Skip to main content
Log in

Time Variations in the Parameters of Dynamic Systems of Geodeformation Processes

  • Published:
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The variability of a correlation dimension parameter of geophysical fields is studied in the tectonically active region of the Parkfield segment of the San-Andreas Fault in 1990–2017 based on understanding a deformation process in the lithosphere as the evolution of a complex dynamic system. The time variability of the correlation dimension is estimated from the long time series of the borehole observations of volumetric strains, creep, and seismicity. The \({{d}_{2}}\) estimate of the volumetric strain field on short time scales (discretization interval \(dt \leqslant 1\) h) indicates a local character of the behavior of a high-dimensional dynamic system, which is different at the considered observation points. At the same time, the variability of \({{d}_{2}}\) on the longer observation scales is largely governed by the main common factor—the change in the regime of deformation activity due to the Parkfield earthquake with \(M = 6.0.\) The dynamic system of fault-slip displacements has a diverse response to the earthquake on longer time scales (\(dt \geqslant 12\) h). The seismicity data for the analysis are the cumulative time series of earthquakes’ energies to power 1/3. Based on the model of the time series with the known time density of the event flow, the time behavior of \({{d}_{2}}\) in a moving window of a variable time scale was compared with the behavior in a window of a constant time scale. The decrease in the correlation dimension of the dynamic system during aftershock activation on shorter scales (\(dt\) < 0.5 h) repeats the characteristic behavior of the b-value (the slope of the frequency–magnitude relationship of the earthquakes). The \({{d}_{2}}\) estimate of the seismic parameter on longer time scales (\(dt = 24\) h) shows the growth of the dimension of the dynamic system on the time segment containing the time of the earthquake. This behavior may suggest that the dynamic system vigorously varies on the longer time scales. The results of this work can be used for studying the evolution of the stress–strain state of the geological medium and for developing the approaches, methods, and algorithms of nonlinear dynamics for analyzing the geophysical fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aki, K., Maximum likelihood estimate of b in the formula logN = abM and its confidence limits, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo, 1965, vol. 43, pp. 237–239.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anishchenko, V.S., Astakhov, V.V., Vadivasova, T.E., Neiman, A.B., Strelkova, G.I., and Shimanskii-Gaier, L., Nelineinye effekty v khaoticheskikh i stokhasticheskikh sistemakh (Nonlinear Effects in Chaotic and Stochastic Systems), Moscow–Izhevsk: Inst. komp’yut. issled., 2003.

  3. Bakun, W.H. and Lindh, A.G., The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment, Science, 1985, vol. 229, pp. 619–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cherepantsev, A.S., The time variations in the parameters of the volumetric strain response to the tidal and baric impacts, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2016, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 590–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cherepantsev, A.S., Characteristics of a dynamic system of geophysical fields on different time scales, Izv., Phys. Solid Earth, 2019, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 403–419.

  6. Grassberger, P. and Procaccia, I., On the characterization of strange attractors, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1983, vol. 50, pp. 346–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, R.A. and Segall, P., Detection of a locked zone at depth on the Parkfield, California, segment of the San Andreas fault, J. Geophys. Res., 1987, vol. 92, pp. 7945–7962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johanson, I.A., Fielding, E.J., Rolandone, F., and Burgmann, R., Coseismic and postseismic slip of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake from space-geodetic data, 2006, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., vol. 96, no. 4B, pp. 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kagan, Y.Y., Observational evidence for earthquake as a nonlinear dynamic process, Phys. D (Amsterdam, Neth.), 1994, vol. 77, pp. 160–192.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keilis-Borok, V.I. and Soloviev, A.A., Nonlinear Dynamics of the Lithosphere and Earthquake Prediction, Heidelberg: Springer, 2003, pp. 208–237.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Langbein, J., Borcherdt, R., Dreger, D., Fletcher, J., Hardebeck, J.L., Hellweg, M., Ji, C., Johnston, M., Murray, J.R., and Nadeau, R., Preliminary report on the 28 September 2004, M 6.0 Parkfield, California earthquake, Seismol. Res. Lett., 2005, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 10–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Levin, B.R., Teoreticheskie osnovy statisticheskoi radiotekhniki, kniga 1 (Theory of Statistical Radio Engineering, book 1), Moscow: Radio i svyaz', 1989.

  13. Lisowski, M. and Prescott, W., Short-range distance measurements along San Andreas fault system in Central California, 1975 to 1979, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 1981, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 1607–1624.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marone, C.J., Scholtz, C.H., and Bilham, R., On the mechanics of earthquake afterslip, J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 1991, vol. 96, no. B5, pp. 8441–8452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Obara, K., Nonvolcanic deep tremor associated with subduction in southwest Japan, Science, 2002, vol. 296, pp. 1679–1681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Prescott, W., Hodgkinson, K., Neuhauser, D., Silverman, S., Stites, P., and Zuzlewski, S., Access to strain and other low frequency geophysical observations, EarthScope Workshop: Making and Breaking a Continent, Snowbird, Utah, 2001.

  17. Sadovskii, M.A., Pisarenko, V.F., and Shteinberg, V.V., On the dependence of earthquake energy on the volume of seismic source, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1983, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 598–602.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schuster, G., Deterministic Chaos: An Introduction, Weinheim: Physik, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Serebryannikov, M.G. and Pervozvanskii, A.A., Vyyavlenie skrytykh periodichnostei (Detection of Hidden Periodicities), Moscow: Nauka, 1965.

  20. Shelly, D.R., Migrating tremors illuminate complex deformation beneath the seismogenic San Andreas fault, Nature, 2010, vol. 463, no. 7281, pp. 648–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Titus, S.J., DeMets, C., and Tikoff, B., Thirty five year creep rates for the creeping segment of the San Andreas Fault and the effects of the 2004 Parkfield earthquake: constraints from alignment arrays, continuous global positioning system, and creepmeters, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 2006, vol. 96, no. 4B, pp. 250–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Turcotte, D.L., Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Utsu, T., A statistical significance test of the difference in b-value between two earthquake groups, J. Phys. Earth, 1966, vol. 14, pp. 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The waveform data, metadata, and data products for this study were accessed through the Northern California Earthquake Data Center (NCEDC), doi 10.7932/NCEDC.

Funding

The work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 17-05-00185-a).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Cherepantsev.

Additional information

Translated by M. Nazarenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cherepantsev, A.S. Time Variations in the Parameters of Dynamic Systems of Geodeformation Processes. Izv., Phys. Solid Earth 55, 420–438 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351319030121

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351319030121

Keywords:

Navigation