Abstract
A multicriteria approach to identify and forecast mathematical models is considered. The need for such an approach arises, in particular, when it is necessary to take into account errors that cannot be reduced to one function and in the absence of specific information about the data interference class. The paper deals with a multicriteria version of the identification sets method based on approximating and visualizing the graph of the vector function of identification errors and its projections onto the space of identification parameters. The nearness function is introduced that describes the proximity of a criterion point to the set of nonimprovable (Pareto efficient) solutions of the identification problem. The efficient criteria set (Pareto frontier), the sets of efficient and subefficient parameters, and the corresponding forecast trajectory tubes are studied. To construct these objects, methods for approximating implicitly specified sets are used, in particular, methods for approximating the Edgeworth–Pareto hull and the deep holes method. The technique and examples for two criteria of identification quality are considered in detail.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
P. S. Krasnoshchekov and A. A. Petrov, Principles of Model Construction (FAZIS, VTS RAN, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].
L. Ljung, System Identification: Theory for User (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1987).
G. K. Kamenev, “Multicriteria identification sets method,” Comput. Maths. Math. Phys. 56, 1843–1858 (2016).
G. K. Kamenev, “A visual method for parameter estimation,” Dokl. Math. 57, 305–307 (1998).
G. K. Kamenev, “On one approach to the uncertainty investigation arising in model identification,” Mat. Model. 22 (9), 116–128 (2010).
G. K. Kamenev, Method for Analyzing Uncertainty in Model Parameter Identification (Vychisl. Tsentr RAN, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].
V. E. Berezkin, G. K. Kamenev, and A. V. Lotov, “Hybrid adaptive methods for approximating a nonconvex multidimensional Pareto frontier,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 46, 1918–1931 (2006).
V. A. Bushenkov, O. L. Chernykh, G. K. Kamenev, and A. V. Lotov, “Multidimensional images given by mappings: construction and visualization,” Pattern Recognit. Image Anal. 5, 35–56 (1995).
A. V. Lotov, V. A. Bushenkov, G. K. Kamenev, and O. L. Chernykh, Computer and Compromise. Search. Method of Attainable Targets (Nauka, Moscow, 1997) [in Russian].
A. V. Lotov, V. A. Bushenkov, and G. K. Kamenev, Interactive Decision Maps. Approximation and Visualization of Pareto Frontier, Vol. 89 of Applied Optimization (Kluwer Academic, Boston, Dordrecht, New York, London, 2004).
G. K. Kamenev, “Approximation of completely bounded sets by the deep holes method,” Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 41, 1667–1675 (2001).
M. Yu. Andreev, V. P. Vrzheshch, N. P. Pilnik, I. G. Pospelov, M. A. Khokhlov, A. A. Zhukova, and S. A. Radionov, “Intertemporal general equilibrium model of the Russian economy based on national accounts deaggregation,” in Proceedings of the Seminar of I. G. Petrovskii (Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2013), pp. 43–145; J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.) 197, 175–236 (2014).
G. K. Kamenev and N. N. Olenev, “Study of the russian economy’s identification and forecast stability using a Ramsey type model,” Math. Models Comput. Simul. 7, 179–189 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © G.K. Kamenev, 2017, published in Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2017, Vol. 29, No. 8, pp. 29–43.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kamenev, G.K. A Multicriteria Method for Identification and Forecasting. Math Models Comput Simul 10, 154–163 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048218020060
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070048218020060