Abstract
A combination of xenogamy and autogamy in the breeding system is typical for natural Fragaria vesca L. populations. A natural experiment has been conducted to clarify the portion of xenogamy. During flowering, the plants of inbred line no. 08-2, marked by recessive c allele (light yellow colored berry), are placed in native populations of wood strawberry of two different biotopes. The plants of the native population form only red berries (a dominant trait). After the end of flowering period, the berries are collected from plants of line no. 08-2, the seeds are isolated, and seedlings are obtained. Genetic analysis by the “;berry color” marker sign is conducted among these seedlings. In the case of autogamy, the seed progenies have a light yellow berry; in the case of xenogamy, they have berries with a red skin (as a result of infusion of the pollen with dominant C allele from native F. vesca populations by pollinator insects). Genetic analysis demonstrates significant differences in regards to the ratio of crossing systems (autogamy and xenogamy) in a series of experimental plants. However, the integral value of xenogamy achieved in the seed progeny is close in both natural F. vesca populations (21%), while the average portion of autogamy is 79%. We assume that the indicated ratio of crossing systems for the F. vesca populations is optimal to maintain population heterogeneity and develop their life strategy under growth conditions. During xenogamy, a certain portion of heterotic heterozygotes able to develop new habitats (fulfilling the explerent strategy) is maintained in the population. Autogamy contributes to an increase in the portion of inbred genotypes (patients). Thus, the opportunities to achieve any three type of strategies (violents, patients, and explerents) are created for the F. vesca depending on the plant living conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baturin, S.O., Peculiarities of seed germination of Fragaria vesca L. from the atypical ecotopes of Western Siberia, Contemp. Probl. Ecol., 2009, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 556–559.
Blažyte-Čereškiene, L., Būda, V., and Bagdonaitė, E., Three wild Lithuanian strawberry species and their pollinators, Plant Syst. Evol., 2012, vol. 298, no. 4, pp. 819–826.
Brown, T. and Wareing, P.F., The genetical control of the everbearing habit and three other characters in varieties of Fragaria vesca, Eupthytica, 1965, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 97–112.
Charlesworth, D., Evolution of plant breeding systems, Curr. Biol., 2006, vol. 16–17, pp. R726–R735. http://ac.els-cdn.com/S0960982206019178/1-s2.0-S0960982206019178-main.pdf..
Dem’yanova, E.I., Antekologiya: uchebnoe posobie po spetskursu (Antecology: Manual for Special Course Study), Perm: Permsk. Gos. Univ., 2010.
Dem’yanova, E.I., The breeding systems of flowering plants in Perm krai, Vestn. Permsk. Gos. Univ., 2014, no. 3, pp. 4–18.
Dubrovnaya, S.A., The structure of natural populations of wild strawberry Fragaria vesca L., Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Yoshkar-Ola, 2000.
Hancock, J.F. and Bringhurst, J.R.S., Inter-populational differentiation and adaptation in the perennial, diploid species Fragaria vesca L., Am. J. Bot., 1978, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 795–803.
Heslop-Harrison, J., Forty years of genecology, Adv. Ecol. Res., 1964, vol. 2, pp. 159–247.
Irkaeva, N.M. and Ankudinova, I.N., Evaluation of the outbreeding level of the strawberry Fragaria vesca L. using genetic markers, Russ. J. Genet., 1994, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 816–822.
Irkaeva, N.M. and Pendinen, G.I., Variability of wild populations of Fragaria vesca L. found in inbreeding: anomalies of morphogeneis, Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 3: Biol., 1987, vol. 4, no. 27, pp. 69–76.
Irkaeva, N.M. and Smirnov, A.N., Analysis of low-fertile plants isolated from natural populations of wild strawberry Fragaria vesca L., Vestn. Leningr. Univ., Ser. 3: Biol., 1989, vol. 4, no. 24, pp. 82–86.
Jurik, T.W., Differential costs of sexual and vegetative reproduction in wild strawberry populations, Oecologia, 1985, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 394–403.
Kassen, R., The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity, J. Evol. Biol., 2002, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 173–190.
Lar’kina, T.P., Analysis of ecotypes of Fragaria vesca L. in Perm krai, Permsk. Agrar. Vestn., 2014, no. 2 (6), pp. 55–59.
Lotova, L.I., Morfologiya i anatomiya vysshikh rastenii (Morphology and Anatomy of the Higher Plants), Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001.
Palilov, A.I., Khotyleva, L.V., Savchenko, A.P., Korpusenko, L.I., Anakhina, T.A., Polkanova, T.P., and Danilov, A.S., Polimorfizm rastenii po stepeni perekrest-noopylyaemosti (biologicheskoe znachenie, geneticheskie osnovy, prakticheskoe ispol’zovanie) (The Plant Polymorphism by Degree of Cross-Breeding: Biological Role, Genetic Principles, and Practical Use), Minsk: Nauka i Tekhnika, 1981.
Richards, A.J., Plant Breeding Systems, London: G. Allen & Unwin, 1986.
Richards, A.J., Breeding systems in flowering plants and the control of variability, Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon., 1996, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 283–293.
Shivtsova, I.V., Ecological and morphological features of the species and population organization of Fragaria vesca L., Cand. Sci. (Biol.) Dissertation, Yoshkar-Ola, 2008.
Terekhin, E.S., Semya i semennoe razmnozhenie (Seed and Seed Breeding), St. Petersburg: Mir i Sem’ya-95, 1996.
Trofimova, I.E. and Balybina, A.S., Classification of climates and climatic regionalization of the West-Siberian plain, Geogr. Nat. Resour., 2014, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 114–122.
Tsyganov, D.N., Fitoindikatsiya ekologicheskikh rezhimov v podzone khvoino-shirokolistvennykh lesov (Phytoindication of Ecological Regimes in subzone of Coniferous-Broad-Leaved Forests), Moscow: Nauka, 1983.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baturin, S.O. On the Role of Xenogamy in the Development of Life Strategy for Fragaria vesca L. in Western Siberia. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 12, 92–96 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519010025
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425519010025