Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Study of Plant Physiological Responses to Long-Term and Short-Term Daily Exposures to Low Temperature in the Presence of Protein-Synthesis Inhibitors

  • Published:
Biology Bulletin Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of the protein synthesis system in the physiological responses to cold was assessed in chilling-sensitive (cucumber) and cold-tolerant (wheat) plants with the use of protein-synthesis inhibitors on 80S (cycloheximide, CHX) and 70S (chloramphenicol, CAP) ribosomes. The plants were subjected to a constant low temperature (LT treatment) at 12°C for cucumber and 4°C for wheat. Another regimen (DROP treatment) included a 2-h daily temperature drop to 12°C for cucumber and 4°C for wheat at the end of the night. Both inhibitors were found to suppress plant leaf growth under any temperature regimen, including the control (at a constant temperature of 23°C). They also reduced the rates of net photosynthesis, transpiration, dark respiration, and chlorophyll accumulation in all treatments but to a larger degree in the control and DROP-treated plants. The results confirmed the previously established dependence of enhanced cold tolerance on protein biosynthesis on 70S and, especially, 80S ribosomes in the LT-treated plants. It was demonstrated for the first time that the protein synthesis system is involved in the enhancement of plant cold tolerance afforded by short-term daily temperature drops. Temperature drops often occur under natural conditions and are used to reduce stem elongation in greenhouse production as an alternative to the use of retardants. The reported data are novel in that the enhanced cold tolerance of DROP-treated plants is accounted for not only by de novo protein synthesis but also by adaptive posttranslational control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Bieleski, R.L. and Reid, M.S., Physiological changes accompanying senescence in the ephemeral daylily flower, Plant Physiol., 1992, vol. 98, pp. 1042–1049.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, H.R., Long, S.P., Baker, N.R., Öquist, G., Schreiber, U., and Lechner, E.G., Chlorophyll fluorescence as a probe of the photosynthetic competence of leaves in the field: a review of current instrumentation, Funct. Ecol., 1989, vol. 3, pp. 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bouma, T.J., De Visser, R., Janssen, J.H.J.A., De Kock, M.J., van Leeuwen, P.H., and Lambers, H., Respiratory energy requirements and rate of protein turnover in vivo determined by the use of an inhibitor of protein synthesis and a probe to assess its effect, Physiol. Plant., 1994, vol. 92, pp. 585–594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Browse, J. and Xin, Z.G., Temperature sensing and cold acclimation, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 2001, vol. 4, pp. 241–246.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carvalho, S.M.P., van Noort, F., Postma, R., and Heuvelink, E., Possibilities for Producing Compact Floricultural Crops: Wageningen UR Greenhouse Horticulture Report No. 173, Wageningen: Wageningen UR Greenhouse Hortic., 2008.

  6. Chen, S., McMahon, D., and Bogorad, L., Early effects of illumination on the activity of some photosynthetic enzymes, Plant Physiol., 1967, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dheidan, M. and Black, M., The inhibitory action of cycloheximide on respiration of coleoptiles is relieved by light, Physiol. Plant., 1976, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 83–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Drozdov, S.N., Budykina, N.P., Kurets, V.K., and Balagurova, N.I., Resistance of the plants to frost, in Metody otsenki ustoichivosti rastenii k neblagopriyatnym usloviyam sredy (Evaluation of Resistance of the Plants to Adverse Conditions of Environment), Leningrad: Kolos, 1976, pp. 222–228.

  9. Drozdov, S.N., Kurets, V.K., and Titov, A.F., Termorezistentnost’ aktivno vegetiruyushchikh rastenii (Thermal Resistance of Actively Vegetating Plants), Leningrad: Nauka, 1984.

  10. Ellis, R.J. and MacDonald, I.R., Specificity of cycloheximide in higher plant systems, Plant Physiol., 1970, vol. 46, pp. 227–232.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler, S. and Thomashow, M.F., Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway, Plant Cell, 2002, vol. 14, pp. 1675–1690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gree, D.H., Berry, J.A., and Bjorkman, O., Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in bean leaves: role of light and temperature, and requirement for chloroplast-protein synthesis during recovery, Planta, 1986, vol. 1, pp. 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guy, C.L., Cold acclimation and freezing stress tolerance: role of protein metabolism, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1990, vol. 41, pp. 187–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Huges, M.A. and Dunn, M.A., The molecular biology of plant acclimation to low temperature, J. Exp. Bot., 1996, vol. 47, pp. 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ikkonen, E.N., Shibaeva, T.G., Sysoeva, M.I., and Sherudilo, E.G., Stomatal conductance in Cucumis sativus upon short-term and long-term exposures to low temperatures, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2012, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 696–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ikkonen, E.N., Shibaeva, T.G., and Titov, A.F., Response of the photosynthetic apparatus in cucumber leaves to daily short-term temperature drops, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2015, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 494–498.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller, C.J. and Huffaker, R.C., Evidence for in vivo light-induced synthesis of ribulose-1,5-diP carboxylase and phosphoribulokinase in greening barley leaves, Plant Physiol., 1967, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1246–1254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Korneev, D.Yu., Informatsionnye vozmozhnosti metoda induktsii fluorestsentsii khlorofilla (Information Possibilities of the Method of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Induction), Kyiv: Al’terpress, 2002.

  19. Margulies, M.M., Effect of chloramphenicol on light dependent development of seedlings of Phaseolus vulgaris var. Black Valentine, with particular reference to development of photosynthetic activity, Plant Physiol., 1962, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 473–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Margulies, M.M., Effect of chloramphenicol on light-dependent synthesis of proteins and enzymes of leaves and chloroplasts of Phaseolus vulgaris,Plant Physiol., 1964, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 579–585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Markovskaya, E.F., Sysoeva, M.I., Sherudilo, E.G., and Topchieva, L.V., Differential gene expression in cucumber plants in response to brief daily cold treatments, Russ. J. Plant Physiol., 2007, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 607–611.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Myster, L. and Moe, R., Effect of diurnal temperature alternations on plant morphology in some greenhouse crops—a mini review, Sci. Hort., 1995, vol. 62, pp. 205–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nikolaeva, M.K., Vlasova, M.P., and Osipova, O.P., Change of pigment composition and structure of chloroplasts affected by chloramphenicol, Fiziol. Rast., 1970, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 5–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nishiyama, Y., Yamamoto, H., Allakhverdiev, S.I., Inaba, H., Yokota, A., and Murata, N., Oxidative stress inhibits the repair of photodamage to the photosynthetic machinery, EMBO J., 2001, vol. 20, pp. 5587–5594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Osipova, O.P., Nikolaeva, M.K., and Khein, Kh.Ya., The effect of chloramphenicol on photosynthetic apparatus of the plants, Fiziol. Rast., 1967, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 210–218.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rehman, A.U., Kodru, S., and Vass, I., Chloramphenicol mediates superoxide production in photosystem II and enhances its photodamage in isolated membrane particles, Front. Plant Sci., 2016, vol. 7, pp. 479–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sherudilo, E.G., Resistance of barley plants to low and high temperatures, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Kazan: Kazan Inst. Biol., 1990.

  28. Shukhtina, G.G., The effect of repeated thermal hardening on thermal resistance of the plant cells, in Tsitologicheskie osnovy prisposobleniya rastenii k faktoram sredy (Cytological Principles of the Plant Adaptation to Environmental Factors), Moscow: Nauka, 1964, pp. 26–29.

  29. Thomashow, M.F., Role of cold-responsive genes in plant freezing tolerance, Front. Plant Sci., 1998, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomashow, M.F., Plant cold acclimation: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 1999, vol. 50, pp. 571–599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomashow, M.F., So what’s new in the field of plant cold acclimation? Lots! Plant Physiol., 2001, vol. 125, pp. 89–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Titov, A.F., Resistance of actively vegetating plants to low and high temperatures: patterns of variation and mechanisms, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow: Timiryazev Inst. Plant Physiol., Russ. Acad. Sci., 1989, pp. 1–42.

  33. Titov, A.F. and Kritenko, S.P., The role of the transcription-translation system in the mechanisms of wheat adaptation to cold and heat, Biol. Nauki, 1985, no. 8, pp. 77–81.

  34. Titov, A.F., Drozdov, S.N., and Kritenko, S.P., The effect of specific transcription and translation inhibitors on the ability of cucumber seedlings to cold and heat hardening, Fiziol. Rast., 1981, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 852–859.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Titov, A.F., Drozdov, S.N., Talanova, V.V., and Akimova, T.V., The mechanisms of increase the heat resistance of the plants under the short and prolonged effect of high temperatures, Fiziol. Rast., 1987, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 173–178.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Titov, A.F., Akimova, T.V., Talanova, V.V., and Topchieva, L.V., Ustoichivost’ rastenii v nachal’nyi period deistviya neblagopriyatnykh temperatur (Resistance of the Plants in Initial Period of the Effect of Adverse Temperatures), Moscow: Nauka, 2006.

  37. Trunova, T.I. and Zvereva, G.N., The effect of protein synthesis inhibitors on the frost resistance of wheat, Fiziol. Rast., 1977, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 395–402.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Voinikov, V.K., Borovskii, G.B., Kolesnichenko, A.V., and Rikhvanov, E.G., Stressovye belki rastenii (Stress Proteins of the Plants), Irkutsk: Inst. Geogr., Sib. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2004.

  39. Yarwood, C.E., Adaptation of plants and plant pathogens to heat, Publ. Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., 1967, vol. 84, pp. 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zhu, H., Chen, X., Pan, X., and Zhang, D., Effect of chloramphenicol on pigmentation, proline accumulation and chlorophyll fluorescence of maize (Zea mays) seedlings, Int. J. Agric. Biol., 2011, vol. 13, pp. 677–682.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The research was carried out using the equipment of the Core Facility of the Karelian Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Funding

The study was carried out under state order no. 0221-2017-0051.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. G. Shibaeva.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by A. Aver’yanov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sherudilo, E.G., Shibaeva, T.G., Ikkonen, E.N. et al. Comparative Study of Plant Physiological Responses to Long-Term and Short-Term Daily Exposures to Low Temperature in the Presence of Protein-Synthesis Inhibitors. Biol Bull Rev 10, 71–80 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420010077

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086420010077

Navigation