Abstract
E1 transition properties such as the reduced transition probabilities, excitation energies and photon–absorption cross-sections have been theoretically investigated for \(^{\mathrm {181}}\)Ta nucleus within the framework of Translational and Galileo Invariant-Quasiparticle Phonon Nuclear Model (TGI-QPNM). The model Hamiltonian includes the single-particle and the isovector dipole–dipole interaction terms along with the restoration forces. The strength of the isovector dipole–dipole interaction has been chosen to be \(\chi = 500/\hbox {A}^{\mathrm {5/3}} MeV \cdot fm^{-2}\). Theoretical calculations show that in addition to the M1 excitations, there is considerable amount of E1 transitions especially between 2.6–3 MeV, which gives remarkable contribution to the fragmentation in the low-energy region of the dipole spectrum. Thus, the agreement between theory and experiment in terms of the fragmentation increases. Furthermore, the photon–absorption cross-sections in the Pigmy Dipole Resonance (PDR) region below the neutron separation energy (\(S_{n}\)) is compatible with experimental data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability Statement
This manuscript has no associated data or the data will not be deposited. [Authors’ comment: The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.]
References
W. Bothe, W. Gentner, Zeitschrift für Physik 106, 236 (1937)
N. Bohr, Nature 141, 326 (1938)
A.B. Migdal, Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i teoreticheskoi Fiziki 15, 81 (1945)
G. Baldwin, G. Klaiber, Phys. Rev. 7, 3 (1947)
D. Savran et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 70, 210 (2013)
M. Goldhaber, E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 74, 1046 (1948)
A. Zilges et al., Phys. Lett. B 542, 43 (2002)
T. Oishi et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 034329 (2016)
G.A. Bartholomew, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 11, 259 (1961)
J.S. Brzosko et al., Can. J. Phys. 47, 2849 (1969)
N.S. Martoranaa et al., Phys. Lett. B 782, 112 (2018)
L. Pellegri et al., Phys. Lett. B 738, 519 (2014)
V. Derya et al., Nucl. Phys. A 906, 94 (2013)
J. Endres et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 212503 (2010)
J. Endres et al., Phys. Rev. C 85, 064331 (2012)
J. Endres et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 034302 (2009)
E.G. Lanza et al., Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014)
D. Savran et al., Nucl. Phys. A 788, 165 (2007)
A. Bracco, E.G. Lanza, A. Tamii, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 106, 360 (2019)
F.C.L. Crespi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 012501 (2014)
F.C.L. Crespi et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 024323 (2015)
M. Krzysiek et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 044330 (2016)
U.E.P.J. Berg, Phys. C 4, 359 (1984)
D. Bohle et al., Phys. Lett. B 137, 27 (1984)
R.D. Heil et al., Nucl. Phys. A 506, 223 (1990)
A. Zilges et al., Z. Phys. A 340, 155 (1991)
M. Spieker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 192504 (2015)
F. Iachello, Phys. Lett. B 160, 1 (1985)
I. Morrison, J. Weise, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 8, 678 (1982)
F. Scholtz, F. Hahne, Phys. Lett. B 123, 147 (1983)
M. Spieker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015)
G. Co et al., Phys. Rev. C 80, 014308 (2009)
N. Demirci Saygı, F. Ertuğral Yamaç, A.A. Kuliev, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E (2020)
N. Ryezayeva et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 272502 (2002)
N. Tsoneva, H. Lenske, Phys. Rev. C 77, 024321 (2008)
S. Goriely, E. Khan, Nucl. Phys. A 706, 217 (2002)
V.O. Nesterenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 182501 (2018)
P.-G. Reinhard et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 024321 (2014)
M. Martini et al., Phys. Rev. C 94, 014304 (2016)
Kai Wang, M. Kortelainen, J. C. Pei, Phys. Rev. C 96, 031301(R) (2017)
E. Litvinova, P. Ring, V. Tselyaev, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014312 (2008)
E. Litvinova, P. Ring, V. Tselyaev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 022502 (2010)
E. Tabar et al., Nucl. Phys. A 1001, 121885 (2020)
J. Dudek, T. Werner, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Phys. 4, 1543 (1978)
P. Möller et al., At Data Nucl Data Tables 59, 185 (1995)
V.G. Soloviev, Theory of Complex Nuclei (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1976)
N.I. Pyatov, D.I. Salamov, Nucleonica 22, 127 (1977)
N. Çakmak, S. Çakmak, C. Salam, S. Ünlü, Paramana 90, 15 (2018)
Z. Zenginerler et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 107 (2013)
E. Guliyev et al., Nucl. Phys. A 915, 78 (2013)
E. Guliyev et al., Phys. Lett. B 532, 173 (2002)
E. Guliyev et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 39, 323 (2009)
E. Tabar et al., Nucl. Phys. A 979, 143 (2018)
R. Bramblett et al., Phys. Rev. 129, 2723 (1963)
R. Bergere et al., Nucl. Phys. A 121, 463 (1968)
G. Gurevich et al., Nucl. Phys. A 351, 257 (1981)
A. Makinaga et al., Phys. Rev. C 90, 044301 (2014)
A. Wolpert et al., Phys. Rev. C 58, 765 (1998)
E. Tabar et al., Int. J. Modern Phys. E 25, 1650053 (2016)
V. Soloviev, A. Sushkov, Phys. Lett. B 262, 189 (1991)
I. Hamamoto et al., Phys. Lett. B 226, 17 (1989)
M.I. Baznat et al., Yad. Fiz. 25, 1155 (1977)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project no. 118F094), Research Fund of the Sakarya University (Project No. 2020-7-25-56) and Council of Higher Education (YÖK) 100/2000 CoHE PhD Scholarship.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Mark Caprio
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tabar, E., Yakut, H., Kuliev, A.A. et al. Investigation of the electric dipole (E1) excitations in \(^{\mathrm {181}}\)Ta nucleus. Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 271 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00274-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00274-x