Abstract
In this paper we characterize planar central configurations in terms of a sectional curvature value of the Jacobi–Maupertuis metric. This characterization works for the N-body problem with general masses and any 1/rα potential with α > 0. We also obtain dynamical consequences of these curvature values for relative equilibrium solutions. These curvature methods work well for strong forces (α ≥ 2).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albouy, A., Cabral, H.E., and Santos, A.A., Some Open Problems on the Classical N-Body Problem, Celestial Mech. Dynam. Astronom., 2012, vol. 113, no. 4, pp. 369–375.
Arnol’d, V. I., Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, 2nd ed., Grad. Texts in Math., vol. 60, New York: Springer, 1989.
Barbosu, M. and Elmabsout, B., Courbures de Riemann dans le problème plan des trois corps: Stabilité, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris. Sér. 2b, 1999, vol. 327, pp. 959–962.
Barutello, V., Jadanza, R. D., and Portaluri, A., Morse Index and Linear Stability of the Lagrangian Circular Orbit in a Three-Body-Type Problem via Index Theory, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 2016, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 387–444.
Chenciner, A., Collisions totales, mouvements complètement paraboliques et réduction des homothéties dans le problème des n corps, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 1998, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 93–106.
Fujiwara, T., Fukuda, H., Ozaki, H., and Taniguchi, T., Saari’s Homographic Conjecture for General Masses in Planar Three-Body Problem under Newton Potential and a Strong Force Potential, J. Phys. A, 2015, vol. 48, no. 26, 265205, 17 pp.
Hu, X. and Sun, Sh., Morse Index and Stability of Elliptic Lagrangian Solutions in the Planar Three-Body Problem, Adv. Math., 2010, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 98–119.
Hu, X. and Yu, G., An Index Theory for Zero Energy Solutions of the Planar Anisotropic Kepler Problem, Comm. Math. Phys., 2018, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 709–736.
Jackman, C. and Meléndez, J., Hyperbolic Shirts Fit a 4-Body Problem, J. Geom. Phys., 2018, vol. 123, pp. 173–183.
Jackman, C. and Montgomery, R., No Hyperbolic Pants for the 4-Body Problem with Strong Potential, Pacific J. Math., 2016, vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 401–410.
Kobayashi, Sh., Hyperbolic Complex Spaces, Grundlehren Math. Wiss., vol. 318, Berlin: Springer, 1998.
Lee, J.M., Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Grad. Texts in Math., vol. 176, New York: Springer, 1997.
Martínez, R., Samà, A., and Simó, C., Stability of Homographic Solutions of the Planar Three-Body Problem with Homogeneous Potentials, in Proc. of the Internat. Conf. on Differential Equations (EQUADIFF’2003), F. Dumortier, H. Broer, J. Mawhin, A. Van der bauwhede, S. Verduyn Lunel (Eds.), Hackensack,N.J.: World Sci., 2005, pp. 1005–1010.
Moeckel, R., Lectures on Central Configurations, https://doi.org/www.math.umn.edu/rmoeckel/notes/CentralConfigurations (2014).
Moeckel, R., A Computer Assisted Proof of Saari’s Conjecture for the Three-Body Problem in Rd, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. S, 2008, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 631–646.
Montgomery, R., The Hyperbolic Plane, Three-Body Problems, andMnëv’s Universality Theorem, Regul. Chaotic Dyn., 2017, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 688–699.
Montgomery, R., Fitting Hyperbolic Pants to a Three-Body Problem, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems, 2005, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 921–947.
Montgomery, R., Blow-Up for Realizing Homotopy Classes in the Three-Body Problem, arXiv:1507.07982 (2015).
Pin, O.Ch., Curvature and Mechanics, Advances in Math., 1975, vol. 15, pp. 269–311.
Paternain, G.P., Geodesic Flows, Progr. Math., vol. 180, Boston,Mass.: Birkhüser, 2012.
Roberts, G. E., Some Counterexamples to a Generalized Saari’s Conjecture, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 2006, vol. 358, no. 1, pp. 251–265.
Roberts, G.E., Linear Stability of the Elliptic Lagrangian Triangle Solutions in the Three-Body Problem, J. Differential Equations, 2002, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 191–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackman, C., Meléndez, J. On the Sectional Curvature Along Central Configurations. Regul. Chaot. Dyn. 23, 961–973 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354718070109
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1560354718070109