Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical Study of Two-Phase Hyperbolic Models

  • Published:
Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the numerical study of a finite-volume scheme with an HLLEM flux for solving equations from the family of Baer-Nunziato models. Three versions of the model are considered, differing in the degree of “nonequilibrium.” A brief description of the models and their differences are provided. To approximate the equations of nonequilibrium models with stiff right-hand sides, describing the process of mechanical and thermodynamic relaxation, the method of splitting into physical processes is used. Spatial approximations are constructed using the 1st and 2nd (TVD) order finite volume method. The HLLEM flux is used as a numerical flux, for which a simple algorithm for determining the parameter of the method that guarantees the physicality of the solution is proposed. A feature of the study is that all three considered models are applied to analyze numerically the same physical setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. M. Dumbser and D. S. Balsara, “A new efficient formulation of the HLLEM Riemann solver for general conservative and non-conservative hyperbolic systems,” J. Comput. Phys. 304, 275–319 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M. R. Baer and J. W. Nunziato, “A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow 12 (6), 861–889 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. A. Drew and S. L. Passman, Theory of Multicomponent Fluids (Springer Science & Business Media, New York, 2006).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Favrie, S. L. Gavrilyuk, and R. Saurel, “Solid–fluid diffuse interface model in cases of extreme deformations,” J. Comput. Phys. 228 (16), 6037–6077 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. A. K. Kapila, S. F. Son, J. B. Bdzil, R. Menikoff, and D. S. Stewart, “Two-phase modeling of DDT: Structure of the velocity-relaxation zone,” Phys. Fluids 9 (12), 3885–3897 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. K. Kapila, R. Menikoff, J. B. Bdzil, S. F. Son, and D. S. Stewart, “Two-phase modeling of deflagration-to-detonation transition in granular materials: Reduced equations,” Phys. Fluids 13 (10), 3002–3024 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. L. van de Leur, “Assessment of the Baer-Nunziato seven-equation model applied to steam-water transients: Calibration of the stiffened gas equation of state based on steam-water tables,” Master Thesis (Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven, 2015).

  8. A. Murrone and H. Guillard, “A five equation reduced model for compressible two phase flow problems,” J. Comput. Phys. 202 (2), 664–698 (2005).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. S. A. Tokareva and E. F. Toro, “HLLC-type Riemann solver for the Baer–Nunziato equations of compressible two-phase flow,” J. Comput. Phys. 229 (10), 3573–3604 (2010).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. F. Fraysse, C. Redondo, G. Rubio, and E. Valero, “Upwind methods for the Baer–Nunziato equations and higher-order reconstruction using artificial viscosity,” J. Comput. Phys. 326, 805–827 (2016).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Menshov and A. Serezhkin, “A generalized Rusanov method for the Baer–Nunziato equations with application to DDT processes in condensed porous explosives,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 86 (5), 346–364 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Saurel and R. Abgrall, “A simple method for compressible multifluid flows,” SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 21 (3), 1115–1145 (1999).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. D. Gidaspow, “Modeling of two phase flow,” in Proc. International Heat Transfer Conference 5 (Tokyo, Japan, 3–7 September, 1974), pp. 163–168, International Heat Transfer Conference Digital Library (Begel House, New York, 1974).

  14. L. van Wijngaarden, “Some problems in the formulation of the equations for gas/liquid flows,” in Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Proc. 14th Int. Congress (Delft, Netherlands, August 30–September 4, 1976), Ed. by W. T. Koiter (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977), pp. 249–260.

  15. R. W. Lyczkowski, D. Gidaspow, C. W. Solbrig, and E. D. Hughes, “Characteristics and stability analyses of transient one-dimensional two-phase flow equations and their finite difference approximations,” Nucl. Sci. Eng. 66 (3), 378–396 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. G. Allaire, S. Clerc, and S. Kokh, “A five-equation model for the simulation of interfaces between compressible fluids,” J. Comput. Phys. 181 (2), 577–616 (2002).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Saurel, O. Le Métayer, J. Massoni, and S. Gavrilyuk, “Shock jump relations for multiphase mixtures with stiff mechanical relaxation,” Shock Waves 16 (3), 209–232 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. V. Rodionov, “Methods of increasing the accuracy in Godunov’s scheme,” USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 27 (6), 164–169 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Le Floch and T.-P. Liu, “Existence theory for nonlinear hyperbolic systems in nonconservative form,” Forum Math. 5 (3), 261–280 (1993).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Dal Maso, P. G. LeFloch, and F. Murat, “Definition and weak stability of nonconservative products,” J. Math. Pures Appl. 74 (6), 483–548 (1995).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. M. J. Castro, P. G. LeFloch, M. L. Muñoz-Ruiz, and C. Parés, “Why many theories of shock waves are necessary: Convergence error in formally path-consistent schemes,” J. Comput. Phys. 227 (17), 8107–8129 (2008).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 17-71-30014.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. B. Savenkov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Korneev, B.A., Tukhvatullina, R.R. & Savenkov, E.B. Numerical Study of Two-Phase Hyperbolic Models. Math Models Comput Simul 13, 1002–1013 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048221060090

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048221060090

Keywords:

Navigation