Skip to main content
Log in

Synthesis, Cytotoxic, and Antibacterial Evaluation of C-12 Substituted Ocotillol-type Derivatives

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A novel series of ocotillol-type triterpenoid derivatives have been synthesized to evaluate for their antibacterial activity, structure-activity relationships (SARs), and antibacterial mechanism. Compound (Vl), which were found to be the most active one, displayed good antibacterial activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 2–8 μg/mL against Gram+ bacteria and 8–32 μg/mL against Gram– bacteria. Further testing against drug-resistant bacteria also showed that (Vk) and (Vl) exhibited potent antibacterial activity with MICs of 4–32 μg/mL against MRSA and K. pneumonia. The following synergistic antibacterial activity revealed that compound (Vl) significantly improved the susceptibility of MRSA USA300 and E.coli DH5α to kanamycin and chloramphenicol. Further research suggested that (Vl) displayed obvious bactericidal activity against MRSA at 2 MIC while it only showed bacteriostatic effects at MIC. This active molecule (Vl) also induced bacterial resistance more slowly than norfloxacin and chloramphenicol. Moreover, compound (Vl) not only had low toxicity, but also could rapidly inhibit the growth of drug-resistant bacteria by damaging cell membranes, and the incidence of drug resistance was obviously lower than that of positive control group. Additionally, the properties of absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of these compounds demonstrated their drug-likeness with moderate oral absorption and blood-brain barrier permeability. Preliminary in vivo results also confirmed that (Vl) could reduce the number of viable colonies in the infected cornea at a high concentration (3.2 mg/mL). These results suggested that ocotillol-type triterpenoid derivatives represent as potential leads for the development of antibacterial agents against antibiotic-resistant superbugs and deserve further attention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Scheme 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Aslam, B., Wang, W., Arshad, M.I., Khurshid, M., Muzammil, S., Rasool, M.H., Nisar, M.A., Alvi, R.F., Aslam, M.A., Qamar, M.U., Salamat, M.K.F., and Baloch, Z., Infect. Drug Resist., 2018, vol. 11, pp. 1645–1658. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S173867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashwath, P. and Sannejal, A.D., Curr. Gene Ther., 2022, vol. 22, pp. 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2174/1566523221666210419084836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou, Z.W., Ma, C., Zhang, H.Y., Bi, Y., Chen, X., Meng, Q.G., and Xu, J.Y., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2013, vol. 68, pp. 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bi, Y., Yang, X., Zhang, T.T., Liu, Z.Y., Zhang, X.C., Lu, J., Cheng, K.G., Xu, J.Y., Wang, H.B., Lv, G.Y., Lewis, P.J., and Meng, Q.G., Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2015, vol. 101, pp. 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cao, Y.C., Wang, K.Y., Xu, S., Kong, L.T., Bi, Y., and Li, X.P., Molecules, 2020, vol. 25, pp. 5562–5571. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang, Z.Y., Zeng, X.M., Zhang, S.Y., Zhou, Y.Y., and Zhou, Z.W., Mol. Divers., 2022, vol. 26, pp. 2103–2120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11030-021-10318-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bi, Y., Ma, C., Zhang, H.Y., Zhou, Z.W., Yang, J., Zhang, Z.L., Meng, Q.G., and Xu, J.Y., Chem. Boil. Drug Des., 2014, vol. 84, pp. 489–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.12337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Z.Y., Chen, Z.G., Zhang, S.Y., Shao, X., and Zhou, Z.W., Fitoterapia, 2020, vol. 144, pp. 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2020.104597

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shao, X., Zhang, S.Y., Zhou, Y.Y., Zeng, X.M., and Zhou, Z.W., J. Indian Chem. Soc., 2020, vol. 97, pp. 27–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Spivak, A.Y., Khalitova, R.R., Nedopekina, D.A., and Gubaidullin, R.R., Steroids, 2020, vol. 154, pp. 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2019.108530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu, L.Z., Zhu, L., Zheng, K., Liu, J.L., Tian, P.P., Hu, D., Wang, Q.Q., and Zuo, Q.Y., J. Mater. Chem. B, 2021, vol. 13, pp. 3068–3078. https://doi.org/10.1039/d1tb00127b

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin, J.W., He, H., Zhang, X.Y., Wu, R.H., Gan, L., Li, D.L., Liu, Y.J., and Zhang, K, Bioorg. Chem., 2021, vol. 113, pp. 104981–104995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.104981

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan, B.C.L., Ip, M., Gong, H., Lui, S.L., and See, R.H., Phytomedicine, 2013, vol. 20, pp. 611–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2013.02.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipinski, C.A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B.W., and Feeney, P.J., Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev., 2001, vol. 23, pp. 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Haar, E., Coll, J.T., Austen, D.A., Hsiao, H.M., Swenson, L., and Jain, J., Nat. Struct. Biol., 2009, vol. 8, pp. 593–602. https://doi.org/10.1038/89624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pettersen, E.F., Goddard, T.D., and Huang, C.C., J. Comput. Chem., 2004, vol. 25, pp. 1605–1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Camp, D., Garavelas, A., and Campitelli, M., J. Nat. Prod., 2015, vol. 78, pp. 1370–1382. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Melzig, M.F., Bader, G., and Loose, R., Planta Med., 2001, vol. 67, pp. 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-10632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bajpai, V.K., Sharma, A., and Baek, K.H., Food Control, 2013, vol. 32, pp. 582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.01.032

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Health commission of Hubei Province scientific research project (grant number WJ2019H534) and Medical and health research project of Yichang (A20-2-056).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Authors HZ and ZZh designed the experiments. Authors JL and XZ synthesized the derivatives and carried out their NMR analysis. Author SW completed pharmacological analysis and data processing. Authors JL, HZ, and ZZ contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors participated in the discussions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Huili Zhang or Zhiwen Zhou.

Ethics declarations

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This article does not contain any studies involving animals or human participants performed by any of the authors. Informed consent was not required for this article. No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note. Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, J., Zhang, X., Wang, S. et al. Synthesis, Cytotoxic, and Antibacterial Evaluation of C-12 Substituted Ocotillol-type Derivatives. Russ J Bioorg Chem 49, 1452–1466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162023060249

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1068162023060249

Keywords:

Navigation