Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of support for civil industry in Russia in terms of the structure and content of the corresponding target programs and state programs. A possible solution to the problem of the recurrence of priorities and support instruments in the form of rejecting the sectoral principle of program formation is suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D. V. Manturov, “State regulation of industry for 25 years. Industry of the 1990s,” Vopr. Gos. Munitsip. Upr., No. 3, 31–48 (2016).
D. V. Manturov, “State regulation of industry for 25 years. Industry in 2000–2009,” Vopr. Gos. Munitsip. Upr., No. 4, 99–116 (2016).
A. N. Udovenko, “Transition to the program budget: Results, problems, and prospects,” Byudzhet, 2012, No. 6. http://bujet.ru/article/189590.php.
V. V. Karacharovskii, “Modernization of the Russian high-tech industry in programs and practices of power (content analysis),” O-vo. Ekon., No. 1, 31–42 (2005).
V. V. Ivanter, “Strategy of transition to economic growth,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (1), 1–4 (2016).
A. A. Shirov, “From a crisis of financing mechanisms to sustainable economic growth,” Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 27 (4), 359–366 (2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Original Russian Text © A.M. Kalinin, 2018.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalinin, A.M. Evolution of Instruments of State Support of Industry in the Russian Federation: From Federal Target Programs to the State Program. Stud. Russ. Econ. Dev. 29, 28–34 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700718010069
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700718010069