Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nesting of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pall.) in the Southeast of Western Siberia

  • Published:
Contemporary Problems of Ecology Aims and scope

Abstract

The natural quantity of the pied flycatcher in deciduous, mixed, and coniferous forests and reproductive parameters in deciduous and mixed stands of subtaiga forests in the southeast of Western Siberia has been studied comparatively based on materials collected in the period from 1980 to 2017. The natural quantity of the species at the nesting period is greater in mixed and deciduous forests when compared to coniferous forests. Nesting density, clutch size, volume of eggs, success, and productivity of reproduction in nest boxes are higher in deciduous forests. The data on the natural quantity and breeding of pied flycatchers in the study area are compared with the similar indicators in the European part of the range.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Alatalo, R.V. and Lundberg, A., Density-dependence in breeding success of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca), J. Anim. Ecol., 1984, vol. 53, pp. 969–977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alatalo, R.V. and Lundberg, A., Clutch size of the pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) an experiment, Ornis Fenn., 1989, vol. 66, pp. 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Artem’ev, A.V., Populyatsionnaya ekologiya mukholovki-pestrushki v severnoi zone areala (Population Ecology of Pied Flycatchers in the Northern Zone of the Range), Moscow: Nauka, 2008.

  4. Baranov, S.A., Peculiarities of breeding biology of pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) in the southeastern subzone of coniferous-deciduous forests, Nauchn. Zhizn’, 2016, no. 9, pp. 73–85.

  5. Baranovskii, A.V. and Ivanov, E.S., The structure and dynamics of avifauna of the Kartsevsky forest, Vestn. Rybinsk. Gos. Aviats. Tekh. Univ., 2014, no. 2 (22), pp. 3–7.

  6. Baranovskii, A.V. and Ivanov, E.S., Gnezdyashichiesya ptitsy goroda ryazani (Atlas rasprostraneniya i osobennosti biologii) (Nesting Birds of Ryazan: Atlas of Distribution and Peculiarities of Biology), Ryazan: Pervopechatnik’, 2016.

  7. Bel’skii, E.A., Ecology of birds of impact regions, Extended Abstract of Doctoral (Biol.) Dissertation, Yekaterinburg, 2010.

  8. Bel’skii, E.A. and Bel’skaya, E.A., Reproduction of pied flycatchers depending on timing of reproduction and seasonal dynamics of invertebrate abundance in the vicinity of the Sredneuralsk Copper Smelting Plant, Materialy V Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii “Biologicheskie sistemy: ustoichivost’, printsipy i mekhanizmy funktsionirovaniya,” Nizhnii Tagil, 1–4 marta 2017 g. (Proc. V All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “Biological systems: Stability, Principles, and Functional Mechanisms,” Nizhny Tagil, March 1–4, 2017), Nizhny Tagil: Nizhnetagil’sk. Gos. Sots.-Pedagog. Inst., 2017, pp. 67–70.

  9. Berglund, E.M.M., Ingvarsson, P.K., Danielsson, H., and Nyholm, N.E.I., Lead exposure and biological effects in pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) before and after the closure of a lead mine in northern Sweden, Environ. Pollut., 2010, vol. 158, pp. 1368–1375.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borgström, E., Breeding data for the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca in Central Sweden, Var Fagelvarld, 1990, vol. 49, pp. 140–146.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bragin, A.B. and Gilyazov, A.S., Results of attracting birds to nest-boxes in taiga zone of the Kola Peninsula, in Problemy okhrany prirody v basseine Belogo morya (Nature Protection in the White Sea Basin), Fillipova, L.N., Ed., Murmansk: Murmansk. Knizhn. Izd., 1984, pp. 4–30.

  12. Chernyshov, V.M., Biology of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca and the spotted flycatcher Muscicapa striata in the Barabinsk forest-steppe (south of West Siberia), Russ. Ornitol. Zh., 2012, vol. 21, no. 716, pp. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chichkova, A.S., Breeding features of hole-nesting birds in an urbanized environment, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Perm, 2009.

  14. Creutz, G., Der Trauerschnapper (Muscicapa hypoleuca (Pallas)). Eine Populations Studie, J. Ornithol., 1955, vol. 96, pp. 241–326.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Czeszczewik, D., Breeding success and timing of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca nesting in natural holes and nest-boxes in the Białowieża Forest, Poland, Acta Ornithol., 2004, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dhondt, A.A., Fierens, F., Lambrechts, M., Adriaensen, F., Matthysen, E., De Laet, J., and Bijnens, L., The establishment of a breeding population of the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca in the Peerdsbos, near Antwerpen, Le Gerfaut, 1987, vol. 77, pp. 333–339.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Drobot, V.I., Mudrova, K.S., Chemekov, V.A., and Drobot, V.V., Bird communities of the Bolshaya Kokshaga Nature Reserve, Materialy XII Vserossiiskogo populyarnogo seminara posvyashchennogo pamyati I.V. Glotova “Problemy populyatsionnoi biologii” (Proc. XII All-Russ. Popular Seminar in Memoriam of I.V. Glotov “Problems of Population Biology”), Yoshkar-Ola: String, 2017, pp. 75–77.

  18. Eeva, T. and Lehikoinen, E., Egg shell quality, clutch size, and hatching success of Great Tit (Parus major) and pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in an air pollution gradient, Oecologia, 1995, vol. 102, pp. 312–323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eeva, T., Lehikoinen, E., and Pohjalainen, T., Population related variation in food supply and breeding success in two hole nesting Passerines, Ecology, 1997, vol. 78, pp. 1120–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eeva, T., Lehikoinen, E., Rönkä, M., Lummaa, V., and Currie, D., Different responses to cold weather in two pied flycatcher populations, Ecography, 2002, vol. 25, pp. 705–713.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Filonov, K.P., Experience in the quantitative characteristics of the summer avifauna of the Bashkir Nature Reserve, Ornitologiya, 1965, no. 7, pp. 63–66.

  22. Gaber, N.A. and Galinskaya, I.A., The impact of radiation pollution on size and shape of pied flycatcher eggs, Materialy I Mezhdunarodnogo soveshchaniya “Sovremennye problemy oologii,” Lipetsk, 14–18 sentyabrya 1993 g. (Proc. I Int. Conf. “Modern Problems of Oology,” Lipetsk, September 14–18, 1993), Lipetsk, 1993, pp. 49–51.

  23. Gilyazov, A.S., Influence of summer cold spells on breeding success of passerines of the Lapland nature reserve, Ekologiya, 1981, no. 4, pp. 91–93.

  24. Glutz von Blotzheim, U.N. and Bauer, K.M., Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas. Passeriformes. Muscicapidae. Paridae, Wiesbaden: Aula, 1993, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 165–263.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Golubeva, T.B., Korneeva, E.V., and Aleksandrov, L.I., The success and timing of nesting of the pied flycatcher in the Prioksko-Terrasny State Nature Biosphere Reserve at beginning of 21st century, Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Dinamika chislennosti ptits v nazemnykh landshaftakh,” 17–21 marta 2017 (Proc. All-Russ. Sci. Conf. “Bird Population Dynamics in Terrestrial Landscapes,” March 17–21, 2017), Moscow: KMK, 2017, pp. 219–225

  26. Grishutkin, G.F., The dynamics of number of birds in deciduous and pine forests of the Mordovia Nature Reserve in nesting period, Tr. Mordovsk. Gos. Prirod. Zapoved. im. P.G. Smidovicha, 2015, no. 14, pp. 220–227.

  27. Harvey, P.H., Greenwood, P.J., Campbell, B., and Stenning, M.J., Breeding dispersal of pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca), J. Anim. Ecol., 1984, vol. 53, pp. 727–736.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Haverschmidt, F., Waarnemingen aan een populatie bonte vliegenvangers Ficedula hypoleuca,Limosa, 1973, vol. 46, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hillstrom, L., Body mass reduction during reproduction in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca—physiological stress or adaptation for lowered costs of locomotion, Funct. Ecol., 1995, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 807–817.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoyt, D.F., Practical methods of estimating volume and fresh weight of bird eggs, Auk, 1979, vol. 96, pp. 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huhta, E., Jokimaki, J., and Ranco, P., Distribution and reproductive success of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in relation to forest patch size and vegetation characteristics: the effect of scale, Ibis, 1998, vol. 140, pp. 214–222.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Il’ina, I.S., Lapshina, E.I., Lavrenko, N.N., Mel’tser, L.I., Romanova, E.A., et al., Rastitel’nyi pokrov Zapadno-sibirskoi ravniny (Vegetation Cover of West Siberian Plain), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Isachenko, A.G., Landshafty SSSR (Landscapes of USSR), Leningrad: Leningr. Gos. Univ., 1985.

  34. Izmailov, I.V., Perennial changes in the bird population in the Penkinsky pine forest (Vladimir oblast), in Geografiya i ekologiya nazemnykh pozvonochnykh Naechernozem’ya (Prtitsy) (Geography and Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates in Nonchernozem Region: Birds), Izmailov, I.V., Ed., Vladimir, 1981, pp. 5–21.

  35. Kallander, H., Breeding date for pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in southernmost Sweden, Ornis Fenn., 1975, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Karev, V.A., The attractiveness of glades overhead power lines for bird nesting, Vestn. Okhotoved., 2017, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 28–236.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Khakhalkin, V.V., Zakharchenko, A.V., and Nekhoro-shev, O.G., Landscape-ecological analysis of the territory of the Lomachevka stationer as a full-scale model, Vopr. Geogr. Sib., 1999, no. 23, pp. 225–236.

  38. Khokhlova, T.Yu., Interspecific competition among secondary hole-nesting birds under conditions of sharp inter-annual spring temperatures differences in Karelia, Prints.Ekol., 2014, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Klimov, S.M., Sarychev, V.S., Nedosekin, V.Yu., et al., Kladki i razmery yaits ptits basseina Verkhnego Dona (Clutches and Egg Sizes of Birds of the Upper Don River), Lipetsk: Lipetsk. Gos. Politekh. Inst., 1998.

  40. Komarov, Yu.E., Attracting nest- holes birds in the green zone of Tambov in late 60s of twentieth century (by example of Tambov suburban forestry), Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya “Novaya nauka: opyt, traditsii, innovatsii,” g. Sterlitamak, 24 oktyabrya 2015 g. (Int. Sci.-Pract. Conf. “New Science: Experience, Traditions, and Innovations,” Sterlitamak, October 24, 2015), Sterlitamak: Red. Izd. Tsentr, AMI, 2015, part 2, pp. 20–23.

  41. Korovin, V.A., The structure and population dynamics of pine forest birds in the Middle Urals, in Fauna Urala i prilezhashchikh territorii (Fauna of Ural and Neighboring Areas), Braude, M.I., Ed., Sverdlovsk: Ural. Gos. Univ., 1982, pp. 46–59.

  42. Korovin, V.A., The bird population structure of forest and floodplain habitats of the Pripyshminskie Bory National Park, Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii posvyashchennoi 40-letiyu Visimskogo gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo biosfernogo zapovednika i 10-letiyu prisvoeniya emu statusa biosfernogo “Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya OOPT Urala,” Tizhnii Tagil, 2–4 dekabrya 2011 g. (Proc. Sci.-Pract. Conf. Dedicated to the 40th Anniversary of Visim Nature Reserve and 10th Anniversary of Biosphere Status “Modern State and Prospective Development of Strictly Protective Nature Territories of Ural,” Nizhny Tagil, December 2–4, 2011), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Izd. Poligr. Tsentr, 2011, pp. 144–148.

  43. Kuitunen, M.T., Viljanen, J., Rossi, E., and Stenroos, A., Impact of busy roads on breeding success in pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca,Environ. Manage., 2003, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 79–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kuranov, B.D., Nest biology in urban population of pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca), Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., 2007, no. 297, pp. 192–200.

  45. Kuranov, B.D., Nesting biology of the flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca, Passeriformes, Muscicapidae) in southeastern part of its distribution area, Zool. Zh., 2018, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 321–336.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kuranov, B.D., Nekhoroshev, O.G., Mitchell, P.J., and Milovidov, S.P., Birds of Siberian-pine (Pinus sibirica) forests of the south-east part of Western Siberia (Tomsk region), Int. J. Environ. Stud., 2017, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 854–861.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kut’in, S.D. and Konstantinov, V.M., Specific features of nesting bird populations in forest-meadow-field landscapes of Meshchovsk Opolye reflect heterogeneity of their biotope connections, Biol. Bull. (Moscow), 2008, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 475–481.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lashchinskii, N.N. and Pisarenko, O.Yu., Dark coniferous forests of the West Siberian Plain on Southern limit of spread, Rastit. Ross., 2016, no. 28, pp. 89–107.

  49. Likhachev, G.N., Reproduction and abundance of pied flycatchers in south of Moscow oblast, in Pritsy i presmykayushchiesya. Issledovaniya po fuane Sovetskogo Soyuza (Birds and Reptiles. Studies of Fauna of Soviet Union), Sudilovskaya, A.M. and Flint, V.E., Eds., Moscow: Mosk. Gos. Univ., 1978, vol. 17, pp. 119–140.

  50. Lugovoi, A.E., The structure of bird population of coniferous forests of Prisurya, in Geografiya i ekologiya nazemnykh pozvonochnykh Nechernozem’ya (Ptitsy) (Geography and Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates of Nonchernozem Region: Birds), Izmailov, I.V., Ed., Vladimir: Vladimir. Gos. Pedagog. Inst., 1981, pp. 49–60.

  51. Lyanders, L.S., Orlov, E.A., and Sorokin, M.G., The structure of bird population of some biotopes of the Upper Volga region, in Fauna Nechernozem’ya, ee okhrana, vosproizvedenie i ispol’zovanie (Fauna of Nonchernozem: Protection, Reproduction, and Use), Tomashevskii, K.E., Ed., Kalinin: Kalinin. Gos. Univ., 1980, pp. 81–87.

  52. Mänd, R. and Tilgar, V., Does supplementary calcium reduce the cost of reproduction in the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca? Ibis, 2003, vol. 145, pp. 67–77.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Manukov, Yu.I., Evaluation of changes in the bird community of mixed forest of north-western Moscow suburbs over 57 years, Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Obl. Univ., Biol., 2011, no. 4, pp. 1–10. http://www.evestnik-mgou.ru.

  54. Marochkina, E.A., Baranovskii, A.V., Chel’tsov, N.A., et al., The mechanisms of ecological segregation of three species of flycatchers, pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca, spotted flycatcher Muscicapa striata, and red-breasted flycatcher Muscicapa parva,Russ. Ornitol. Zh., 2006, vol. 15, no. 323, pp. 611–630.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Meidell, O., Life history of the pied flycatcher and the redstart in a Norwegian mountain area, Nytt. Mag. Zool., 1961, vol. 10, pp. 5–47.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mikhlin, V.E. and Sal’nikov, G.M., Study of latitudinal variability of mixed forest bird community, in Geografiya i ekologiya nazemnykh pozvonochnykh Nechernozem’ya (Ptitsy) (Geography and Ecology of Terrestrial Vertebrates of Nonchernozem Region: Birds), Izmailov, I.V., Ed., Vladimir: Vladimir. Gos. Pedagog. Inst., 1981, pp. 67–74.

  57. Milovidov, S.P., Nekhoroshev, O.G., and Kuranov, B.D., Birds of the valleys of the Tom River tributaries (Tomsk oblast), Vestn. Tomsk. Gos. Univ., Biol., 2015, no. 4 (32), pp. 91–106.

  58. Morozova, O.V., Deciduous-coniferous forest zone of European Russia (syntaxonomic review), Tr. Gl. Bot. Sada,Ross. Akad. Nauk, 2016, vol. 143, pp. 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Nazimova, D.I., Tsaregorodtsev, V.G., and Andreeva, N.M., Forest zones of southern Siberia and current climate change, Geogr. Prirod. Resur., 2010, pp. 55–63.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Nekrasova, V.D., Biotopic factors determining settlement of pied flycatchers and great tit in nesting period and requirements of these species for artificial nesting, Tr. Mordovsk. Gos. Prirod. Zapoved. im. P.G. Smidovicha, 2016, no. 16, pp. 3–33.

  61. Nilsson, J.-E., Resultat av 20ars holkstudier—framst rorande svartvit flugsnappare Ficedula hypoleuca,Ornis Svecica, 2008, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 52–64.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Nilsson, S.G., Clutch-size and breeding success of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in natural tree-holes, Ibis, 1984, vol. 126, no. 3, pp. 407–410.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Nilsson, S.G., Bjorkman, C., Forsland, P., and Hoglund, J., Nesting holes and food supply in relation to forest bird densities on islands and mainland, Oecologia, 1985, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 516–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Numerov, A.D., Population ecology of pied flycatchers on territory of the Oksky Nature Reserve, in Nauchnye osnovy okhrany i ratsional’nogo ispol’zovaniya ptits (Scientific Principles of Protection and Rational Use of Birds), Tr. Okskogo Biosfernogo Gos. Zapoved. No. 19, Priklonskii, S.G., Ed., Ryazan: Russkoe Slovo, 1995, no. 19, pp. 75–100.

  65. Numerov, A.D., Vengerov, P.D., Kiselev, O.G., Boris-kin, D.A., Vetrov, E.V., et al., Atlas gnezdyashchikhsya ptits goroda Voronezha (Atlas of Nesting Birds of Voronezh City), Voronezh: Nauchnaya Kniga, 2013.

  66. Nyholm, N.E.I., Dynamics and reproduction of a nest-box breeding population of pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in a subalpine birch forest in Swedish Lapland during a period of 46 years, Ornis Svecia, 2011, vol. 21, pp. 133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Ojanen, M., Orell, M., and Vaisanen, R.A., Egg and clutch sizes to four passerine species in northern Finland, Ornis Fenn., 1978, vol. 55, pp. 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Paevskii, V.A., Demografiya ptits (Demography of Birds), Leningrad: Nauka, 1985.

  69. Peklo, A.M., Mukholovka fauny SSSR (The Pied Flycatcher in Fauna of USSR), Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 1987.

  70. Potti, J., Temperature during egg formation and the effect of climate warming on egg size in a small songbird, Acta Oecol., 2008, vol. 33, pp. 387–393.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Potti, J. and Merino, S., Causes of hatching failure in the pied flycatcher, Condor, 1996, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 328–336.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Preobrazhenskaya, E.S., Ekologiya vorob’innykh ptits Privetluzh’ya (Ecology of Passeridae Birds in the Coastal Zone of the Vetluga River), Moscow: KMK, 1998.

  73. Ptitsy Ryazanskoi Meshchery (Birds of Ryazan Meshchera Region), Khlebosolova, E.I., Ed., Ryazan: Golos Gubernii, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Ravkin, E.S. and Ravkin, Yu.S., Ptitsy ravnin Severnoi Evrazii (Birds of the Plains of Northern Eurasia), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2005.

  75. Ravkin, Yu.S., Method of describing forest landscape birds, in Priroda ochagovogo entsefalita na Altae (Nature of Foci Encephalitis in Altai Region), Maksimov, A.A., Ed., Novosibirsk, 1967, pp. 66–75.

  76. Ravkin, Yu.S., Pritsy lesnoi zony Prob’ya (Forest Birds of the Coastal Zone of the Ob’ River), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1978.

  77. Ravkin, Yu.S. and Livanov, S.G., Faktornaya zoogeografiya (Factor Zoogeography), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2008.

  78. Romanov, V.V., Peculiarities of the fauna and population of birds of the Vladimir opol’e, Extended Abstract of Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Moscow, 2003.

  79. Ryabintsev, V.K., Pritsy Urala, Priural’ya i Zapadnoi Sibiri: Spravochnik-opredelitel’ (Birds of Ural, Cis-Ural, and Western Siberia Territories), Yekaterinburg: Ural. Gos. Univ., 2008.

  80. Rysin, L.P. and Savel’eva, L.I., Sosnovye lesa Rossii (Pine Forests of Russia), Moscow: KMK, 2008.

  81. Sanz, J.J., Geographic variation in breeding parameters of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca,Ibis, 1997, vol. 139, pp. 107–114.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Scholin, K.G. and Kallander, H., A 64-year study of a pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca population, Ornis Svecica, 2011, vol. 21, nos. 2–4, pp. 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Shcherbakova, K.A., Renewal of studies of hole-nesting birds in the Kivach Nature Reserve and first results, Materialy mezhdunarodnoi konferentsii “Energetika i godovye tsikly ptits,” Moskva, 24–29 sentyabrya 2015 g. (Proc. Int. Conf. “Energy and Annual Cycles of Birds,” Moscow, September 24–29, 2015), Moscow: KMK, 2015, pp. 290–292.

  84. Shirpuzheva, A.S., Hole-nesting birds in areas with different anthropogenic load, Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii posvyashchennoi 100-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya doktora biologicheskikh nauk, professora Sapozhnikovoi E.V. “Biologiya: Teoriya, praktika, eksperiment” (Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. Dedicated to the 100th Anniversary of Doctor of Biological Science, Prof. E.V. Sapozhnikova “Biology: Theory, Practice, and Experiment”), Saransk: Mordovsk. Gos. Univ., 2008, book 1, pp. 17–21.

  85. Smirnov, O.P. and tyurin, V.M., The successful reproduction period of the pied flycatcher in Leningrad oblast, Ornitologiya, 1986, no. 21, pp. 170–171.

  86. Sternberg, H., Grinkov, V.G., Ivankina, E.V., Ilyina, T.A., Kerimov, A.B., and Schwarz, A., Evaluation of the size and composition of nonbreeding surplus in a pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca population: removal experiments in Germany and Russia, Ardea, 2002, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 461–470

    Google Scholar 

  87. Strasevicius, D., Micael, J., Nyholme, N.I., and Malmqvist, B., Reduced breeding success of pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca along regulated rivers, Ibis, 2013, vol. 155, pp. 348–356.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Thingstad, P.G., Annual and local reproductive variations of pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca population near a subalpine lake in Central Norway, Ornis Fenn., 1997, vol. 74, pp. 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Toropov, K.V. and Bochkareva, E.N., Pritsy podtaezhnykh lesov Zapadnoi Sibiri: 30–40 let spustya (Birds of Subtaiga Forests of Western Siberia: 30–40 Years Later), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2014.

  90. Toropov, K.V. and Shor, E.L., Pritsy yuzhnoi taigi Zapadnoi Sibiri: 25 let spustya (Birds of Southern Taiga of Western Siberia: 25 Years Later), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2012.

  91. Vasil’chenko, A.A., Pritsy Kemerovskoi oblasti (Birds of Kemerovo Oblast), Kemerovo: Kuzbassvizizdat, 2004.

  92. Vladykina, N.S., Influence of garden development of forest territory upon the species diversity and abundance of bird population, Materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Ekologiya, evolyutsiya i sistematika zhivotnykh,” R-yazan’, 17–19 noyabrya 2009 g. (Proc. All-Russ. Sci.-Pract. Conf. with Int. Participation “Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics of the Animals,” Ryazan, November 17–19, 2009), Ryazan: Golos Gubernii, 2009, pp. 193–194.

  93. Vysotskii, V.G., Embryonic mortality in pied flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca), Tr. Zool. Inst., Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1988, vol. 182, pp. 64–69.

    Google Scholar 

  94. Yudkin, V.A., Pritsy podtaezhnykh lesov Zapadnoi Sibiri (Birds of Subtaiga Forests of Western Siberia), Novosibirsk: Nauka, 2002.

  95. Yaremchenko, O.A., Population structure of the pied flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca in the Polesie State Radioecological Reserve, Materialy Vsesoyuznogo ornitologicheskogo obshchestva i IX Vsesoyuznogoi ornitologicheskoi konferentsii “Izuchenie ptits SSSR, ikh okhrana i ratsional’noe ispol’zovanie,” Leningrad, 16–20 dekabrya 1986 g., Tezisy dokladov (Proc. All-Union Ornithological Society and IX All-Union Ornithological Conf. “Study of Birds of USSR: Protection and Rational Use,” Leningrad, December 16–20, 1986, Abstracts of Papers), Leningrad, 1986, part 2, pp. 367–368.

  96. Zakharov, V.D., Bioraznoobrazie naseleniya ptits nazemnykh mestoobitanii Yuzhnogo Urala (Biological Diversity of Bird Population in Terrestrial Habitats of Southern Urals), Miass: Il’men. Gos. Zapoved., Ural. Otd., Ross. Akad. Nauk, 1998.

  97. Zimin, V.B., Reproductive ecology of pied flycatchers in southern Karelia, Ekologiya, 1972, no. 5, pp. 23–29.

  98. Zubtsovskii, N.E., Vasil’eva, G.E., and Petrova, T.G., Nesting ecology of pied flycatchers in Ilmen Nature Reserve, in Fauna i ekologiya zhivotnykh UASSR i prilezhashchikh raionov (Fauna and Ecology of Animals of Udmurt ASSR and Adjacent Areas), Roshchinenko, V.I., Ed., Izhevsk: Udmurt. Gos. Univ., 1981, pp. 57–66.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are sincerely grateful to A.V. Artem’ev, A.V. Baranovskii, E.A. Bel’skii, A.S. Gilyazov, V.I. Golovan, T.V. Golubeva, G.V. Grishanov, T. Eeva, V.D. Zakharov, V.A. Korovin, E.S. Ravkin, Yu.S. Ravkin, and M.V. Yakovleva for help in writing this article.

Funding

This study was supported by the Program for Improving the Competitiveness of the Tomsk State University (no. NU 8.1.25.2018 L) and the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (no. 6.7525.2017/8.9).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tomsk State University, 634050, Tomsk, Russia

    B. D. Kuranov, O. G. Nekhoroshev, S. P. Gureev & S. V. Kilin

Authors
  1. B. D. Kuranov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. O. G. Nekhoroshev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. P. Gureev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. V. Kilin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. D. Kuranov.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Statement on the welfare of animals. This article does not contain any studies involving animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Translated by L. Solovyova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuranov, B.D., Nekhoroshev, O.G., Gureev, S.P. et al. Nesting of the Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca Pall.) in the Southeast of Western Siberia. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 12, 607–620 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519060064

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519060064

Keywords:

Search

Navigation