Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of Soil Extractants and Spectral Reflectance Measurement for Estimation of Available Soil Potassium in Some Ethiopian Soils

  • SOIL CHEMISTRY
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract—

A study was conducted with the purpose of comparing the efficiency of ammonium acetate (NH4OAc), Mehlich 3 (M-3), Calcium Chloride (CaCl2) and alpha MIR spectroscopy measurement, for the determination of available potassium (K) on 58 Ethiopian agricultural soils. Four soil reference groups were sampled for the study. The NH4OAc extractant was used as standard method against which K values estimated by other methods were compared. Results showed that generally highly significant correlations existed among all the methods used for available K extraction. The coefficients of determination (R2) values between NH4OAc method and the other methods were 0.90 (M-3), 0.70 (CaCl2), and 0.37(spectral). A statistically poor relationship (R2 = 0.07) was found between CaCl2 and spectral methods. On an average, the K extracted by M-3 and CaCl2 amounted to 106 and 49% of NH4OAc K, respectively while the spectral method detected 196% of the NH4OAc K. The highly significant correlation between different soil extraction methods indicated that any of the methods can be used to accurately predict the concentration of available K in the soil. The correlations between K concentration estimated by different methods and plant uptake (product of plant K concentration and dry matter yield) of K were the highest with M-3 and the lowest with spectral methods with R2 values of 0.65, 0.64, 0.54 and 0.16 for M-3, NH4OAc, CaCl2 and spectral methods, respectively. It can, therefore, be generalized that the M- 3 is a suitable extractant for K in Ethiopian soils, but further study is recommended to determine how these relationships could be translated to plant K uptake under field condition. Besides, the spectral measurement of K as a soil test method for heterogeneous group of soils warrants further investigation and refinement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. Astatke, T. Mamo, D. Peden, and M. Diedhiou, “Participatory on-farm conservation tillage trial in the Ethiopian highland vertisols: the impact of potassium application on crop yields,” Exp. Agric. 40 (3), 369–379 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. E. Cox, B. C. Joern, S. M. Brouder, and D. Gao, “Plant-available potassium assessment with a modified sodium tetraphenyl-boron method,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63 (4), 902 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Hosseinpour and A. A. S. Sinegani, “Evaluating garlic available potassium with chemical extractants,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35 (15–16), 2147–2159 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. K. Metherell and P. L. Carey, “Monitoring long-term changes in reserve potassium in some Monitoring long-term changes in reserve potassium in some New Zealand soils using a modified sodium tetraphenyl-boron method,” N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 46, 199–213 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Mehlich, “Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15 (12), 1409–1416 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Mengel, and E. A. Kirkby, Principles of Plant Nutrition, 5th ed. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. N. Sharpley, “Effect of soil pH on cation and anion solubility,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 22 (9–10), 827–841(1991).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. R. Hosseinpur and M. Samavati, “Evaluation of chemical extractants for the determination of available potassium,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 39 (9–10), 1559–1570 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. Schneider, “Release and fixation of potassium by a loamy soil as affected by initial water content and potassium status of soil samples,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 48 (2), 263–271 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Swarup and A. N. Ganeshmurthy, “Emerging nutrient deficiencies under intensive cropping systems and remedial measures for sustainable high productivity,” Fertil. News 43 (7), 37–50 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. Swarup, “Emerging soil fertility management issues for sustainable crop production in irrigated systems”, in Long-Term Soil Fertility Management through Integrated Plant Nutrient Supply, Ed. by A. Swarup, (Indian Institute of Soil Science, Bhopal, 1998), pp. 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. Bar-Yosef, H. Magen, A. E. Johnston, and E. A. Kirkby, “Potassium fertilization: paradox or K management dilemma,” Renewable Agric. Food Syst. 30 (2), 115–119 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. H. Abreu, M. Takashi, and A. F. Lavorante, “Relationship between acidity and chemical properties of Brazilian soils,” Sci. Agric. 60 (2), 337–343 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. R. DE Kimpe, M. R. Laverdiere, and Y. A. Martel, “Surface area and exchange capacity of clay in relation to mineralogical composition of gleysolic soils,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 59 (4), 341–347 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Zörb, M. Senbayram, and E. Peiter, “Potassium in agriculture—Status and perspectives,” J. Plant Physiol. 171 (9), (2014).

  16. D. K. Acquaye, “Factors determining the potassium supplying power of soils in Ghana,” in Proceedings of the 10th Colloquium of the International Potash Institute “Potassium in Tropical Crops and Soils,”1973 (International Kali-Institut, Bern, 1974), pp. 51–70.

  17. E. A. Hanlon and G. V. Johnson, “Bray/Kurtz, Mehlich III, AB/D and ammonium acetate extractions of P, K and MG in four Oklahoma soils,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15 (3), 277–294 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. V. A. Haby, M. P. Russelle, and E. O. Skogley, “Testing soil for potassium, calcium and magnesium,” in Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Soil Science Society of America Book Series 3, Ed. by R. L. Westerman (Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, 1991), 181–227.

  19. E. Salomon, “Extraction of soil potassium with 0.01 M calcium chloride compared to official Swedish methods,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 29 (19–20), 2841–2854 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Karltun, T. Mamo, T. Bekele, S. Gameda, and S. Kidanu, Ethiopian Soil Information System towards Improved Fertilizer Recommendations in Ethiopia.Nutrient Indices for Categorization of Fertilizer Blends from Ethio-SIS District Soil Inventory Data (Addis Ababa, 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ethiopian Soils Information System (EthioSIS), Soil Fertility Status and Fertilizer Recommendation Atlas of Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia (Addis Ababa, 2016).

  22. G. J. Michaelson, C. L. Ping, and G. A. Mitchell, “Correlation of Mehlich 3, Bray 1, and ammonium acetate extractable P, K, Ca, and Mg for Alaska agricultural soils,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 18 (9), 1003–1015(1987).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Nachimuthu, Y. Zhang, A. McNeill, S. Mason, M. J. Bell, and M. J. McLaughlin, “Comparison of soil analytical methods for estimating wheat potassium fertilizer requirements in response to contrasting plant K demand in the glasshouse,” Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 1–10 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. H. Cantarella, J. A. Quaggio, B. van Raij, and M. F. De Abreu, “Variability of soil analysis in commercial laboratories: implications for lime and fertilizer recommendations,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 37 (15–20), 2213–2225 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  25. H. Hurni, B. Amare, K. Herweg, B. Portner, and H. Verti, Landscape Transformation and Sustainable Development in Ethiopia Background Information for a Study Tour through Ethiopia (University of Bern, Bern, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. I. Cakmak, “Potassium for better crop production and quality,” Plant Soil 335, 1–2 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  27. I. C. Braunschweigh, “K+ availability in relation to clay content. Results of field experiment,” Potash Rev. 2, 1–8 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. E. Richards and T. E. Bates, “Studies on the potassium-supplying capacities of southern Ontario soils. II. Nitric acid extraction of nonexchangeable K and its availability to crops,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 68 (2), 199–208 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. G. Cobo, G. Dercon, T. Yekeye, L. Chapungu, C. Kadzere, A. Murwira, R. Delve, and G. Cadisch, “Integration of mid-infrared spectroscopy and geostatistics in the assessment of soil spatial variability at landscape level,” Geoderma 158 (3–4), 398–411 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. J. Wang, D. L. Harrell, R. E. Henderson, and P. F. Bell, “Comparison of soil-test extractants for phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium, sodium, zinc, copper, manganese, and iron in Louisiana soils,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 35 (1–2), 145–160 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. J. Wang and A. D. Scott, “Determination of exchangeable potassium in soil using ion-selective electrodes in soil suspensions,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52 (1), 143–150 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Matula and J. Matula, “A relationship between multi-nutrient soil tests (Mehlich 3, ammonium acetate, and water extraction) and bioavailability of nutrients from soils for barley,” Plant, Soil Environ. 55 (4), 173–180 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. P. Bonett, J. H. Camacho-Tamayo, and L. Ramírez-López, “Mid-infrared spectroscopy for the estimation of some soil properties,” Agron. Colomb. 33 (1), 99–106 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. Reeves III, G. McCarty, and T. Mimmo, “The potential of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the determination of carbon inventories in soils,” Dtsch. Med. Wochenschr. 116, 277–284 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. R. Brown and D. Warncke, “Recommended cation tests and measures of cation exchange capacity,” in Recommended Chemical Soil Test Procedures for the North Central Region, Ed. by W. C. Dahnke (Missouri Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, MO, 1988), pp. 15–16.

  36. J. S. Rawat and J. P. Sanwal, “Potassium and its role in sustainable agriculture,” in Potassium Solubilizing Microorganisms for Sustainable Agriculture, Ed. by V. Meena, (Springer, New Delhi, 2016), 235-253.

    Google Scholar 

  37. J. W. Wendt, “Evaluation of the Mehlich 3 soil extractant for upland Malawi soils,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 26 (5–6), 687–702 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. Zbíral and P. Němec, “Comparison of Mehlich 2, Mehlich 3, Cal, Schachtschabel, 0.01 M CaCl2 and Aqua Regia extractants for determination of potassium in soils,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36 (4–6), 795–803 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  39. K. Sardi and G. Fuleky, “Comparison of extractants used for evaluating the bioavailability of soil P and K,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 33 (15–18), 2803–2812 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  40. K. S. Grewal, M. A. Bhat, and D. Tomar, “Comparison of chemical extractants for determination of available potassium,” Int. J. Chem. Stud. 5 (6), 417–423 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. L. Blake, S. Mercik, M. Koerschens, K. W. T. Goulding, S. Stempen, A. Weigel, P. R. Poulton, and D. S. Powlson, “Phosphorus content in soil, uptake by plants and balance in 3 European long-term field experiments,” Plant Soil 216 (1–2), 1–14 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  42. L. Bortolon and C. Gianello, “Simultaneous multielement extraction with the Mehlich-1 solution for Southern Brazilian soils determined by ICP–OES and the effects on the nutrients recommendations to crops,” Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo, 34 (1), 125–132(2010).

    Google Scholar 

  43. L. Horiba, NextGen Project LA-950 for Windows Release 7.01 (Horiba, Kyoto, 2010).

  44. L. J. Janik and J. O. Skjemstad, “Characterization and analysis of soils using mid-infrared partial least-squares. II. Correlations with some laboratory data,” Aust. J. Soil Res. 33 (4), 637–650 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  45. M. G. Walsh and K. D. Shepherd, “Infrared spectroscopy-enabling an evidence-based diagnostic surveillance approach to agricultural and environmental management in developing countries,” Near Infrared Spectrosc. 15, 1–19 (2007).

  46. M. Kozak, M. Stepien, and A. Joarder, “Relationships between available and exchangeable potassium content and other soil properties,” Pol. J. Soil Sci. 38 (2), 179–186 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  47. M. Madaras, M. Koubová, and M. Smatanová, “Long-term effect of low potassium fertilization on its soil fractions,” Plant Soil Environ. 60 (8), 358–363 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Madaras and J. Lipavský, “Interannual dynamics of available potassium in a long-term fertilization experiment,” Plant, Soil Environ. 55 (8), 334–343 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  49. M. S. Woods, Q. M. Ketterings, and F. S. Rossi, “Effectiveness of standard soil tests for assessing potassium availability in sand rootzones,” Soil Sci. 170 (2), 110–119 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  50. M. Zarenia, A. R. Hosseinpur, M. Zarbizadeh, and S. Kiani, “Comparison of ammonium acetate at different concentrations and some extractants for determination of plant-available potassium in different soils of Chahar Mahal and Bakhtiari province in Iran,” Ann. Biol. Res. 4 (7), 165–170 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  51. N. A. Slaton, B. R. Golden, R. E. DeLong, and M. Mozaffari, “Correlation and calibration of soil potassium availability with soybean yield and trifoliate potassium,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 74 (5), 1642 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  52. P. A. Barbagelata, PhD Thesis (Iowa State University, 2006).

  53. S. K. Bansal, R. C. Srinivasa, N. S. Pasricha, and P. Imas, “Potassium dynamics in major benchmark soil series of India under long-term cropping,” in Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of Soil Science (Bangkok, 2002), pp. 1–21.

  54. P. Csathó, “Correlations between two soil extractants and corn leaf potassium contents from Hungarian field trials,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 29 (11–14), 2149–2160 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  55. P. Hinsinger, “Potassium,” in Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Ed. by R. Lal (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2006), pp. 1354–1358.

    Google Scholar 

  56. P. W. Moody and M. J. Bell, “Availability of soil potassium and diagnostic soil tests,” Aust. J. Soil Res. 44 (3), 265–275 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  57. R. A. V. Rossel, D. J. J. Walvoort, A. B. McBratney, L. J. Janik, and J. O. Skjemstad, “Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties,” Geoderma 131 (1–2), 59–75(2006).

    Google Scholar 

  58. R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2017).

    Google Scholar 

  59. S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, and T. R. Ellsworth, “The potassium paradox: Implications for soil fertility, crop production and human health,” Renewable Agric. Food Syst. 29 (1), 3–27 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  60. T. Mamo and C. Richter, “Phosphorus availability studies on ten Ethiopian vertisols,” Agric. Rural Dev. Trop. J. 103 (2), 177–183 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  61. T. Mamo, C. Richter, and B. Heiligtag, “Comparison of extractants for the determination of available phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and sodium in some Ethiopian and German soils,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 27 (9–10), 2197–2212 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  62. V. J. G. Houba, I. Novozamsky, T. M. Lexmond, and J. J. van der Lee, “Applicability of 0.01 M CaCl2 as a single extraction solution for the assessment of the nutrient status of soils and other diagnostic purposes,” Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 21 (19–20), 2281–2290 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  63. V. Römheld and E. S. Kirkby, “Research on potassium in agriculture: needs and prospects,” Plant Soil 335, 155–180 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  64. V. Zebec, D. Rastija, Z. Lončarić, A. Bensa, B. Popović, and V. Ivezić, “Comparison of chemical extraction methods for determination of soil potassium in different soil types,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 1420–1427 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  65. W. Haile and S. Boke, “Response of Irish potato (Solanum tuberosum) to the application of potassium at acidic soils of Chencha, Southern Ethiopia,” Int. J. Agric. Biol. 13 (4), 595–598 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  66. . E. Johnston and K. W. T. Goulding, “The use of plant and soil analysis to predict the potassium supplying capacity of soil,” in Proceedings 22nd Colloquium of the International Potash Institute “Development of K-Fertilizer Recommendations,” Soligorsk, USSR, June 18-23, 1990 (International Potash Institute, Bern, 1990), pp. 177–204

  67. W. T. Pettigrew, “Potassium influences on yield and quality production for maize, wheat, soybean and cotton,” Physiol. Plant. 133 (4), 670–681 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  68. X.-Y. Wang, J.-M. Zhou, C.-W. Du, and X.-Q. Chen, “Potassium fractions in soils as affected by monocalcium phosphate, ammonium sulfate, and potassium chloride application,” Pedosphere 20 (3), 368–377 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Y. Andrist-Rangel, A. C. Edwards, S. Hillier, and I. Öborn, “Long-term K dynamics in organic and conventional mixed cropping systems as related to management and soil properties,” Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 122 (4), 413–426 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Y. C. Agrawal, I. N. McCave, and J. B. Riley, “Laser diffraction size analysis,” in Principles, Methods and Application of Particle Size Analysis, Ed. by J. P. M. Syvitski (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors were grateful to the International Potash Institute (IPI), Israel Chemicals Limited (ICL) and Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA) for financial support. We are also grateful to Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (especially the Pulses program) for providing the lath house for this study. Special thanks go to the late Professor Tekalign Mamo for his contribution in the conduct of the experiment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Transformation Agency (ATA), Addis Ababa, P.O. Box 708, Ethiopia

    M. Demiss

  2. Hawassa University, College of Agriculture, Hawassa, Ethiopia

    M. Demiss & Sh. Beyene

  3. OCP Societe Anonyme, Commercial Representative Office in Addis Ababa, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    S. Kidanu

Authors
  1. M. Demiss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sh. Beyene
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Kidanu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Demiss.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demiss, M., Beyene, S. & Kidanu, S. Comparison of Soil Extractants and Spectral Reflectance Measurement for Estimation of Available Soil Potassium in Some Ethiopian Soils. Eurasian Soil Sc. 53, 1100–1109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320080049

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229320080049

Keywords:

Search

Navigation