Skip to main content
Log in

Soil water retention curve of agrogray soils: Influence of anisotropy and the scaling factor

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The soil water characteristic or soil water retention curve (WRC) of medium-loamy gray forest soil horizons was studied in cylinder-shaped samples of disturbed and undisturbed structure. The sample height varied within 2–4 cm and the diameter within 4.5–10 cm. The soil monoliths were sampled in three profiles: vertically, along the slope, and across the slope in accordance with the intrasoil paleorelief formed by the funnel-shaped surface of the second humus horizon. The experimental WRC were approximated with the van Genuchten equation. The statistical analysis of the WRc approximation parameters proved to differ significantly in filled soil samples and monoliths, and a number of parameters differ for samples of the maximal height and diameter. The reliable differences of the parameters were also noted for the different sampling directions, most often, for those across the paleorelief slope. The noted variation in the WRC approximation parameters may substantially influence the predictive estimation of the spring water reserve for example. This fact suggests the necessity to strictly indicate the sampling procedure, in particular, with respect to the soil profile, the asymmetry in the soil properties, and the sample sizes (scaling factor) used for analyzing the hydrological properties of structured soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. A. Arkhangel’skaya, “Thermal diffusivity of gray forest soils in the Vladimir opolie region,” Eur. Soil Sci. 37(3), 332–342 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. D. Voronin, Fundamentals of Soil Physics (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. M. Globus, Soil-Geographical Supply of Agroecological Mathematical Models, (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. V. Medvedev and I. V. Plisko, Bonitation and Qualitative Evaluation of Ukrainian Lands (13-ya Tipografiya, Kharkov, 2006) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  5. Theory and Methods of Soil Physics, Ed. by E. V. Shein and L. O.. Karpachevskii (Grif i K, Moscow, 2007) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. B. Umarova, Preferential Water Flows in Soils: Regularities of the Formation and the Role in Soil Functioning (GEOS, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. V. Shein, A Course of Soil Physics (Izd. Mosk. Gos. Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. V. Shein, “Soil hydrology: stages of development, current state, and nearest prospects,” Eur. Soil Sci. 43(2), 158–167 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. E. V. Shein, A. L. Ivanov, M. A. Butylkina, and M. A. Mazirov, “Spatial and temporal variability of agrophysical properties of gray forest soils under intensive agricultural use,” Eur. Soil Sci. 34(5), 512–517 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. V. Shein and T. A. Arkhangel’skaya, “Pedotransfer functions: state of the art, problems, and outlooks,” Eur. Soil Sci. 39(10), 1089–1099 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. E. V. Shein, A. M. Rusanov, E. Yu. Milanovskii, D. D. Khaidapova, E. I. Nikolaeva, “Mathematical models of some soil characteristics: substantiation, analysis, and using features of model parameters,” Eur. Soil Sci. 46(5), 541–547 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Developments in Soil Science, Ed. by Ya. A. Pachepsky and W. J. Rawls (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. K. Ranatunda, E. R. Nation, and D. G. Barrat, “Review of soil water models and their applications in Australia,” Environ. Model. Software 23, 1182–1206 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. G. Schaap and M. Th. van Genuchten, “A modified Mualem-Van Genuchten formulation for improved description of the hydraulic conductivity near saturation,” Vadose Zone J. 5, 27–34 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Šimunek, M. Th. van Genuchten, and M. Šejna, “Development and applications of HYDRUS and STANMOD software packages and related codes,” Vadose Zone J. 7(2), 587–600 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. V. Terleev, W. Mirshel, U. Schindler, and K.-O. Wenkel, “Estimation of soil water retention curve using some agrophysical characteristics and Voronin’s empirical dependence,” Int. Agrophys. 24, 381–387 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  17. M. Th. van Genuchten, “A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic,” conductivity of unsaturated soils, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Umarova.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.B. Umarova, E.V. Shein, N.S. Kukharuk, 2014, published in Pochvovedenie, 2014, No. 12, pp. 1460–1466.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Umarova, A.B., Shein, E.V. & Kukharuk, N.S. Soil water retention curve of agrogray soils: Influence of anisotropy and the scaling factor. Eurasian Soil Sc. 47, 1238–1244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314120096

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229314120096

Keywords

Navigation