Skip to main content
Log in

Semi-Paired Multiview Clustering Based on Nonnegative Matrix Factorization

  • COMPUTER METHODS
  • Published:
Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences International Aims and scope

Abstract

As data that have multiple views become widely available, the clusterization of such data based on nonnegative matrix factorization has been attracting greater attention. In the majority of studies, the statement in which all objects have images in all representations is considered. However, this is often not the case in practical problems. To resolve this issue, a novel semi-paired multiview clustering algorithm is proposed. For incomplete data, it is assumed that their views have the same indicator vector, and the paired matrix is introduced. The objects that are close to each other in each view must have identical indicators, which makes regularization and reconstruction of the manifold geometric structure possible. The proposed algorithm can work both with incomplete and complete data having multiple views. The experimental results obtained on four datasets prove its effectiveness compared to other modern algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. L. Wang and S. Chen, “Joint representation classification for collective face recognition,” Pattern Recognit. 63, 182–192 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Scheffer and S. Bickel, “Multi-view clustering,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (IEEE Computer Soc., Washington, DC, 2004), pp. 19–26.

  3. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung, “Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization,” Nature (London, U.K.) 401, 788–791 (1999).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. D. D. Lee and H. S. Seung, “Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000), pp. 535–541.

  5. W. Xu, X. Liu, and Y. Gong, “Document clustering based on non-negative matrix factorization,” in Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Canada, Toronto, 2003, pp. 267–273.

  6. J. Qiang, Y. Li, Y. Yuan, and W. Liu, “Snapshot ensembles of non-negative matrix factorization for stability of topic modelling,” Appl. Intell. 48, 3963–3975 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Vorontsov and A. Potapenko, “Additive regularization of topic models,” Mach. Learning 101, 303–323 (2015).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Y. Sang and D. H. Sun, “Co-clustering over multiple dynamic data streams based on non-negative matrix factorization,” Appl. Intell. 41, 487–502 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Liu, C. Wang, J. Gao, and J. Han, “Multi-view clustering via joint nonnegative matrix factorization,” in Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, Austin, TX, 2013, pp. 252–260.

  10. L. Wang, S. Chen, and Y. Wang, “A unified algorithm for mixed l 2, p-minimizations and its application in feature selection,” Comput. Optimiz. Appl. 58, 409–421 (2014).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Liu, H. Wang, S. Risacher, A. Saykin, and L. Shen, “Multiple incomplete views clustering via non-negative matrix factorization with its application in Alzheimer’s disease analysis,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, Washington, DC, 2018, pp. 1402–1405.

  12. Y. Ling, X. Pan, G. Li, and X. Hu, “Clinical documents clustering based on medication/symptom names using multi-view nonnegative matrix factorization,” IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 14, 500–504 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. M. Kalayeh, H. Idrees, and M. Shah, “NMF-KNN: image annotation using weighted multi-view non-negative matrix factorization,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Columbus, OH, 2014, pp. 184–191.

  14. R. Rad and M. Jamzad, “Image annotation using multi-view non-negative matrix factorization with different number of basis vectors,” J. Visual Commun. Image Repres. 46, 1–12 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. F. Zhong and L. Ma, “Image annotation using multi-view non-negative matrix factorization and semantic co-occurrence,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Region 10 Conference TENCON, Singapore, 2016, pp. 2453–2456.

  16. X. Zhang, H. Gao, G. Li, J. Zhao, J. Huo, J. Yin, Y. Liu, and L. Zheng, “Multi-view clustering based on graph-regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for object recognition,” Inform. Sci. 432, 463–478 (2018).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. W. Shao, L. He, C. Lu, and P. S. Yu, “Online multi-view clustering with incomplete views,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Washington, DC, 2016, pp. 1012–1017.

  18. W. Shao, L. He, C. Lu, X. Wei, and P. S. Yu, “Online unsupervised multi-view feature selection,” in Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Barcelona, Spain, 2016, pp. 1203–1208.

  19. S. T. Roweis and L. K. Saul, “Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding,” Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 290 (5500), 2323–2326 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. B. Tenenbaum, V. de Silva, and J. C. Langford, “A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction,” Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 290 (5500), 2319–2323 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Belkin and P. Niyogi, “Laplacian eigenmaps and spectral techniques for embedding and clustering,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems: Natural and Synthetic, Vancouver, Canada, 2001, pp. 585–591.

  22. L. Tao, H. H. Ip, Y. Wang, and X. Shu, “Low rank approximation with sparse integration of multiple manifolds for data representation,” Appl. Intell. 42, 430–446 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. R. Hadsell, S. Chopra, and Y. LeCun, “Dimensionality reduction by learning an invariant mapping,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New York, 2006, pp. 1735–1742.

  24. D. Cai, X. He, J. Han, and T. S. Huang, “Graph regularized nonnegative matrix factorization for data representation,” IEEE TPAMI 33, 1548–1560 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Zong, X. Zhang, L. Zhao, H. Yu, and Q. Zhao, “Multi-view clustering via multi-manifold regularized non-negative matrix factorization,” Neuron Networks 88, 74–89 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Yang, Y. Gao, L. Cao, M. Yang, and Y. Shi, “mPadal: a joint local-and-global multi-view feature selection method for activity recognition,” Appl. Intell. 41, 776–790 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. H. Zhao, Z. Ding, and Y. Fu, “Multi-view clustering via deep matrix factorization,” in Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, San Francisco, CA, 2017, pp. 2921–2927.

  28. X. Xie and S. Sun, “Multi-view laplacian twin support vector machines,” Appl. Intell. 41, 1059–1068 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. W. Shao, L. He, and S. Y. Philip, Multiple Incomplete Views Clustering via Weighted Nonnegative Matrix Factorization with L 2, 1 Regularization, Vol. 9284 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Ed. by A. Appice, P. Rodrigues, V. Santos Costa, C. Soares, J. Gama, and A. Jorge (Springer, Cham, 2015).

  30. S. Y. Zhi and H. Zhou, “Partial multi-view clustering,” in Proceedings of the 28th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Quebec, Canada, 2014, pp. 1968–1974.

  31. N. Rai, S. Negi, S. Chaudhury, and O. Deshmukh, “Partial multi-view clustering using graph regularized NMF,” in Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Cancun, Mexico, 2016, pp. 2192–2197.

  32. H. Zhao, H. Liu, and Y. Fu, “Incomplete multi-modal visual data grouping,” in Proceedings of the 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, New York, 2016, pp. 2392–2398.

  33. M. Hu and S. Chen, “Doubly aligned incomplete multi-view clustering,” in Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Macao, China, 2018, pp. 2262–2268.

  34. J. Wang, F. Tian, H. Yu, C. H. Liu, K. Zhan, and X. Wang, “Diverse non-negative matrix factorization for multiview data representation,” IEEE Trans. Cybern. 48, 2620–2632 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper was partially supported by the Chinese NUAA funding, project no. NG2019004; NSFC funding, project no. 61703206; and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project no. 19-01-00625.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to X. Chen or I. A. Matveev.

Additional information

Translated by A. Klimontovich

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, X., Chen, X., Matveev, I.A. et al. Semi-Paired Multiview Clustering Based on Nonnegative Matrix Factorization. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. Int. 58, 579–594 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230719040117

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064230719040117

Navigation