Skip to main content
Log in

Integrability and Adapted Complex Structures to Smooth Vector Fields on the Plane

  • Published:
Lobachevskii Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Singular complex analytic vector fields on the Riemann surfaces enjoy several geometric properties (singular means that poles and essential singularities are admissible). We describe relations between singular complex analytic vector fields \({\mathbb{X}}\) and smooth vector fields \(X\). Our approximation route studies three integrability notions for real smooth vector fields \(X\) with singularities on the plane or the sphere. The first notion is related to Cauchy–Riemann equations, we say that a vector field \(X\) admits an adapted complex structure \(J\) if there exists a singular complex analytic vector field \({\mathbb{X}}\) on the plane provided with this complex structure, such that \(X\) is the real part of \({\mathbb{X}}\). The second integrability notion for \(X\) is the existence of a first integral \(f\), smooth and having non vanishing differential outside of the singularities of \(X\). A third concept is that \(X\) admits a global flow box map outside of its singularities, i.e. the vector field \(X\) is a lift of the trivial horizontal vector field, under a diffeomorphism. We study the relation between the three notions. Topological obstructions (local and global) to the three integrability notions are described. A construction of singular complex analytic vector fields \({\mathbb{X}}\) using canonical invariant regions is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Notes

  1. Here we abuse of the notation, since a non smooth point is not a trajectory of \(X\).

  2. These functions are called additively automorphic.

  3. The change of coordinates for \({\widehat{\mathbb{C}}}\) is \(z\mapsto w=1/z\).

REFERENCES

  1. L. V. Ahlfors, Complex Analysis, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, Tokyo, 1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. L. V. Ahlfors, Conformal Invariants: Topics in Geometric Function Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Alvarez-Parrilla and J. Muciño-Raymundo, ‘‘Complex analytic vector fields with essential singularities I,’’ Conf. Geom. Dyn. 21, 126–224 (2017).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. V. I. Arnold, ‘‘Wave front evolution an equivariant Morse lemma,’’ Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 29, 557–582 (1976).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. W. M. Boothby, ‘‘The topology of level curves of harmonic functions with critical points,’’ Am. J. Math. 73, 512–53 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Bott, ‘‘Marston Morse and his mathematical works,’’ Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 3, 907–950 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. N. H. Ibragimov, Elementary Lie Group Analysis and Ordinary Differential Equations (Wiley, Chichester, 1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. W. Kaplan, ‘‘On partial differential equations of first order,’’ in Topics in Analysis, Jyväskylä, 1970, Vol. 419 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics (Springer, Berlin, 1974), pp. 221–231.

  9. J. A. Jenkins, Univalent Functions and Conformal Mapping (Springer, Berlin, 1958).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Kobayashi and K. Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry (Wiley, New York, 1969), Vol. 2.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Muciño-Raymundo, ‘‘Complex structures adapted to smooth vector fields,’’ Math. Ann. 322, 229–265 (2003).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Muciño-Raymundo and C. Valero-Valdéz, ‘‘Bifurcations of meromorphic vector fields on the Riemann sphere,’’ Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 15, 1211–1222 (1995).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. M. P. Muller, ‘‘An analytic foliations of the plane without weak first integrals of class \(C^{1}\),’’ Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex. 2 21 (1), 1–5 (1976).

  14. A. A. du Plessis and Ch. T. C. Wall, ‘‘Discriminants and vector fields,’’ in Singularities, Vol. 162 of Progress in Mathematics (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1998), pp. 119–140.

  15. K. Strebel, Quadratic Differentials (Springer, Berlin, 1984).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. J. L. Weiner, ‘‘First integrals for a direction field on a simply connected plane domain,’’ Pacif. J. Math. 132, 195–208 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Zoladek, ‘‘On the first integrals for polynomial differential equations on the line,’’ Studia Math. 107, 205–211 (1993).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gaspar León-Gil or Jesús Muciño-Raymundo.

Additional information

(Submitted by M. A.Malakhaltsev)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

León-Gil, G., Muciño-Raymundo, J. Integrability and Adapted Complex Structures to Smooth Vector Fields on the Plane. Lobachevskii J Math 43, 110–126 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222040151

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995080222040151

Keywords:

Navigation