Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of carbonate pedofeatures of different ages in modern chernozems

  • Mineralogy and Micromorphology of Soils
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbonate pedofeatures of three chernozemic soils developed from loesslike loams in the foreststeppe zone of Lipetsk oblast under fallow plot (Luvic Chernozem (Clayic, Pachic)) and under forest (Calcic Chernozem (Clayic, Pachic)) and in the steppe zone of Dnepropetrovsk oblast (Calcic Chernozem (Episiltic, Endoclayic, Pachic)) were studied in the field and laboratory with the use of a set of methods, including the radiocarbon method, mass spectrometry, and micro- and submicromorphology. The morphological diversity of carbonate pedofeatures in these soils was represented by carbonate veins, coatings, disperse carbonates (carbonate impregnations), soft masses (beloglazka), and concretions. In the forest-steppe soils, disperse carbonates and soft masses were absent. The radiocarbon age of carbonate pedofeatures in the forest-steppe soils varied within a relatively narrow range of 3–4.3 ka cal BP with a tendency for a younger age of carbonate concretions subjected to destruction (geodes). In the steppe chernozem, this range was larger, and the 14C ages of different forms of carbonate pedofeatures were different. Thus, soft masses (beloglazka) had the age of 5.5–6 ka cal BP; disperse carbonates, 17.5–18.5 ka cal BP; and hard carbonate concretions, 26–27 ka cal BP. Data on δ13C demonstrated that the isotopic composition of carbon in virtually all the “nonlabile” carbonate pedofeatures does not correspond to the isotopic composition of carbon of the modern soil organic matter. It was shown that the studied chernozemic soils are polygenetic formations containing carbonate pedofeatures of different ages: (a) recent (currently growing), (b) relict, and (c) inherited pedofeatures. The latter group represents complex pedofeatures that include ancient fragments integrated in younger pedofeatures, e.g., the Holocene soft carbonate nodules with inclusions of fragments of the ancient microcodium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. M. Alifanov, L. A. Gugalinskaya, and Yu. A. Ovchinnikov, Paleocryogenesis and Diversity of Soils in the Center of East European Plain (GEOS, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. V. Arinushkina, Manual on the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. S. Bazykina and S. V. Ovechkin, “Migration-mycelial chernozems of Kursk oblast in climatic and biosphere cycles,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 70, 3–17 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. A. Belova and A. P. Travleev, Natural Forests and Steppe Soils: Ecology, Micromorphology, and Genesis (Dnepropetrovsk State Univ., Dnepropetrovsk, 1999) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. V. V. Dobrovol’skii, “Carbonate concentrations in soils and parent materials of the central chernozemic region,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 31–42 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. L. Shishov, V. D. Tonkonogov, I. I. Lebedeva, and M. I. Gerasimova, Classification and Diagnostic System of Russian Soils (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2004) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. I. I. Lebedeva, “Humus and carbonate accumulations as diagnostic criteria in chernozems of Eastern Europe,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 68, 3–18 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. I. Lebedeva and S. V. Ovechkin, “Carbonate profile of East European chernozems,” in Soil Science: Aspects, Problems, and Solutions (Dokuchaev Soil Science Inst., Moscow, 2003), pp. 56–83.

    Google Scholar 

  9. A. V. Makedonov, Modern Concretions in Sediments and Soils and Their Geographical Distribution (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. I. Nikolaev, P. Yakumin, A. L. Aleksandrovskii, et al., Human Environment in the Holocene According to the Isotope-Geochemical and Soil-Archeological Studies in European Russia (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2002) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. V. Ovechkin and G. S. Bazykina, “The carbonate profile and water regime of migrational-mycelial chernozems in different ecosystems of Kursk oblast,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 44 (12), 1352–1363 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. T. V. Prokof’eva, T. I. Malysheva, and Yu. E. Alekseev, Zonal Practice in Soil Science. Route Description (Oikumena, Smolensk, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guide of Scientific Excursions of the XII International Symposium and Open Seminar on Paleosoil Science “Paleosols, Pedosediments, and Relief as the Archives of Environmental Conditions,” Kursk and Voronezh Oblasts, Russia, August 10–15, 2013, Ed. by I. V. Kovda (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, 2013) [in Russian].

  14. E. V. Rubilin and M. G. Kozyreva, “Age of Russian chernozem,” Pochvovedenie, No. 7, 16–26 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ya. G. Ryskov and V. A. Demkin, Development of Soils and the Environment in the Steppes of Southern Ural in the Holocene: Reconstruction Using Geochemistry of Stabile Isotopes (Pushchino Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1997) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. N. Simakova, Candidate’s Dissertation in Geology-Mineralogy (Moscow, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. A. Sycheva, “Cycles of soil formation and sediment accumulation in the Holocene (according to 14C data),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 325 (6), 613–623 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Theory and Practice of the Chemical Analysis of Soils, Ed. by L. A. Vorob’eva (GEOS, Moscow, 2006) [in Russian].

  19. O. S. Khokhlova, Doctoral Dissertation in Geography (Moscow, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. S. Khokhlova, A. V. Rusakov, A. M. Kuznetsova, T. N. Myakshina, and Yu. G. Chendev, “Radiocarbon dating of pedogenic carbonates in deep horizons of forest-steppe soils,” Pochvovedenie, No. 9, 1095–1109 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. V. Shnitnikov, Centennial Variability of the Components of Total Moistening (Nauka, Leningrad, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. E. Cerling, “The stable isotopic composition of modern soil carbonate and its relationships to climate,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 71, 229–240 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. E. Cerling, “Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere: evidence from Cenozoic and Mezozoic paleosols,” Am. J. Sci. 291, 377–400 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Cerling, J. Quade, Y. Wang, and J. R. Bowman, “Carbon isotopes in soils and paleosols as ecology and paleoecology indicators,” Nature 341, 138–139 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. N. Durand, H. C. Monger, and M. G. Canti, “Calcium carbonate features,” in Interpretation of Micromorphological Features of Soils and Regoliths, Ed. by G. Stoops, V. Marcelino, and F. Mees (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2010), pp. 157–202.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Polibino, Dankovsky district, Lipetsk oblast. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polibino,_Dankovsky_District,_Lipetsk_Oblast.

  27. IUSS Working Group WRB, World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps, World Soil Resour. Rep. No. 106 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2014).

  28. I. Kovda, E. Morgun, and K. Gongalsky, “Stable isotopic composition of carbonate pedofeatures in soils across the transect, south of the European part of Russia,” Catena 112, 56–64 (2014). http://dx.doi.org/. doi 10.1016/j.catena.2013.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. I. Kovda, S. Sycheva, M. Lebedeva, and S. Inozemtzev, “Variability of carbonate pedofeatures in a loess-paleosoil sequence and their use for paleoreconstructions,” J. Mountain Sci. 6 (2), 155–161 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. I. V. Kovda, L. P. Wilding, and L. R. Drees, “Micromorphology, submicroscopy, and microprobe study of carbonate pedofeatures in a vertisol gilgai soil complex, South Russia,” Catena 54, 457–476 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. I. P. Montañez, “Modern soils system constraints on reconstructing deep-time atmospheric CO2,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 101, 57–75 (2013). doi 10.1016/j.gca.2012.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. V. V. Skripkin and N. N. Kovalukh, “Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide,” Radiocarbon 40, 211–214 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. Quade, T. Cerling, and J. Bowman, “Systematic variations in the carbon and oxygen isotopic composition of pedogenic carbonate along elevation transects in the southern Great Basin, United States,” Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 101, 464–475 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. V. Kovda.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.V. Kovda, E.G. Morgun, M.P. Lebedeva, S.A. Oleinik, V.A. Shishkov, 2016, published in Pochvovedenie, 2016, No. 7, pp. 874–891.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kovda, I.V., Morgun, E.G., Lebedeva, M.P. et al. Identification of carbonate pedofeatures of different ages in modern chernozems. Eurasian Soil Sc. 49, 807–823 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931607005X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931607005X

Keywords

Navigation