Abstract
We consider the entanglement island in a deformed Jackiw–Teitelboim black hole in the presence of the phase transition. This black hole has the van der Waals–Maxwell-like phase structure as it is coupled with a Maxwell field. We study the behavior of the Page curve of this black hole by using the island paradigm. In the fixed charge ensemble, we discuss different situations with different charges that influence the system’s phase structure. There is only a Hawking–Page phase transition in the absence of charges, which leads to an unstable small black hole. Hence, the related Page curve does not exist. However, a van der Waals–Maxwell-like phase transition occurs in the presence of charges. This yields three black hole solutions. The Page curve of the middle size black hole does not exist. For the extremal black hole, the Page time approaches zero in the phase transition situation but becomes divergent without the phase transition. In a word, we study the Page curve and the island paradigm for different black hole phases and in different phase transition situations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
It is widely believed that studying the information loss paradox is significant for revealing quantum gravity. In 1975, Stephen Hawking discovered that the black hole would emit black-body radiation which does not carry any information about the interior of the black hole [1, 2]. If a black hole is formed by the pure state, then the whole process of black hole evaporation corresponds to the evolution from the pure state to the mixed state, which breaks the unitary principle of quantum mechanics. If quantum mechanics is respected, the fine-grained entropy, also called entanglement entropy or von-Neuman entropy, of Hawking radiation should drop to zero at the end of the whole process. However, Don Page pointed out that if black hole evaporation is a unitary process, then the entanglement entropy of the radiation should linearly increase at the early time, and decrease after a special time – Page time, this curve is called the Page curve [3, 4]. Recently, there is a great breakthrough in this issue. By using the island formula [5], the Page curve emerges naturally. It leads to a decreasing fine-grained entropy for the Hawking radiation due to the emergence of the island in the black hole interior. The fine-grained entropy of Hawking radiation can be expressed as [6, 7]
where I represents the island, \(G_N\) is the Newton constant, R is the radiation region and \(\partial I\) is the boundary of the island. Crucially, the calculations include the contribution of islands inside the black hole to the radiation entropy. In order to obtain the right answer, we should first extremize the generalized entropy and then pick up the minimum value to match this formula. Before the Page time, there are no islands, so the generalized entropy without the island is the smaller one. However, the generalized entropy with the island has more weight in the process of minimization after the Page time. Therefore, the entanglement wedge not only includes the outgoing Hawking radiation, but also the black hole interior purifying partner.
The island formula was first proposed in a solvable two dimensional evaporating black hole model which is constructed by coupling a bath to a nearly-\(\mathrm {AdS_2}\) black hole [8]. Different from the evaporating black hole, the island of the eternal black hole is well established and outside the event horizon [9]. Although the island formula is derived from Jackiw–Teitelboim (JT) black holes, its application is beyond the context of Anti-de Sitter (AdS) spacetime. It can be applied to other spacetime backgrounds, such as the other \(\text {AdS}_2\) black hole [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], the two-dimensional (2D) dilaton gravity [18,19,20,21,22,23,24], the higher-dimensional spacetime [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34], the cosmology [35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42], the boundary conformal field theory (BCFT) [43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. Interestingly, there are also some related works for the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev (SYK) model [50,51,52,53,54,55].
Up to now, most studies have not yet considered the influence of the black hole phase transition on the Page curve. Considering the possibility that the phase transition may change the structure of the Page curve, we would like to study the relationship among the island formula, the Page curve, and the phase transition. Based on this motivation, this paper studies a special 2D black hole solution that yields van der Waals–Maxwell-like phase structure in deformed JT gravity [56,57,58]. Following [9], we consider a two-side eternal black hole coupled to flat thermal baths. Then we use these strategies to obtain the Page curve and discuss the effect of the phase transition on the Page curve.
This paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we discuss the black hole solution which is derived from JT–Maxwell gravity and introduce our toy model – the two-sided deformed JT black hole coupled thermal baths. In Sect. 3, we calculate the evolution of entanglement entropy without island and display the paradox. Then, we consider an island that would avoid the divergence of the entanglement entropy at late times. In Sect. 4, based on the previous result, we plot the Page curve and derive the scrambling time. In Sect. 5, we considered these results in combination with the phase transition. We discuss the change of the Page time with different charges in the canonical ensemble. We consider both the Hawking–Page phase transition without charges and the van der Waals–Maxwell-like phase transition with charges. Finally, we give a summary and some remarks in the last section. Hereafter,we use the unit \(\hbar =k_B=c=1\).
2 Set up
In this section, we briefly review the deformed JT gravity with a Maxwell field [56, 59,60,61,62]. We can write down the action for the deformed JT gravity with metric g and dilaton coupled to conformal matter, the action can be written as follows [63, 64],
The first term \(S_{\mathrm{{top}}}\) is a purely topological term and only contributes a constant \(\phi _{0}\chi \), where \(\chi \) is the Euler characteristic of the corresponding manifold \({\mathcal {M}}\). The second term \(S_{\mathrm{{JT}}}\) is the consequence of dimensional reduction. The dilaton \(\phi \), the Gibbons–Hawking–York boundary term, a counter-term with boundary metric \(\gamma \) and curvature K, and boundary dilaton value \(\phi _{\mathrm{{b}}}\) are included in \(S_{\mathrm{{JT}}}\). The last term \(S_{\mathrm{{m}}}\) is simply a 2D CFT action for a matter field, which does not couple to the dilaton directly.
Hereafter, we consider a deformed JT gravity plus a Maxwell field. The action for this theory reads as [56]
where l is the Ads radius, \({\mathcal {F}}\) is the Maxwell field and \({\mathcal {L}}_{\textrm{ct}}\) is the counterterms. The first bracket is the topological term for JT gravity. Through the variation of this action, we can obtain the black hole solution of the above theory in the Schwarzschild coordinates,
where l is the AdS radius, \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) is the event horizon of the black hole, Q represents the charge density, and the parameters satisfy \(a_{0}>0,\eta>0,\zeta >0\). The dilaton potential \(V\left( \phi \right) \) satisfies \(V\left( \phi _{\infty }\right) =2r\) for \(r\rightarrow \infty \). Note that \(\mu =\frac{{\mathcal {Q}}}{\zeta -1} r_{\mathrm{{H}}}^{1-\zeta }\) is the chemical potential. The blacken factor f(r) recovers the standard JT black hole for \(f(r)=\frac{1}{l^{2}}\left( r^{2}-r_{\mathrm{{H}}}^{2}\right) \) as \(a_{0}=Q^{2}=0\). The Hawking temperature and the entropy of the black hole are given by
This black hole solution is an asymptotically AdS black hole which shows a clear van der Waals–Maxwell like phase structure. More discussions about this black hole solution can be found in [56].
We consider a two-side asymptotically AdS black hole coupled with a bath. The existence of the AdS boundary prevents black hole evaporation, so we apply the transparent boundary condition to make the radiation enter the bath. The asymptotically AdS black hole solution is (2.3a). As shown in Fig. 1, we assume that the asymptotically AdS spacetime and the bath are in thermal equilibrium. We denote \(b_{\pm } \left( \pm t_b,r_b\right) \) and \(a_{\pm } \left( \pm t_a,r_a\right) \) as the locations of the cutoff surface in the bath and the locations of the island in the asymptotically AdS spacetime, respectively.
In order to obtain the maximal extension of the whole spacetime, we perform the Kruskal transformation, defining the following coordinates,
and rewrite the metric as
For the metric in (2.3a), the twist factor \(\Omega \) is given by
where \(\kappa =2\pi T_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) is the surface gravity, and \(r^{*}=\int f^{-1}(r) d r\) is the tortoise coordinate. For the flat bath region, \(f(r)=1\), \(r^*=r\), so we can obtain the twist factor in the bath
Now, we assume the system is in a vacuum state. So we can use the entanglement entropy formula for 2D vacuum CFT [65], which reads as
which represents the entanglement entropy from the contribution of the matter field. Here L is the geodesic distance between two boundary points of a single interval, \(\Omega _{1}, \Omega _{2}\) are the twist factors for these two boundary points, \(U_{1,2}\) and \(V_{1,2}\) are the Kruskal coordinates of these two points in the spacetime. We will use this equation to calculate the entanglement entropy in the following contexts.
3 Entanglement entropy
In this section, we calculate the entanglement entropy of the radiation region \(\left[ -\infty , b_{-}\right] \cup \left[ b_{+}, \infty \right] \) without the contribution of the island at first. Considering the evolution of the pure state, we only need to calculate the entanglement entropy of the region \(\left[ b_-,b_+\right] \) because of the complementarity principle, i.e.,
Inserting \(b_+\left( t,r_b\right) \) and \(b_-\left( -t,r_b\right) \) into (2.6), we can obtain the Kruskal coordinates of \(b_+\) and \(b_-\). As shown in Fig. 1a, since coordinates \(b_+\) and \(b_-\) are in the bath, we can obtain the twist factors by (2.9), i.e., \(\Omega _{b_+}=\Omega _{b_-}=\kappa e^{\kappa r_b}\). One inserts the Kruskal coordinates of \(b_+\) and \(b_-\) into (3.1) and obtains
At late times, the approximation \(\kappa t \gg 1\) is valid, so we have
and then obtain,
Because of the late time approximation, we can find the increase of the entanglement entropy agrees with the original Hawking’s result. The entanglement entropy grows approximately linearly with time. Therefore, there is a very sharp paradox here. The entanglement entropy diverging over time violates the unitary principle of quantum mechanics. In order to satisfy the unitary, we introduce the island to avoid such divergence.
3.1 Cutoff surface far away horizon
Now, we consider the cutoff surface that is far away from the horizon first and then consider the cutoff surface that is near the horizon for calculating the entanglement entropy with islands. The island emerges at late times as shown in Fig. 1b. At large distances and late times approximation, the generalized entropy can be expressed as twice of the fine-grained entropy of the region \(\left[ a_+,b_+\right] \) with the contribution of the island [66],
where the first term is the area term in two-dimensional gravity and the second term represents the contribution of the matter field. \(a_+\) and \(b_+\) are the locations of the island and the cutoff surface in the right wedge of Fig. 1b, respectively. One inserts the coordinates of \(b_+\left( t_b,r_b\right) \) and \(a_+\left( t_a,r_a\right) \) into (3.5), and obtains
At first, we extremize \(S_{\mathrm{{gen}}}\) with respect to \(t_a\), i.e.
The only solution is \(t_a=t_b\). Then, (3.6) can be rewritten in the following simpler form,
where \(r_a, r_b\) are the radial-coordinates of the island and the cutoff surface. To obtain the location of the island, we extremize \(S_{\mathrm{{gen}}}\) with respect to \(r_a\),
Here, we take the near horizon approximation as follows,
where the denominator makes the whole formula dimensionless for the tortoise coordinate. By the near horizon approximation, we insert the \(f\left( r_a\right) \) approximation into (3.9) and can be simplified as
Invoking \(r_{a}^{*}\) approximation into (3.11), we obtain
By solving (3.12), we can obtain the location of islands
Simplifying the function \(r_a\left( c\right) \) by Taylor’s expansion in series of c, we obtain
From (3.14), we can see that the location of the boundary of the island is outside the event horizon. We can insert (3.14) into (3.8) and omit the high order terms. We can obtain the expression of the entanglement entropy,
Because of the emergence of islands, the entanglement entropy does not increase but arrives at a maximal value which is twice the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. The logarithm term comes from the quantum effect of the matter field. Therefore, for the whole evaporation process, the entanglement entropy increases approximately linearly at the beginning, and then does not increase after reaching the maximum value.
3.2 Cutoff surface near horizon
Now let us discuss the case where the cutoff surface is near the horizon, which is different from the case where the cutoff surface is far from the black hole horizon. We follow the similar logic in [25]. When it nears the horizon, the generalized entropy is given by
where K is a constant and L is the geodesic distance between the endpoint of the island and the cutoff surface,
We substitute (3.17) into (3.16) and extremize \(S_{\mathrm{{gen}}}\) with respect to \(r_a\),
where approximations \(\sqrt{r_a-r_{\mathrm{{H}}}} \ll 1\) and \(r_b\simeq r_{\mathrm{{H}}} \) are taken into account. The minimization occurs at a smaller solution, satisfying \(\sqrt{r_a-r_{\mathrm{{H}}}} \ll \sqrt{r_b-r_{\mathrm{{H}}}}\), we obtain the location of the island as
Obviously, the location of the boundary of the island is also outside and very close to the event horizon. The result is similar to the situation that the cutoff surface is far from the horizon (3.14).
Inserting (3.19) to (3.16), we can obtain the entanglement entropy as
Again, the first term of the entanglement entropy is twice of the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. The second term is a small number and can be omitted. Because of the emergence of the island, whatever we choose the cutoff surface, the entanglement entropy is about twice the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy.
In summary, the entanglement entropy without islands linear growth diverges in later times leading to the information paradox. However, once the island is considered, the configuration of space-time changes: a region that is not connected with the external radiation region appears inside the black hole, i.e., the entanglement wedge of radiation contains the black hole interior. At last, the entanglement entropy reaches a constant at late times with island. According to the island paradigm, we obtain the unitary result of the evolution of the entanglement entropy.
4 Page curve and Page time
In this section, we obtain the change of the entanglement entropy of the evolution of the black hole. At the early time, from (3.4), the entanglement entropy linearly increases. But because of the island paradigm, after the Page time, the emergence of the island leads to the entanglement entropy does not increase but is a constant (3.15). Therefore we can obtain the Page curve naturally in Fig. 2. By considering (3.4) and (3.15), we obtain the Page time easily,
Also, we can obtain the scrambling time which is defined as the minimum time interval in which the information is recovered [67]. In the island paradigm, this corresponds to the period from the cutoff surface to the boundary of the island. We assume the time interval between sending the information from the cutoff surface \(r=r_b\) to the black hole and recovering on the island surface \(r=r_a\) to be
Substituting the value of \(r_a\) from Eq. (3.14) in Eq. (4.2), the scrambling time is given by
where we set \(r_b\) to have the same order with \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\), \(T_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) is the Hawking temperature defined (2.4), and \(S_{\mathrm{{BH}}}=2 \pi r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) is the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. This result is consistant with [25, 68].
5 Phase transition of the black hole
So far, we calculate the change of the entanglement entropy of the whole evaporation process for the special black hole solution and obtain the location of the island and the scrambling time. According to our calculation results, we plot the unitary Page curve. Now we consider the phase transition and analyze the relationship between the Page curve and the phase structure. We consider the charged black hole solution in canonical ensemble with \(\eta =1,\zeta =2\), and set the AdS radius \(l=1\). Then (2.3c) can be simplified as
For this charged black hole, we can obtain the Hawking temperature and the entropy from (2.4) and (2.5), which read as
We also can obtain the expression of the free energy of this black hole solution [56],
In the following, we study the chargeless case first and then consider the charged black hole.
5.1 \(Q = 0\)
For the special case with \(Q = 0\), the black hole thermodynamics phase diagram reduces to the Hawking–Page phase transition. We can write down the Hawking temperature and the free energy as
At the same temperature, for the small black hole, its horizon radius is
while, for the large black hole, its horizon radius is
Obviously, there is a minimum temperature \(T_{\mathrm{{H}}\left( \textrm{min}\right) }=\frac{\sqrt{a_0}}{\sqrt{2}\pi }\). For the minimum temperature, two radii are coincident, \(r_{l}=r_{s}=\frac{\sqrt{a_0}}{\sqrt{2}}\). Moreover, there are no black hole phases below the minimum temperature.
We can plot the F-\(T_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) diagram as follows.
As shown in Fig. 3, the free energy of the large black hole is always lower than the free energy of the small black hole. Therefore, for the same temperature, the large black hole is the stable phase. Considering the Hawking–Page phase transition, the small black hole is thermodynamically unstable. Therefore, we do not need to consider the island and the Page time of the small black hole, including the extremal black hole.
To study the effect on the Page curve from the Hawking–Page phase transition, we consider the situation in the absence of the islands first. From Eq. (3.4), the entanglement entropy increases linearly at late times. As shown in Fig. 4, we obtain the figure for the increased rate of the entanglement entropy and the Page time,
We choose \(\eta =1,\zeta =2, Q=0, c=1.5\) for (4.1) and (4.2), then we obtain
Now we consider the island paradigm,
The whole process of the evolution of the entanglement entropy should satisfy (5.9). Considering theHawking–Page phase transition, we set \(c=1.5\) and plot the Page curve as a function of time t and radius \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) for \(a_0=1\) in Fig. 5.
5.2 \(Q \ne 0\)
For the general case, we set \(\eta =1,\zeta =2,a_0=1,l=1\) and obtain the Hawking temperature and the free energy as
By extremizing \(T_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) with respect to \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\),
we can find only two real, positive solutions obey (5.11). These two solutions coalesce at the critical point,
According to Eqs. (5.11) and (5.12), we can obtain \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}\left( \text{ crit }\right) }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{6}}\), \(Q_{\left( \text{ crit }\right) }=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3\sqrt{6}}}\), \(T_{\mathrm{{H}}\left( \text{ crit }\right) }=\frac{1}{2 \pi }\sqrt{\frac{3}{2}}\). Also, we can plot the F-\(T_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) diagram for the charged situation as follows.
There is a section of the well-known “swallowtail” shape in Fig. 6a. The intersection points correspond to the phase transition point in the fixed charge ensemble for \(Q^2<Q^2_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\). The most stable phase requires the lowest free energy. When \(Q^2>Q^2_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\), the swallowtail structure disappears in Fig. 6b, so the phase transition also does not happen.
To investigate the phase transition effects on the Page curve, we plot the increased rate of the entanglement entropy as a function of the radius for several different values of \(Q^2\),
According to (4.1) and (4.3), we set c = 1.5 and write down the Page time and the scrambling time versus the radius for any \(Q^2\),
Obviously, in Fig. 7a, the increased rate of the entanglement entropy is not a monotonic function of the radius when \(Q^2<Q^2_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\). The same increased rate corresponds to three different radius values which represent the “small, middle, large” black hole. However, in real physical processes, the lower the free energy is, the more stable phase is. As Fig. 6a, the intersection points are just the critical points where the phase transition happens. Above the critical temperature, the large black hole is more stable, but below the critical temperature, the small black hole is more stable. Thus, Fig. 6a behaves like the van der Waals–Maxwell phase structure.
In Fig. 7b, it is obvious that the Page time will be a constant \(\left( t_{\mathrm{{Page}}}=8\pi \right) \), when \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) approaches infinity. For the large black hole, the charge and entropy do not influence the Page time. However, for the extremal black hole, the Page time is divergent. Since the middle black hole is unstable, so that the physical meaning of the Page time of the middle black hole is not clear when \(Q^2<Q^2_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\).
Considering the island paradigm (5.9), we set \(c=1.5\) and plot the Page curve of a series of small and large black holes at \(Q^2=0.04\) in Fig. 8. As shown in Fig. 8a, for the small black hole, the Page time approaches zero. It is different from Fig. 7b. Because we take the late time approximation in Fig. 7b, it is inaccurate for the Page time of the small black hole. But we do not use the late time approximation in (5.9), therefore the result of Fig. 8 is reasonable.
In Fig. 9, we plot the Page curve of the black hole with the special phase structure. Above the critical temperature, we can only obtain the Page curve of the large black hole. However, below the critical temperature, we can only obtain the Page curve of the small black hole. The lower the temperature, the greater the Page time. This implies that the lower the temperature, the later the island appears in the black hole’s interior. Taking into account the critical temperature, because of the instability of the middle black hole, the range of the radius of the middle black hole would not become the black hole phase, so the island does not emerge. As the phase transition of the black hole, the location of the island also has a jump. In Fig. 10, when the black hole temperature is the critical temperature, the large and small black holes coexist.
Finally, we consider the different situations without phase transition when \(Q^2>Q^2_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\). The green branch corresponds to the critical charge in Fig. 7. As shown in Fig. 7a, we know the increased rate of the entanglement entropy beyond the critical charge is the monotone function of the radius. As shown in Fig. 7b, with the increase of the charge, the Page time is later. There is no more phase transition, so the Page curve has no special situation for any size black hole just like in Fig. 2. We set \(c=1.5\) and plot the Page curve as a function of time t and radius \(r_{\mathrm{{H}}}\) at \(Q^2=0.5\) in Fig. 11.
6 Discussion and conclusion
In summary, we consider the information paradox for a special black hole derived from the deformed JT gravity with the van der Waals–Maxwell like phase structure. To make the black hole evaporate, we construct the eternal black hole by gluing the flat bath. Then we use the island formula to calculate the entanglement entropy. At early time, the entanglement entropy linearly increases without islands. It matches Hawking’s original calculations. At later times, because of the island, the entanglement entropy reaches a constant value which is twice of the Bekenstein–Hawking entropy. Finally, we obtain the scrambling time and the Page curve. We obtain the unitary result and the island outside the event horizon that is consistent with the result of the eternal black hole. Moreover, we consider different situations for the cutoff surface and find the final result is independent of the distance of the cutoff surface.
Moreover, we consider the impact of the phase transition. Phase transition is an important and interesting thermodynamic phenomenon. In fixed charged ensembles with different charges, the black hole has different phase transitions. There is the Hawking–Page phase transition in the black hole without charges. As the charge increases, There is the van der Waals–Maxwell-like phase transition. But if the charge is beyond the critical charge, there are no phase transitions. We study the island and the Page time for the black hole with these phase structures to obtain some results about the influence yielded on the phase transition.
For an neutral black hole without charges, there is only the Hawking–Page phase transition. For the same temperature, there are two black hole phases – the small and large black holes. By calculating the free energy and the Hawking temperature, we obtain Fig. 3, where the large black hole with lower free energy is more stable. Note that the system has a minimum temperature for forming the black hole. So it is meaningless to discuss the island and the Page time below this minimum temperature in this situation. Thus, we only can obtain the Page curve of the large black hole and the scrambling time curve in Fig. 12.
For charged black holes, at first, we consider \(Q<Q_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\), the black hole would have the van der Waals–Maxwell-like phase structure that three different black hole phases may correspond to the same temperature. By calculating the free energy and the Hawking temperature, we obtain Fig. 6a, the lowest free energy phase is stable, so only one of the three phases is the stable one. There is a critical temperature where the small black hole phase would jump to the large black hole phase. Of course, the Page time about the middle black hole is meaningless. The situations with the temperature beyond, below, and equal to the critical temperature respectively correspond to Fig. 9a which the large black hole is more stable, Fig. 9b which the small black hole is more stable, and Fig. 10 which the small and large black holes coexist. Then we consider \(Q\ge Q_{\mathrm{{crit}}}\) case in which is the no phase transition happens. The Page time for any temperature is well defined in this situation. Different from the no phase transition situation, the Page time of the small black hole approaches zero in Fig. 8a. We do not use the late time approximation to calculate the Page time in (5.9). As shown in Fig. 13, the scrambling time curve monotonically decreases in the no phase transition situation. But in the phase transition situation, there is a maximum scrambling time.
In the doubly-holographic system [69], one simply includes a second Karch–Randall brane as a gravitating bath. One finds if the bath itself gravitates, the original Page curve vanishes. And the quantum extremal surface is just at the horizon. These successful works about the introduction of the gravitating bath are in the high dimension [31, 69, 70]. But there is no graviton in two dimensions. So we can not introduce the KR brane as the gravitating bath in our 2d gravity model. We will consider the reliable construction of the gravitating bath in future work.
In conclusion, we use a simple black hole model with a rich phase structure to compute and analyze the Page curve and study the effect of the phase transition to Page curves. We find the important relationship between the phase transition and the black hole information paradox. We hope that the deep understanding and keen insight of the 2D gravity model in this paper can be applied to the higher-dimensional space-time we live in. As an important phenomenon, the phase transition might be interesting for understanding the information paradox.
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This paper is a purely theoretical calculation, without data and other additional materials.]
References
S.W. Hawking, Particle creation by black holes. Commun. Math. Phys. 43, 199 (1975) (Erratum;[Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976))
S.W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse. Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460–2473 (1976)
D.N. Page, Information in black hole radiation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3743–3746 (1993). arXiv:hep-th/9306083
D.N. Page, Time dependence of Hawking radiation entropy. JCAP 1309, 028 (2013). arXiv:1301.4995 [hep-th]
N. Engelhardt, A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime. JHEP 01, 073 (2015). arXiv:1408.3203 [hep-th]
A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, Y. Zhao, The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry. JHEP 03, 149 (2020). arXiv:1908.10996 [hep-th]
G. Penington, Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox. JHEP 09, 002 (2020). arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]
A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole. JHEP 12, 063 (2019). arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]
A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon. arXiv:1910.11077 [hep-th]
T. Hollowood, S. Kumar, Islands and page curves for evaporating black holes in JT gravity. arXiv:2004.14944 [hep-th]
H. Chen, Z. Fisher, J. Hernandez, R. Myers, S. Ruan, Information flow in black hole evaporation. JHEP 03, 152 (2020). arXiv:1911.03402 [hep-th]
H. Chen, Z. Fisher, J. Hernandez, R. Myers, S. Ruan, Evaporating black holes coupled to a thermal bath. arXiv:2007.11658 [hep-th]
A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian, A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes and the entropy of hawking radiation. arXiv:1911.12333 [hep-th]
E. Verheijden, E. Verlinde, From the BTZ black hole to JT gravity: geometrizing the island. JHEP 11, 092 (2021). arXiv:2102.00922 [hep-th]
S. He, Y. Sun, L. Zhao, Y.-X. Zhang, The universality of islands outside the horizon. arXiv:2110.07598 [hep-th]
P.-C. Sun, Entanglement islands from holographic thermalization of rotating charged black hole. arXiv:2108.12557 [hep-th]
M.-H. Yu, C.-Y. Lu, X.-H. Ge, S.-J. Sin, Island, Page curve and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes. Phys. Rev. D 105(6), 066009 (2022). arXiv:2112.14361 [hep-th]
M.-H. Yu, X.-H. Ge, Entanglement islands in generalized two-dimensional dilaton black holes. Phys. Rev. D (in press). arXiv:2208.01943 [hep-th]
T. Anegawa, N. Iizuka, Notes on islands in asymptotically flat 2d dilaton black holes. JHEP 07, 036 (2020). arXiv:2004.01601 [hep-th]
T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian, A. Strominger, Islands in asymptotically Flat 2D gravity. JHEP 07, 022 (2020). arXiv:2004.13857 [hep-th]
K. Goto, T. Hartman, A. Tajdini, Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole. arXiv:2011.09043 [hep-th]
X. Wang, R. Li, J. Wang, Page curves for a family of exactly solvable evaporating black holes. arXiv:2104.00224 [hep-th]
R. Li, X. Wang, J. Wang, Island may not save the information paradox of Liouville black holes. arXiv:2105.03271 [hep-th]
M.-H. Yu, X.-H. Ge, Page curves and islands in charged dilaton black holes. Eur. Phys. J. C 82(2), 167 (2022). arXiv:2107.03031 [hep-th]
K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka, Y. Matsuo, Islands in Schwarzschild black holes. JHEP 06, 085 (2020). arXiv:2004.05863 [hep-th]
A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions. SciPost Phys. 9(1), 001 (2020). arXiv:1911.09666 [hep-th]
S.A. Hosseini Mansoori, O. Luongo, S. Mancini, M. Mirjalali, M. Rafiee, A. Tavanfar, Planar black holes in holographic axion gravity: islands, page times, and scrambling times. arXiv:2209.00253 [hep-th]
Y. Ling, Y. Liu, Z. Xian, Island in charged black holes. JHEP 03, 251 (2021). arXiv:2010.00037 [hep-th]
M. Alishahiha, A. Astaneh, A. Naseh, Island in the presence of higher derivative terms. JHEP 02, 035 (2021). arXiv:2005.08715 [hep-th]
Y. Matsuo, Islands and stretched horizon. JHEP 07, 051 (2021). arXiv:2011.08814 [hep-th]
H. Geng, A. Karch, Massive islands. JHEP 09, 121 (2020). arXiv:2006.02438 [hep-th]
J. Chu, F. Deng, Y. Zhou, Page curve from defect extremal surface and island in higher dimensions. JHEP 10, 149 (2021). arXiv:2105.09106 [hep-th]
K. Ghosh, C. Krishnan, Dirichlet baths and the not-so-fine-grained Page curve. JHEP 08, 119 (2021). arXiv:2103.17253 [hep-th]
G. Yadav, Page curves of Reissner–Nordström black hole in HD gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 904 (2022)
T. Hartman, Y. Jiang, E. Shaghoulian, Islands in cosmology. JHEP 11, 111 (2020). arXiv:2008.01022 [hep-th]
V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, T. Ugajin, Islands in de Sitter space. JHEP 02, 072 (2021). arXiv:2008.05275 [hep-th]
S. Azarnia, R. Fareghbal, A. Naseh, H. Zolfi, Islands in flat-space cosmology. arXiv:2109.04795 [hep-th]
K. Goswami, K. Narayan, H.K. Saini. Cosmologies, singularities and quantum extremal surfaces. arXiv:2111.14906 [hep-th]
R. Espindola, B. Najian, D. Nikolakopoulou, Islands in FRW cosmologies. arXiv:2203.04433 [hep-th]
G. Yadav, N. Joshi, Cosmological and black hole Islands in multi-event horizon spacetimes. arXiv:2210.00331 [hep-th]
R. Bousso, E. Wildenhain, Islands in closed and open universes. arXiv:2202.05278 [hep-th]
J. Kames-King, E. Verheijden, E. Verlinde, No Page curves for the de Sitter horizon. arXiv:2108.09318 [hep-th]
K. Suzuki, T. Takayanagi, BCFT and islands in two dimensions. arXiv:2202.08462 [hep-th]
Z. Wang, Z. Xu, S. Zhou, Y. Zhou, Partial reduction and cosmology at defect brane. arXiv:2112.13782 [hep-th]
Q.-L. Hu, D. Li, R.-X. Miao, Y.-Q. Zeng, AdS/BCFT and island for curvature-squared gravity. arXiv:2202.03304 [hep-th]
T. Li, J. Chu, Y. Zhou, Reflected entropy for an evaporating black hole. JHEP 11, 155 (2020). arXiv:2006.10846 [hep-th]
A. Almheiri, H.W. Lin, The entanglement wedge of unknown couplings. arXiv:2111.06298 [hep-th]
T. Li, M. Yuan, Y. Zhou, Defect extremal surface for reflected entropy. arXiv:2108.08544 [hep-th]
D.S. Ageev, Shaping contours of entanglement islands in BCFT. arXiv:2108.08544 [hep-th]
Y. Chen, X.-L. Qi, P. Zhang, Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Majorana chains. arXiv:2003.13147 [hep-th]
S.-K. Jian, B. Swingle, Note on entropy dynamics in the Brownian SYK model. arXiv:2011.08158 [hep-th]
D.L. Nedel, Time dependent entanglement entropy in SYK models and Page curve. arXiv:2007.06770 [hep-th]
K. Su, P. Zhang, H. Zhai, Page curve from non-Markovianity. arXiv:2101.11238 [hep-th]
A. Kruchkov, A. Patel, P. Kim, S.R. Sachdev, Thermoelectric power of Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev islands: probing Bekenstein–Hawking entropy in quantum matter experiments. arXiv:1912.02835 [hep-th]
G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford, Z. Yang, Replica wormholes and the black hole interior. arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]
S. Cao, Y.-C. Rui, X.-H. Ge, Thermodynamic phase structure of complex Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and charged black hole in deformed JT gravity. arXiv:2103.16270 [hep-th]
W. Sun, X.-H. Ge, Holographic heat engine efficiency of hyperbolic charged black holes. Chin. Phys. B 30(10), 109501 (2021). arXiv:2205.00654 [gr-qc]
W. Cai, S. Cao, X.-H. Ge, M. Matsumoto, S.-J. Sin, A non-Hermitian two coupled Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model. Phys. Rev. D 106, 106010 (2022). arXiv:2208.10800 [hep-th]
E. Witten, Matrix models and deformations of JT gravity. Proc. R. Soc. A 476(2244), 20200582 (2020)
D. Momeni, P. Channuie, Exact solutions of (deformed) Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 81(6), 534 (2021). arXiv:2009.03723 [hep-th]
M. Alishahiha, A.F. Astaneh, G. Jafari, A. Naseh, B. Taghavi, Free energy for deformed Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity. Phys. Rev. D 103(4), 046005 (2021)
D. Momeni, Real classical geometry with arbitrary deficit parameter (s) \(\alpha (I)\) in deformed Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 81(3), 202 (2021)
R. Jackiw, Lower dimensional gravity. Nucl. Phys. B 252, 343–356 (1985)
C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and hamiltonian structure in two spacetime dimensions. Phys. Lett. B 126(1–2), 41–45 (1983)
P. Calabrese, J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory. J. Phys. A 42, 504005 (2009). arXiv:0905.4013 [hep-th]
H. Casini, C.D. Fosco, M. Huerta, Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions. J. Stat. Mech. 0507, P07007 (2005). arXiv:cond-mat/0505563
P. Caputa, J. Simon, A. Stikonas, T. Takayanagi, K. Watanabe, Scrambling time from local perturbations of the eternal BTZ black hole. arXiv:1503.08161 [hep-th]
Q.-B. Wang, Yu. Ming-Hui, X.-H. Ge, Scrambling time for analogue black holes embedded in AdS space. Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 468 (2022). arXiv:2203.07914 [hep-th]
H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas, S. Shashi, Information transfer with a gravitating bath. SciPost Phys. 10(5), 103 (2021). arXiv:2012.04671 [hep-th]
H. Geng, S. Lüst, R.K. Mishra, D. Wakeham, Holographic BCFTs and communicating black holes. JHEP 08, 003 (2021). arXiv:2104.07039 [hep-th]
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Cheng Ran, Hai-Ming Yuan, Yu-Qi Lei and Qing-Bin Wang for helpful discussions. The study was partially supported by NSFC, China (Grant no. 12275166 and no. 11875184).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Funded by SCOAP3. SCOAP3 supports the goals of the International Year of Basic Sciences for Sustainable Development.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, CY., Yu, MH., Ge, XH. et al. Page curve and phase transition in deformed Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity. Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 215 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11358-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11358-5