Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Characteristics of Recent and Buried Soil Associations in the Desert-Steppe Zone on the Volga-Don Interfluve

  • GENESIS AND GEOGRAPHY OF SOILS
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract—

We studied ancient (27th–26th centuries BC) and recent soil associations of the desert-steppe zone on low and high terraces of the Dzhurak-Sal River and in the interfluve area within the Sal-Manych Ridge (southeast of the East European Plain). Morphological, chemical, and microbiological soil analyses were performed. It has been found out that soil associations formed in the Bronze Age were the most contrast on low terraces and the least contrast in the interfluve areas. Microbial communities in buried and recent soil associations weakly depended on the solonetz process. The total number of three groups of microorganisms–(a) growing on soil agar and using nutrients from a dispersed state, (b) growing on nitrite agar and consuming humus, and (c) growing on a rich medium and decomposing plant residues–is approximately the same within the test plot, but their proportions differ significantly in soils on various landforms. At the same time, the ratios between microorganisms of different trophic groups, corresponding to ancient and present-day climatic conditions, are preserved both in light chestnut soils (Eutric Cambisols (Loamic, Protocalcic)) and in solonetzes (Haplic Solonetz (Loamic, Cutanic, Ochric),

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Chemical analyses were performed in the Common Use Center, Institute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems of Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences.

REFERENCES

  1. E. V. Arinushkina, Manual on the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. V. Blagodatskaya and N. D. Anan’eva, “Assessment of the resistance of soil microbial communities to pollutants,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 29, 1251–1255 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. N. Bolyshev, Origin and Properties of Semidesert Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. F. Bol’shakov and V. M. Borovskii, “Soils and microrelief of the Caspian Lowland,” in Solonchaks of the Trans-Volga Region: Research Data and Design of Irrigation in the Trans-Volga Region (All-Union Lenin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Moscow, 1937), No. 7, pp. 134–169.

  5. K. K. Gedroits, Selected Works, Vol. 1: Soil Colloids and Soil Adsorption Capacity (Sel’khozgiz, Moscow, 1955) [in Russian].

  6. A. N. Gennadiev and T. A. Puzanova, “Holocene evolution of soils and environmental conditions in the lowland part of Kalmykia,” in The Ancient History of the Northern Caspian Region (Kuibyshev, 1990), pp. 71–72.

  7. I. N. Gogolev and I. N. Voloshin, “Diagnostic features and classification principles of solonchak soils,” in Reclamation of Solonchaks (Sel’khozgiz, Moscow, 1968), Part 1, pp. 206–216.

  8. V. A. Demkin, “Paleosols of the southeast of the Russian Plain in the Bronze Age,” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 2, 82–88 (1995).

  9. V. A. Demkin, Paleopedology and Archeology (Pushchino Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. A. Demkin, A. V. Borisov, T. S. Demkina, and S. N. Udal’tsov, “Soil evolution and climate dynamics of the steppe of the southeast of Russian plain in the Eneolithic and Bronze ages (4th–2nd millennium BC),” Izv. Ross. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., No. 1, 46–57 (2012).

  11. V. A. Demkin and I. V. Ivanov, Development of Soils in the Caspian Lowland in the Holocene (Pushchino, 1985) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. A. Demkin and A. V. Lukashov, “Pedogenesis in dry steppes in the Holocene,” Pochvovedenie, No. 6, 5–14 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  13. T.S. Demkina, I.V. Popova, and V.A. Demkin, “Characterization of the microbial communities in the modern and buried under kurgans soils of solonetzic complexes in the dry steppes of the Lower Volga region,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46, 768–777 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931307003X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. G. Zvyagintsev, I. V. Aseeva, I. P. Bab’eva, and T. G. Mirchink, Practical Manual on Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. V. Ivanov, Soil Evolution of the Steppe Zone in the Holocene (Nauka, Moscow, 1992) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. N. Ivanova, “Solonchaks of the chestnut soil zone in the Volga–Ural interfluve,” in Soils of the Complex Plain of Northern Caspian Area and Their Meliorative Characteristic (Nauka, Moscow, 1964), pp. 114–155.

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. N. Ivanova and V. M. Fridland, “Soil complexes of dry steppes and their evolution,” in Improvement of Fodder Resources in the Steppe, Semidesert, and Desert Zones of the USSR (Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow, 1954), pp. 162–190.

    Google Scholar 

  18. I. S. Kaurichev, Soils Science (Kolos, Moscow, 1975) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  19. N. V. Knyzeva, “Soil peptization and activity of Na ions in soil suspensions,” Pochvovedenie, No. 8, 52–60 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  20. V. A. Kovda, Soils of the Caspian Lowland (Academy of Sciences of USSR, Moscow, 1950) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. V. Konyushkova and B. D. Abaturov, “Specific microrelief and soil properties of solonchak complex at the later stages of development of the Caspian Lowland,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 83, 53–79 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. I. N. Lyubimova, V. V. Khan, and I. A. Salpagarova, “Diagnosis of solonetzic process in virgin and agrogenically transformed soils of different regions,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47, 863–872 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. V. Mozharova and K. N. Fedorov, “Evolution of soil mesocombinations on the accumulative-marine plain of the Terek-Kuma Lowland,” Biol. Nauki, No. 2, 132–144 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. V. Novikova and P. G. Kovalivnich, “Correlation between the degrees of salinity and illuviation in solonchak soils of Crimean Sivash Lake,” in Proceedings of All-Russian Scientific-Tehcnical Conf. on Melioration of Solonchaks (Moscow, 1968), pp. 216–227.

  25. A. A. Rode and M. N. Pol’skii, “Soils of the Dzhanybek station,” Tr. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva 56, 3–214 (1961).

  26. Theories and Methods of Soil Physics, Ed. By E. V. Shein and L. O. Karpachevskii (Grif i K, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. Z. Tepper, Microorganisms of Genus Nocardia and Humus Decomposition (Nauka, Moscow, 1976) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. M. Fridland, The Soil Cover Pattern (Mysl’, Moscow, 1972) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  29. N. B. Khitrov, Genesis, Diagnostics, Properties, and Functioning of Clayey Swelling Soils of the Central Cis-Caucasus (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  30. N. B. Khitrov, “The choice of diagnostic criteria to judge the development of the solonetzic process in soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 37, 12–23 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  31. N. B. Khitrov, “The relationship between the soils of solonetzic complexes in the northern Caspian Lowland and the local microtopography,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 38, 237–249 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. E. Khomutova, T. S. Demkina, A. V. Borisov, and I. I. Shishlina, “State of microbial communities in paleosols buried under kurgans of the desert-steppe zone in the Middle Bronze Age (27th–26th centuries BC) in relation to the dynamics of climate humidity,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 50, 229–238 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317020065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. T. E. Khomutova, N. N. Kashirskaya, and V. A. Demkin, “Assessment of the living and total biomass of microbial communities in the background chestnut soil and in the paleosols under burial mounds,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 1373–1380 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. N. P. Chizhikova, I. V. Kovda, A. V. Borisov, and N. I. Shishlina, “The solonetzic process in surface soils and buried paleosols and its reflection in the mineralogical soil memory,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 42, 1179–1189 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J. P. E. Anderson and K. H. Domsch, “A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 10 (3), 215–221 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was performed according to the State Task Scientific Program no. АААА-А18-118013190175-5 Soil Formation under Conditions of Changing Climate and Anthropogenic Impact. Field studies were supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project 17-18-01406.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. S. Demkina.

Additional information

Translated by I. Bel’chenko

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Demkina, T.S., Borisov, A.V. & Khomutova, T.E. Comparative Characteristics of Recent and Buried Soil Associations in the Desert-Steppe Zone on the Volga-Don Interfluve. Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 1321–1332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319110024

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319110024

Keywords:

Navigation