Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Responses of Above-ground Biomass, Plant Diversity, and Dominant Species to Habitat Change in a Freshwater Wetland of Northeast China

  • Published:
Russian Journal of Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

Habitat change is one of the most important driving forces of biodiversity loss and vegetation distribution in freshwater wetland. Research on the responses of plant diversity and community structure to habitat change is essential to biodiversity conservation. In this study, we demonstrated responses of the above-ground biomass, plant diversity, and dominant species to the habitat change in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China. Different plant diversity indicators, including the species richness, Shannon-Wiener index, and Simpson index were selected to study their sensitivities to the habitat change. The dominant species, Deyeuxia angustifolia (Kom.) Y.L. Chang, Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh, Carex pseudocuraica Fr. Schmidt and Glyceria spiculosa (Schmidt.) Roshev, were selected to illustrate their vulnerabilities to the habitat change at the population level. Besides, the relationships between water level and traits of dominant species were investigated. When the habitat changed from marsh to meadow, the above-ground biomass increased and a corresponding plant diversity loss occurred. In addition, C. lasiocarpa, C. pseudo-curaica, and G. spiculosa had higher importance values in the marsh than that in the meadow, which were contrary to that of D. angustifolia. Overall, plant diversity and community structure had significant vulnerabilities to habitat change, and habitat protection is of great importance in biodiversity conservation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Mace, G.M., Norris, K., and Fitter, A.H., Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multilayered relationship, Trends Ecol Evol., 2011, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pascual, M., Pérez Miñana, E., and Giacomello, E., Integrating knowledge on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Mind-mapping and Bayesian network modelling, Ecosyst. Serv., 2016, vol. 17, pp. 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Bello, F.D., Lavorel, S., Diaz, S., et al., Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits, Biodivers. Conserv., 2010, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 2873–2893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liquete, C., Gid, N., Lanzanova, D., et al., Perspectives on the link between ecosystem services and biodiversity: The assessment of the nursery function, Ecol. Indic., 2016, vol. 63, pp. 249–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasaki, T. and Lauenroth, W.K., Dominant species, rather than diversity, regulates temporal stability of plant communities, Oecologia, 2011, vol. 166, no. 3, pp. 761–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Huston, M.A. and Wolverton, S., The global distribution of net primary production: Resolving the paradox, Ecol. Monogr., 2009, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 343–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kerns, B.K. and Ager, A., Risk assessment for biodiversity conservation planning in Pacific Northwest forests, For. Ecol. Manag., 2007, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dana, G.V., Kapuscinski, A.R., and Donaldson, J.S., Integrating diverse scientific and practitioner knowledge in ecological risk analysis: A case study of biodiversity risk assessment in South Africa, J. Environ. Manage., 2012, vol. 98, 134–146.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Humbert, J.Y., Dwyer, J.M., Andrey, A., and Ariettaz, R., Impacts of nitrogen addition on plant biodiversity in mountain grasslands depend on dose, application duration and climate: A systematic review, Glob. Change Biol., 2016, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Todd, M.J., Muneepeerakul, R., Pumo, D., et al., Hydrological drivers of wetland vegetation community distribution within Everglades National Park, Florida, Adv. Water Resour., 2010, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1279–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Royan, A., Hanna, D.M., Reynolds, J., et al., River birds’ response to hydrological extremes: New vulnerability index and conservation implications, Biol. Conserv., 2014, vol. 177, pp, 64–73.

  12. Temesgen, H.W., Shi, X., Yirsaw, E. Bekele, B., and Kindu, M., Variation in ecosystem service values in an agroforestry dominated landscape in Ethiopia: Implications for land use and conservation policy, Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Panel, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Biodiversity Synthesis, Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2005, pp. 77–101.

  14. Souza, D.M., Teixeira, R.F.M., and Ostermann, O.P., Assessing biodiversity loss due to land use with Life Cycle Assessment: Are we there yet?, Glob. Change Biol., 2015, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pimm, S.L., Jenkins, C.N., Abel, R., et al., The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection, Science, 2014, vol. 344, no. 6187, 1246752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Campagnaro, T., Trentanovi, G., and Sitzia, T., Identifying habitat type conservation priorities under the habitats directive: Application to two Italian biogeographical regions, Sustainability, 2018, vol. 10, no. 4, 1189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Munns, W.R., Jr., Rea, A.W., Suter, G.W. 2nd, et al., Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment, Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag., 2016, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 522–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nienstedt, K.M., Brock, Th., Wensem, J., et al., Developing specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides using an ecosystem services approach, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2011, vol. 415, no. 2, pp. 31–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Giam, X., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Tan, H.T.W., et al., Future habitat loss and the conservation of plant biodiversity, Biol. Conserv., 2010, vol. 143, no. 7, pp. 1594–1602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alofs, K.M., Gonzalez, A.V., and Fowler, N.L., Local native plant diversity responds to habitat loss and fragmentation over different time spans and spatial scales, Plant Ecol., 2014, vol. 215, no. 10, pp. 1139–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Merbach, W., Habitat fragmentation and biodiversity conservation: Key findings and future challenges, Landsc. Ecol., 2016, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 219–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, K., Mires of China, Beijing: Science Press, 1999, pp. 164–166.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Luo, W., Song, F., and Xie, Y., Trade-off between tolerance to drought and tolerance to flooding in three wetland plants, Wetlands, 2008, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 866–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, X., Mao, R., Gong, C., et al., Effects of hydrology and competition on plant growth in a freshwater marsh of northeast China, J. Freshw. Ecol., 2014, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 4942–4954.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, Z., Song, K., Ma, W., et al., Loss and fragmentation of marshes in the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China, 1954–2005, Wetlands, 2011, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 945–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhou, D., Gong, H., Wang, Y., et al., Driving forces for the marsh wetland degradation in the Honghe National Nature Reserve in Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China, Environ. Model. Assess., 2009, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou, D., Gong, H., Wang, Y., et al., Spatial distribution patterns of wetland plants in relation to environmental gradient in the Honghe National Nature Reserve, Northeast China, J. Geogr. Sci., 2012, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Na, X.D., Zhang, S.Q., Kong, B., et al., Effects of Sanjiang Plain land use/cover change on wetland vegetation degradation of Honghe Nature Reserve, J. Arid Land Resour. Environ., 2009, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Liu, H. and Li, Z., Effects of land use/cover change on wetland landscape of Honghe Nature Reserve, Acta Geogr. Sinica, 2007, vol. 2007, no. 11, pp. 1215–1222.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dwire, K.A., Kauffman, J.B., Brookshire, E.N.J., and Baham, J.E., Plant biomass and species composition along an environmental gradient in montane riparian meadows, Oecologia, 2004, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 309–317.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Paillisson, J.M. and Marion, L., Can small water level fluctuations affect the biomass of Nymphaea alba in large lakes?, Aquat. Bot., 2006, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scholte, P., Maximum flood depth characterizes above-ground biomass in African seasonally shallowly flooded grasslands, J. Trop. Ecol., 2007, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shi, F., Cong, Ch., Zhang, X., et al., Plant zonation patterns reflected by the differences in plant growth, biomass partitioning and root traits along a water level gradient among four common vascular plants in freshwater marshes of the Sanjiang Plain, Northeast China, Ecol. Eng., 2015, vol. 81, pp. 158–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wu, G.L. Ren, G.H., Wang, D., et al., Above- and below-ground response to soil water change in an alpine wetland ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China, J. Hydrol., 2013, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 907–911.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mao, R., Chen, H.M., Zhang, X.H., et al., Effects of P addition on plant C:N:P stoichiometry in an N-limited temperate wetland of Northeast China, Sci. Tot. Environ., 2016, vol. 559, pp. 1–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Curran, M., Hellweg, S., and Beck, J., Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?, Ecol. Appl., 2014, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 617–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Davidson, T.A., Mackay, A.W., Wolski, P., et al., Seasonal and spatial hydrological variability drives aquatic biodiversity in a flood-pulsed, sub-tropical wetland, Freshw. Biol., 2012, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 1253–1265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Garssen, A.G., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Voesenek, L.A., et al., Riparian plant community responses to increased flooding: A meta-analysis, Glob. Change Biol., 2015, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2881–2890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lou, Y., Pan, Y., Gao, C., et al., Response of plant height, species richness and aboveground biomass to flooding gradient along vegetation zones in floodplain wetlands, Northeast China, PloS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 4, e0153972.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen, I.C., Hill. J.K., Ohlemüller, R., et al., Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming, Science, 2011, vol. 333, no. 6045, pp. 1024–1026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Harsch, M.A. and Hillerislambers, J., Climate warming and seasonal precipitation change interact to limit species distribution shifts across western North America, PloS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 7, e0159184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. de Baan, L., Mutel, C.L., Curran, M., et al., Land use in life cycle assessment: Global characterization factors based on regional and global potential species extinction, Environ. Sci. Technol., 2013, vol. 47, no. 16, pp. 9281–9290.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Xie, Y., Luo, W., Wang, K., and Ren, B., Root growth dynamics of Deyeuxia angustifolia seedlings in response to water level, Aquat. Bot., 2008, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 292–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Engels, J.G., Rink, F., and Jensen, K., Stress tolerance and biotic interactions determine plant zonation patterns in estuarine marshes during seedling emergence and early establishment, J. Ecol., 2011, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 277–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lou, Y., Lu, X., Wang, G., et al., Vegetative zonation patterns in depression and riparian wetlands of the Sanjiang Plain, Northeastern China, Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2012, vol. 11, no. 2, S159.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was founded by the National Key Research and Development Project (no. 2016YFA0602301), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 41671091, 41471078 and 41871097). Authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Wetland Ecology and Environment, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, 130102, Changchun, China

    Liping Shan, Changchun Song & Xinhou Zhang

  2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

    Liping Shan

  3. Qiqihaer Emission Permits Reserve Center, Qiqihaer, China

    Xianghong Wang

  4. Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China

    Zhaoqing Luan

Authors
  1. Liping Shan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Changchun Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xinhou Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xianghong Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhaoqing Luan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changchun Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liping Shan, Song, C., Zhang, X. et al. Responses of Above-ground Biomass, Plant Diversity, and Dominant Species to Habitat Change in a Freshwater Wetland of Northeast China. Russ J Ecol 51, 57–63 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620010051

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413620010051

Keyword:

Search

Navigation