Skip to main content
Log in

Palaeomagnetism of the Sarmatian-Maeotian of the Eastern Paratethys: Remagnetization or Not?

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—We present the rock-magnetic and palaeomagnetic results of the Sarmatian-Maeotian (Upper Miocene) sediments of the key sections of Cape Popov Kamen and Cape Panagia from Taman Peninsula (Eastern Paratethys) and forming the flanks of a single synclinal fold. A three-component composition of magnetization has been detected. The first is the viscous component A, the second is the component B, which is intermediate between the components A and the third component C, which tends to zero in the Zijderveld diagram. The directions of component B are characterized by northern–northeastern–eastern declinations and positive inclinations in the stratigraphic coordinate system; the fold test for the Popov Kamen and Panagia results is negative, and the magnetization is post-folding. The directions of component C have negative inclinations and southern declinations in the stratigraphic coordinate system. Paleomagnetic results for two sections showed the test fold positive, magnetization preliminary and the magnetization is pre-folding. Components B and C, on the basis of which the polarity of the magnetozones is determined, are of different ages, and the palaeomagnetic record of component B is the result of complete or partial remagnetization, which makes it impossible to use magnetostratigraphy for section dating. Our work affects an important question about the reliability of palaeomagnetic data on the Miocene deposits of the Kerch-Taman region (Eastern Paratethys).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Chadima, M. and Hrouda, F., Remasoft 3.0 a user-friendly paleomagnetic data browser and analyzer, Trav. Géophys., 2006, vol. 27, pp. 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chadima, M. and Jelinek, V., Anisoft 42, 2009. www.AGICO.com.

  3. Chumakov, I.S., Byzova, S.L., and Ganzei, S.S., Geokhronologiya i korrelyatsiya pozdnego kainozoya Paratetisa (Geochronology and Correlation of the Late Cenozoic Paratethys), Devyatkin, E.V., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Day, R., Fuller, M., and Schmidt, V.A., Hysteresis properties of titanomagnetites: Grain size and compositional dependence, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 1977, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 260–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-9201(77)90108-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Enkin, R.J., A Computer Program Package for Analysis and Presentation of Palaeomagnetic Data, Sidney, British Columbia: Pacific Geoscience Centre, Geol. Survey Canada, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Enkin, R.J., The direction-correction tilt test: an all-purpose tilt/fold test for paleomagnetic studies, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 2003, vol. 212, no. 1-2, pp. 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faure, G., Principles of Isotope Geology, New York: Wiley, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gaidalenok, O.V., Structure of the Kerch-Taman zone of folded deformations of the Azov-Kuban trough, Cand. Sci. (Geol.–Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow: Geol. Inst., Russ. Acad. Sci., 2020.

  9. Gaidalenok, O.V., Sokolov, S.A., Izmaylov, Ya.A., Frolov, P.D., Titov, V.V., Latyshev, A.V., Tesakov, A.S., and Trifonov, V.G., Recent data in Late Quaternary folding on the Taman Peninsula, Krasnodar Krai, Mater. LI Tekton. soveshch. “Problemy tektoniki kontinentov i okeanov” (Proc. LI Tectonic Conf. “Problems of Tectonics of Continents and Oceans”), Moscow: GEOS, 2019, vol. 1, pp. 131–135.

  10. Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M., and Ogg, G., The Geologic Time scale 2012, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA), Division V, and Working Group 8, The 9th-generation international geomagnetic reference field international, Geophys. J. Int., 2003, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 1051–1056. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2003.02102.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ismagilov, D.F., Kozlov, V.N., Popkov, V.I., and Terekhov, A.A., Geologicheskoe stroenie Kerchensko-Tamansogo shel’fa (po dannym seismorazvedki MOGT) (Geological Structure of the Kerch-Taman Shelf (Based on Seismic Survey Data of the CDP Method)), Stavropol: Severo-Kavkazskii Gosudarstvennyi tekhnicheskii universitet, 2002.

  13. Jasonov, P.G., Nurgaliev, D.K., Burov, B.V., and Heller, F., A modernized coercivity spectrometer, Geol.Carpathica, 1998, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 224–226.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khramov, A.N., Goncharov, G.I., Komissarova, R.A., Pisarevskii, S.A., Pogarskaya, I.A., Rzhevskii, Yu.S., Rodionov, V.P., Slautsitais, I.P., Paleomagnitologiya (Paleomagnetology), Khramov, A.N., Ed., Leningrad: Nedra, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kirschvink, J.L., The least-squares line and plane and the analysis of paleomagnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 1980, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 699–718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Laskar, J., Robutel, P., Joutel, F., Gastineau, M., Correia, A.C.M., and Levrard, B., A long-term numerical solution for the insolation quantities of the Earth, Astron. Astrophys., 2004, vol. 428, pp. 261–285. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20041335

  17. Lowrie, W., Identification of ferromagnetic minerals in a rock by coercitivity and unblocking temperature properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 1990, vol. 17, no 2, pp. 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Maxbauer, D.P., Feinberg, J.M., and Fox, D.L. MAX UnMix: A web application for unmixing magnetic coercivity distributions, Comput. Geosci., 2016, vol. 95, pp. 140–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nevesskaya, L.A., Goncharova, I.A., Il’ina, L.B., Voronina, A.A., Bagdasaryan, K.G., and Babak, E.V., History of neogene mollusks of the Paratethys, in Trudy Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, tom 220 (Trans. Paleontol. Inst. Akad. Sci. USSR, vol. 220), Rozanov, A.Yu., Ed., Moscow: Nauka, 1986.

  20. Opdyke, M.D. and Channell, J.E.T., Magnetic Stratigraphy, San Diego: Academic Press,1996.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Palcu, D.V., Vasiliev, I., Stoica, M., and Krijgsman, W., The end of the Great Khersonian Drying of Eurasia: Magnetostratigraphic dating of the Maeotian transgression in the Eastern Paratethys, Basin Res., 2019, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 33–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/bre.12307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Palcu, D.V., Patina, I.S., Șandric, I., Lazarev, S., Vasiliev, I., Stoica, M., and Krijgsman, W., Late Miocene megalake regressions in Eurasia, Sci. Rep., 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, Article ID 11471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91001-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pevzner, M.A. and Chikovani, V.A., Paleomagnetic studies of the Upper Miocene and Lower Pliocene marine deposits of the Taman peninsula, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Geology, 1978, no. 8, pp. 61–66.

  24. Pilipenko, O.V. and Trubikhin, V.M., Petromagnetic and magnetostratigraphic studies of the upper Sarmatian deposits of the Popov Kamen reference section (Taman peninsula), Vestn. KRAUNTs, Nauki Zemle, 2014, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pilipenko, O.V., Trubikhin, V.M., Rostovtseva, Yu.V., Rybkina, A.I., and Filina, E.V., Magnetostratigraphic studies of the upper Sarmatian-Lower Maeotian deposits of the Cape Panagia section (Taman peninsula), Bull. Kamchatka Reg. Assoc. “Educ.-Sci. Cent.”. Earth Sci., 2019, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31431/1816-5524-2019-2-42-67-76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pilipenko, O.V., Salnaya, N.V., Rostovtseva, Yu.V., and Novruzov, Z., Rock-magnetic studies of the Tarkhanian sediments in Kop-Takyl section (the Kerch peninsula), Russ. J. Earth Sci., 2021, vol. 21, Article ID ES2005. https://doi.org/10.2205/2021ES000765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Popov, S.V., Rostovtseva, Y.V., Fillippova, N.Y., Golovina, L.A., Radionova, E.P., Goncharova, I.A., Vernyhorova, Yu.V., Dykan, N.I., Pinchuk, T.N., Iljina, L.B., Koromyslova, A.V., Kozyrenko, T.M., Nikolaeva, I.A. and Viskova, L.A., Paleontology and stratigraphy of the Middle–Upper Miocene of the Taman Peninsula: Part 1. Description of key sections and benthic fossil groups, Paleontol. J., 2016, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1039–1206. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0031030116100014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Radionova, E.P., Golovina, L.A., Filippova, N.Yu., Trubikhin, V.M., Popov, S.V., Goncharova, I.A., Vernigorova, Yu.V. and Pinchuk, T.N., Middle-Upper Miocene stratigraphy of the Taman Peninsula, Eastern Paratethys, Cent. Eur. J. Geosci., 2012, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 188–204.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Raffi, I., Wade, B.S., Pälike, H., Beu, A.G., Cooper, R., Crundwell, M.P., Krijgsman, W., Moore, T., Raine, I., Sardella, R., and Vernyhorova, Y.V., The Neogene period, Ch. 29 of Geologic Time Scale 2020, vol. 2, Gradstein, F.M., Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D. and Ogg, G.M., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2020, pp.1141–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-824360-2.00029-2

  30. Rostovtseva, Yu.V., Lower Meotian facies of the Taman trough, Lithol. Miner. Resour., 2009, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rostovtseva, Yu.V., Sedimentogenesis in the Middle and Late Miocene basins of the Eastern Paratethys, Doctoral (Geol.-Mineral.) Dissertation, Moscow: Moscow State Univ., 2012, p. 371.

  32. Rostovtseva, Yu.V. and Parfenova, O.V., Middle-upper Miocene volcanic ashes of the Kerch-Taman region, Lithol. Miner. Resour., 2006, vol.41, no. 5, pp. 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0024490206050051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rostovtseva, Yu.V. and Rybkina, A.I., Cyclostratigraphy of Pontian deposits of the Eastern Paratethys (Zheleznyi Rog Section, Taman), Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull., 2014, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 236–241. doi 10.3103 / S0145875214040103

  34. Rostovtseva, Yu.V. and Rybkina, A.I., The Messinian event in the Paratethys: Astronomical tuning of the Black Sea Pontian, Mar. Pet. Geol., 2017, vol. 80, pp. 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2016.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rostovtseva, Yu.V., Radionova, E.P., and Popov, S.V., Detalied correlation of the Taman sections, Paleontol. J., 2016, vol. 50, no. 10, pp. 1160–1163.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rostovtseva, Yu.V., Rybkina, A.I., and Filina, E.V., The Sarmatian-Maeotian transition in Eastern Paratethys, Abstracts, PRIDE-RCMNS Conf. 2018 Ecosystem Isolation and Connection: Rise and Demise of Biota in the Pontocaspian-Caucasian Region, Tbilisi, 2018, Tbilisi: Georgian Natl. Mus., 2018, p. 29.

  37. Rybkina, A.I. and Rostovtseva, Yu.V., Astronomically-tuned cyclicity in Upper Maeotian deposits of the eastern paratethys (Zheleznyi Rog section, Taman), Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull., 2014, vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 341–346. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875214050081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rybkina, A.I., Kern, A.K., and Rostovtseva, Y.V., New evidence of the age of the lower Maeotian substage of the Eastern Paratethys 511 based on astronomical cycles, Sediment. Geol., 2015, vol. 330, pp. 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2015.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Slivinskaya, G.V., Results of palaeomagnetic studies of the upper Miocene deposits of Cape Panagia (Taman Peninsula), Geofiz. Zh., 2009, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 124–131.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Stratigraficheskii kodeks Rossii (Stratigraphic Code of Russia), Zhamoida, A.I., Ed., 3d ed., St. Petersburg: VSEGEI, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Trubikhin, V.M. and Pilipenko, O.V., Rock magnetism and palaeomagnetism of the Maeotian deposits of the Popov Kamen reference section (Taman Peninsula), Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2011, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vasiliev, I., Iosifidi, A.G., Khramov, A.N., Krijgsman, W., Kuiper, K., Langereis, C.G., Popov, V.V., Stoica, M., Tomsha, V.A., and Yudin, S.V., Magneto-stratigraphy and radio-isotope dating of upper Miocene-lower Pliocene sedimentary successions of the Black Sea Basin (Taman Peninsula, Russia), Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 2011, vol. 310, no.3-4, pp. 163−175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zijderveld, J.D.A., Demagnetization of rocks: analysis of results, in Methods in Palaeomagnetism, Collinson, D.W., Creer, K.M., and Runcorn, S.K., Eds., vol. 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1967, pp. 254−286.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to project leader A.I. Rybkina for organizing the field work and providing comprehensive support for the studies, D.M. Kuzina and V.V. Antonenko for their help in conducting measurements with the coercivity spectrometer at the Laboratory of Palaeomagnetism of Kazan Federal University.

Funding

This work was carried out at the Center for the Collective Use of Research Equipment of the Institute of Physics of the Earth (RAS) “Petrophysics, Geomechanics, and Palaeomagnetism” and the Geological Institute (RAS) under the sponsorship of the Russian Science Foundation, Grant no. 19-77-10075.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Salnaia.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salnaia, N.V., Rostovtseva, Y.V., Pilipenko, O.V. et al. Palaeomagnetism of the Sarmatian-Maeotian of the Eastern Paratethys: Remagnetization or Not?. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 58, 882–901 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351322060118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351322060118

Keywords:

Navigation