Skip to main content
Log in

Structural Shifts in the Foreign Trade of Border Regions of Russia and Belarus in the Context of Political and Economic Challenges of the 2010s

  • Regional Development
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The state of foreign trade in the border regions of Russia and Belarus is defined both by the inherited (established in the USSR) functions of the regions in trade and specialization of economies and by the consequences of contemporary political and economic events. This paper attempts to identify changes in the foreign trade of the border regions of Russia and Belarus in the context of transformation processes related to Eurasian integration, the economic crisis, and the introduction of sanctions and antisanctions. It is found that the dynamics of overall foreign trade turnover has no correlation with integration processes. The possible trade effects of the EAEU when assessing only the volume indicator are unnoticeable against the backdrop of established functions of the regions in foreign trade and specialization of the regional industrial complexes. The greatest shifts in the inherited foreign trade functions of the border regions are characteristic of Pskov oblast, where the role of the export component is strengthened and the share of imports is decreasing with a general reduction in trade turnover. For Pskov oblast, this is leading not only to improvement in the balance of foreign trade relations, but also to consolidation of the asymmetry of cross-border interaction (exports of raw materials and products with low added value and imports of finished products). It was revealed that in the commodity structure of the foreign trade of border regions, most positions in exports and imports are determined by old ties preserved from Soviet times or restored in the post-Soviet period. Such contacts, on the one hand, are stable in terms of supply directions, and on the other hand, volatile in volume, because they are highly prone to fluctuations in global commodity markets and the influence of the financial solvency of buyers. New, post-Soviet enterprises, even in traditional export commodity groups, are either more flexible (an example is the Belarusian food enterprises that responded to new niches in the Russian market) or more diversified in sales geography (not as strongly oriented toward Russia).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anisimov, A.M., Barinov, S.L., Vardomskiy, L.B., et al., Cross-border cooperation of the regions of Russia, Belarus and Ukraine: status and prospects, Evraziiskaya Ekon. Integr., 2013, no. 4 (21), pp. 77–96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Vardomskiy, L.B., Rossiiskoe porubezh’e v usloviyakh globalizatsii (Russian Borderlands in the Context of Globalization), Moscow: Librokom, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vneshnyaya torgovlya Respubliki Belarus’: Statisticheskii sbornik (Foreign Trade of the Republic of Belarus: Statistical Handbook), Minsk: Nats. Stat. Kom. Resp. Bel., 2017.

  4. Limonov, L.E., Oding, N.Yu., Kadochnikov, D.V., Savul’kin, L.I., and Anisimov, A.M., Analysis of trade and production relations between the border regions of Russia and Kazakhstan: the impact of the Customs Union and the Single Economic Space, Evraziiskaya Ekon. Integr., 2012, no. 4 (17), pp. 32–57.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mezhevich, N.M., Regional’naya ekonomicheskaya politika Rossiiskoi Federatsii: vliyanie transgranichnogo sotrudnichestva na traditsionnye i novye mekhanizmy realizatsii (Regional Economic Policy of Russian Federation: Influence of Cross-Border Cooperation on Traditional and New Mechanisms of Implementation), St. Petersburg: S.-Peterb. Gos. Univ., 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nikitenko, P.G. and Vertinskaya, T.S., Belarusian-Russian cross-border cooperation as a factor in the development of the Union State of Belarus and Russia, Neprikosnovennyi Zapas, 2006, no. 3, pp. 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Official statistics, Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service of Pskov oblast. http://pskovstat. gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/pskovstat/ru/statistics/. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  8. Official statistics, Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service of Smolensk oblast. http://sml. gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/sml/ru/statistics/. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  9. Official statistics, Territorial Body of the Federal State Statistics Service of Bryansk oblast. http://bryansk. gks.ru/ wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_ts/bryansk/ru/statistics/. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  10. Official website of Northwestern custom office of the Federal Custom Service of Russian Federation. http://sztu.customs.ru/. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  11. Official website of Central custom office of the Federal Custom Service of Russian Federation. http://ctu.customs. ru/. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  12. Regional statistics, General Statistical Office of Vitebsk oblast. http://vitebsk.belstat.gov.by. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  13. Regional statistics, General Statistical Office of Gomel oblast. http://gomel.belstat.gov.by. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  14. Regional statistics, General Statistical Office of Mogilev oblast. http://mogilev.belstat.gov.by. Accessed November 29, 2017.

  15. Saliichuk, V.F. and Kislyakova, M.A., Infrastructure of foreign trade of the border region: composition, significance, and development trends, Ekon. Reg., 2011, no. 3, pp. 124–135.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shavel’, A.N., Territorial-structural analysis of the distribution of foreign trade of Belarus between the regions of the Russian Federation, Materialy mezhdunarodnogo nauchno-prakticheskogo seminara “Integratsiya na postsovetskom prostranstve: realii i perspektivy,” 4–7 dekabrya 2014 g. (Proc. Int. Sci.-Pract. Seminar “Integration in Post-Soviet Space: Realities and Prospects,” December 4–7, 2014), Ozem, G.Z., Sidorenko, V.P., and Zaprudskii, I.I., Eds., Minsk: Bel. Gos. Univ., 2014, pp. 142–145.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shavel’, A.N., Economic and geographical aspects of foreign trade cooperation of Belarus within the framework of the Customs Union and the Single Economic Space, Vestn. Bel. Gos. Univ., Ser. 2. Khim., Biol., Geogr., 2015, no. 1, pp. 81–87.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shadrakov, A.V., Assessment of the export potential of the Belarusian–Russian borderlands, Magileuski Merydyyan, 2011, nos. 1–2, pp. 148–150.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shadrakov, A.V., Economic and geographical assessment of the competitiveness factors of the cross-border region with the case of the Belarusian–Russian borderland, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Geogr.) Dissertation, Minsk, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Coughlin, C. and Novy, D., Is the international border effect larger than the domestic border effect? Evidence from USTrade, CESifo Econ. Stud., 2013, vol. 59, pp. 249–276. doi 10.1093/cesifo/ifs002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gallego, N. and Llano, C., The border effect and the nonlinear relationship between trade and distance, Rev. Int. Econ., 2014, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 1016–1048. doi 10.1111/roie.12152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nurseiit, N., Estimation of Kazakhstan’s trade potential in the framework of the Custom Union, Bus. Econ. Horiz., 2014, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 320–347. doi 10.15208/beh.2014.25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shkodinsky, S.V. and Prodchenko, I.A., Methodological approaches to assessment for the economic effects of the state’s participation in integration processes, J. Appl. Econ. Sci., 2016, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 1661–1672.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shkvarya, L., Karabulatova, I., Rusakovich, V., and Rapiev, A., The impact of the customs union and the EAEU on the small and medium business in Kazakhstan, Cent. Asia Caucasus, 2017, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, J., The transformation of Soviet republic borders to international borders: competing concepts of the Kazakhstan–Russia border, J. Borderlands Stud., 2017, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 91–104. doi 10.1080/08865655.2016.1211958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Suvankulov, F., Revisiting national border effects in foreign trade in goods of Canadian provinces, J. Int. Trade Econ. Dev., 2015, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 1045–1070. doi 10.1080/09638199.2016.1176229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vieira, A., A tale of two unions: Russia–Belarus integration experience and its lessons for the Eurasian Economic Union, J. Borderlands Stud., 2017, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 41–53. doi 10.1080/08865655.2016.1211959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhiltsov, S., Eurasian integration: Problems and development scenarios, Cent. Asia Caucasus, 2016, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. A. Morachevskaya.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © K.A. Morachevskaya, A.N. Shavel’, A.S. Zinovyev, 2018.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morachevskaya, K.A., Shavel’, A.N. & Zinovyev, A.S. Structural Shifts in the Foreign Trade of Border Regions of Russia and Belarus in the Context of Political and Economic Challenges of the 2010s. Reg. Res. Russ. 8, 269–280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518030061

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970518030061

Keywords

Navigation