Abstract
we conduct a more realistic double-folding numerical treatment of the Coulomb potential in comparison with the usual analytical approximation for the different prescriptions of nuclear radius. By using this double-folding technique, we present that a superior approximation to the standard analytical rigid spheres one could be achieved. The results illustrating the differences for the extensively studied \(^{16}\)O + \(^{208}\)Pb system are presented. It is observed that the potential for the short-ranges, which one expects to be below or up-to the barrier, the analytical approximations are inferior to the double-folding procedure, especially so for the simplest radius choice. Our results clearly show that the analytical approaches are rather poor and the use of the double-folding technique for the Coulomb potential will lead to a better determination of the nuclear potential for the interaction of two nuclei.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: This is a theoretical study and there is no experimental data.]
References
R. Devries, M. Clover, Coulomb potentials in heavy-ion interactions. Nucl. Phys. A 243(3), 528–532 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(75)90294-8
G. Satchler, W. Love, Folding model potentials from realistic interactions for heavy-ion scattering. Phys. Rep. 55(3), 183–254 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(79)90081-4
M. Ismail, W. Seif, H. El-Gebaly, On the Coulomb interaction between spherical and deformed nuclei. Phys. Lett. B 563(1–2), 53–60 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(03)00600-2
B. Carlson, L. Chamon, L. Gasques, Accurate approximation for the Coulomb potential between deformed nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 70(5), 1–4 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.057602
O. Ghodsi, J. Ariai, Calculation of the Coulomb potential between spherical-deformed and deformed-deformed nuclei using the Monte Carlo method. Eur. Phys. J. A-Hadrons Nuclei 69, 65–69 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2007-10412-8, http://www.springerlink.com/index/xp14q3g189122347.pdf
O. Ghodsi, V. Zanganeh, Calculation of the total potential between two deformed heavy ion nuclei using the Monte Carlo method and M3Y nucleon-nucleon forces. Phys. Rev. C 79(4), 1–5 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.044604
I. Gontchar, M. Chushnyakova, A C-code for the double-folding interaction potential of two spherical nuclei. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181(1), 168–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.007, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010465509002860
G. R. Satchler, Oxford, Uk: Clarendon, p. 833. (International Series Of Monographs On Physics, 68) (1983)
a Umar, V. Oberacker, Heavy-ion interaction potential deduced from density-constrained time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculation. Phys. Rev. C 74(2), 4–6 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.74.021601
aS. Umar, V.E. Oberacker, Density-constrained time-dependent Hartree-Fock calculation of 16O + 208Pb fusion cross-sections. Eur. Phys. J. A 39(2), 243–247 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2008-10712-5
H. D. Vries, C. D. Jager, C. D. Vries, nuclear charge-density-distribution parameters from elastic eleci’ron scati’ering. Atom. Data Nucl. 36, 3. http://www.calstatela.edu/faculty/kaniol/phys444/nucl.chg.dist.atm.nucl.data.v36.issue3.pdf
E. Nadjakov, K. Marinova, Y. Gangrsky, Systematics of nuclear charge radii. Atom. Data Nucl. Data Tables 56(1), 133–157 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1994.1004, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092640X84710047
S. Goriely, M. Samyn, P.-H. Heenen, J.M. Pearson, F. Tondeur, Hartree-Fock mass formulas and extrapolation to new mass data. Phys. Rev. C 66(2), 1–9 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.024326
M. Samyn, S. Goriely, P.-H. Heenen, J. Pearson, F. Tondeur, A Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formula. Nucl. Phys. A 700(1–2), 142–156 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(01)01316-1
G. Audi, A. Wapstra, The 1995 update to the atomic mass evaluation. Nucl. Phys. A 595(1995), 409–480 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(95)00445-9
J. Dechargé, D. Gogny, Hartree-Fock-Bogolyubov calculations with the D 1 effective interaction on spherical nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 21, 4. http://prc.aps.org/abstract/PRC/v21/i4/p1568_1
G. Bertsch, M. Girod, S. Hilaire, J.-P. Delaroche, H. Goutte, S. Péru, Systematics of the First 2+ Excitation with the Gogny Interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99(3), 1–4 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.032502
R. Capote, M. Herman, P. Obložinský, P. Young, S. Goriely, T. Belgya, a.V. Ignatyuk, A.J. Koning, S. Hilaire, V. Plujko, M. Avrigeanu, O. Bersillon, M. Chadwick, T. Fukahori, Z. Ge, Y. Han, S. Kailas, J. Kopecky, V. Maslov, G. Reffo, M. Sin, E. Soukhovitskii, P. Talou, RIPL -reference input parameter library for calculation of nuclear reactions and nuclear data evaluations. Nucl. Data Sheets 110(12), 3107–3214 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2009.10.004, http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090375209000994
G.R. Satchler, W.G. Love, Folding model potentials from realistic interactions for heavy-ion scattering. Phys. Rep. 55, 83–254 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(79)90081-4
T. Dao, W. Khoa, H.G. von Oertzen, F. Bohlen, Nuoffer, Study of diffractive and refractive structure in the elastic 16O+16O scattering at incident energies ranging from 124 to 1120 MeV. Nucl. Phys. A 672, 387–416 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(99)00856-8
V. Yu Denisov, W. Nörenberg, Entrance channel potentials in the synthesis of the heaviest nuclei. Eur. Phys. J. A Hadrons Nuclei 15, 375–388 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10039-3
I. Gontchar, M. Chushnyakova, A C-code for the double folding interaction potential of two spherical nuclei. Comput. Phys. Commun. 181, 168–182 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.007
L.R. Gasques, L.C. Chamon, D. Pereira, V. Guimarães, A. Lépine-Szily, M.A.G. Alvarez, E.S. Rossi, C.P. Silva, B.V. Carlson, J.J. Kolata, L. Lamm, D. Peterson, P. Santi, S. Vincent, P.A. De Young, G. Peasley, Experimental determination of the surface density for the \({}^{6}\rm He\) exotic nucleus. Phys. Rev. C 67, 024602 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.024602
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Alexis Diaz-Torres.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Đapo, H., Kucuk, Y. & Boztosun, I. A realistic numerical treatment of Coulomb potential in comparison with the analytical approximations. Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 85 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00728-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00728-4