Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Border Studies: Development of the Theory and Major Trends in a Changing Geopolitical Environment

  • BORDER STUDIES
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The author aims to briefly analyze the objective reasons for the growing interest in studying political, administrative, and cultural borders (border studies), which has over the past 30 years turned into an important interdisciplinary field, and the progress of their theory. Diverse approaches to study of borders can be divided into two large types: pragmatic and critical. The traditional pragmatic approach, based on analysis of border functions and mainly using historical cartographic, comparative typological, and statistical methods, has been significantly developed due to attention towards actors, in addition to the state: local authorities, business, NGOs, etc. The information base has been significantly enriched, and understanding of the importance of cross-border cooperation and border-related social practices has increased. The critical approach is aimed at studying the cognitive–symbolic functions of borders associated with their perception, representation as sign systems, the politics of memory, and discourse and narratives. Today, pragmatic and critical approaches are integrated, including in the practice–policy–perception model. To a large extent, influenced by geopolitical shifts in recent years, seven key topics have emerged in the growing flow of border studies, including analysis of the role of borders as a tool for controlling international migration and regulating other social processes, the widespread activation of the barrier function of borders at different levels, redistribution of functions between them, etc. One direction for further development of border research is noted: study of the relationship and isomorphism of borders at different levels. According to the author, isomorphism means the similarity of the functions of formal (state, administrative) borders at all levels, although in different ways and in different proportions. The reason for this similarity is that borders act as a means of adapting space to the redistribution of political influence between different actors and centers, changes in the geopolitical position, and territorial distribution of the population and the economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In the article, the borders of Russia are considered in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993, with amendments approved during the All-Russian vote on July 1, 2020.

REFERENCES

  1. A Research Agenda for Border Studies, Scott J.W., Ed., Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aalto, P., A European geopolitical subject in the making? EU, Russia and the Kaliningrad question, Geopolitics, 2002, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amilhat Szary, A.-L. Géopolitique des frontières. Découper la terre, imposer une vision du monde, Paris: Le Cavalier Bleu, 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Amilhat Szari, A.-L. and Girault, F., Borderities and the Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amilhat Szary, A.-L. and Hamez, G., Frontières, Paris: Armand Colin, 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Anđelković-Stoilković, M., Devedzic, M., and Vojković, G., The border regions of Serbia: Peripheral or marginal areas, Trames J. Humanit. Soc. Sci., 2018, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baklanov, P.Ya. and Ganzei, S.S., Transgranichnye territorii: problemy ustoichivogo prirodopol’zovaniya (Cross-border Territories: Problems of Sustainable Nature Management), Vladivostok: Dal’nauka, 2008.

  8. Basboga, K., The role of open borders and cross-border cooperation in regional growth across Europe, Reg. Stud. Reg. Sci., 2020, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 532–549.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benedek, J. and Moldovan, A., Economic convergence and Polarisation: Towards a multi-dimensional approach, Hung. Geogr. Bull., 2015, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boehmer, C.R. and Peña, S., The determinants of open and closed borders, J. Borderlands Stud., 2012, vol. 27, no. 3, p. 27335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Böhm, H., The influence of the Covid-19 pandemic on Czech-Polish cross-border cooperation: From debordering to re-bordering?, Moravian Geogr. Rep., 2021, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Borders and Border Walls, Bissonnette, A. and Vallet, E., Eds., London: Routledge, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Boucher, A., Hooijer, G., King, D., and Napier, I., COVID-19: A crisis of borders, PS: Polit. Sci. Politics, 2021, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 617–622. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096521000603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brambilla, C. and Jones, R., Rethinking borders, violence, and conflict: From sovereign power to borderscapes as sites of struggles, Environ. Plann. D, 2020, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brambilla, C., Laine, J., and Bocchi, G., Borderscaping: Imaginations and Practices of Border Making, London: Rouledge, 2016.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Browning, C.S. and Joenniemi, P., Gibraltar, Jerusalem, Kaliningrad: Peripherality, marginality, hybridity, in The Geopolitics of Europe’s Identity, Parker, N., Ed., New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008, pp. 141–158.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brunet-Jailly, E., Theorizing borders: An interdisciplinary perspective, Geopolitics, 2005, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 633–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Busygina, I.M. and Filippov, M.G., Changing the incentives and strategies of national governments in the context of multilevel governance in the European Union, Polis. Polit. Issled., 2020, no. 5, pp. 148–163.

  19. Chaulagaina, R., Nasserb, W.M., and Young, J.E.E., #StayHomeSaveLives: Essentializing entry and Canada’s biopolitical COVID borders, J. Borderlands Stud., 2021, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1985588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Durand, F. and Decoville, A., A multidimensional measurement of the integration between European border regions, J. Eur. Integr., 2020, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 163–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fedorov, G.M. and Korneevets, V.S., Cross-border regionalization in the context of globalization, Balt. Reg., 2010, no. 4, pp. 103–114.

  22. Fedorov, G. and Mikhaylov, A., Regional divergence dynamics in the Baltic region: Towards polarisation or equalization?, Geogr. Pol., 2018, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 339–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Golunov, S., Pandemic borders of post-Soviet de facto states, J. Borderlands Stud., 2021, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 741–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2021.1943495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Golunov, S. and Smirnova, V., Russian border controls in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Social, political, and economic implications, Probl. Post-Communism, 2021, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2021.1920839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gülzau, F. and Mau, S., Walls, barriers, checkpoints, landmarks, and “no-man’s-land.” A quantitative typology of border control infrastructure, Histor. Soc. Res., 2021, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 23–48.

  26. Jones, R., Border Walls: Security and the War on Terror in the United States, India, and Israel, London: Zed Books, 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Kolosov, V.A., Critical geopolitics: Basic concepts and experience of its use in Russia, Polit. Nauka, 2011, no. 4, pp. 31–52.

  28. Kolosov, V., Phantom borders: The role in territorial identity and the impact on society, Belgeo, 2020, no. 2, pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.38812

  29. Kolosov, V. and Morachevskaya, K., The role of an open border in the development of peripheral border regions: The case of Russian-Belarusian borderland, J. Borderlands Stud., 2022, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 533–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kolosov, V. and Scott, J., Selected conceptual issues in border studies, Belgeo, 2013, no. 4, pp. 9–21.

  31. Kolosov, V. and Zotova, M., “De-facto borders” as a mirror of sovereignty. The case of the post-Soviet non-recognized states, Histor. Soc. Res., 2021, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 178–207.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kolosov, V., Tikunov, V., and Eremchenko, E., Areas of sociogeographical study of the COVID-19 pandemic in Russia and the world, Geogr. Environ. Sustainability, 2021, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 109–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kolosov, V.A., Zotova, M.V., and Turov, N.L., Geopolitics and political geography in Russia: Global context and national characteristics, Reg. Res. Russ., 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kondrat’eva, N.B., Evropeiskaya model’ integratsii rynkov. Stanovlenie i perspektiva (European Model of Market Integration. Formation and Perspective), Moscow: Inst. Evr. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2020.

  35. Konrad, V., Toward a theory of borders in motion, J. Borderlands Stud., 2015, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Korneevets, V.S., Mezhdunarodnaya regionalizatsiya na Baltike (International Regionalization in the Baltic), St. Petersburg: S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2010.

  37. Laine, J., New Civic Neighborhood: Cross-Border Cooperation and Civil Society Engagement at the Finnish-Russian Border, Joensuu: Univ. East. Finland, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lunden, T., Border Regions and Cross-Border Cooperation in Europe: A Theoretical and Historical Approach, Cham: Springer, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mamadouh, V., Borderitis, Newsletter of IGU Commission on Political Geography, 2015, no. 19, pp. 2–5. http://www.igu-cpg.unimib.it/wp-content/uploads/ 2015/01/IGU-CPG_newsletter_19_ver5.pdf. Cited September 19, 2017.

  40. Mikhalev, M.S., Ethnocultural, ethnosocial and ethnopolitical problems in the fate of the indigenous peoples of the Russian–Chinese cross-borderland (the end of the 20th–the beginning of the 21st centuries), Doctoral (Histor.) Dissertation, Moscow: Inst. Ethnol. Cult. Anthropol. Russ. Acad. Sci., 2021.

  41. Möller, C., Alfredsson-Olsson, E., Ericsson, B., and Overvåg, K., The border as an engine for mobility and spatial integration: A study of commuting in a Swedish-Norwegian context, Norw. J. Geogr., 2018, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2018.1497698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Newman, D. and Paasi, A., Fences and neighbours in the post-modern world: Boundary narratives in political geography, Prog. Hum. Geogr., 1998, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 186–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Paasi, A., Political borders, in International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, Kobayashi, A., Ed., Oxford: Elsevier, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Paasi, A., Problematizing “bordering, ordering, and othering” as manifestations of socio-spatial fetishism, Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2021, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 18–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Paasi, A. and Zimmerbauer, K., Penumbral borders and planning paradoxes: Relational thinking and the question of borders in spatial planning, Environ. Plann. A, 2015, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pal’movski, T. and Fedorov, G.M., Russian–Polish borderland: Problems and prospects for the development of cross-border relations, Polis. Polit. Issled., 2020, no. 2, pp. 178–191.

  47. Perkmann, M., Policy entrepreneurship and multi-level governance: A comparative study of European cross-border regions, Environ. Plann. C, 2007, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 861–879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Radil, S.M., Pinos, J.C., and Ptak, T., Borders resurgent: towards a post-Covid-19 global border regime?, Space Polity, 2020, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 132–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Rosière, S. and Jones, R., Teichopolitics: Re-considering globalization through the role of walls and fences, Geopolitics, 2012, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 217–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Rossiiskoe pogranich’e: vyzovy sosedstva (Russian Borderland: Neighborhood Challenges), Kolosov, V.A., Ed., Moscow: IP Matushkina, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rothmüller, N., Covid-19. Borders, world-making, and fear of others, Res. Globalization, 2021, vol. 3, p. 100036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sack, R.D., Human territoriality: A theory, Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr., 1983, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 55–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sahlins, P., Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrénées, Berkeley: Univ. California Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Scott, J.W., Introduction: Bordering, ordering, othering (almost) twenty years on, Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2020, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 1–8.

  55. Sohn, C., Modelling cross-border integration: The role of borders as a resource, Geopolitics, 2014, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 587–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. van Houtum, H.J., Beyond “borderism”: Overcoming discriminative b/ordering and othering, Tijdschr. Econ. Soc. Geogr., 2021, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. van Houtum, H.J., Kramsch, O.T., and Zierhofer, F.W., B/Ordering Space, Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vardomskii, L.B., Rossiiskoe porubezh’e v usloviyakh globalizatsii (Russian Frontier in the Context of Globalization), Moscow: LIBROKOM, 2009.

  59. Vendina, O.I. and Gritsenko, A.A., Cultural landscape of the borderland and the struggle for symbolic resources to assure sovereignty, in V fokuse naslediya (In the Focus of Heritage), Kuleshova, M.E., Ed., Moscow: Inst. Geogr. Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2017, pp. 398–416.

  60. von Hirschhausen, B., Grandits, H., Kraft, C., Müller, D., and Serrier, T., Phantom borders in Eastern Europe: A new concept for regional research, Slavic Rev., 2019, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 368–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Vvedenie v issledovaniya granits (Introduction to Boundary Studies), Sevast’yanov, S.V., Laine, Yu., and Kireev, A.A., Eds., Vladivostok: Dal’nevost. Fed. Univ., 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wassenberg, B., The Schengen crisis and the end of the “myth” of Europe without border, Borders Globalization Rev., 2020, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Zotova, M.V., Gritsenko, A.A., and von Levis, S., Ours or others? Transformation of border practices and attitudes towards neighbors in Belgorod and Rostov oblasts of Russia after 2014, Etnograf. Obozrenie, 2021, no. 1, pp. 124–144.

  64. Zotova M.V., Gritsenko A.A., Sebentsov A.B. Everyday life in the Russian borderlands: Motives and factors of cross-border practices, Mir Ross., 2018, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The article was prepared with the support of the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-17-00263 “Effects and Functions of Borders in the Spatial Organization of Russian Society: Country, Region, Municipality”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119017, Moscow, Russia

    V. A. Kolosov

Authors
  1. V. A. Kolosov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Kolosov.

Ethics declarations

The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolosov, V.A. Border Studies: Development of the Theory and Major Trends in a Changing Geopolitical Environment. Reg. Res. Russ. 13, 652–662 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700946

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970523700946

Keywords:

Search

Navigation