Rev. D 55, 468–479 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.55.468. arXiv:gr-qc/9607064
N. Andersson, C.J. Howls, The asymptotic quasinormal mode spectrum of nonrotating black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 1623–1642 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/6/021. arXiv:gr-qc/0307020
V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, Quasi-normal modes and gravitational wave astronomy. Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 40, 945–970 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-007-0585-1. arXiv:0709.0657 [gr-qc]
E. Berti, V. Cardoso, A.O. Starinets, Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 163001 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/16/163001. arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]
K.D. Kokkotas, B.G. Schmidt, Quasinormal modes of stars and black holes. Living Rev. Relativ. 2, 2 (1999). https://doi.org/10.12942/lrr-1999-2. arXiv:gr-qc/9909058
H.-P. Nollert, TOPICAL REVIEW: quasinormal modes: the characteristic ‘sound’ of black holes and neutron stars. Class. Quantum Gravity 16, R159–R216 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/16/12/201
S. Boudet, F. Bombacigno, G.J. Olmo, P.J. Porfirio, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild black holes in projective invariant Chern–Simons modified gravity. JCAP 05, 032 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/05/032. arXiv:2203.04000 [gr-qc]
E. Berti, V. Cardoso, M.H.-Y. Cheung, F. Di Filippo, F. Duque, P. Martens, S. Mukohyama, Stability of the fundamental quasinormal mode in time-domain observations against small perturbations. Phys. Rev. D 106, 084011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.084011. arXiv:2205.08547 [gr-qc]
V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, P. Pani, Is the gravitational-wave ringdown a probe of the event horizon? Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 171101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.171101, arXiv:1602.07309 [gr-qc]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 089902 (2016)]
E. Berti et al., Testing general relativity with present and future astrophysical observations. Class. Quantum Gravity 32, 243001 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/32/24/243001. arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, İ. Sakallı, J. Saavedra, Quasinormal modes of a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an electromagnetic universe. Chin. Phys. C 42, 105102 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/42/10/105102. arXiv:1708.08331 [physics.gen-ph]
M. Bouhmadi-López, S. Brahma, C.-Y. Chen, P. Chen, D. Yeom, A consistent model of non-singular Schwarzschild black hole in loop quantum gravity and its quasinormal modes. JCAP 07, 066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2020/07/066. arXiv:2004.13061 [gr-qc]
D.J. Gogoi, U.D. Goswami, Quasinormal modes and Hawking radiation sparsity of GUP corrected black holes in bumblebee gravity with topological defects. JCAP 06, 029 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/06/029. arXiv:2203.07594 [gr-qc]
D.J. Gogoi, U.D. Goswami, Quasinormal modes of black holes with non-linear-electrodynamic sources in Rastall gravity. Phys. Dark Universe 33, 100860 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2021.100860. arXiv:2104.13115 [gr-qc]
D.J. Gogoi, R. Karmakar, U.D. Goswami, Quasinormal modes of nonlinearly charged black holes surrounded by a cloud of strings in Rastall gravity. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 20, 2350007 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021988782350007X. arXiv:2111.00854 [gr-qc]
D.J. Gogoi, U.D. Goswami, Tideless traversable wormholes surrounded by cloud of strings in f(R) gravity. JCAP 02, 027 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/027. arXiv:2208.07055 [gr-qc]
D.J. Gogoi, A. Övgün, M. Koussour, Quasinormal modes of black holes in \(f(Q)\) gravity (2023). arXiv:2303.07424 [gr-qc]
C. Gundlach, R.H. Price, J. Pullin, Late time behavior of stellar collapse and explosions: 2. Nonlinear evolution. Phys. Rev. D 49, 890–899 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.49.890. arXiv:gr-qc/9307010
B.F. Schutz, C.M. Will, Black hole normal modes: a semianalytic approach. Astrophys. J. Lett. 291, L33–L36 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1086/184453
S. Iyer, C.M. Will, Black hole normal modes: a WKB approach. 1. Foundations and application of a higher order WKB analysis of potential barrier scattering. Phys. Rev. D 35, 3621 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.35.3621
R.A. Konoplya, Quasinormal behavior of the d-dimensional Schwarzschild black hole and higher order WKB approach. Phys. Rev. D 68, 024018 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.68.024018. arXiv:gr-qc/0303052
R.G. Daghigh, M.D. Green, Validity of the WKB approximation in calculating the asymptotic quasinormal modes of black holes. Phys. Rev. D 85, 127501 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.127501. arXiv:1112.5397 [gr-qc]
R.G. Daghigh, M.D. Green, Highly real, highly damped, and other asymptotic quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild–anti De Sitter black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 26, 125017 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/12/125017. arXiv:0808.1596 [gr-qc]
A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of Schwarzschild de Sitter black holes. Class. Quantum Gravity 21, 273–280 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/1/019. arXiv:gr-qc/0307012
A. Zhidenko, Quasi-normal modes of the scalar hairy black hole. Class. Quantum Gravity 23, 3155–3164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/9/024. arXiv:gr-qc/0510039
Samuel Lepe, Joel Saavedra, Quasinormal modes, superradiance and area spectrum for 2+1 acoustic black holes. Phys. Lett. B 617, 174–181 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2005.05.021. arXiv:gr-qc/0410074
M. Chabab, H. El Moumni, S. Iraoui, K. Masmar, Behavior of quasinormal modes and high dimension RN-AdS black hole phase transition. Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 676 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4518-6. arXiv:1606.08524 [hep-th]
M. Chabab, H. El Moumni, S. Iraoui, K. Masmar, Phase transition of charged-AdS black holes and quasinormal modes?: a time domain analysis. Astrophys. Space Sci. 362, 192 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-017-3175-z. arXiv:1701.00872 [hep-th]
R.A. Konoplya, A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal modes of black holes: from astrophysics to string theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793–836 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.83.793. arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]
Y. Hatsuda, Quasinormal modes of black holes and Borel summation. Phys. Rev. D 101, 024008 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.024008. arXiv:1906.07232 [gr-qc]
D.S. Eniceicu, M. Reece, Quasinormal modes of charged fields in Reissner–Nordström backgrounds by Borel–Padé summation of Bender–Wu series. Phys. Rev. D 102, 044015 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.044015. arXiv:1912.05553 [gr-qc]
P.A. González, Á. Rincón, J. Saavedra, Y. Vásquez, Superradiant instability and charged scalar quasinormal modes for (2+1)-dimensional Coulomb-like AdS black holes from nonlinear electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. D 104, 084047 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084047. arXiv:2107.08611 [gr-qc]
A. Rincon, P.A. Gonzalez, G. Panotopoulos, J. Saavedra, Y. Vasquez et al., Quasinormal modes for a non-minimally coupled scalar field in a five-dimensional Einstein–Power–Maxwell background. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 1278 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-03438-4. arXiv:2112.04793 [gr-qc]
G. Panotopoulos, Á. Rincón, Quasinormal spectra of scale-dependent Schwarzschild–de Sitter black holes. Phys. Dark Universe 31, 100743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2020.100743. arXiv:2011.02860 [gr-qc]
G. Panotopoulos, Á. Rincón, Quasinormal modes of regular black holes with non linear-electrodynamical sources. Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134, 300 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12686-x. arXiv:1904.10847 [gr-qc]
P.A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, Á. Rincón, Y. Vásquez, Quasinormal modes of massive scalar fields in four-dimensional wormholes: anomalous decay rate. Phys. Rev. D 106, 024050 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.024050. arXiv:2205.06079 [gr-qc]
Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Övgün, Z.-W. Long, Z. Xu, Quasinormal modes of Kerr-like black bounce spacetime (2022). arXiv:2205.07530 [gr-qc]
Y. Yang, D. Liu, A. Övgün, Z.-W. Long, Z. Xu, Probing hairy black holes caused by gravitational decoupling using quasinormal modes and greybody bounds. Phys. Rev. D 107, 064042 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.107.064042. arXiv:2203.11551 [gr-qc]
A. Övgün, İ. Sakallı, H. Mutuk, Quasinormal modes of dS and AdS black holes: feedforward neural network method. Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 18, 2150154 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887821501541. arXiv:1904.09509 [gr-qc]
R.A. Konoplya, A.F. Zinhailo, J. Kunz, Z. Stuchlik, A. Zhidenko, Quasinormal ringing of regular black holes in asymptotically safe gravity: the importance of overtones. JCAP 10, 091 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/10/091. arXiv:2206.14714 [gr-qc]
G. Lambiase, F. Scardigli, Generalized uncertainty principle and asymptotically safe gravity. Phys. Rev. D 105, 124054 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.124054. arXiv:2204.07416 [hep-th]
V. Perlick, O.Y. Tsupko, G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Influence of a plasma on the shadow of a spherically symmetric black hole. Phys. Rev. D 92, 104031 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.104031
V. Perlick, O.Y. Tsupko, G.S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Black hole shadow in an expanding universe with a cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. D 97, 104062 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.104062
J. Matyjasek, M. Telecka, Quasinormal modes of black holes. II. Padé summation of the higher-order WKB terms. Phys. Rev. D 100, 124006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.124006. arXiv:1908.09389 [gr-qc]
M.A. Anacleto, J.A.V. Campos, F.A. Brito, E. Passos, Quasinormal modes and shadow of a Schwarzschild black hole with GUP. Ann. Phys. 434, 168662 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2021.168662. arXiv:2108.04998 [gr-qc]
Acknowledgements
GL, AÖ and RP to acknowledge networking support by the COST Action CA18108. GL thanks INFN for financial support. A. Ö. would like to acknowledge networking support by the COST Action CA21106 - COSMIC WISPers in the Dark Universe: Theory, astrophysics and experiments (CosmicWISPers).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.
About this article
Cite this article
Lambiase, G., Pantig, R.C., Gogoi, D.J. et al. Investigating the connection between generalized uncertainty principle and asymptotically safe gravity in black hole signatures through shadow and quasinormal modes. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 679 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11848-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11848-6