Skip to main content
Log in

Contact angles of wetting and water stability of soil structure

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From the soddy-podzolic soils and typical chernozems of different texture and land use, dry 3-1 mm aggregates were isolated and sieved in water. As a result, water-stable aggregates and water-unstable particles composing dry 3-1 mm aggregates were obtained. These preparations were ground, and contact angles of wetting were determined by the static sessile drop method. The angles varied from 11° to 85°. In most cases, the values of the angles for the water-stable aggregates significantly exceeded those for the water-unstable components. In terms of carbon content in structural units, there was no correlation between these parameters. When analyzing the soil varieties separately, the significant positive correlation between the carbon content and contact angle of aggregates was revealed only for the loamy-clayey typical chernozem. Based on the multivariate analysis of variance, the value of contact wetting angle was shown to be determined by the structural units belonging to water-stable or water-unstable components of macroaggregates and by the land use type. In addition, along with these parameters, the texture has an indirect effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. V. Arinushkina, Manual on the Chemical Analysis of Soils (Moscow State University, Moscow, 1970) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. S. Bazykina, “Soils of steppe and dry steppe zones in abnormal weather conditions of the recent decades,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 73, 54–81 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. F. Ganzhara and D. S. Orlov, “Transformation of organic matter in soils and its qualitative composition,” in A Concept of Optimization of the Soil Organic Matter Regime in Agrolandscapes (Moscow State Agricultural Academy, Moscow, 1993), pp. 18–26.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. V. Gubler, Computational Analysis and Recognition of Pathological Processes (Meditsina, Leningrad, 1978) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Körcshens, “Significance of humus content for soil fertility and nitrogen cycle,” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 122–131 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. M. Kogut, S. A. Sysuev, and V. A. Kholodov, “Water stability and labile humic substances of typical chernozems under different land uses,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 45(5), 496–502 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. I. V. Kuznetsova, N. A. Azovtseva, and A. G. Bondarev, “Normative changes in the physical properties of soils in the steppe, dry steppe, and semidesert zones of European Russia,” Byull. Pochv. Inst. im. V.V. Dokuchaeva, No. 67, 3–19 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. V. Kuznetsova, V. F. Utkaeva, and A. G. Bondarev, “Normatives of changes in the physical properties of chernozems in the forest-steppe zone of European Russia under conditions of their intensive agricultural use,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 46(12), 1194–1202 (2013). doi: 10.7868/S0032180X14010067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. V. V. Medvedev, Soil Structure: Methods, Genesis, Classification, Evolution, Geography, Monitoring, and Protection (13 Tipografiya, Kharkov, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yu. L. Meshalkina and V. P. Samsonova, Manual on Mathematical Statistic Methods Used in Soil Science (Moscow State University, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Yu. Milanovskii, Humus Substances in Soils as Natural Hydrophobic-Hydrophylic Compounds (GEOS, Moscow, 2009) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Soil Science. Soils and Soil Formation, Ed. by V. A. Kovda and B. G. Rozanov (Vysshaya Shkola, Moscow, 1988), Part 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yu. G. Frolov, Lectures on Colloidal Chemistry: Surface Phenomena and Dispersed Systems (Khimiya, Moscow, 1982) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. V. Khan, Organomineral Compounds and Soil Structure (Nauka, Moscow, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. V. Shein, Lectures on Soil Physics (Moscow State University, Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. V. Shein and L. O. Karpachevskii, Explanatory Dictionary on Soil Physics (GEOS, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. V. Shein and E. Yu. Milanovskii, “The role of organic matter in the formation and stability of soil aggregates,” Eurasian Soil Sci. 36(1), 51–58 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Bachmann, R. Horton, R. R. van der Ploeg and S. Woche, “Modified sessile drop method for assessing initial soil-water contact angle of sandy soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 564–567 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S. M. Beatty and J. E. Smith, “Fractional wettability and contact angle dynamics in burned water repellent soils,” J. Hydrol. 391, 97–108 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. V. O. Biederbeck, “Using oil waste sludge disposal to conserve and improve sandy cultivated soils,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Waste Management Practices (New Orleans, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Capriel, H. Beck, H. Borchert, and P. Harter, “Relation between aliphatic fraction extracted with supercritical hexane, soil microbial biomass, and soil aggregate stability,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 415–420 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Chefetz, J. Tarchitzky, A. P. Deshmukh, P. G. Hatcher, and Y. Chen, “Structural characterization of soil organic matter and humic acids in particlesize fractions of an agricultural soil,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 66, 129–141 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. H. Czachor, “Modeling the effect of pore structure and wetting angles on capillary rise in soils having different wettabilities,” J. Hydrol. 328, 604–613 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. E. Diamantopoulos and W. Durner, “Physically-based model of soil hydraulic properties accounting for variable contact angle and its effect on hysteresis,” Adv. Water Res. 59, 169–180 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. E. T. Elliott, “Aggregate structure and carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in native and cultivated soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 627–633 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. P. E. Fernandes, J. F. B. Sao Jose, E. R. M. A. Zerdas, N. J. Andrade, C. M. Fernandes, and L. D. Silva, “Influence of the hydrophobicity and surface roughness of mangoes and tomatoes on the adhesion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and evaluation of cleaning procedures using surfactin,” Food Control 41, 21–26 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Fernandez-Galvez and M. D. Mingorance, “Vapor and liquid hydrophobic characteristics induced by presence of surfactants in an agricultural soil,” Geoderma 154, 321–327 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B. Gajic, G. Dugalic, and N. Diurovic, “Comparison of soil organic matter content, aggregate composition and water stability of Gleyic Luvisol from adjacent forest and cultivated areas,” Agron. Res. 4(2), 499–508 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. Garcia-Oliva, M. Oliva, and B. Sveshtarova, “Effect of soil macroaggregates crushing on C mineralization in a tropical deciduous forest ecosystem,” Plant Soil 259(1–2), 297–305 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. O. Goebel, S. K. Woche, and J. Bachmann, “Quantitative analysis of liquid penetration kinetics and slaking of aggregates as related to solid-liquid interfacial properties,” J. Hydrol. 442, 63–74 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. D. Jastrow, “Soil aggregate formation and the accrual of particuney, mineral associated organic matter,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 28, 657–676 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  32. K. Muller and M. Deurer, “Review of the remediation strategies for soil water repellency,” Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. V. 144, 208–221 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. J. Pogorzelski, P. Rochowski, and J. Szurkowski, “Pinus sylvestris L. needle surface wettability parameters as indicators of atmospheric environment pollution impacts: novel contact angle hysteresis methodology,” Appl. Surf. Sci. 292, 857–866 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. Rawson and B. Murphy, “The greenhouse effect, climate change, and native vegetation,” in Background Paper No 7 (Native Vegetation Advisory Council, NSW Department of Land and Water Conservation, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. Y. Shang, M. Flury, J. B. Harsh, and R. L. Zollars, “Comparison of different methods to measure contact angles of soil colloids,” J. Colloid Interface Sci. 256(1), 299–307 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Y. Shang, M. Flury, J. B. Harsh, and R. L. Zollars, “Contact angles of aluminosilicate clays as affected by relative humidity and exchangeable cations,” Colloids Surf., A 353, 1–9 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. J. Six, H. Bossuyt, S. Degryze, and K. Denef, “A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics,” Soil Tillage Res. 79, 7–31 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. J. Six, E. T. Elliott, K. Paustian, and J. W. Doran, “Aggregation and soil organic matter accumulation in cultivated and native grassland soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 1367–1377 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Six, E. T. Elliott, and K. Paustian, “Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and notillage systems,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 1350–1358 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Six, E. T. Elliott, and K. Paustian, “Soil macroaggregate turnover and microaggregate formation: a mechanism for C sequestration under no-tillage agriculture,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 2099–2103 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. J. Six, K. Paustian, E. T. Elliott, and C. Combrink, “Soil structure and organic matter: I. Distribution of aggregate-size classes and aggregate-associated carbon,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64, 681–689 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. L. A. Sullivan, “Soil organic matter, air encapsulation and water-stable aggregation,” J. Soil Sci. 41, 529–534 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. World Reference Base for Soil Resources. A Framework for International Classification, Correlation and Communication, in Word Soil Resource Report 103 (Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, 2006).

  44. L. M. Zavala, A. J. P. Granged, A. Antonio Jordán, and G. Bárcenas-Moreno, “Effect of burning temperature on water repellency and aggregate stability in forest soils under laboratory conditions,” Geoderma 158, 366–374 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. A. Kholodov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.A. Kholodov, N.V. Yaroslavtseva, M.A. Yashin, A.S. Frid, V.I. Lazarev, Z.N. Tyugai, E.Yu. Milanovskiy, 2015, published in Pochvovedenie, 2015, No. 6, pp. 693–701.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kholodov, V.A., Yaroslavtseva, N.V., Yashin, M.A. et al. Contact angles of wetting and water stability of soil structure. Eurasian Soil Sc. 48, 600–607 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931506006X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931506006X

Keywords

Navigation