Skip to main content
Log in

Application of cluster and discriminant analyses to diagnose lithological heterogeneity of the parent material according to its particle-size distribution

  • Genesis and Geography of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Particle-size distribution in soddy-podzolic and light gray forest soils of the Botanical Garden of Kazan Federal University has been studied. The cluster analysis of data on the samples from genetic soil horizons attests to the lithological heterogeneity of the profiles of all the studied soils. It is probable that they are developed from the two-layered sediments with the upper colluvial layer underlain by the alluvial layer. According to the discriminant analysis, the major contribution to the discrimination of colluvial and alluvial layers is that of the fraction >0.25 mm. The results of canonical analysis show that there is only one significant discriminant function that separates alluvial and colluvial sediments on the investigated territory. The discriminant function correlates with the contents of fractions 0.05–0.01, 0.25–0.05, and >0.25 mm. Classification functions making it possible to distinguish between alluvial and colluvial sediments have been calculated. Statistical assessment of particle-size distribution data obtained for the plow horizons on ten plowed fields within the garden indicates that this horizon is formed from colluvial sediments. We conclude that the contents of separate fractions and their ratios cannot be used as a universal criterion of the lithological heterogeneity. However, adequate combination of the cluster and discriminant analyses makes it possible to give a comprehensive assessment of the lithology of soil samples from data on the contents of sand and silt fractions, which considerably increases the information value and reliability of the results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. A. Vorob’eva, Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils (GEOS, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. P. Gradusov, “Cluster analysis of mineralogical and particle-size distribution data on soils developed from homogeneous and heterogeneous substrates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 34, 1200–1210 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. B. P. Gradusov, V. D. Tonkonogov, and D. A. Kaverin, “On the origin of textural differentiation in taiga soils developed from two-layered loamy substrates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 37, 1017–1023 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. A. Dmitriev, “Methods and techniques of division of the objects into two groups,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: Pochvoved., No. 1, 15–19 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. A. Dmitriev, Theoretical and Methodological Problems in Soil Science (GEOS, Moscow, 2001) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. O. P. Ermolaev, M. E. Igonin, A. Yu. Bubnov, and S. V. Pavlova, Landscapes of the Tatarstan Republic (Slovo, Kazan, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. F. R. Zaidelman, A. S. Nikiforova, L. V. Stepantsova, and V. P. Volokhina, “Dark gray soils on two-layered deposits in the north of Tambov Plain: agroecology, properties, and diagnostics,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 459–471 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F. I. Kozlovskii, “Soil individuum and its analysis,” in The Patterns of Spatial Variation in Soil Properties and their Information Statistical Analysis (Nauka, Moscow, 1970), pp. 42–59.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. I. Kozlovskii, Theory of the Soil Cover and Methods for Its Study (GEOS, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. G. Kornilova, A. A. Shinkarev, T. Z. Lygina, and K. G. Giniyatullin, Diagnostics of Lithological Homogeneity of a Soil Profile from Data on Index Elements (Kazan State Univ., Kazan, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu. L. Meshalkina and V. P. Samsonova, Mathematical Statistics in Soil Science (MAKS Press, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. B. G. Rozanov, Soil Morphology (Akademicheskii Proekt, Moscow, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Handbook on Soil Science, Ed. by V. G. Mamontov, N. P. Panov, M. N. Lobanov, and A. M. Belyakov (Print, Volgograd, 2013) [in Russian].

  14. V. O. Targulian and I. V. Vishnevskaya, “Migration of silt and clay particles in the profile of a soddy-podzolic soil,” in Geochemical and Soil Aspects in the Study of Landscapes (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1975), pp. 26–42.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. O. Targulian and L. K. Tselishcheva, “Fissure network in soddy-podzolic soils and illuviation of particles in the profile: macro-and mesomorphological study,” in Micromorphological Diagnostics of Soils and Pedogenetic Processes (Nauka, Moscow, 1983), pp. 33–68.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. D. Tonkonogov, D. A. Kaverin, and I. V. Zaboeva, “Soils on contrasting deposits in the northeast of European Russia,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 37, 221–229 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. T. V. Tursina, “On the genesis and lithological homogeneity of texture-differentiated soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 5–19 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T. V. Tursina, “Approaches to the study of the lithological homogeneity of soil profiles and soil polygenesis,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45, 472–487 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. E. V. Shein, “The particle-size distribution in soils: problems of the methods of study, interpretation of the results, and classification,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 42, 284–291 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. E. V. Shein, L. O. Karpachevskii, and A. V. Dembovetskii, “Translation of soil textural characteristics from national to foreign classification systems,” in Theories and Methods of Soil Physics (Grif i K, Moscow, 2007), pp. 75–78.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elementary Pedogenic Processes: Conceptual Analysis, Characteristics, and Systematics (Nauka, Moscow, 1992) [in Russian].

  22. M. Anda, D. J. Chittleborough, and R. W. Fitzpatrick, “Assessing parent material uniformity of a red and black soil complex in the landscapes,” Catena 78, 142–153 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. I. Barshad, “Chemistry of soil development,” in Chemistry of the Soil (Reinhold, New York, 1965), pp. 1–70.

    Google Scholar 

  24. I. Barshad, “Soil development,” in Chemistry of the Soil (Reinhold, New York, 1955), pp. 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. F. Beshay and A. Sh. Sallam, “Evaluation of some methods for establishing uniformity of profile parent materials,” Arid Land Res. Manage. 9 (1), 63–72 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Cabrera-Martinez, W. G. Harris, V. W. Carlisle, and M. E. Collins, “Evidence for clay translocation in Coastal Plain soils with sandy/loamy boundaries,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 53, 1108–1114 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. R. Drees and L. P. Wilding, “Elemental variability within a sampling units,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 37, 72–87 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. C. Lorz and J. D. Phillips, “Pedo-ecological consequences of lithological discontinuities in soils—examples from Central Europe,” J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169, 573–581 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. M. Mahmoodi, F. Khormali, A. Amini, and S. Ayoubi, “Weathering and soils formation on different parent materials in Golestan Province, Northern Iran,” J. Mt. Sci. 13 (5), 870–881 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. L. D. Norton and G. F. Hall, “Differentiation of lithologically similar soil parent materials,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 409–414 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. M. H. Stolt, J. C. Baker, and T. W. Simpson, “Soillandscape relationships in Virginia: I. Soil variability and parent material uniformity,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 414–421 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. L. T. West, L. P. Wilding, C. R. Stahnke, and C. T. Hallmark, “Calciustolls in Central Texas: I. Parent material uniformity and hillslope effects on carbonate- enriched horizons,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1722–1731 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. P. Wilding and L. R. Drees, “Spatial variability and pedology,” in Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy: Concept and Interactions (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983), pp. 83–116.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. G. Giniyatullin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © K.G. Giniyatullin, A.A. Valeeva, E.V. Smirnova, 2017, published in Pochvovedenie, 2017, No. 8, pp. 946–953.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giniyatullin, K.G., Valeeva, A.A. & Smirnova, E.V. Application of cluster and discriminant analyses to diagnose lithological heterogeneity of the parent material according to its particle-size distribution. Eurasian Soil Sc. 50, 917–924 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931708004X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931708004X

Keywords

Navigation