Skip to main content
Log in

Shoot-Formation Model as a Basis for Adaptations of Flowering Plants

  • Published:
Contemporary Problems of Ecology Aims and scope

Abstract

This study describes the biomorphology of plants living under variable watering conditions. Its outcome expands the concept of a modular organization as a constructive and representative approach to comparative-morphological analysis and unraveling the ways of biomorph evolution. The structural organization of biomorphs growing in sites composed of gradients of humidification stability (from floodplain meadows to coasts, water cuts, and beaches) is examined on a base of systemic and complementary approaches. Model plant species—Solanum ulcamara, Thalictrum simplex, Lysimachia vulgaris, Lycopus europaeus, Stellaria palustris Persicaria amphibia, and Erysimum cheiranthoides—are studied. It is determined that acceleration in the vegetative and generative spheres entails the appearance of monocarps in the hygrophilic evolutional line. It is shown that the ontogenesis of individuals of seed and vegetative origin is reduced to a single fruiting, and the specificity of the shoot-formation model is preserved in plants of all the considered biotopes. Such a specific sign is identified as the internode elongation in the shoots located in the substrate, in the supersubstrate parts under flooding, in grass rags, or in dense grass under low light. Another sign is a sympodial growth by formation of the replacement shoots. On the model species, it is determined that plant adaptability is supported by the changes in individual structural elements of the monocarpic shoots; the structural and functional zonation of the monocarpic shoots determines the autonomization of the individual’s parts. Our results confirm the idea that the monocarpic shoot and the system formed on its basis belong to the category of axes of an herbaceous plant as part of an architectural unit (in terms of D. Barthelemy and Y. Caraglio). Our data make it possible to conclude that reservoir settlement with flowering plants is possible for long-shoot long-rhizome grasses and subshrub vines. Two evolutional directions are possible: (1) the emergence of monocarpic annuals and (2) the emergence of short-lived and annual plants of vegetative origin associated with the formation of acentric and clearly polycentric stolon-forming and root-shoot biomorphs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aktual’nye problemy sovremennoi biomorfologii (Relevant Problems of Modern Biomorphology), Savinykh, N.P., Ed., Kirov: Raduga-PRESS, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Antonova, I.S. and Fat’yanova, E.V., The structure levels of tree crowns in moderate zone, Bot. Zh., 2016, vol. 101, no. 6, pp. 628–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Astashenkov, A.Yu., Cheryomushkina, V.A., Grebenjuk, A.V., and Dzumanov, S.D., Transformation of life forms and ontogenetic structure of Nepeta pulchella Pojark: coenopopulations in Aksu-Zhabagly State Nature Reserve, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2017, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 674–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barthélémy, D. and Caraglio, Y., Plant architecture: a dynamic, multilevel and comprehensive approach to plant form, structure and ontogeny, Ann. Bot., 2007, vol. 99, no. 3, pp. 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Begon, M., Harper, J.L., and Townsend, C.R., Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, Oxford: Blackwell, 1990, 2nd ed.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Belyakov, E.A. and Lapirov, A.G., Modular and structural–functional organization of G. sparganium L. species in different ecological conditions, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2015, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 647–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Borisova, I.V. and Popova, G.A., Diversity of functional-spatial structure of the shoots of perennial plants, Bot. Zh., 1990, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 1420–1426.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chazova, I.V. and Shabalkina, S.V., Seasonal development of Lycopus europaeus, Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Mekhanizmy ustoichivosti i adaptatsii biologicheskikh sistem k prirodnym i tekhnogennym faktoram,” 22–25 aprelya 2015 g. (Proc. All-Russ. Sci. Conf. “Mechanisms of Resistance and Adaptation of Biological Systems to Natural and Technogenic Factors,” April 22–25, 2015), Kirov: Vesi, 2015, pp. 145–147.

  9. Gould, S.I., Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hallé, F. and Oldeman, R.A.A., Essai Sur L’architecture Et la Dynamique de Croissance Des Arbres Tropicaux, Paris: Masson, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hallé, F., Oldeman, R.A.A., and Tomlinson, P.B., Tropical Trees and Forests: An Architectural Analysis, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Khokhryakov, A.P., Evolyutsiya biomof rastenii (Evolution of the Plant Biomorphs), Moscow: Nauka, 1981.

  13. Koposova, K.D. and Shabalkina, S.V., Anatomy of above ground organs of Lycopus europaeus L., Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Ekologiya rodnogo kraya: problemy i puti ikh resheniya,” 28–29 aprelya 2016 g. (Proc. All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. with Int. Participation “Ecology of Native Land: Problems and Solutions,” April 28–29, 2016), Kirov: Raduga-Press, 2016, book 1, pp. 249–252.

  14. Lelekova E.V. and Savinykh, N.P., Shoot formation of Persicaria amphibian (L.) Delarbre from positions of modular organization, Inland Water Biol., 2019, vol. 12, suppl. 1, pp. S10–S17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marfenin, N.N., A concept of modular structure in development, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1999, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Markov, M.V., Populyatsionnaya biologiya rozetochnykh i polurozetochnykh maloletnikh rastenii (Population Biology of Rosette and Semi-Rosette of Juvenile Plants), Kazan: Kazan. Gos. Univ., 1990.

  17. Markov, M.V., Populyatsionnaya biologiya rastenii (Population Biology of the Plants), Moscow: KMK, 2012.

  18. Musina, L.S., Shooting and development of life forms of some rosette-forming grasses, Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd.Biol., 1976, vol. 81, no. 6, pp. 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nukhimovskii, E.L., Osnovy biomorfologii semennykh rastenii (Fundamentals of Biomorphoogy of Seed Plants), Moscow: Nauka, 1997, vol. 1.

  20. Papchenkov, V.G., Rastitel’nyi pokrov vodoemov i vodotokov Srednego Povolzh’ya (Vegetation Cover of Reservoirs and Water Basins of Central Volga Region), Yaroslavl: Mezhdunar. Akad. Biz. Nov. Tekhnol., 2001.

  21. Polivariantnost’ razvitiya orgnaizmov, populyatsii i soobshchestv (Polyvariance of Development of Organisms, Populations, and Communities), Yoshkar-Ola, 2006.

  22. Savinykh, N.P., Shooting and relationship of life forms in section Veronica of genus Veronica L., Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd.Biol., 1979, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Savinykh, N.P., Evolutionary transformation of shoot systems during development of grasses in seasonal climate by example of section Veronica of genus Veronica L.), Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd.Biol., 1981, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Savinykh, N.P., Rod veronika: morfologiya i evolyutsiya zhiznennykh form (Genus Veronica L.: Morphology and Evolution of Life Forms), Kirov: Vyatsk. Gos. Gumanit. Univ., 2006.

  25. Savinykh, N.P., Hygrophilic evolution of annual Veronica L. species, Tr. Inst. Biol. Vnutr. Vod. im. I.D. Papanina, Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2015a, no. 71 (74), pp. 97–111.

  26. Savinykh, N.P., Modularity as a basis of heterochronies and heterotopies in flowering plants, Paleontol. J., 2015b, vol. 49, no. 14, pp. 1657–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Savinykh, N.P., Evolution of the life forms of flowering plants in a biodiversity formation, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2019, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Savinykh, N.P. and Cheryomushkina, V.A., Biomorphology: current status and prospects, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2015, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Savinykh, N.P. and Konovalova, I.A., Shoot systems of Solanum dulcamara L., Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2019, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 570–576.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Savinykh, N.P. and Mal’tseva, T.A., Module in the plants as the structure and category, Vestn. Tversk. Gos. Univ., Ser. Biol. Ekol., 2008, no. 9, pp. 227–233.

  31. Savinykh, N.P. and Sivkov, A.A., Shooting of stachys palustris Stachys palustris, Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Mekhanizmy ustoichivosti i adaptatsii biologicheskikh sistem k prirodnym i tekhnogennym faktoram,” 22–25 aprelya 2015 g. (Proc. All-Russ. Sci. Conf. “Mechanisms of Resistance and Adaptation of Biological Systems to Natural and Technogenic Factors,” April 22–25, 2015), Kirov: Vesi, 2015, pp. 148–152.

  32. Savinykh, N.P., Bezmel’tseva, O.M., and Vasil’evykh, P.V., Ecology and shoot formation of Thalictrum simplex L., Materialy XII Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Biodiagnostika sostoyaniya prirodnykh i prirodno-tekhnogennykh sistem,” 2–3 dekabrya 2014 g. (Proc. XII All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. with Int. Participation “Biodiagnostics of Natural and Natural-Technogenic Systems,” December 2–3, 2014), Kirov: Vesi, 2014a, book 1, pp. 79–83.

  33. Savinykh, N.P., Mshetsyan, A.I., and Chazova, I.V., Ecology and shoot formation of wild mint Mentha arvensis, Materialy XII Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Biodiagnostika sostoyaniya prirodnykh i prirodno-tekhnogennykh sistem,” 2–3 dekabrya 2014 g. (Proc. XII All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. with Int. Participation “Biodiagnostics of Natural and Natural-Technogenic Systems,” December 2–3, 2014), Kirov: Vesi, 2014b, book 1, pp. 74–79.

  34. Sedykh, I.B., Garden loosestrife Lysimachia vulgaris, in Biologicheskaya flora Moskovskoi oblasti (Biological Flora of Moscow Oblast), Pavlov, V.N., Ed., Moscow: Grif i K, 2003, no. 15, pp. 155–175.

  35. Serebryakov, I.G., Morfologiya vegetativnykh orgnaov vysshikh rastenii (Morphology of Vegetative Organs of Higher Plants), Moscow: Sovetskaya Nauka, 1952.

  36. Serebryakov, I.G., Types of development of shoots of perennial grasses and its formation, Uch. Zap. Mosk. Pedagog. Inst.im.V.P. Potemkina, 1959, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Serebryakov, I.G., Ekologicheskaya morfologiya rastenii (Ecological Morphology of the Plants), Moscow: Vysshaya Shkola, 1962.

  38. Serebryakov, I.G., Life forms of higher plants and their analysis, in Polevaya geobotanika (Field Geobotany), Moscow: Nauka, 1964, vol. 3, pp. 146–205.

  39. Serebryakov, I.G., Ratio of external and internal factors in annual rhythm of plant ontogenesis, Bot. Zh., 1966, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 923–938.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Serebryakova, T.I., Morfogenez pobegov i evolyutsiya zhiznennykh form zlakov (Morphogenesis of Shoots and Evolution of Life Forms of Cereals), Moscow: Nauka, 1971.

  41. Serebryakova, T.I., General “architecture models” of perennial herbs and modules of their transformation, Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd.Biol., 1977, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 112–128.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Serebryakova, T.I., Models of shoot formation and evolution trends in genus Gentiana L., Byull. Mosk. O-va. Ispyt. Prir., Otd.Biol., 1979, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 97–109.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Serebryakova, T.I., Life forms and models of shoot formation of terrestrial-creep perennial plants, in Zhiznennye formy: struktura, spektry i evolyutsiya (Life Forms: Structure, Diversity, and Evolution), Moscow: Nauka, 1981, pp. 161–179.

  44. Serebryakova, T.I., Modules of morphological evolution of flowering plants, Zh. Obshch. Biol., 1983, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 579–593.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Serebryakova, T.I., Variants of shoot formation models of perennial grasses, in Morfogenez i ritm razvitiya vysshikh rastenii (Morphogenesis and Rhythm of Development of the Higher Plants), Moscow: Mosk. Pedagog. Gos. Univ. im. V.I. Lenina, 1987, pp. 3–19.

  46. Shabalkina, S.V. and Savinykh, A.A., Shoot formation in Naumburgia thyrsiflora (Primulaceae), Materialy XII Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Ekologiya rodnogo kraya: problemy i puti ikh resheniya,” 13–14 aprelya 2017 g. (Proc. XII All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. with Int. Participation “Ecology of Native Land: Problems and Solutions,” April 13–14, 2017), Kirov: Vyatsk. Gos. Univ., 2017, book 2, pp. 104–109.

  47. Shafranova, L.M. and Gatsuk, L.E., The plant as a spatio-temporal metameric (module) system, in Uspekhi ekologicheskoi morfologii i ee vliyanie na smezhnye nauki (Advances in Ecological Morphology and Its Influence on Related Sciences), Moscow: Prometei, 1994, pp. 6–7.

  48. Sovremennye podkhody k opisaniyu struktury rasteniya (Modern Approaches to Description of the Plant Morphology), Savinykh, N.P. and Bobrov, Yu.A., Eds., Kirov: Loban’, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Talovskaya, E.B., Cheremushkina, V.A., Astashenkov, A.Yu., and Guseva, A.A., Morphological adaptation of Thymus roseus (Lamiaceae) in Eastern Kazakhstan, Bot. Zh., 2017, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1232–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Troll, W., Die Infloreszenzen, Jena: G. Fischer, 1964, vol. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tsenopopulyatsii rastenii (Osnovnye ponyatiya i struktura) (Plant Cenopopulations: General Terms and Structure), Moscow: Nauka, 1976.

  52. Tsyganov, D.N., Fitoindikatsiya ekologicheskikh rezhimov v podzone khvoino-shirokolistvennykh lesov (Phytoindication of Ecological Regimes in Subzone of Coniferous–Broad-Leaved Forests), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.

  53. Zhukova, L.A., Populyatsionnaya zhizn’ lugovykh rastenii (Population Life of Meadow Plants), Yoshkar-Ola: Lanar, 1995.

  54. Zhukova, L.A., Assessment of the ecological valence of species of the main ecological-cenotic groups, in Vostochnoevropeiskie lesa. Istoriya v golotsene i sovremennost’ (East European Forests: History in Holocene and Present Time), Moscow: Nauka, 2004, book 1, pp. 256–270.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project nos. 13-04-01-057 and 16-04-01073.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. P. Savinykh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by A. Aver’yanov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Savinykh, N.P., Shabalkina, S.V. Shoot-Formation Model as a Basis for Adaptations of Flowering Plants. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 13, 226–236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425520030105

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425520030105

Keywords:

Navigation