Abstract.
The photoproduction of \( \omega\) and \( \eta^{\prime}\) mesons off carbon and niobium nuclei has been measured as a function of the meson momentum for incident photon energies of 1.2-2.9GeV at the electron accelerator ELSA. The mesons have been identified via the \(\omega \rightarrow \pi^{0} \gamma \rightarrow 3 \gamma\) and \(\eta^{\prime} \rightarrow \pi^{0} \pi^{0}\eta \rightarrow 6 \gamma\) decays, respectively, registered with the CBELSA/TAPS detector system. From the measured meson momentum distributions the momentum dependence of the transparency ratio has been determined for both mesons. Within a Glauber analysis the in-medium \( \omega\) and \(\eta^{\prime}\) widths and the corresponding absorption cross sections have been deduced as a function of the meson momentum. The results are compared to recent theoretical predictions for the in-medium \( \omega\) width and \( \eta^{\prime}\)-N absorption cross sections. The energy dependence of the imaginary part of the \( \omega\)- and \(\eta^{\prime}\)-nucleus optical potential has been extracted. The finer binning of the present data compared to the existing data allows a more reliable extrapolation towards the production threshold. The modulus of the imaginary part of the \(\eta^{\prime}\)-nucleus potential is found to be about three times smaller than recently determined values of the real part of the \(\eta^{\prime}\)-nucleus potential, which makes the \(\eta^{\prime}\) meson a suitable candidate for the search for meson-nucleus bound states. For the \( \omega\) meson, the modulus of the imaginary part near threshold is comparable to the modulus of the real part of the potential. As a consequence, only broad structures can be expected, which makes the observation of \( \omega\) mesic states very difficult experimentally.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Hayano, T. Hatsuda, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2949 (2010)
S. Leupold, V. Metag, U. Mosel, Int. J. Mod. Phys. 19, 147 (2010)
E. Oset et al., Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 21, 1230011 (2012)
H. Nagahiro, S. Hirenzaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 232503 (2005)
I. Strakovsky et al., Phys. Rev. C 91, 045207 (2015)
E. Czerwinski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 062004 (2014)
T. Yamazaki, Y. Akaishi, Phys. Lett. B 535, 70 (2002)
M. Agnello et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 212303 (2005)
T. Yamazaki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 132502 (2010)
Y. Ichikawa et al., Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015, 021D01 (2015)
G. Agakishiev et al., Phys. Lett. B 742, 242 (2015)
E. Epple, L. Fabbietti, Phys. Rev. C 92, 044002 (2015)
H. Gilg et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 025201 (2000)
K. Itahashi et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 025202 (2000)
H. Geissel et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 122301 (2002)
K. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 072302 (2004)
P. Kienle, T. Yamazaki, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52, 85 (2004)
J. Weil, U. Mosel, V. Metag, Phys. Lett. B 723, 120 (2013)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (M. Kotulla et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 192302 (2008)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (M. Kotulla et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 199903 (2015)
E.Ya. Paryev, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40, 025201 (2013)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (M. Nanova et al.), Phys. Lett. B 727, 417 (2013)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (M. Nanova et al.), Phys. Lett. B 710, 600 (2012)
V. Metag et al., Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67, 530 (2012)
V. Metag, Hyperfine Interact. 234, 25 (2015)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (S. Friedrich et al.), Phys. Lett. B 736, 26 (2014)
D. Cabrera, R. Rapp, Phys. Lett. B 729, 67 (2014)
A. Ramos et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 148 (2013)
F. Klingl, T. Waas, W. Weise, Nucl. Phys. A 650, 299 (1999)
M.F.M. Lutz, G. Wolf, B. Friman, Nucl. Phys. A 706, 431 (2002) 765
P. Mühlich et al., Nucl. Phys. A 780, 187 (2006)
E. Oset, A. Ramos, Phys. Lett. B 704, 334 (2012)
D. Husmann, W.J. Schwille, Phys. Bl. 44, 40 (1988)
W. Hillert, Eur. Phys. J. A 28, 139 (2006) (Supplement 1, s01)
The Crystal Barrel Collaboration (E. Aker et al.), Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 321, 69 (1992)
R. Novotny, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 38, 379 (1991)
A.R. Gabler et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 346, 168 (1994)
Particle Data Group (K.A. Olive et al.), Chin. Phys. C 38, 090001 (2014)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (A. Thiel et al.), Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 102001 (2012)
J.G. Messchendorp et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 11, 95 (2001)
M. Kaskulov, E. Hernandez, E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. A 31, 245 (2007)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (F. Dietz et al.), Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 6 (2015)
CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration (I. Jaegle et al.), Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 11 (2011)
C. Ciofi degli Atti, S. Simula, Phys. Rev. C 53, 1689 (1996)
R. Brun, GEANT, Cern/DD/ee/84-1 (1986)
M. Thiel et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 132 (2013)
T. Falter, S. Leupold, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 64, 024608 (2001)
N. Bianchi et al., Phys. Rev. C 54, 1688 (1996)
V. Muccifora et al., Phys. Rev. C 60, 064616 (1999)
D. Cabrera et al., Nucl. Phys. A 733, 130 (2004)
J. Nieves, E. Oset, C. Garcia-Recio, Nucl. Phys. A 554, 509 (1993)
C.W. de Jager, D. de Vries, C. de Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 479 (1974)
G.I. Lykasov et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 6, 71 (1999)
O. Buss et al., Phys. Rep. 512, 1 (2012)
H. Lenske, private communication (2015)
K. Itahashi et al., Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 601 (2012)
N. Muramatsu, Few-Body Syst. 128, 997 (2013)
V. Metag, approved proposal ELSA/03-2012-BGO-OD
H. Nagahiro et al., Phys. Rev. C 87, 045201 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. Salabura
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
The CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration., Friedrich, S., Nanova, M. et al. Momentum dependence of the imaginary part of the \( \omega\)- and \( \eta^{\prime}\)-nucleus optical potential. Eur. Phys. J. A 52, 297 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16297-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16297-4