Abstract—
We analyzed the original and most developed environmental legislation of the Netherlands, Germany, the United States, and Canada, as well as the systems of Finland, the Czech Republic, China, the Republic of South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand, which have a number of specific features in terms of the content of chemical elements in soils. We summarized environmental legislation principles and actions in cases of exceeding soil quality standards. Comparing methodologically close legislations, the specificity of calculation of a soil quality standard should be taken into account. The standards for the content of chemical elements are differentiated depending on the properties of soils in Russia, Germany, China, and the Czech Republic; land use is taken into account in Canada, Germany, the Republic of South Africa, China (only for agricultural land), Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Synergism of negative effects on organisms in case of polyelemental contamination is taken into account in the standards of Russia for element pairs Mn + V and Hg + Pb and in the standards of the United States for all substances.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The values of SRCeco are derived from the earlier variants of MPCs [13] using a refined methodology of calculation.
Baseline concentrations are used in the environmental assessment of the areas, where the threshold values are exceeded.
Threshold values are also used to assess the quality of translocated materials and redeposited soils [9, 22].
For some organic pollutants, SQGs are calculated separately for coarse- and fine-textured soils for each land-use zone.
REFERENCES
Yu. N. Vodyanitskii, “Standards for the contents of heavy metals and metalloids in soils,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 321–328 (2012).
O. V. Nesterova, V. G. Tregubova, and V. A. Semal, “Use of regulatory documents for assessing the contamination of soils with heavy metals,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 47, 1161–1166 (2014).
A. I. Syso, “Russian standards for evaluation of soil and fodder quality: problems of use,” in Proceedings of International School of Young Scientists “Ecological Monitoring of the Environment” (Zolotoi Kolos, Novosibirsk, 2016), No. 1, pp. 153–168.
O. V. Chernova and O. V. Beketskaya, “Permissible and background concentrations of pollutants in environmental regulation (heavy metals and other chemical elements),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44, 1008–1017 (2011).
Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Assessment and Management of Contaminated Sites (Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council, Canberra, 1992).
“Bundes-Bodenschutz- und Altlastenverordnung (BBodSchV) vom Juli 12, 1999,” Bundesgesetzblatt 1, (1554).
W. N. Beyer, “Evaluating soil contamination,” U.S. Fish Wildl., Serv., Biol. Rep. 90 (2), (1990).
E. Brand, J. Bogte, B.-J. Baars, P. Janssen, G. Tiesjema, R. van Herwijnen, P. van Vlaardingen, and E. Verbruggen, Proposal for Intervention Values Soil and Groundwater for the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Series of Compounds (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 2012).
C. Carinon, Derivation Methods of Soil Screening Values in Europe. A Review and Evaluation of National Procedures Towards Harmonization (Joint Research Centre of European Commission, Ispra, 2007).
Canadian Council for Ministers for the Environment, Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines, 2018. http://st-ts.ccme.ca/en/index.html.
National Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Environmental Quality Standard for Soils (Ministry of Environmental Protection of China, Beijing, 1995).
S. B. Chen, M. Wang, S. S. Li, Z. Q. Zhao, and W. E, “Overview on current criteria for heavy metals and its hint for the revision of soil environmental quality standards in China,” J. Integr. Agric. 17 (4), 765–774 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61892-6
T. Crommentuijn, D. Sijim, J. de Bruijin, M. van den Hoop, K. van Leeuwen, and E. van de Plassche, “Maximum permissible and negligible concentrations for metals and metalloids in the Netherlands, taking into account background concentrations,” J. Environ. Manage. 60, 121–143 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2000.0354
Framework for the Management of Contaminated Land (Department Environmental Affairs of the Republic of South Africa, Cape Town, 2010).
Assessment Levels for Soil, Sediment and Water (Department of Environment and Conservation, Perth, WA, 2010).
Guidance for Developing Ecological Soil Screening Levels (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1999).
Risk Assessment, Environmental Protection Agency, 2018. https://www.epa.gov/risk.
Environmental Quality Standards for Contaminated Sites, Rationale and Guidance Document (Nova Scotia Environment, Halifax, NS, 2014).
Chinese Environmental Protection Agency of the States (National Soil Environmental Quality Standard of China, Beijing, 1995).
“Government notice: National norms and standards for the remediation of contaminated land and soil quality, Department of Environmental Affairs, National environmental management Waste Act no. 59 of 2008,” Gov. Gaz. Staatskoerant 587 (37603), (2014).
D. Heemsbergen, M. Warne, M. McLaughlin, and R. Kookana, The Australian Methodology to Derive Ecological Investigation Levels in Contaminated Soils: CSIRO Land and Water Science Report 43/09 (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Canberra, 2009).
J. Jarva, Geochemical Baselines in the Assessment of Soil Contamination in Finland (Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo, 2016).
A. Kabata-Pendias and B. Szteke, Trace Elements in Abiotic and Biotic Environments (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015).
J. P. A. Lijzen, A. J. Baars, P. F. Otte, M. G. J. Rikken, F. A. Swartjes, E. M. J. van Verbruggen, and A. P. Wezel, Technical Evaluation of the Intervention Values for Soil/Sediment and Groundwater. Human and Ecotoxicological Risk Assessment and Derivation of Risk Limits for Soil, Aquatic Sediment and Groundwater: RIVM Report 711701 (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, 2001).
Proposed National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health–Evaluation under Section 32 of the Resource Management Act (Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, 2011).
Roadworks—Contaminated Soil Management Procedure (Including Management of Coastal Acid Sulphate Soils, i.e. Coode Island Silt) (Melbourne, 2015).
Soil remediation circular, 2009. http://www.esdat.net.
R. Vácha, M. Sáňka, J. Skála, J. Čechmánková and V. Horváthová, “Soil contamination health risks in Czech proposal of soil protection legislation,” in Environmental Health Risk–Hazardous Factors to Living Species, Ed. by M. Larramendy (InTech Open, London, 2016). https://doi.org/10.5772/62456
E. Wcislo, L. Dlugosz, and M. Korcz, “A human health risk assessment software for facilitating management of urban contaminated sites: a case study: the Massa Site, Tuscany, Italy, human and ecological risk assessment,” Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 11 (5), 1005–1024 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030500257762
L. Yagming and T. Chen, Twenty Years of Research and Development on Soil Pollution and Remediation in China, Ed. by Y. Luo and C. Tu (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6029-8
Funding
This study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation, project no. 17-77-20072.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by D. Konyushkov
Supplementary materials are available for this at doi: 10.1134/S1064229319100107 and are accessible for authorized users.
Supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Semenkov, I.N., Koroleva, T.V. International Environmental Legislation on the Content of Chemical Elements in Soils: Guidelines and Schemes. Eurasian Soil Sc. 52, 1289–1297 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319100107
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229319100107