Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of an Accelerator Driven System with Different Spallation Targets

  • PHYSICS OF ELEMENTARY PARTICLES AND ATOMIC NUCLEI. EXPERIMENT
  • Published:
Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A number of neutronics of JNIR big uranium target are simulated towards the planning of experimental investigations aimed to the transmutation of radioactive waste. Integral data of the neutron yield and energy spectra are given for several homogeneous spallation targets which are planned to be used as insertions in uranium blanket. Combined spallation targets are also of interest, because it can help to obtain an optimal neutron energy spectrum for effective burning of long-lived fission products and minor-actinides. For this purpose, uranium-beryllium dual insertion was also considered and described in this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. I. Dubrouski and A. I. Kiyavitskaya, “Simulation of neutronics of an accelerator driven system,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 17, 19–26 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Geant4 Collaboration Physics Reference Manual, Release 10.6. https://Geant4.Web.Cern.Ch/Support/User_documentation. Accessed February 01, 2020.

  3. M. S. Zucker et al., “Spallation neutron production measurements,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Accelerator Driven Transmutation Technologies and Applications (ADTTA), Kalmar, Sweden, June 1996, Vol. 1, pp. 527–533.

  4. A. I. Kievitskaia et al., “Accelerator molten salt breeder as fissible producing component of THORIUM-NES concept for energy production and transmutation of plutonium,” in Proceedings of the 8tht International Conference on Emerging Nuclear Energy Systems ICENES’96, Obninsk, Russia, June 24–28, 1996, pp. 564–571.

  5. T. Goorley et al. (MCNP Monte Carlo Team, X-5), “Release of MCNP5_RSICC_1.30,” Report LA-UR-04-8086 (Los Alamos Natl. Lab., Los Alamos, 2004).

  6. H. Huges et al., “MCNPX - the LAHET/MCNP code merger,” Report No. LA-UR-97-1638 (Los Alamos Natl. Lab., Los Alamos, USA, 1997), p. 26.

  7. A. A. Baldin, A. I. Berlev, I. V. Kudashkin, G. Mogildea, M. Mogildea, M. Paraipan, and S. I. Tyutyunnikov, “Simulation of neutron production in heavy metal targets using Geant4 software,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 13, 391–402 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Malyshkin et al., “Modeling spallation reactions in tungsten and uranium targets with the Geant4 toolkit,” EPJ Web of Conf. 21, 10006 (2012).

  9. A. I. Kievitskaya, “Mesocatalytic hybrid reactor. Neutronics and energy balance,” Cand. Sci. (Phys. Math.) Dissertation (Minsk, 1991), p. 125.

  10. S. E. Chigrinov, I. Rakhno, and H. Kiyavitskaya, “The code SONET to calculate accelerator driven system performance,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Accelerator Driven Transmutation Technologies and Application (99’ADTTA), Praha, Pruhonice, Czech Republic, June 7–11, 1999, paper MO-O-C12, pp. 1–8.

  11. S. Chigrinov, I. Rakhno, and A. Kievitskaia, “Monte Carlo calculation of relativistic protons interaction with extended targets and transmutation of iodine-129 and neptunium-237,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on the Physics of Nuclear Science and Technology, New York, USA, October 5–8, 1998, pp. 1455–1461.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. I. Dubrouski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dubrouski, A.I., Kiyavitskaya, A.I. & Tyutyunnikov, S.I. Simulation of an Accelerator Driven System with Different Spallation Targets. Phys. Part. Nuclei Lett. 18, 27–35 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477121010052

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1547477121010052

Navigation